International Human Resource Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Further Advancements

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 9

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political Science and International Relations, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Interests: Interactive learning environment; compliance; organizational change; organizational psychology; human resource management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

International human resource management (IHRM) is currently facing unprecedented complexity due to the technological, geopolitical, and cultural changes that are affecting organizations and their broader environments. The simultaneous convergence of these dynamics requires organizations to take up challenges and seize opportunities in order to ensure the sustainable management of their workforces at a global level.

The most successful approaches in the IHRM sector will not be able to accommodate binary solutions and will have to simultaneously embrace technological progress and human values, global coherence and local adaptation, and operational efficiency and employee well-being. The most competitive organizations will cultivate the ability to transform tensions arising from having to accommodate apparently opposing moments into levers for innovation.

In this perspective, organizations will have to be constantly committed to building a talented and culturally adaptable workforce through the adoption of human-scale technologies, the creation of inclusive ecosystems that enhance demographic diversity as a strategic advantage, and the development of leadership models capable of enhancing local decisions within shared ethical frameworks at a global level. Among the key challenges that organizations will have to manage are regulatory fragmentation and compliance complexity, cross-cultural talent management, and AI-driven workforce transformation.

In light of these considerations, it is essential to proceed with a more in-depth examination of the “nature” of the type of innovation that is required today from organizations that operate on an international scale. The following bullet points briefly illustrate how the innovation process must abandon the simplistic models that too often underlie it, in order to be able to transform the critical issues of a continuously and unpredictably changing environment into opportunities, leveraging the sustainable management of the workforce on a global scale:

  1. Moving from adaptation to co-creation

Although adaptive responses can offer effective solutions in the short term, they often fail to fully exploit the innovation potential present in an organization. In this perspective, integrating participatory communication models into the innovation management process is today essential. In this way, through the active involvement of often heterogeneous employees and their ability to diagnose problems and find solutions, it is possible to transform innovation from being merely reactive (“only adaptive”) to being creative. By drawing on local insights and promoting ownership, organizations that facilitate the development of the process of building innovations that are not only effective, but also ethically grounded and culturally shared.

  1. Managing innovation through learning and experimentation

The most robust responses to the need for innovation are often “emergent” ones, rather than those generated by “top–down” models. This requires the promotion of an organizational culture focused on research, open and transparent communication, and continuous experimentation. Instead of looking for perfect and risk-free solutions a priori, a human resources management model that wants to project the organization towards the challenges of continuous innovation must encourage the development of pilot programs, stimulating the construction of internal feedback systems and iterative learning models. This “learning-oriented approach” recognizes uncertainty as an intrinsic and irrepressible element of the contemporary global context. This approach would enable organizations to test their strategies for technological innovation, organizational well-being, and cultural integration based on employee feedback, thus keeping aligned the need for technological progress and respect for human values.

  1. Redefining ends and means

Effective IHRM innovation is not just about finding better ways to achieve the goals set by improving or enhancing the means at your disposal. The organizational inquiry, open communication and continuous experimentation inherent in the “emergent” approach may reveal that the goals themselves need to be reassessed. For example, a rigid global performance metric may clash irreconcilably with local cultural norms. A sustainable innovation model requires the courage to question and – if necessary – drastically redefine the company's strategic goals, ensuring that ends and means are aligned with the complexity that characterizes a workforce that operates on a global scale, ensuring a constant alignment between operational efficiency and employee well-being.

  1. Rejecting universality in favor of contextual sensitivity and intelligence

A contemporary approach to the theme of innovation cannot presuppose the existence of models characterized by their universal applicability. Instead, the management of an organization that operates on a global scale is required to adopt a strategic thinking that is coherent but at the same time sensitive to the different reference contexts. This means designing responses that are extremely sensitive to national factors (legal systems, labor markets, cultural values, socio-political climates, and economic models) and even regional factors. An innovation effectively applied in one region of a given country could fail or cause counterproductive effects in another region. Integrating this contextual intelligence ensures that the legitimate search for global coherence (coordination) does not overwhelm the necessary local adaptation, transforming this tension into a source of richer and more resilient solutions.

  1. Adopt integrated models of normative and contextual reasoning

Every response provided by an organization must be deeply imbued with value and contextualized. Choices regarding the use of a particular technology, performance management and evaluation models, diversity management policies and organizational well-being programs intrinsically reflect our positions on fundamental issues such as equity and organizational justice, respect for privacy and fairness in the employer–employee relationship. Recognizing the importance of adopting an integrated reasoning model is essential as it requires us to explicitly consider the ethical implications of any development program and ensures that innovation is consistently aligned not only with the business objectives, but also with the human value system and the specific socio-cultural contexts in which the organization operates.

Therefore, the innovation required in IHRM is not a linear process of solving discrete problems with standardized solutions. It is a complex, dynamic, and intrinsically normative practice. Only by adopting this multifaceted and sophisticated vision of innovation, can IHRM models enable organizations to successfully navigate the unprecedented complexity that characterizes our contemporary world, seeking to transform the intrinsic tensions of the global landscape into a sustainable competitive advantage and concrete well-being for the workforce. The innovation process itself can therefore become the mechanism for harmonizing differences, ensuring that global strategies are respectful of local realities, that technological advances serve human needs, and that programs aimed at generating greater organizational efficiency improve, rather than deteriorate, employee well-being.

Edwards, T., Almond, P., Murray, G., & Tregaskis, O. (2022). International human resource management in multinational companies: Global norm making within strategic action fields. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(3), 683-697.

Fan, D., Zhu, C. J., Huang, X., & Kumar, V. (2021). Mapping the terrain of international human resource management research over the past fifty years: A bibliographic analysis. Journal of World Business, 56(2), 101185.

Lee, J., Chae, C., Lee, J. M., & Fontinha, R. (2024). Understanding the evolution of international human resource management research: a bibliometric review over the past 25 years (1995–2019). Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 12(4), 691-714.

Lucio, M. M., & MacKenzie, R. (Eds.). (2022). International human resource management: The transformation of work in a global context. Sage.

Reiche, B. S., Harzing, A. W., & Tenzer, H. (2022). International human resource management.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 300–500 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors or to Administrative Sciences editorial office (admsci@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Dr. Francesco Ceresia
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human resource management
  • leadership
  • organizational change
  • employee well-being
  • human values
  • talent management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers

This special issue is now open for submission.
Back to TopTop