Advancing Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Research: Integrating Sustainability in Corporate Practices and Reporting

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2025 | Viewed by 8792

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Management, LIUC–Cattaneo University, 21053 Castellanza, VA, Italy
Interests: financial reporting and analysis; accounting education; group accounting; auditing; international accounting; non-financial and sustainability/ESG reporting; sport governance

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The aim of this Special Issue is to collate pioneering qualitative and quantitative research in the areas of sustainability management, ESG reporting and impact accounting, governance for environment and social issues, integrated reporting, SDGs and 2030 UN agenda, marketing and greenwashing, ESG data and business, sustainability reporting assurance (SRA), and green and sustainable finance.

In recent years, though there has been a tectonic shift towards sustainable investing, the fair pursuit of profit is still what animates markets, and the long-term profitability is the measure by which markets will ultimately determine a company’s success. In this context, ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) is an umbrella term that refers to specific data designed to be used by investors for evaluating the material risk that an organization is taking based on the externalities it is generating. The data produced can also be used within an organization as metrics for strategic and managerial purposes.

Investors may also use ESG data beyond assessing material risks to the organization in their evaluation of enterprise value, specifically by designing models based on assumptions that the identification, assessment and management of sustainability-related risks and opportunities in respect to all organizational stakeholders lead to higher long-term risk-adjusted return. Organizational stakeholders include, but are not limited to, customers, suppliers, employees, leadership, and the environment. Hence, state-of-the-art research pertaining to sustainability in business is deemed timely and necessary.

We welcome papers on the contextualization of the topics mentioned below with respect to the management and governance of emerging organizational problems to cope with environmental and social concerns at business and corporate levels:

  • Sustainability management and business;
  • ESG reporting and sustainability performance measurement;
  • Governance for environmental and social impacts;
  • Communication and marketing in sustainability: spotting greenwashing;
  • Green and sustainable finance.

References:

  • Alessi, L., Cojoianu, T., Hoepner, A. & Michelon, G. (2022). Accounting for the EU Green Taxonomy. Special Issue of Accounting Forum and European Commission–Call for Papers.
  • Akpinar, O. (2021). The EU Taxonomy and its Possible Effects on Hydropower. WasserWirt-shaft. 111(4), 42–43.
  • Ascui, F., & Lovell, H. (2011). As Frames Collide: Making Sense of Carbon Accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 24(8), 978–999.
  • Baboukardos, D. (2017). Market Valuation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under a Mandatory Reporting Regime: Evidence from the UK. Accounting Forum, 41(3), 221–233.
  • Becchetti, L., Cordella, M. & Morone, P. (2022). Measuring Investments Progress in Ecological Transition: The Green Investment Financial Tool (GIFT) Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 357.
  • Bond, A. & Dusík, J. (2022). Environmental Assessments and Sustainable Finance Taxonomies–A Riposte. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 40(2), 123–128.
  • Comoli, M., Tettamanzi, P. & Murgolo, M. (2023). Accounting for ‘ESG’ under Disruptions: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis. Sustainability.
  • De Wolf, C., Cordella, M., Dodd, N., Byers, B. & Donatello, S. (2022). Whole life cycle environmental impact assessment of buildings: Developing software tool and database support for the EU framework Level(s). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 188.
  • Edenhofer, O., Klein, C., Lessmann, K. & Wilkens, M. (2022). Financing the Transformation: a Proposal for a Credit Scheme to Finance the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy.
  • Faccia, A., Manni, F. & Capitanio, F. (2021). Mandatory ESG Reporting and XBRL Taxonomies Combination: ESG Ratings and Income Statement, a Sustainable Value-Added Disclosure. Sustainability. 13(16), 8876.
  • Freiberg, D., Panella, K., Serafeim, G. & Zochowski, R. (2020). Accounting for Organiza-tional Employment Impact. Working Paper–Harvard Business School Paper Series.
  • Freiberg, D., Park, D. G., Serafeim, G. & Zochowski, R. (2021). Corporate Environmental Impact: Measurement, Data and Information. Working Paper – Harvard Business School Pa-per Series.
  • Gibon, T., Popescu, I.-S., Hitaj, C., Petucco, C. & Benetto, E. (2020). Shades of Green: Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects Financed Through Green Bonds. Environmental Research Letters. 15(10).
  • Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P. & Sharma, U. (2021). Exploring sustainability and green banking disclosures: a study of banking sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
  • Haslam, C., Tsitsianis, N., Lehman, G., Andersson, T. & Malamatenios, J. (2018). Accounting for Decarbonization and Reducing Capital at Risk in the S&P500. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 119–129.
  • Marcacci, A. (2023). Global Finance and the Anthropocene: Regulatory Shifts and Prospective Effects. European Business Law Review, 34.
  • Margerison, J., Fan, M. & Birkin, F. (2019). The Prospects for Environmental Accounting and Accountability in China. Accounting Forum. 43(3), 327–347.
  • Serafeim, G. & Trinh, K. (2020). A Framework for Product Impact-Weighted Accounts. Working Paper – Harvard Business School Paper Series.
  • Tettamanzi, P., Venturini, G. & Murgolo, M. (2022). Sustainability and Financial Accounting: a Critical Review on the ESG Dynamics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29, 16758–16761.
  • Usmani, M., Davidson, J. & Napier, C. J. (2020). The Production of Stand-Alone Sustainability Reports: Visual Impression Management, Legitimacy and ‘Functional Stupidity’. Ac-counting Forum. 44(4), 315–343.
  • Yadong, Y (2013). Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978-2010: Decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecological Indicators. 24, 177–184.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarising their intended contribution. Please send these to the Special Issue Editors Prof. Dr. Patrizia Tettamanzi ([email protected]), and copy /Administrative Sciences/ Editorial Office ([email protected]). The Guest Editors will review the abstracts to ensure that they are within the scope of this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Patrizia Tettamanzi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ESG reporting
  • sustainability
  • impact accounting
  • green finance
  • sustainable corporate strategy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 547 KiB  
Article
Diversity and the Influence of Social Enterprises in South Korea
by Jongmin Jeon, Jinhee Choi and Ivan Ureta Vaquero
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120329 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 459
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the growth of social enterprises, their operational diversity and impact, and their characteristics from the stakeholders’ perspective focusing on the diversity and influence of social enterprises in the Republic of Korea. Based on data from periodical reports, newspaper [...] Read more.
This study aimed to examine the growth of social enterprises, their operational diversity and impact, and their characteristics from the stakeholders’ perspective focusing on the diversity and influence of social enterprises in the Republic of Korea. Based on data from periodical reports, newspaper articles, and the existing academic literature, this study provides insights into the diversity and influence of social enterprises in Korea. This study suggests that the growth of Korean social enterprises is rooted in extensive government support, including financial subsidies, tax benefits, and technological innovation incentives. We found that the landscape includes officially recognized social enterprises and other entities that, while not formally certified, fulfill similar roles by embodying social values within diverse institutional frameworks. These enterprises have diversified to engage various social issues, from job creation for marginalized groups to environmental sustainability and community development. Effective stakeholder engagement fostered diversity and inclusiveness within these organizations. A limitation of this study is the use of secondary sources. Future research should use more diverse data collection methods and examine a broader range of social enterprises, including non-certified ones. This study contributes to the discourse on social enterprise by highlighting the trajectory of social enterprise development, the critical role of government support, and the importance of stakeholder engagement to promote diversity. It also provides insights into the diversity and role of social enterprises in Korea and their potential to address socio-economic issues. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

38 pages, 6435 KiB  
Article
How Ethical Behavior Is Considered in Different Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends
by Le Vu Lan Oanh, Patrizia Tettamanzi, Dinh Tien Minh, Maurizio Comoli, Kamel Mouloudj, Michael Murgolo and Mai Dang Thu Hien
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090200 - 31 Aug 2024
Viewed by 6014
Abstract
In the past, sustainable development was considered a guideline for all human activities, but the world has gradually changed. The criteria for action today must not only ensure sustainability but also meet appropriate ethical standards in diverse contexts. As a result, the topic [...] Read more.
In the past, sustainable development was considered a guideline for all human activities, but the world has gradually changed. The criteria for action today must not only ensure sustainability but also meet appropriate ethical standards in diverse contexts. As a result, the topic of ethical behavior has been studied more extensively in recent studies. Accordingly, through bibliometric approaches, this study seeks to generalize the issues of ethical behavior explored in a variety of contexts from 1991 to 2022. A total of 1409 articles were found and extracted from the Web of Science using the keywords “ethical behavior” and “context”; they were then decoded using VOSviewer software (version 1.6). Three techniques, including bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and co-occurrence were conducted to identify the six most influential contexts in ethical behavior. The results demonstrate that the six most influential contexts in ethical behavior are consumption, leadership, business, organization, medical, and education. The results further revealed that leading countries such as the USA and UK have a larger number of studies on ethical behavior in many different contexts, such as organization, business, education, health, consumption, and politics. The Journal of Business Ethics leads the way in research into ethical behavior, followed by the Journal of Applied Psychology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 505 KiB  
Article
Does the Workforce and Sustainability Reports Strengthen the Relationship between Gender Diversity and Sustainability Performance Reporting?
by Albertina Paula Monteiro, Catarina Cepêda and Amélia Ferreira da Silva
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060105 - 21 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1510
Abstract
Gender diversity and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance reporting are critical to corporate sustainability. This study aims to analyze the impact of gender diversity on ESG performance reporting and the mediating effect of the workforce and sustainability reports, considering that these variables [...] Read more.
Gender diversity and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance reporting are critical to corporate sustainability. This study aims to analyze the impact of gender diversity on ESG performance reporting and the mediating effect of the workforce and sustainability reports, considering that these variables are crucial for ESG performance reporting. To achieve the objective, an empirical analysis was conducted with 207 European-listed companies belonging to the healthcare sector for the economic years 2017–2021. Our results prove that board gender diversity influences ESG performance reporting. In addition, this research shows that the workforce and sustainability reports have a positive impact on ESG performance reporting. This study does not show that the workforce and sustainability reports act as mediating variables in the relationship between gender diversity and ESG information transparency, but its inclusiveness has a significant impact on ESG performance reporting. Our results are useful for companies, investors, governments, and organizations in developing sustainability reporting standards. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop