Bouncing Back or Bouncing Forward? Knowledge Drivers of Absorptive, Adaptive, and Transformative Resilience in Crises

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2023) | Viewed by 11656

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
Interests: resilience; innovation management; organizational theory
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Business Administration, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA
Interests: resilience; crisis management; conflict management; organizational communication

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
Interests: intercultural crisis communication; social media and crisis communication; public relations; scholarship of teaching and learning

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In these last decades, black swans—low-probability, high-consequence events—are becoming more frequent than ever and reverberating through all levels of society. Among these events, the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the complex, interdependent global system and intersected with global megatrends: i.e., an aging population, widening social inequalities, volitile economic growth, the digitization and platformization of society, climate change, and the exponential growth of urbanization. These megatrends are all distributed on a wider economic supercycle and consequently all have dramatically deeper antecedents than their alleged cause. 

The confluence of broader trends with this black swan brings new issues into relief for decision makers, companies, and institutions. Resilience thinking has (re)gained its centrality. But which type of resilience is really needed to face this and future black swans? Is it absorptive, adaptive, or transformative resilience? The question has implications in the present but also going forward with how decision makers, organizations, and institutions prepare for and respond in interdependent systems, where seemingly unrelated trends or events can set off a chain reaction. 

In fact, resilience is a multifaceted phenomenon. It can be understood both as the ability to “bounce back” (i.e., absorbing and adapting) in response to sudden changes and as the ability to “bounce forward” by exploring how knowledge leads to transformations in response to shocks as windows of opportunities.

Moreover, in unpredictable, emerging, and complex environments—as we are dramatically seeing during the COVID-19 pandemic—a crucial aspect is to be able to “bounce forward” (instead of “bouncing back”). In answering to this challenge, knowledge asset dynamics play a crucial role. 

Knowledge asset dynamics clearly emerge from the exploration–exploitation dilemma. In fact, when dealing with a changing scenario where a whole reconfiguration of the environment is needed and consolidated schemes appear no longer useful, exploring knowledge is an effective way to enable a transformative and viable resilience at socio-economic and institutional levels. Moreover, knowledge assets represent strategic resources and sources of organizational value creation: Their effective development and deployment are at the basis of organizational value creation capacity.

In this line, for this Special Issue of Administrative Sciences, we welcome submissions, both conceptual and empirical, from a variety of disciplines, perspectives, and methodological approaches. We also encourage submissions that can craft an open interdisciplinary conversation with other socio-cultural and managerial approaches. 

Topics of this Special include (but are not restricted to) the following:

  • Historical antecedents in the interplay between knowledge, resilience, and socio-economic transformation;
  • Black swans, knowledge asset dynamics, and resilience;
  • Interplay between dynamic capabilities and transformative resilience;
  • Knowledge exploration, social innovation, and resilience;
  • Knowledge-building processes and sensemaking during crises;
  • Designing resilience during systemic shocks;
  • The role of companies, institutions, and decision makers in reinforcing and/or balancing systems’ resilient behaviors;
  • Resilience as the capability for knowledge exploration;
  • Resilience between the exploitation and exploration of knowledge;
  • Implementing resilient policies and intervention strategies to address first-order and second-order change.

Dr. Antonio La Sala
Dr. Ryan P. Fuller
Dr. Andrew Pyle
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • black swans
  • mega trends
  • megacrises
  • knowledge asset dynamics
  • resilience
  • adaptation
  • transformation

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 284 KiB  
Article
Reluctant Innovators: Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation of Italian Opera Houses in the Pandemic Crisis
by Nicola Bellini and Marina Raglianti
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030083 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1630
Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the process of digitalization of Italian opera houses. Based on a conceptual framework provided by the literature on dynamic capabilities and digital transformation, the evidence collected from six case studies is presented. Results are [...] Read more.
This paper analyzes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the process of digitalization of Italian opera houses. Based on a conceptual framework provided by the literature on dynamic capabilities and digital transformation, the evidence collected from six case studies is presented. Results are discussed with reference to two ideal-types of pandemic-induced paths (“back to normal” vs “new normal”) and to the variables that explain differences in strategies: history, digital mindset of human resources staff, dominance, leadership and external integration. Relevant implications for both theory and policy and managerial practice are presented with regard to present and future innovation paths. Full article
19 pages, 1661 KiB  
Article
Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0
by Teresa Galanti, Clara De Vincenzi, Ilaria Buonomo and Paula Benevene
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020030 - 19 Jan 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4905
Abstract
Background: The impact of technologies on workers has been a recurring theme in occupational health psychology. In particular, the sudden digital transformation of the last two decades, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has stressed the urgency to investigate new ways of working that [...] Read more.
Background: The impact of technologies on workers has been a recurring theme in occupational health psychology. In particular, the sudden digital transformation of the last two decades, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has stressed the urgency to investigate new ways of working that are characterized by flexibility and a constant increase of autonomy. In this perspective, this study aims to investigate the state of the art of the innovation process in Italian factories, explore whether and how digitalization can be seen as an opportunity, and imagine a new way of working characterized by adaptability, resilience, and openness to change. Methods: Thirty in-depth interviews of Italian experts in HR management were collected and analyzed using a mix-method approach. Results: The findings underline the Italian HR experts’ perceptions of the risks associated with rapid changes required by technological progress in terms of workers’ wellbeing and satisfaction and suggest how important it is that organizations rapidly set up learning and training programs to guide workers to the acquisition of new skills required by Industry 4.0. Conclusions: Future workplaces will be characterized by extreme versatility, which requires workers to increasingly have both technical and soft skills as well as the ability to collaborate and build functional relationships. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1141 KiB  
Article
From War to Change, from Resistance to Resilience: Vicariance, Bricolage and Exaptation as New Metaphors to Frame the Post COVID-19 Era
by Antonio La Sala, Ryan Patrick Fuller and Mario Calabrese
Adm. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030113 - 5 Sep 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2204
Abstract
In complex societal contexts, resilience seems the only way to survive and prosper. This is even truer when considering the present COVID-19 pandemic and its detrimental effects on global health systems and on every aspect of life. The impact was so deep that [...] Read more.
In complex societal contexts, resilience seems the only way to survive and prosper. This is even truer when considering the present COVID-19 pandemic and its detrimental effects on global health systems and on every aspect of life. The impact was so deep that the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global emergency on 30 January 2020. Accordingly, governments declared border closures, travel restrictions, and quarantines in the world’s largest economies, also giving rise to socio-economic recessions. There is wide literature on the pandemic’s impacts on people’s minds and societies, yet still few studies have investigated this topic holistically, examining how language shapes both human and social sides of COVID-19’s impacts. To fill this gap, this work discusses the need for new metaphorical clusters—bricolage, vicariance, and exaptation—as social sense makers to reframe a positive socially resilient response after COVID-19. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 1546 KiB  
Review
A Categorization of Resilience: A Scoping Review
by Alexander Nieuwborg, Suzanne Hiemstra-van Mastrigt, Marijke Melles, Jan Zekveld and Sicco Santema
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040095 - 23 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2044
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the existential public health and economic fragilities of the civil aviation industry. To prevent future public health disruptions, the civil aviation industry is gaining interest in becoming more “resilient” but rarely elaborates on its meaning, hampering decision-making and strategy [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the existential public health and economic fragilities of the civil aviation industry. To prevent future public health disruptions, the civil aviation industry is gaining interest in becoming more “resilient” but rarely elaborates on its meaning, hampering decision-making and strategy development. When looking into the academic literature it seems that a proliferation of resilience-related concepts occurred. Although enriching resilience, it also dilutes its meaning and reduces its use for practice. This paper aims to create concept clarity regarding resilience by proposing a categorization of resilience. Based upon a scoping review, this categorization dissects resilience into four reoccurring aspects: fragility, robustness, adaptation, and transformation. This categorization is expected to support sensemaking in disruptive times while assisting decision-making and strategy development on resilience. When applying this categorization in the civil aviation and public health context, the transformative aspect seems underused. Further research will focus on maturing the categorization of resilience and its use as a sensemaking tool. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop