Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Aim of the Study
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Design
4.2. Participants and Procedure
4.3. Analysis
5. Results
5.1. Qualitative Results
5.2. Quantitative Results
Analysis of Occurrence and Co-Occurrence
6. Discussion
7. Limits and Future Perspective
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, Zaheer Khan, Geoffrey Wood, and Gary Knight. 2021. COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research 136: 602–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arenas-Gaitán, Jorge A., Francisco Villarejo Ramos, and Begoña Peral-Peral. 2019. A posteriori segmentation of elderly internet users: Applying PLS-POS. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 38: 340–53. [Google Scholar]
- Avanzi, Lorenzo, Michela Cortini, and Elisabetta Crocetti. 2012. When age matters: The role of teacher aging on job identity and organizational citizenship behaviours. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale 25: 179–21. [Google Scholar]
- Badri, Adel, Bryan Boudreau-Trudel, and Ahmed Saadedine Souissi. 2018. Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? Safety Science 109: 403–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, Arnold B., and Evangelia Demerouti. 2017. Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 22: 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barber, Larissa K., and Alecia M. Santuzzi. 2015. Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 20: 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brod, Craig. 1982. Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel Journal 61: 753–57. [Google Scholar]
- Brod, Craig. 1984. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
- Cantoni, Franca, and Gianluigi Mangia, eds. 2018. Human Resource Management and Digitalization. London: Routledge, p. 300. [Google Scholar]
- Caronia, Dora. 2021. Lo Smart Working Oltre Il COVID-19: Qual è il Futuro del Lavoro Dopo L’emergenza sanitaria? Osservatori Digital Innovation. Available online: https://blog.osservatori.net/it_it/smart-working-emergenza-covid (accessed on 15 September 2022).
- Cascio, Wayne F., and Ramiro Montealegre. 2016. How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3: 349–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazan, Ana-Maria Elena Cocoradă, and Catalin Ioan Maican. 2016. Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Computers in Human Behavior 55: 258–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Yuhsuan, Chungjen Chien, and Li-Fang Shen. 2021. Telecommuting during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Future Time Orientation as a Mediator between Proactive Coping and Perceived Work Productivity in Two Cultural Samples. Personality and Individual Differences 171: 110508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charalampous, Maria, Christine A. Grant, Carlo Tramontano, and Evie Michailidis. 2019. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 28: 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Adela, and Elena Karahanna. 2018. Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quarterly 42: 1023–42. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Shoshi, Mina Westman, and Dov Eden. 2009. Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new information technology: A field-experimental test of conservation of resources theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 14: 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christensen, Jan Olav, Live Bakke Finne, Anne Helene Garde, Morten Birkeland Nielsen, Kathrine Sørensen, and Jolien Vleeshouwes. 2020. The Influence of Digitalization and New Technologies on Psychosocial Work Environment and Employee Health: A Literature Review. STAMI-rapport. Available online: https://stami.brage.unit.no/stami-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2723779/Rapport-The-influence-of-digitalization-and-new-technologies-on-psychosocial-work-environment-and-employee-health.pdf?sequence=2 (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- Cortini, Michela. 2014. Mix-method research in applied psychology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5: 1900–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortini, Michela, and Stefania Fantinelli. 2018. Fear for doocing and digital privacy in the workplace: A dual pathway model. Management Revue 29: 162–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortini, Michela, and Stefania Tria. 2014. Triangulating qualitative and quantitative approaches for the analysis of textual materials: An introduction to T-lab. Social Science Computer Review 32: 561–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrino, Alberto, Mguel A. Sebastián, and Cristina González-Gaya. 2020. Industry 4.0 Roadmap: Implementation for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Applied Sciences 10: 8566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crawford, Joanne Osbourne, Laura MacCalman, and Craig A. Jackson. 2011. The health and well-being of remote and mobile workers. Occupational Medicine 61: 385–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- D’Alterio, Nicola, Stefania Fantinelli, Teresa Galanti, and Michela Cortini. 2019. The mediator role of the job-related stress in the relation between learning climate and job performance. Evidences from the health sector. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 110: 251–54. [Google Scholar]
- Dachs, Bernhard. 2018. The impact of new technologies on the labour market and the social economy. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available online: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/464308 (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- De-la-Calle-Durán, Maria-Carmen, and Josè-Luis Rodríguez-Sánchez. 2021. Employee engagement and wellbeing in times of COVID-19: A proposal of the 5Cs model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dombrowski, Uwe, and Tobias Wagner. 2014. Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution. Procedia Cirp 17: 100–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Donati, Simone, Gianluca Viola, Ferdinando Toscano, and Salvatore Zappalà. 2021. Not all remote workers are similar: Technology acceptance, remote work beliefs, and wellbeing of remote workers during the second wave of the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 12095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elfering, Achim, Miriam Dubi, and Norbert K. Semmer. 2010. Participation during major technological change and low back pain. Industrial health 48: 370–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Evangelista, Rinaldo, Paolo Guerrieri, and Valentina Meliciani. 2014. The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23: 802–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, Vincenc, and Eva Gallardo-Gallardo. 2020. Tackling the HR digitalization challenge: Key factors and barriers to HR analytics adoption. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 31: 162–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrara, Bruna, Martina Pansini, Clara De Vincenzi, Ilaria Buonomo, and Paula Benevene. 2022. Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 12373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Floridi, Luciano. 2009. Web 2.0 vs. the semantic web: A philosophical assessment. Episteme 6: 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Floridi, Luciano. 2015. The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Berlin: Springer Nature, p. 264. [Google Scholar]
- Galanti, Teresa. 2021. Risk management and learning climate in emergency contexts: A qualitative study. Sustainability 13: 5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galanti, Teresa, Stefania Fantinelli, Michela Cortini, and Teresa Di Fiore. 2022. The Five-day challenge: How to turn a change in a chance: An action-research to promote resilience and self-empowerment during lockdown. Psychology Hub 39: 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Ghislieri, Chiara, Monica Molino, and Claudio G. Cortese. 2018. Work and Organizational Psychology Looks at the Fourth Industrial Revolution: How to Support Workers and Organizations? Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gigauri, Iza. 2020. Effects of COVID-19 on Human Resource Management from the Perspective of Digitalization and Work-life-balance. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbig, Britta, Nico Dragano, and Peter Angerer. 2013. Health in the long-term unemployed. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 110: 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hesselberth, Pepita. 2018. Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society 20: 1994–2010. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Chiungjung. 2010. Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13: 241–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iancu, Ioana, and Bogdan Iancu. 2020. I love it, but it is too complicated. Aging adults’ perspective on mobile technology acceptance. ESSACHESS–Journal for Communication Studies 13: 13–39. [Google Scholar]
- INAP. 2020. More Than 7.2 Million Employed Work Remotely, 61% of Them at Least 3 Days a Week. Report of National Institute for Public Policy Analysis. January 26. Available online: https://www.inapp.org/it/inapp-comunica/sala-stampa/comunicati-stampa/oltre-72-milioni-di-occupati-lavorano-da-remoto (accessed on 8 July 2022).
- Johansson, Jan, Lena Abrahamsson, Birgitta Bergvall Kåreborn, Ylva Fältholm, Camilla Grane, and Agnieszka Wykowska. 2017. Work and organization in a digital industrial context. Management Revue 28: 281–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juchnowicz, Marta, and Hanna Kinowska. 2021. Employee well-being and digital work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information 12: 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadir, Bzhwen A., and Ole Broberg. 2020. Human well-being and system performance in the transition to industry 4.0. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 76: 102936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kagermann, Henning, Wolf-Dieter Lukas, and Wolfgang Wahlster. 2011. Industry 4.0: With the internet of things on the way to the 4th industrial revolution. VDI News. 13. Available online: https://www-live.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2022).
- Kamble, Sachin S., Angappa Gunasekaran, and Rohit Sharma. 2018. Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry. Computers in Industry 101: 107–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karsten, Rex, Atul Mitra, and Dennis Schmidt. 2012. Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 24: 54–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiel, Daniel, Julian M. Müller, Christian Arnold, and Kai-Ingo Voigt. 2017. Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation Management 21: 1740015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraan, Karolus O., Steven Dhondt, Irene L. D. Houtman, Ronald S. Batenburg, Michiel A. J. Kompier, and Toon W. Taris. 2014. Computers and types of control in relation to work stress and learning. Behaviour & Information Technology 33: 1013–26. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, Veepan, Prem Vrat, and Ravi Shankar. 2021. Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in Industry 4.0: A hybrid MCDM approach. Opsearch 2021: 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasi, Heiner, Peter Fettke, Hans-Georg Kemper, Thomas Feld, and Micheal Hoffmann. 2014. Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6: 239–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Jay, Hung-An Kao, and Shanhu Yang. 2014. Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp 16: 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, Yongxin, Fernando Deschamps, Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures, and Luiz Felipe Pierin Ramos. 2017. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research 55: 3609–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, Asif, Asif Arshad Ali, Muhammad Nazam, and Muhammad Nazim. 2021. Developing an interplay among the psychological barriers for the adoption of industry 4.0 phenomenon. PLoS ONE 16: e0255115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manuti, Amelia, and Giuseppe Mininni. 2013. Narrating organizational change: An applied psycholinguistic perspective on organizational identity. Text & Talk 33: 213–32. [Google Scholar]
- Margherita, Emanuele Gabriele, and Alessio Maria Braccini. 2020. Industry 4.0 technologies in flexible manufacturing for sustainable organizational value: Reflections from a multiple case study of Italian manufacturers. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McFadden, Paula, Jana Ross, John Moriarty, John Mallett, Heike Schroder, Jermaine Ravalier, Jill Manthorpe, Denise Currie, Jaclyn Harron, and Patricia Gillen. 2021. The Role of Coping in the Wellbeing and Work-Related Quality of Life of UK Health and Social Care Workers during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIver, Derrick, Mark L. Lengnick-Hall, and Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall. 2018. A strategic approach to workforce analytics: Integrating science and agility. Business Horizons 61: 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meske, Christian, Tobias Kissmer, and Stefan Stieglitz. 2020. Bridging formal barriers in digital work environments–Investigating technology-enabled interactions across organizational hierarchies. Telematics and Informatics 48: 101342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mininni, Giuseppe, and Luigi Anolli. 2002. Discorso e conversazione. In Psicologia Della Comunicazione. Edited by Anolli Luigi. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 239–69. ISBN 8815084924. [Google Scholar]
- Miron, Dumitru, Monica Aureliana Petcu, Iulia David-Sobolevschi, and Radu Cezar Cojocariu. 2021. A multidimensional approach of the relationship between teleworking and employees well-being- Romania during the pandemic generated by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Amfiteatru Economic 23: 15. [Google Scholar]
- Molino, Monica, Emanuela Ingusci, Fulvio Signore, Amelia Manuti, Maria Luisa Giancaspro, Vincenzo Russo, Margherita Zito, and Claudio G. Cortese. 2020. Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability 12: 5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukamurera, Joséphine, France Lacourse, and Yves Couturier. 2022. Des avancées en analyse qualitative: Pour une transparence et une systématisation des pratiques. Recherches Qualitatives 26: 110–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, Julian M. 2019. Assessing the barriers to Industry 4.0 implementation from a workers’ perspective. IFACPapersOnLine 52: 2189–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- N’Cho, Julie. 2017. Contribution of talent analytics in change management within project management organizations The case of the French aerospace sector. Procedia Computer Science 121: 625–29. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, Karina, Raymond Randall, Ann-Louise Holten, and Eusebio Rial González. 2010. Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress 24: 234–59. [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien, Bridget C., Ilene B. Harris, Thomas J. Beckman, Darcy A. Reed, and David A. Cook. 2014. Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine 89: 1245–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osborne, Schrita, and Mohamad S. Hammoud. 2017. Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology 16: 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patton, Micheal Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, London and New Dehli: SAGE Publications, International Educational and Professional Publisher. [Google Scholar]
- Raj, Alok, Gourav Dwivedi, Ankit Sharma, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, and Sonu Rajak. 2020. Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 224: 107546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salanova, Marisa, Susana Llorens, and Eva Cifre. 2013. The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology 48: 422–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sartori, Riccardo, Arianna Costantini, Andrea Ceschi, and Francesco Tommasi. 2018. How do you manage change in organizations? Training, development, innovation, and their relationships. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaufeli, Wilmar B., and Arnold B. Bakker. 2004. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior 25: 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schaufeli, Wilmar B., and Marisa Salanova. 2007. Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 20: 177–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scheid, Jennifer L., Shannon P. Lupien, Gregory S. Ford, and Sarah L. West. 2020. Commentary: Physiological and psychological impact of face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlachter, Svenja, Almuth McDowall, Mark Cropley, and Ilke Inceoglu. 2018. Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 20: 825–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schneider, Paul. 2018. Managerial Challenges of Industry 4.0: An Empirically Backed Research Agenda for a Nascent Field. Review of Managerial Science, hlm. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, vol. 12. [Google Scholar]
- Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar]
- Shahbaz, Muhammad, Muhammad Zeshan, and Talat Afza. 2012. Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Economic Modelling 29: 2310–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spitzmüller, Christiane, and Jeffrey M. Stanton. 2006. Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79: 245–72. [Google Scholar]
- Stentoft, Jan, Kent Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Kristian Philipsen, and Anders Haug. 2020. Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: Empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Production Planning & Control 2020: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Stock, Tim, and Günther Seliger. 2016. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40: 536–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Strange, Roger, and Antonella Zucchella. 2017. Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review 25: 174–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taleb, Nicholas Nassim. 2012. Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House. [Google Scholar]
- Tarafdar, Monideepa, Qiang Tu, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan. 2010. Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 27: 303–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toscano, Ferdinando, Salvatore Zappalà, and Teresa Galanti. 2022. Is a Good Boss Always a Plus? LMX, Family–Work Conflict, and Remote Working Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences 11: 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseitlin, Ariel. 2013. The antifragile organization. Communications of the ACM 56: 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel-Heuser, Birgit, and Dieter Hess. 2016. Guest editorial Industry 4.0–prerequisites and visions. IEEE Transactions on automation Science and Engineering 13: 411–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Bin, Yukun Liu, Jing Qian, and Sharon K. Parker. 2020. Achieving Effective Remote Working during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Work Design Perspective. Applied Psychology 70: 16–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
C | Age | Gender | Years of Experience | Job Role | Company Type | Business Sector |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 49 | M | 15+ | CEO | Small | Food and Tech |
2 | 51 | F | 15+ | CEO | Small | Hotel |
3 | 35 | M | 10 | CEO-CO-F | Small | Neuromarketing |
4 | 68 | M | 30+ | CEO | Medium | Env. Ser and Tech |
5 | 53 | M | 20+ | CEO | Medium | Luxury |
6 | 54 | M | 20+ | Director | Medium | Healthcare |
7 | 61 | M | 30+ | CEO | Small | Tech |
8 | 45 | M | 15+ | HR M | Medium | Tech |
9 | 55 | M | 20 | Professor | Medium | University |
10 | 38 | M | 10 | CEO | Small | Hotel |
11 | 67 | F | 30+ | HR M | Medium | Tech |
12 | 72 | M | 40 | Director | Medium | Healthcare |
13 | 59 | M | 30 | Freelancer | - | Journalism |
14 | 33 | F | 10 | Director | Small | Hotel |
15 | 23 | M | 5 | Operational M | Medium | Healthcare |
16 | 36 | M | 10 | Professor | Medium | University |
17 | 66 | M | 30+ | HR M | Medium | Industrial |
18 | 64 | M | 30+ | Professor | Medium | University |
19 | 38 | F | 10+ | Consultant | Small | HR |
20 | 29 | F | 5 | Professor | Medium | University |
21 | 43 | M | 15 | Partner | Small | Tech |
22 | 45 | M | 15 | CEO | Small | Tech |
23 | 45 | M | 15 | Professor | Medium | University |
24 | 52 | M | 20+ | Professor | Medium | University |
25 | 43 | M | 15 | HR M | Medium | Sustainable places |
26 | 42 | M | 15 | HR D | Medium | Services |
27 | 36 | F | 10+ | HR M | Small | Tech |
28 | 38 | F | 10+ | HR M | Medium | Bank |
29 | 47 | M | 15+ | IC D | Medium | Motor |
30 | 37 | F | 10+ | CT D | Medium | Services |
LEMMA | COEFF | C.E.(A) | C.E.(AB) | CHI² |
---|---|---|---|---|
Company (azienda) | 0.354 | 591 | 232 | 5.26 |
From_home (da casa) | 0.255 | 69 | 57 | 69,401 |
Smart_working | 0.248 | 169 | 87 | 20,685 |
Office (ufficio) | 0.237 | 169 | 83 | 15,028 |
People (persona) | 0.221 | 194 | 83 | 5,038 |
Home (casa) | 0.218 | 155 | 73 | 9,942 |
Before (prima) | 0.19 | 232 | 78 | 0.382 |
Remote (a distanza) | 0.187 | 60 | 39 | 23,588 |
Skills (abilità) | 0.185 | 105 | 51 | 8,328 |
Professions (professionalità) | 0.184 | 102 | 50 | 8,639 |
Organizations (organizzazioni) | 0.182 | 73 | 42 | 16,135 |
Digitalization (digitalizzazione) | 0.181 | 263 | 79 | 3,861 |
LEMMA | COEFF | C.E.(A) | C.E.(AB) | CHI² |
---|---|---|---|---|
work (Lavoro) | 0.22 | 726 | 83 | 5,038 |
company (azienda) | 0.17 | 591 | 56 | 0 |
(to) change (cambiare) | 0.15 | 134 | 24 | 11,904 |
management (gestione) | 0.13 | 82 | 18 | 15,511 |
(to) talk (parlare) | 0.14 | 152 | 24 | 7.64 |
(to) see (vedere) | 0.13 | 265 | 30 | 1,212 |
responsible (responsabile) | 0.12 | 34 | 10 | 16,029 |
life (vita) | 0.12 | 59 | 13 | 11,178 |
productivity (produttività) | 0.12 | 83 | 15 | 7.46 |
information (informazione) | 0.11 | 33 | 9 | 12,393 |
home (casa) | 0.11 | 155 | 19 | 1,517 |
relation (relazione) | 0.11 | 45 | 10 | 8,722 |
(to) understand (capire) | 0.11 | 116 | 16 | 2,677 |
office (ufficio) | 0.11 | 169 | 19 | 0.673 |
problem (problema) | 0.10 | 98 | 14 | 2.78 |
LEMMA | COEFF | C.E.(A) | C.E.(AB) | CHI² |
---|---|---|---|---|
Company (azienda) | 0.200 | 591 | 78 | 0.094 |
Process (processo) | 0.190 | 58 | 23 | 38,342 |
Work (Lavoro) | 0.180 | 726 | 79 | 3,861 |
Before (prima) | 0.174 | 232 | 43 | 7,575 |
Tool (strumento) | 0.153 | 102 | 25 | 13,057 |
Necessity (necessità) | 0.136 | 53 | 16 | 14,628 |
New (nuovo) | 0.131 | 128 | 24 | 4,258 |
Reality (realtà) | 0.129 | 121 | 23 | 4,369 |
LEMMA | COEFF | C.E.(A) | C.E.(AB) | CHI² |
---|---|---|---|---|
New (nuovo) | 0.34 | 179 | 54 | 195,857 |
Psychologist (psicologo) | 0.26 | 37 | 19 | 134,156 |
Work (lavoro) | 0.21 | 153 | 31 | 57,219 |
Skills (abilità) | 0.18 | 790 | 60 | 4,629 |
To evolve (evolvere) | 0.18 | 11 | 7 | 63,751 |
Digitalization (digitalizzazione) | 0.16 | 326 | 34 | 12,355 |
Evolution (evoluzione) | 0.14 | 13 | 6 | 36,538 |
Context (contesto) | 0.14 | 30 | 9 | 30,236 |
Identity (identità) | 0.14 | 45 | 11 | 26,891 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Galanti, T.; De Vincenzi, C.; Buonomo, I.; Benevene, P. Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020030
Galanti T, De Vincenzi C, Buonomo I, Benevene P. Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0. Administrative Sciences. 2023; 13(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020030
Chicago/Turabian StyleGalanti, Teresa, Clara De Vincenzi, Ilaria Buonomo, and Paula Benevene. 2023. "Digital Transformation: Inevitable Change or Sizable Opportunity? The Strategic Role of HR Management in Industry 4.0" Administrative Sciences 13, no. 2: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020030