Next Article in Journal
Exploring Factors of Dog Temperament Impacting Pass/Fail Outcomes in Therapy Dog Aptitude Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Emotional Support? Law, Social Control, and the Medicalization of the Human–Animal Bond
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pets
Volume 2
Issue 4
10.3390/pets2040041
pets-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Myocutaneous Flaps and Muscle Flaps for Management of Limbs’ Defects in Dogs and Cats: A Review

by
Mandalena Markou
*,
Eleftheria Dermisiadou
,
Konstantina Karagianni
,
Eugenia Flouraki
and
Vassiliki Tsioli
*
Clinic of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikalon 224, 43100 Karditsa, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pets 2025, 2(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2040041
Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 27 November 2025 / Accepted: 2 December 2025 / Published: 5 December 2025
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to review the anatomical considerations, surgical techniques, clinical applications, and outcomes of myocutaneous and muscle flaps used in the reconstruction of limb defects in dogs and cats. Limb wounds in small animals often result from trauma, neoplasia, or infection and can involve significant soft tissue loss. Reconstruction of these defects is challenging due to limited local skin availability, particularly in distal regions, and the need to preserve function while preventing complications. Muscle and myocutaneous flaps provide well-vascularized tissue suitable for covering complex wounds, especially those with exposed bone, joints, or tendons. This review synthesizes current literature on commonly used flaps—including latissimus dorsi, cutaneous trunci, trapezius, sartorius, semitendinosus, and flexor carpi ulnaris; focusing on their anatomical basis, vascular supply, arc of rotation, surgical technique, indications, and complication rates. Comparative data between dogs and cats are highlighted, and experimental as well as clinical applications are discussed. Myocutaneous flaps offer durable and reliable coverage with lower infection and necrosis rates compared to skin grafts, particularly in contaminated or poorly vascularized wounds. Common complications include distal flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, seroma, and, occasionally, functional deficits. Muscle and myocutaneous flaps remain essential tools in limb reconstruction. Successful outcomes require careful flap planning, surgical expertise, and vigilant postoperative care. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize flap selection and reduce complication rates in both species.

1. Introduction

Soft tissue defects of the limbs in dogs and cats are frequently encountered in clinical practice and may arise from vehicular trauma, tumor excision, bite wounds, perivascular drug administration, leg-hold trap injuries, chronic interdigital pyoderma, burns, gunshots, or animal interactions [1,2]. These injuries often result in complex wounds involving not only cutaneous loss but also underlying tissue damage, including muscle, tendons, neurovascular structures, or bone, potentially accompanied by orthopedic or neurologic compromise [3,4].
Distal limb wounds present unique challenges due to minimal redundant skin, decreased elasticity, limited mobility, and the absence of a panniculus muscle. Reconstruction is further complicated by the exposure of vital underlying structures and increased susceptibility to wound tension, ischemia, infection, and dehiscence [3,5,6]. These factors limit the options for successfully managing the defects and as a result, methods such as primary intention healing, secondary intention healing and delayed primary intention healing may be ineffective or lead to numerous complications. Delayed contraction, reduced blood flow, and tissue necrosis are common, particularly when attempting closure under tension [7,8]. Moreover, suturing even moderate defects is difficult due to the lack of local cutaneous flaps and the need to undermine skin to the level of the underlying muscle fascia [9,10].
A range of reconstructive techniques has been described for managing limb wounds, including axial pattern flaps [11,12,13,14], local or distant flaps [15], free skin grafts [16,17,18], myocutaneous flaps, microvascular free tissue transfer [10,19,20], tissue expanders [10,21,22,23,24], and skin-stretching devices [10,25]. The choice of technique is influenced by wound size, depth, location, and involvement of adjacent structures. While small wounds (<30% of limb circumference or involving only the epidermis) may heal by second intention [2], larger defects (>50%) often necessitate more complex reconstruction, including the use of flaps or grafts [4,10].
Myocutaneous flaps consist of a muscle or muscle portion and its overlying skin, transferred as a single vascularized unit [12,26]. They are particularly advantageous for filling dead space, supporting contaminated wounds, and covering exposed critical structures (Table 1). The preserved vascular pedicle allows for use in sites of infection or osteomyelitis without the need for a granulating bed [27,28,29,30]. Although they are widely used in human reconstructive surgery; following mastectomy (TRAM, DIEP flaps), thoracic wall reconstruction, and in osteomyelitis or pressure sore repair [31,32,33]; their use in veterinary medicine is less common, due in part to the greater skin elasticity and abundant direct cutaneous vasculature in dogs and cats [10,12,14,28,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Muscle flaps, composed exclusively of skeletal muscle, are employed to reconstruct defects with subcutaneous or osseous exposure, particularly when enhanced vascularity is needed for wound healing [10,40]. These flaps support revascularization of ischemic tissue, reduce infection risk, and aid functional recovery. In both veterinary and human contexts, muscle flaps are used in the management of complex wounds, fractures, and post-oncologic or radiation-related defects (Table 1) [41,42,43].
Successful flap application relies on robust vascularization. Dogs and cats differ from humans in that their cutaneous blood supply often arises directly from the muscle, rather than from musculocutaneous perforators [28]. Ideal donor muscles are superficial, maintain regional function, and possess a vascular pedicle with sufficient length and reliability to support flap viability [10,29].
Muscle and myocutaneous flaps are classified into five types based on their vascular anatomy [10,31,44]. In type I muscles, vascularization is based on a single primary vascular pedicle. Type II muscles rely on a primary vascular pedicle at the muscle’s origin or insertion along with one or more segmental vascular pedicles that supply the muscle belly. Type III muscles are supplied by two main vascular pedicles located at the origin and insertion of the muscle, respectively. Type IV muscles have multiple segmental vessels of equal size which enter the muscle at various points between the origin and insertion. Type V muscles have one primary and multiple segmental pedicles. The dominant vascular pedicle enters the muscle at the insertion while the segmental pedicles enter the muscle at the origin.
This review aims to present a comprehensive summary of myocutaneous and muscle flap techniques used in the reconstruction of limb defects in dogs and cats. Emphasis is placed on anatomical considerations, flap selection, vascular classification, surgical approaches, clinical outcomes, and complication management to support evidence-based surgical planning.

2. Materials and Methods

A literature search was conducted for manuscripts relating to the myocutaneous and muscle flap techniques used in the reconstruction of limb defects in dogs and cats from 1977 to 2025. NCBI-PubMed, Web of Science, and SciVerse Scopus were used exhaustively as databases. For all three databases, the search strings included the following terms: {(dog OR dogs OR cat OR cats) AND (myocutaneous flap OR muscle flap OR composite flap) AND (hindlimb OR forelimb) AND (defect OR reconstruction)}. Excluded were single editorials, proceedings, meeting abstracts and articles not written in English. The results are organized into a narrative review with different sections depending on the type of flap (myocutaneous or muscle), the site of the defects (forelimb or hindlimb), the postoperative management and the complications. A PRISMA flow diagram was completed to record the numbers of all the articles in this narrative review (Scheme 1). The flaps reviewed along with the arc of their rotation, and their indications are presented in Table 1.

3. A. Myocutaneous Flaps

3.1. Forelimbs

3.1.1. Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap

Anatomy
The latissimus dorsi is a broad, flat, triangular muscle that covers the dorsal aspect of the lateral thoracic wall. It is the largest skeletal muscle in the canine body, aside from the cutaneous trunci. The latissimus dorsi muscle functions to advance the trunk cranially—and, when necessary, laterally—and to extend the vertebral column. It also supports the limb by drawing it toward the trunk, retracts the free limb during shoulder flexion, and contributes to deceleration of the limb’s cranial motion [12,37,45]. The muscle originates from the thoracolumbar fascia attached to the spinous processes of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and from muscular connections to the last two or three ribs [12,40]. The muscle fibers converge towards the shoulder, with the cranial edge of the muscle located beneath the trapezius thoracic muscle, covering the caudal edge of the scapula. The upper end of the muscle extends over the dorsal border of the deep pectoral muscle, terminating medially in an aponeurosis of the triceps muscle [12].
Vascularization
The latissimus dorsi is classified as a Type V muscle, possessing one dominant vascular pedicle and several secondary segmental pedicles [46,47]. The primary blood supply is the thoracodorsal artery and vein, while segmental vascular branches arise from the posterior intercostal arteries [12,40]. The ventral portion of the muscle receives additional supply from branches of the thoracodorsal artery, including dorsal and lateral thoracic arteries. These vessels also supply the overlying cutaneous trunci and skin. The dorsal portion of the muscle and the cutaneous trunci are vascularized by segmental intercostal branches [12,40].
Indications
The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap incorporates the skin, subcutaneous tissue, cutaneous trunci, and latissimus dorsi muscle, resulting in a flap of considerable thickness and vascular reliability [40,48]. Although bulkier and less flexible than the cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap or thoracodorsal axial flap, it has a wide arc of rotation and sufficient length to reach various sites along the forelimb, depending on the animal’s conformation [12]. Its favorable anatomical location, ease of elevation, versatility, and robust blood supply make it a practical and effective option for reconstructing complex soft tissue defects [37,47,49,50].
Clinically, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps are employed to manage extensive thoracic wall and forelimb defects in dogs [12,40]. For example, this flap has been used to reconstruct ventral thoracic wall defects following resection of rib chondrosarcomas by elevating and rotating the flap cranioventrally and securing it to the pectoral, external abdominal oblique, and remaining serratus ventralis muscles [10,36,40].
The flap can be surgically split into two independent myocutaneous branches, each with its own vascular supply, enabling separate or simultaneous use. Experimental applications of the split latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in dogs include reconstruction of complex cervical and mandibular defects. One skin paddle was used to replace a resected segment of cervical esophagus, while the other reconstructed the overlying cervical skin. Another application involved oral floor reconstruction and simultaneous labial coverage [51].
In human medicine, the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap has a long-standing history of use, initially introduced for breast reconstruction to enhance volume and eliminate implant requirements [52,53]. It has been applied in pharyngeal and esophageal reconstruction [54], as well as for extensive soft tissue defects of the upper and lower extremities, including the ankle and foot, by extending the flap through the inclusion of additional muscle while preserving donor site function [53]. Combination of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with iliac bone flaps has been reported for managing chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremities [55], and with artificial dermis and split-thickness skin grafts for treating large degloving injuries [56]. More recent human studies have highlighted the flap’s efficacy in shoulder and back reconstruction, emphasizing minimal donor site morbidity and accelerated healing [57]. Furthermore, its application in dynamic muscle transfer—either unilaterally or bilaterally—can restore motor function when combined with neurovascular anastomoses [51]. A muscle-sparing version of the flap, preserving nerve integrity and donor site appearance, has also been described [58].
Surgical Technique
In dogs, creation of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap involves identifying anatomic landmarks including the ventral border of the acromion, the caudal border of the triceps muscle, the head of the last rib, and the distal third of the humerus (Figure 1) [37,40]. The patient is placed in lateral recumbency with the forelimb extended perpendicularly to the trunk. The flap is outlined on the skin using a sterile marker. The dorsal border is drawn from a point caudal to the triceps, just below the acromion, extending caudally to the level of the last rib. The ventral border is drawn from the axillary skin fold near the lower edge of the triceps and follows a line parallel to the dorsal border, terminating at the 13th rib. The caudodorsal edge is then completed by joining the dorsal and ventral lines (Figure 2a).
The flap is initiated by incising along the ventral skin line and elevating the underlying latissimus dorsi muscle. The flap is dissected with the muscle width corresponding to the overlying skin. Segmental lateral intercostal vessels are ligated and divided, taking care to preserve the thoracodorsal artery and vein (Figure 2b). The flap is elevated and transposed to the recipient site while maintaining pedicle integrity (Figure 2c). A drain may be placed to minimize dead space beneath the flap or at the donor site. The flap is secured in position, and the donor site is closed primarily [12,36,40].
Reported Outcomes
The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap has been successfully used in dogs for reconstruction of thoracic wall defects following resection of chondrosarcoma yielding a satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcome. Reported complications are generally minor including superficial skin necrosis and wound dehiscence [36].

3.1.2. Cutaneous Trunci Myocutaneous Flap

Anatomy
The cutaneous trunci is a thin, sheet-like muscle originating from the pectoralis profundus and extending across the dorsal, lateral, and ventral abdominal wall. It arises caudally from the gluteal region, with fibers coursing cranially and ventrally, terminating in the axillary region where it merges closely with the latissimus dorsi and the caudal border of the deep pectoral muscle [12,37]. Functionally, the cutaneous trunci is responsible for the twitch reflex in response to tactile stimuli, serving as a protective mechanism against irritants along the trunk.
Vascularization
The blood supply to the cutaneous trunci muscle and its overlying skin is derived from muscular branches and short direct cutaneous arteries. These include two to four direct cutaneous branches of the thoracodorsal artery located just caudal to the border of the triceps muscle [12,37,40]. The muscle maintains a close anatomical and functional relationship with the skin’s subdermal plexus, making it ideally suited for flap elevation. During surgical dissection, preserving this relationship by undermining beneath the panniculus layer is essential to maintain vascular integrity [12].
Indications
Compared to the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap the cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap, is thinner, more flexible, and more elastic, making it particularly suitable for coverage of defects on the forelimb, especially up to the level of the elbow in dogs [10,40,59].
Surgical Technique
The cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap is planned and marked similarly to the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (see Figure 1). A skin incision is made along the outlined borders, ensuring dissection does not extend beyond the subcutaneous plane between the latissimus dorsi and cutaneous trunci muscles (Figure 3). The cutaneous trunci is carefully elevated by separating it from the loose underlying subcutaneous tissue. To obliterate dead space, drains are placed at both the donor and recipient sites. The flap is sutured in position and the donor site is closed routinely [12,40]. Flap elevation is generally simpler and less invasive than that of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap [37].
Reported Outcomes
While clinical reports are limited, an experimental study in dogs has demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of flap survival. Ease of elevation and mobility allows extension of the flap to the carpus. Complications such as partial flap necrosis, seroma formation and dehiscence are reported with no apparent influence on flap survival [37].

3.1.3. Trapezius Myocutaneous Flap

Anatomy
The trapezius muscle is a thin, triangular muscle divided into cervical and thoracic portions. The cervical portion is partially covered by the cleidocervicalis muscle while the thoracic portion by the latissimus dorsi muscle. It originates from the median raphe of the neck and the supraspinous ligament, spanning from the third cervical vertebra to the ninth thoracic vertebra, and inserts on the scapular spine. Functionally, the trapezius muscle assists in elevating and abducting the forelimb [40,45].
Vascularization
The cervical portion of the trapezius muscle receives its vascular supply from the prescapular branch of the superficial cervical artery [60].
Indications
The trapezius myocutaneous flap has been used successfully in dogs to reconstruct defects involving the cervical region, cranial thorax, and proximal third of the forelimb (Figure 4) [40,61]. In human reconstructive surgery, its use was first described for head and neck defect reconstruction following oncologic resection [62].
Surgical Technique
A curved incision is performed starting from the distal third of the scapular spine, arching cranially and dorsally toward the midline and terminating 5 cm caudal to the wing of the atlas. A second incision, curving ventrally, is made between these points raising a triangular section of the overlying skin (Figure 5a). The cervical part of the trapezius muscle is carefully dissected, starting dorsally and progressing ventrally, while remaining in close proximity to the cleidocervicalis and omotransversarius muscles to preserve the prescapular vascular pedicle (Figure 5b), which emerges ventrally at the junction of these muscles [61,63].
The trapezius muscle is transected approximately 5 mm from its scapular spine insertion (Figure 5c). The accessory nerve is identified and transected caudodorsally at the point where it exits the trapezius. Branches of the prescapular vascular pedicle that lie proximal to the cutaneous and muscular supply are ligated and divided up to the origin of the acromial branch of the superficial cervical artery. A drain is placed exiting at the level of the greater tubercle of the humerus. Skin and subcutaneous tissues are closed routinely [61,63]. Incorporating bone into the flap may enhance adaptability and has been suggested for osteogenic purposes, rather than structural support [40,60].
Reported Outcomes
Clinical reports regarding the use of the trapezius myocutaneous flap in forelimb defects in dogs are lacking. However, the free trapezius myocutaneous flap has been successfully used in dogs by using microvascular techniques. It has been applied for covering defects of tibia, tarsus and metatarsus with good functional long-term outcomes. Reported complications have been minor including infection and donor site seroma formation [61,63].

3.2. Hindlimbs

3.2.1. Semitendinosus Myocutaneous Flap

Anatomy
The semitendinosus is a long, fusiform muscle located on the caudal aspect of the thigh. It originates from the ischial tuberosity and inserts onto the medial tibia and, via the crural fascia, to the calcaneal tuberosity [40].
Vascularization
Classified as a Type III muscle in dogs and cats, it possesses two dominant vascular pedicles: a proximal supply from the caudal gluteal artery and a distal supply from the distal caudal femoral artery [31,64,65]. These two pedicles are capable of supporting the muscle independently [41,42,65].
Indications
The semitendinosus myocutaneous flap has been successfully used in dogs and cats for reconstruction of distal hindlimb skin defects and tibial fractures (Figure 6) [6,30,41].
Surgical Technique
The patient is placed in sternal recumbency with the affected hindlimb suspended from the surgical table. A transverse skin incision is made approximately 2–3 cm cranial to the ischial tuberosity, followed by two vertical incisions extending distally to the caudal stifle (Figure 7a). Subcutaneous tissues are dissected to expose the origins of the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles. The gluteal artery and vein are ligated at their entry into the proximal part of the semitendinosus. The muscle is detached from its origin on the ischial tuberosity using sharp dissection and periosteal elevation. The semitendinosus muscle, along with its overlying skin, is then mobilized distally by blunt dissection, preserving the distal vascular pedicle (Figure 7b). Without detaching the distal insertion, the flap is rotated laterally or medially to cover the tibial defects (Figure 7c). The muscle is sutured to the wound bed, and the overlying skin is closed routinely.
To create a split semitendinosus myocutaneous flap, a standard flap is first prepared as described above. Then, the muscle is longitudinally divided beginning at its origin on the ischial tuberosity and extending distally to just above the insertion of the distal vascular pedicle. The lateral or medial portion of the muscle is then rotated to the defect while preserving both pedicles. This technique increases flap versatility and minimizes donor site morbidity [30].
Reported Outcomes
Clinical reports suggest generally favorable outcomes, although distal skin necrosis can occur, especially in feline cases, due to microcirculatory compromise [6,41]. Functional limb outcomes are usually preserved, with mild transient lameness in some cases [42,66].

4. B. Muscle Flaps

4.1. Forelimbs

4.1.1. Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Flap

Anatomy
The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle in dogs comprises two anatomically and functionally distinct heads: the ulnar head and the humeral head, both of which insert on the accessory carpal bone via separate tendons [67]. The ulnar head continues distally as a flat tendon located laterally and palmarly to the superficial digital flexor, covering the humeral head, and terminates at the apex of the accessory carpal bone. The tendon of the humeral head is positioned deeper and medially. Functionally, the flexor carpi ulnaris serves as both a flexor and abductor of the forepaw and plays an antigravity role, particularly during weight-bearing and stabilization of the carpus [59,68].
Vascularization
The proximal portion of the muscle receives blood from the recurrent ulnar, ulnar, and deep antebrachial arteries [40,69]. A distinct feature of this muscle is that, unlike other antebrachial muscles, it is also supplied by a pedicle from the caudal interosseous artery, which enters the distal aspect of the humeral head near its insertion on the accessory carpal bone [69,70]. These vessels form intramuscular anastomoses with branches of the ulnar and deep antebrachial arteries, contributing to a robust and redundant vascular supply.
Indications
The humeral head of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle is suitable for coverage of antebrachial, carpal, and metacarpal defects in dogs (Figure 8a). It is sufficiently large, easily accessible, relatively superficial, and expendable without causing major functional loss [40,69]. In human medicine, similar applications have been described for soft tissue defects around the elbow, wrist, and hand [67,71,72,73,74,75].
Surgical Technique
To create a flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flap in dogs, the patient is positioned in lateral recumbency. A skin incision is made along the caudolateral surface of the antebrachium, extending from just distal to the elbow joint to approximately 1–2 cm beyond the accessory carpal bone to expose the underlying musculature. The antebrachial and carpal fascia are incised to reveal the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. The antebrachial and carpal fascia are incised, and the humeral head is identified between the caudal ulnar head of the flexor carpi ulnaris and the laterally positioned ulnaris lateralis. In order to fully reveal the humeral head, the distal tendon of the ulnar head is severed. The fascial connections of the humeral head are dissected, and an incision is made at the junction of the proximal and middle third of the muscle (Figure 8b). A bridge incision is then made from the muscle flap site to the recipient wound bed. The muscle is rotated into the wound, either medially or laterally, and sutured to the surrounding tissues with interrupted sutures. The recipient wound in closed in a routine fashion (Figure 8c). If the wound is not immediately closed with a skin flap or graft, the muscle surface is protected with a moist, non-adherent dressing until further closure or granulation occurs [40,69].
Reported Outcomes
The: flexor carpi ulnaris flap has been successfully used in small- to medium-sized dogs with good healing and no significant loss of limb function. Its limited arc of rotation and flap length restrict it to distal forelimb reconstructions [69].

4.2. Hindlimbs

4.2.1. Caudal Sartorius Muscle Flap

Anatomy
The sartorius is a long, strap-like muscle that lies superficially along the medial aspect of the thigh. In dogs, it consists of two distinct bellies, cranial and caudal, each with separate innervation and vascularization. In contrast, cats possess a single-bellied, flat sartorius muscle that extends over the craniomedial thigh, with a comparable origin and insertion to that of the canine sartorius [40,76,77,78]. The caudal belly of the sartorius originates from the bony ridge located between the cranial and caudal ventral iliac spines and courses distally over the medial surface of the vastus medialis and stifle joint. Distally, it forms an aponeurosis that merges with that of the gracilis muscle [12]. Functionally, the caudal sartorius contributes to hip flexion and medial rotation of the femur; however, it is considered non-essential due to functional redundancy with other muscles [76].
Vascularization
The sartorius is classified as a type IV muscle based on its vascularization, receiving multiple segmental pedicles [31,79]. The caudal belly is primarily perfused by a pedicle arising from the saphenous artery and medial saphenous vein, typically located at the distal third of the muscle belly [12]. This vascular pattern supports the use of the muscle as an island flap, provided that pedicle integrity is maintained during elevation [80].
Indications
The caudal sartorius muscle flap has been utilized both for coverage of soft tissue defects involving the distal tibia and metatarsal regions [12,40,76]. When the saphenous vessels are mobilized sufficiently, the flap can extend as far as the tarsocrural joint and proximal metatarsal bones, making it particularly useful for wounds in areas where local tissue is limited or compromised (Figure 9a) [78] The sartorius muscle demonstrates many characteristics of an ideal flap donor: it is superficial, elongated, well-vascularized, and expendable [80]. In human reconstructive surgery, prefabricated distally based sartorius flaps have been employed for soft tissue coverage around the knee joint [81]. More recently, the sartorius muscle flap has been proposed as an alternative to the lateral gastrocnemius flap for reconstruction of lateral thigh defects following distal femoral resection due to bone tumors [82].
Surgical Technique
A skin incision is made along the medial aspect of the thigh, following the course of the caudal sartorius muscle. The subcutaneous tissue is dissected to expose the muscle, which is then transected approximately 4 cm distal to its iliac origin. The saphenous artery and medial saphenous vein are carefully isolated and double-ligated near their confluence with the femoral vessels. Care must be taken to preserve the saphenous vasculature as it runs along the medial aspect of the tibia and adjacent to the muscle’s caudal border (Figure 9b). The muscle’s insertion on the cranial tibia can be transected to allow full mobilization of the flap; the resulting island muscle flap is pedicled on the saphenous vessels. The muscle flap or the island muscle flap is then rotated to the defect. and sutured into position. The muscle is sutured with interrupted sutures to the wound bed, and the overlying skin is closed routinely. A drain may be placed and brought out through a stab incision at the level of the tarsocrural joint. If necessary, the vascular pedicle may be further mobilized by extending the incision and dissecting around the vessel to increase the arc of rotation [12,40,76,83].
Reported Outcomes
Clinical reports suggest that caudal sartorius flaps offer consistent perfusion and successful coverage of distal hindlimb wounds. Few complications have been documented, and donor site morbidity is minimal. These flaps have also been employed for pelvic or abdominal wall reconstructions with good functional results [83,84].

4.2.2. Cranial Sartorius Muscle Flap

Anatomy
The cranial sartorius is a long, flat, strap-like muscle that originates from the iliac crest and lumbodorsal fascia. It courses distally along the medial aspect of the thigh and inserts into the medial femoral fascia just proximal to the patella [12,84]. Functionally, the cranial sartorius contributes to hip flexion and the advancement and adduction of the thigh. However, its role is considered non-essential due to the presence of several synergistic muscles capable of performing similar actions [84].
Vascularization
The cranial sartorius muscle receives its vascular supply primarily from a 3 cm long branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery, which courses along the caudal margin of the muscle. Before entering the proximal third of the muscle, this artery bifurcates into ascending and descending branches, which provide segmental blood flow to the muscle belly [85].
Indications
The cranial sartorius muscle flap has been used in dogs for the reconstruction of trochanteric pressure ulcers and abdominal wall defects (Figure 10a) [84,85,86]. Additionally, it may be useful in femoral and inguinal hernia repair or prepubic tendon reconstruction [12,84]. In both dogs and cats, the sartorius flap has been successfully utilized for abdominal wall reconstruction, including in combination with other muscle flaps [78,83]. In human medicine, the cranial sartorius flap compared to the rectus femoris flap, is easier to dissect and mobilize, and its arc of rotation and superficial location make it well-suited for coverage of the greater trochanter region [12,85].
Surgical Technique
A curved skin incision is made beginning at the greater trochanter, extending cranially toward the ventral border of the iliac wing, and then continuing distally along the craniomedial surface of the thigh to the level of the stifle joint. The skin over the greater trochanter is elevated to expose the cranial sartorius muscle. The proximal portion of the muscle is isolated using blunt dissection, and its origin is elevated from the ilium. Caution is required to preserve the primary vascular pedicle, which enters the muscle along its caudal border at the junction between the proximal and middle thirds. The muscle is transected within its distal third (Figure 10b), and the descending intramuscular branch of the primary pedicle is ligated at the transection site. The remaining muscle belly is carefully dissected free from surrounding areolar tissue, and the vascular pedicle is traced proximally toward the superficial circumflex iliac artery. Small branches of the ascending vascular supply to the tensor fasciae latae muscle are ligated and divided to improve pedicle mobility. The flap is then transposed over the debrided greater trochanteric region, using either rotational transposition or inversion, depending on the desired arc of coverage (Figure 10c). If necessary, a submuscular tunnel is created beneath the cranial portion of the tensor fasciae latae muscle to pass the sartorius muscle and its pedicle through to the defect. The muscle’s edge is then sutured to the adjacent fascia with simple interrupted sutures. The skin is further undermined and then approximated for closure. Alternatively, a random pattern skin flap such as a rotation, Z-plasty or transposition flap may be designed to eliminate tension [85].
Reported Outcomes
Clinical application of the cranial sartorius flap has demonstrated effective wound coverage with minimal functional impact. It provides reliable perfusion for covering the greater trochanter, and its versatility allows it to be considered for a range of abdominal and pelvic reconstructions. No major complications have been reported in the literature [83,84,85].

4.2.3. Semitendinosus Muscle Flap

Indications
The semitendinosus muscle flap has been applied in various reconstructive procedures in dogs and cats. Its reliable vascular anatomy, robust size, and arc of rotation make it well-suited for both orthopedic and soft tissue reconstructions. In dogs, the semitendinosus muscle flap has been used for Achilles tendon repair [42], the management of perineal conditions, including external anal sphincter incompetence, perineal hernia, imperforate anus, and retrovaginal fistula [85,87,88] and for rectal wall repair or reinforcement in both a dog and a cat [89].
A split semitendinosus muscle flap has been utilized to reinforce the pelvic diaphragm in ventral perineal hernia repairs in dogs [90], and the technique has also been reported in a cat with a similar condition [91]. More recently, a bifurcated semitendinosus muscle flap has been developed for the treatment of fecal incontinence in dogs, showing promising clinical results [92].
Surgical Technique
The patient is positioned in lateral or sternal recumbency, depending on the indication and surgical approach.
For Achilles tendon reconstruction, a skin incision is made along the caudolateral aspect of the limb, beginning 2–3 cm proximal to the ischial tuberosity and extending distally to the calcaneus. Subcutaneous tissues are dissected to expose the semitendinosus muscle and its surrounding fascia. The caudal gluteal artery and vein are identified and ligated at their entry point into the proximal muscle. The lateral half of the semitendinosus is detached from its origin on the ischial tuberosity using sharp and blunt dissection, then dissected distally to the level of the caudal femoral artery. The resulting flap is rotated 180° distally and secured in a 3-loop pulley pattern to the Achilles tendon remnant or calcaneus as part of the tendon repair procedure. Subcutaneous tissue and skin are closed routinely [42].
In patients undergoing perineal hernia repair, the surgical approach varies depending on whether the procedure is combined with internal obturator muscle transposition. If so, the skin incision is extended from the ventral aspect of the contralateral ischiatic tuberosity. If performed alone, the incision begins approximately 3 cm lateral to the tail base, extending ventrally across the perineal midline to the opposite ischiatic tuberosity. It is then continued distally along the contralateral caudal thigh to the popliteal region. The semitendinosus muscle may be ransected at midbelly and rotated beneath the anus to support the pelvic diaphragm [91], or, longitudinally split into medial and lateral halves, with both the proximal and distal vascular pedicles preserved. The medial portion is transected distally and rotated beneath the anus to the contralateral perineum [90]. The flap is secured to surrounding anatomical structures in an interrupted pattern, including the coccygeus muscle, sacrotuberous ligament, external anal sphincter, internal obturator, ischiourethralis, and bulbospongiosus muscles, as well as the fascia of the ischiatic tuberosity to ensure adequate pelvic floor reconstruction and long-term support. Drains are not used [90].
Reported Outcomes
Generally effective, although distal skin necrosis can occur, especially in feline cases, due to microcirculatory compromise [6,41]. Functional limb outcomes are usually preserved, with mild transient lameness in some cases [42].

5. C. Postoperative Management of Myocutaneous and Muscle Flaps

Appropriate postoperative care is vital to ensure the success of muscle and myocutaneous flap procedures in dogs and cats. Optimal outcomes depend on a combination of pain management, infection control, wound care, and activity restriction to support flap viability and tissue integration. The surgical site should be monitored at least twice daily for signs of dehiscence, necrosis, infection, or seroma formation. Rectal temperature is also monitored regularly during hospitalization to detect systemic infection [63,75].

5.1. Analgesia

Effective pain control is essential in the immediate and early postoperative period and a multimodal approach combining opioids, non-opioid analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s), gabapentinoids and peripheral or neuraxial local anesthetics acting on different sites of the pain pathway. For the first 24–48 h a combination of locoregional anesthesia and constant rate infusion of drugs is preferred [36,66,87,90]. The degree and duration of the postoperative pain management is based on the type of surgery and on the patient’s pain score according to current recommendations [6,30].

5.2. Antibiotic Prophylaxis

To minimize the risk of surgical site infection, the use of perioperative antibiotics typically involving the administration of broad-spectrum agents such as cephazolin, cefuroxime, cephalexin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid based on surgeons’ preference is commonly administered in both dogs and cats [6,36,37,86,87,93,94]. Prolonged use of antibiotics beyond 24–48 h is considered controversial. However, antibiotic therapy is often continued for 5–7 days, based on culture and sensitivity tests and depending on the extent of surgery and the presence of underlying contamination or infection [6,37,94]. Although widely used, there are currently no published studies specifically addressing antibiotic protocols for reconstructive procedures involving the use of muscle or myocutaneous flaps on limbs in veterinary medicine.

5.3. Wound Protection and Monitoring

Use of an Elizabethan collar is recommended in all cases to prevent self-inflicted trauma to the surgical site. The collar should be maintained until the wound has fully healed, usually between 10 and 21 days postoperatively [6,86,87]. In subdermal and axial pattern flaps the placement of drainage does not seem to affect complication rates [93,94]. In muscle and myocutaneous flaps there are not such studies. Therefore, the decision is based on the surgeon’s preference and on the individual case.
The wound is generally covered with a sterile bandage, which is changed daily during the first postoperative week and subsequently every other day until complete epithelialization or stable granulation tissue is present [6,42]. Bandaging provides wound protection and mechanical support for the flap.

5.4. Activity Restriction

Strict activity restriction is advised for 2–4 weeks following surgery, depending on the location and extent of the flap. Excessive movement can lead to flap tension, vascular compromise, or premature dehiscence. Cage rest or confinement to a small area is advised, particularly for limb and perineal reconstructions [36,42].

6. D. Complications

Complications related to the use of muscle and myocutaneous flaps in dogs and cats are primarily influenced by factors such as preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative care. Errors during flap elevation and transposition, as well as inadequate tissue perfusion, are common causes of flap-related morbidity [10,29]. Additionally, underlying systemic disease and inadequate pain control may increase the risk of flap failure or delayed healing.
Complications are characterized as minor or major. Minor require minimal intervention and can heal by second intention whereas major require an additional surgery to achieve closure [93,94].
Commonly reported minor complications include dehiscence (6–50%), seroma (0–100%), edema (20–75%), infection (40–100%) and delayed healing (20%) [36,66,69,76,84,85]. Wound dehiscence is often associated with excessive movement or skin tension [36]. Seroma formation is typically managed conservatively with drainage [85]. Soft tissue swelling and hemorrhage at the donor or recipient site is another potential complication [66,69,76]. Surgical site infection might require extended antibiotic therapy [76,84]. Delayed wound healing, is often linked to ischemia, tension, or flap instability [42].
The most frequently reported major complications are partial or full-thickness necrosis, particularly affecting the distal portion of the flap. In cats, full-thickness necrosis of the skin (79–86%) overlying the distal end of the semitendinosus myocutaneous flap has been observed when used for hindlimb full-thickness defects. This was attributed to perfusion deficits or microvascular compromise [6,30]. In dogs, skin necrosis distal to the muscle belly was also reported following application of the semitendinosus flap to reconstruct a complex open tibial fracture [41].
Functional complications, though rare, have also been documented. Lameness has been reported in one study following cranial and caudal Sartorius muscle flaps’ transfer to the medial surface of the tibia [76,84]; in another study with semitendinosus flap use for Achilles tendon repair in 20% of the dogs [41]; and finally in 18% of cases with perineal hernia [66]. However, limb function returned quickly without the need for prolonged immobilization.
While these complications are noteworthy, most can be minimized through appropriate surgical planning, flap selection, tension-reducing techniques, and careful postoperative monitoring.

7. Conclusions

Based on the articles that had been reviewed myocutaneous and muscle flaps are considered valuable tools for the reconstruction of complex limb defects in dogs and cats. These flaps offer robust vascularity, enabling coverage of wounds involving bone, tendons, or infected tissue where skin grafts alone would fail. Among the flaps reviewed, the latissimus dorsi, cutaneous trunci, trapezius, sartorius, semitendinosus, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps have demonstrated reliable outcomes with relatively low complication rates when proper surgical planning and postoperative care are applied.

Future Directions

Despite favorable clinical reports, current evidence remains limited to retrospective case series, experimental models, and a small number of prospective trials. Complications such as distal necrosis, dehiscence, seroma formation, and transient functional deficits have been reported inconsistently across studies. These are often attributable to tension at the recipient site, vascular compromise, or inadequate immobilization. Furthermore, most studies focus on immediate or short-term outcomes, with few assessing long-term limb function, quality of life, or flap durability.
To enhance clinical application and support evidence-based flap selection, further research is warranted in the areas of long-term outcome evaluation, quantitative perfusion studies to optimize flap design, and biomechanical assessment of reconstructed limbs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.; data curation, M.M., E.D., K.K. and V.T.; investigation, M.M., E.D. and E.F.; methodology, V.T.; project administration, V.T.; supervision, V.T.; writing—review and editing, M. M., E.D., K.K., E.F. and V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable. All the figures in the manuscript were created or photographed by the authors. The animal depicted is a canine cadaver provided by the Laboratory of Animal Pathology and Veterinary Forensics of the University of Thessaly. No client-owned animals are identifiable in any of the images.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
TRAMTransverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous
DIEPDeep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator
NSAIDsnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

References

  1. Swaim, S.F.; Henderson, R.A., Jr. Wounds on Limbs. In Small Animal Wound Management, 2nd ed.; Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1997; pp. 295–370. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fowler, D. Distal limb and paw injuries. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2006, 36, 819–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beardsley, S.L.; Schrader, S.C. Treatment of dogs with wounds of the limbs caused by shearing forces: 98 cases (1975–1993). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1995, 207, 1071–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Corr, S. Intensive, extensive, expensive. Management of distal limb shearing injuries in cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2009, 9, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hosgood, G. Stages of wound healing and their clinical relevance. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 2006, 36, 667–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dermisiadou, E.; Panopoulos, I.; Psalla, D.; Georgiou, S.; Sideri, A.; Galatos, A.; Tsioli, V. Use of a semitendinosus myocutaneous flap for the coverage of hindlimb full-thickness skin defects in cats. J. Vet. Sci. 2023, 24, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mayhew, P.D. Tension-Relieving Techniques and Local Skin Flaps. In BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Wound Management and Reconstruction, 2nd ed.; British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UK, 2009; pp. 69–99. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stanley, B.J. Tension-Relieving Techniques. In Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal, 1st ed.; Tobias, K.M., Johnston, S.A., Eds.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 1221–1242. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fahie, M.A. Primary Wound Closure. In Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal, 1st ed.; Tobias, K.M., Johnston, S.A., Eds.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2012; pp. 1197–1209. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pavletic, M.M. Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery, 4th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 554–590. [Google Scholar]
  11. Remedios, A.M.; Bauer, M.S.; Bowen, C.V. Thoracodorsal and caudal superficial epigastric axial pattern skin flaps in cats. Vet. Surg. 1989, 18, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pavletic, M.M. Introduction to Myocutaneous and Muscle Flaps. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1990, 20, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Remedios, A. Axial Pattern Flaps. In Manual of Canine and Feline Wound Management and Reconstruction; Fowler, D., Williams, J., Eds.; British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Cheltenham, UK, 1999; pp. 69–81. [Google Scholar]
  14. Degner, D.A.; Walshaw, R.; Arnoczky, S.P.; Smith, R.J.; Patterson, J.S.; Degner, L.A.; Hamaide, A.; Rosenstein, D. Evaluation of the cranial rectus abdominus muscle pedicle flap as a blood supply for the caudal superficial epigastric skin flap in dogs. Vet. Surg. 1996, 25, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lemarié, R.J.; Hosgood, G.; Read, R.A.; Lewis, D.D.; Bellah, R.; Salisbury, S.K.; Goldsmid, S. Distant abdominal and thoracic pedicle skin flaps for treatment of distal limb skin defects. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1995, 36, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Swaim, S.F.; Bradley, D.M.; Steiss, J.E.; Powers, R.D.; Buxton, D.F. Free segmental paw pad grafts in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1993, 54, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shahar, R.; Shamir, M.H.; Brehm, D.M.; Johnston, D.E. Free skin grafting for treatment of distal limb skin defects in cats. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1999, 40, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Swaim, S.F. Skin Grafts. In Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, 3rd ed.; Slatter, D., Ed.; W. B. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2003; pp. 321–338. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller, C.W. Free skin flap transfer by microvascular anastomosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1990, 20, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Camps, G.; Kirpensteijn, J. Avascular and Microvascular Reconstructive Techniques. In Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Management of the Dog and Cat; Kirpensteijn, J., Haar, G., Eds.; Manson Publishing Ltd.: London, UK, 2013; pp. 77–94. [Google Scholar]
  21. Madison, J.; Donawick, W.; Johnston, D.; Orsini, R. The use of skin expansion to repair cosmetic defects in animals. Vet. Surg. 1989, 18, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johnston, D.E. Wound Healing in Skin. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1990, 20, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spodnick, G.J.; Pavletic, M.M.; Clark, G.N.; Schelling, S.H.; Kraus, K.H. Controlled tissue expansion in the distal extremities of dogs. Vet. Surg. 1993, 22, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keller, W.G.; Aron, D.N.; Rakich, P.M.; Crowe, D.T.; Marks, M.A. Rapid tissue expansion for the development of rotational skin flaps in the distal portion of the hindlimb of dogs: An experimental study. Vet. Surg. 1994, 23, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tsioli, V.; Papazoglou, L.G.; Papaioannou, N.; Psalla, D.; Savvas, I.; Pavlidis, L.; Karayannopoulou, M. Comparison of three skin stretching devices for closing skin defects on the limbs of dogs. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 16, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McCraw, J.B.; Dibbell, D.G.; Carraway, J.H. Clinical definition of independent myocutaneous vascular territories. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1977, 60, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Ariyan, S.; Cuono, C.B. Myocutaneous Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction. Head Neck Surg. 1980, 2, 321–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pavletic, M.M. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, 3rd ed.; Saunders–Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2003; pp. 292–321. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dermisiadou, E. Management of Complex Skin Defects on the Feline Distal Tibia by Using Myocutaneous Flaps. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dermisiadou, E.; Panopoulos, I.; Psalla, D.; Georgiou, S.; Sideri, A.; Galatos, A.; Tsioli, V. Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques Based on the Semitendinosus Myocutaneous Flap in Cats. Vet. Sci. 2023, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mathes, S.J.; Nahai, F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1981, 2, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Geddes, C.R.; Morris, S.F.; Neligan, P.C. Perforator flaps: Evolution, classification, and applications. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2003, 50, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, S.L.; Chen, T.M.; Chou, T.D.; Chang, S.C.; Wang, H.J. Distally based sural fasciomusculocutaneous flap for chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. Ann. Plastic Surg. 2005, 54, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Mello-Filho, F.V.; Mamede, R.C.; Sader, A.A.; Velludo, M.A.; Vicente, W.V. Use of the platysma myocutaneous flap for cervical trachea reconstruction: An experimental study in dogs. Laryngoscope 1993, 103, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Smith, Μ.; Shults, S.; Waldron, D.R.; Moon, M.L. Platysma myocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction in cats. Head Neck 1993, 15, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Halfacree, Z.J.; Baines, S.J.; Lipscomb, V.J.; Grierson, J.; Summers, B.A.; Brockman, D.J. Use of a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for one-stage reconstruction of the thoracic wall after en bloc resection of primary rib chondrosarcoma in five dogs. Vet. Surg. 2007, 36, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pavletic, M.M.; Kostolich, M.; Koblik, P.; Engler, S. A comparison of the cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in the dog. Vet. Surg. 1987, 16, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Doyle, C.P.; Degner, D.A. Evaluation of the Superior Labial Musculomucosal Flap in Dogs: An Angiographic Study and Case Report. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2019, 32, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Nelissen, P.; White, D. Flaps and Grafts. In Feline Soft Tissue and General Surgery; Langley-Hobbs, S.J., Demetriou, J.L., Landlow, J.F., Eds.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014; pp. 195–207. [Google Scholar]
  40. MacPhail, C.M.; Fossum, T.W. Small Animal Surgery, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 179–265. [Google Scholar]
  41. Puerto, D.A.; Aronson, L.R. Use of a semitendinosus myocutaneous flap for soft-tissue reconstruction of a grade IIIB open tibial fracture in a dog. Vet. Surg. 2004, 33, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baltzer, W.I.; Rist, P. Achilles tendon repair in dogs using the semitendinosus muscle: Surgical technique and short-term outcome in five dogs. Vet. Surg. 2009, 38, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nicoll, S.A.; Fowler, J.D.; Remedios, A.M.; Clapson, J.B.; George, D. Development of a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap in cats. Vet. Surg. 1996, 25, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mathes, S.J.; Levine, J. Muscle Flaps and Their Blood Supply. In Grabb & Smith’s Plastic Surgery, 6th ed.; Thorne, C.H., Beasley, R.W., Aston, S.J., Bartlett, S.P., Gurtner, G.C., Spear, S.L., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hermanson, J.W. The Muscular System. In Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog, 4th ed.; Evans, H.E., de Lahunta, A., Eds.; Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2013; pp. 250–251. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hayden, R.E.; Kirby, S.D.; Deschler, D.G. Technical Modifications of the Latissimus Dorsi Pedicled Flap to Increase Versatility and Viability. Laryngoscope 2000, 110, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ong, H.S.; Ji, T.; Zhang, C.P. The pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 3, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Motegi, S.; Tamura, A.; Abe, M.; Okada, E.; Nagai, Y.; Ishikawa, O. Reverse latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for reconstruction of lumbar radiation ulcer. J. Dermatol. 2007, 34, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Uzun, H.; Bitik, O.; Ersoy, U.S.; Bilginer, B.; Aksu, A.E. Comparison of Musculocutaneous and Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps for the Reconstruction of the Extensive Composite Scalp and Cranium Defects. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2018, 29, 1947–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vincent, A.; Hohman, M.H. Latissimus Dorsi Flap. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tobin, G.R.; Moberg, A.W.; DuBou, R.H.; Weiner, L.J.; Bland, K.I. The split latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1981, 7, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Marshall, D.R.; Anstee, E.J.; Stapleton, M.J. Soft tissue reconstruction of the breast using an extended composite latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1984, 37, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. He, J.; Qing, L.; Wu, P.; Ketheeswaran, S.; Yu, F.; Tang, J. Variations of Extended Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Large Wounds in the Extremity. Orthop. Surg. 2022, 14, 2598–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yamamoto, K.; Yokota, K.; Higaki, K. Entire pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous island flap. Head Neck Surg. 1985, 7, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ju, J.; Li, L.; Zhou, R.; Hou, R. Combined application of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and iliac bone flap in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qi, J.W.; Chen, S.; Sun, B.H.; Chai, Y.T.; Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.Y.; Sun, H.Y.; Chen, H. Clinical effects of free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap combined with artificial dermis and split-thickness skin graft in the treatment of degloving injury in lower extremity. Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi 2022, 38, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou, J.; Zheng, Y.; Xiao, S.; Wei, Z.; Nie, K.; Liu, Z.; Chang, S.; Jin, W.; Chen, W.; Zhang, F. Preliminary application of foldable pedicled latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for repairing soft tissue defects in shoulder and back. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2024, 38, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwabegger, A.H.; Harpf, C.; Rainer, C. Muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with maintenance of muscle innervation, function, and aesthetic appearance of the donor site. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003, 111, 1407–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Werker, P.M.; Kon, M. Cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap: A new and reliable model for muscle free flap research in the rat. Microsurgery. 1992, 13, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Philibert, D.; Fowler, J.D.; Clapson, J.B. The anatomic basis for a trapezius muscle flap in dogs. Vet. Surg. 1992, 21, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kurach, L.; Smith, M.E.; Fowler, J.D. Microvascular free tissue transfer of the trapezius flap in 20 dogs and a wallaby. Vet. Surg. 2013, 42, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Panje, W.R. Myocutaneous trapezius flap. Head Neck Surg. 1980, 2, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Philibert, D.; Fowler, J.D.; Clapson, J.B. Free microvascular transplantation of the trapezius musculocutaneous flap in dogs. Vet. Surg. 1992, 21, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chambers, J.N.; Rawlings, C.A. Applications of a semitendinosus muscle flap in two dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1991, 199, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Solano, M.; Purinton, P.T.; Chambers, J.N.; Munnell, J.F. Effects of vascular pedicle ligation on blood flow in canine semitendinosus muscle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1995, 56, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hashimoto, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Nishimura, R. Evaluation of semitendinosus muscle transposition for treatment of perineal hernias in 33 small-breed dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2023, 87, 282–289. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wysocki, R.W.; Gray, R.L.; Fernandez, J.J.; Cohen, M.S. Posterior elbow coverage using whole and split flexor carpi ulnaris flaps: A cadaveric study. J. Hand Surg. Am. 2008, 33, 1807–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Franini, A.; Entani, M.G.; Colosio, E.; Melotti, L.; Patruno, M. Case report: Flexor carpi ulnaris tendinopathy in a lure-coursing dog treated with three platelet-rich plasma and platelet lysate injections. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1003993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chambers, J.N.; Purinton, P.T.; Allen, S.W.; Schneider, T.A.; Smith, J.D. Flexor carpi ulnaris (humeral head) muscle flap for reconstruction of distal forelimb injuries in two dogs. Vet. Surg. 1998, 27, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Purinton, P.T.; Chambers, J.N.; Moore, J.L. Identification and categorization of the vascular patterns to muscles of the thoracic limb, thorax, and neck of dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992, 53, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lim, A.Y.; Kumar, V.P.; Hua, J.; Pereira, B.P.; Pho, R.W. The neuromuscular compartments of the flexor carpi ulnaris. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999, 103, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lingaraj, K.; Ruben, M.; Chan, Y.H.; Das, S.D. Identification of risk factors for urinary retention following total knee arthroplasty: A Singapore hospital experience. Singapore Med. J. 2007, 48, 213–216. [Google Scholar]
  73. Payne, D.E.; Kaufman, A.M.; Wysocki, R.W.; Richard, M.J.; Ruch, D.S.; Leversedge, F.J. Vascular perfusion of a flexor carpi ulnaris muscle turnover pedicle flap for posterior elbow soft tissue reconstruction: A cadaveric study. J. Hand Surg. Am. 2011, 36, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yang, K.; Rivedal, D.; Boehm, L.; Yan, J.G.; Sanger, J.; Matloub, H. Distally Based Pedicled Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Flap: An Anatomical Study and Clinical Application. Hand 2019, 14, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Okamoto, S.; Tada, K.; Ai, H.; Tsuchiya, H. Flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flap for soft tissue reconstruction after total elbow arthroplasty. Case Rep. Surg. 2014, 2014, 798506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Weinstein, M.J.; Pavletic, M.M.; Boudrieau, R.J. Caudal sartorius muscle flap in the dog. Vet. Surg. 1988, 17, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tanaka, C.; Ide, M.R.; Junior, A.J. Anatomical contribution to the surgical construction of the sartorius muscle flap. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2006, 28, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sylvestre, A.M.; Weinstein, M.J.; Popovitch, C.A.; Brockman, D.J. The sartorius muscle flap in the cat: An anatomic study and two case reports. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1997, 33, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, D.; Morris, S.F.; Sigurdson, L. The sartorius muscle: Anatomic considerations for reconstructive surgeons. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1998, 20, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Manjunath, K.N.; Venkatesh, M.S.; Shivaprasad, A. Distal major pedicle of sartorius muscle flap: Anatomical study and its clinical implications. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 2018, 51, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hong, J.P.; Lee, H.B.; Chung, Y.K.; Kim, S.W.; Tark, K.C. Coverage of difficult wounds around the knee joint with prefabricated, distally based sartorius muscle flaps. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2003, 50, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Minami, N.; Tsukamoto, S.; Shimizu, T.; Honoki, K.; Hasegawa, H.; Masunaga, T.; Kido, A.; Errani, C.; Mavrogenis, A.F.; Tanaka, Y. Coverage of lateral soft tissue defects with sartorius muscle flap after distal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumors. SICOT J. 2024, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mejia, S.; Boston, S.E.; Skinner, O.T. Sartorius muscle flap for body wall reconstruction: Surgical technique description and retrospective case series. Can. Vet. J. 2018, 59, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar]
  84. Weinstein, M.J.; Pavletic, M.M.; Boudrieau, R.J.; Engler, S.J. Cranial sartorius muscle flap in the dog. Vet. Surg. 1989, 18, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chambers, J.N.; Purinton, P.T.; Moore, J.L.; Allen, S.W. Treatment of trochanteric ulcers with cranial sartorius and rectus femoris muscle flaps. Vet. Surg. 1990, 19, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Feng, Y.C.; Chen, K.S.; Chang, S.C. Reconstruction with latissimus dorsi, external abdominal oblique and cranial sartorius muscle flaps for a large defect of abdominal wall in a dog after surgical removal of infiltrative lipoma. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 1717–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  87. Doust, R.; Sullivan, M. Semitendinosus muscle transfer flap for external anal sphincter incompetence in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 1385–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mortari, A.C.; Rahal, S.C.; Resende, L.A.; Dal-pai-silva, M.; Mamprim, M.J.; Corrêa, M.A.; Antunes, S.H. Electromyographical, ultrasonographical and morphological modifications in semitendinous muscle after transposition as ventral perineal muscle flap. J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2005, 52, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Riggs, J.; Ladlow, J.F.; Owen, L.J.; Hall, J.L. Novel application of internal obturator and semitendinosus muscle flaps for rectal wall repair or reinforcement. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2019, 60, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Morello, E.; Martano, M.; Zabarino, S.; Piras, L.A.; Nicoli, S.; Bussadori, R.; Buracco, P. Modified semitendinosus muscle transposition to repair ventral perineal hernia in 14 dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2015, 56, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vnuk, D.; Babić, T.; Stejskal, M.; Capak, D.; Harapin, I.; Pirkić, B. Application of a semitendinosus muscle flap in the treatment of perineal hernia in a cat. Vet. Rec. 2005, 156, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, M.Y.; Nam, C.H.; Kim, J.H.; Yoon, H.Y. Application of Bifurcated Semitendinosus Muscle Transposition for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Two Dogs. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Field, E.J.; Kelly, G.; Pleuvry, D.; Demetriou, J.; Baines, S.J. Indications, outcome and complications with axial pattern skin flaps in dogs and cats: 73 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2015, 56, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jones, C.A.; Lipscomb, V.J. Indications, complications, and outcomes associated with subdermal plexus skin flap procedures in dogs and cats: 92 cases (2000–2017). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2019, 255, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pets 02 00041 sch001
Scheme 1. Summary of the systematic approach to the literature using a PRISMA flow diagram.
Scheme 1. Summary of the systematic approach to the literature using a PRISMA flow diagram.
Pets 02 00041 sch001
Pets 02 00041 g001
Figure 1. Anatomic landmarks of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous; including the ventral border of the acromion, the caudal border of the triceps muscle, the head of the last rib, and the distal third of the humerus and arc of rotation to the forelimb.
Figure 1. Anatomic landmarks of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous; including the ventral border of the acromion, the caudal border of the triceps muscle, the head of the last rib, and the distal third of the humerus and arc of rotation to the forelimb.
Pets 02 00041 g001
Pets 02 00041 g002aPets 02 00041 g002b
Figure 2. (a) The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is outlined on the skin using a sterile marker. The dorsal border is drawn from a point caudal to the triceps, just below the acromion, extending caudally to the level of the last rib. The ventral border is drawn from the axillary skin fold near the lower edge of the triceps and follows a line parallel to the dorsal border, terminating at the 13th rib. The caudodorsal edge is then completed by joining the dorsal and ventral lines. (b) The flap is dissected and elevated incorporating the latissimus dorsi muscle. Segmental lateral intercostal vessels are ligated and divided, taking care to preserve the thoracodorsal artery and vein (black arrow). (c) The flap is elevated and transposed to the forelimb defect. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 2. (a) The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is outlined on the skin using a sterile marker. The dorsal border is drawn from a point caudal to the triceps, just below the acromion, extending caudally to the level of the last rib. The ventral border is drawn from the axillary skin fold near the lower edge of the triceps and follows a line parallel to the dorsal border, terminating at the 13th rib. The caudodorsal edge is then completed by joining the dorsal and ventral lines. (b) The flap is dissected and elevated incorporating the latissimus dorsi muscle. Segmental lateral intercostal vessels are ligated and divided, taking care to preserve the thoracodorsal artery and vein (black arrow). (c) The flap is elevated and transposed to the forelimb defect. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g002aPets 02 00041 g002b
Pets 02 00041 g003
Figure 3. The cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap is planned and marked similarly to the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. The cutaneous trunci flap is carefully elevated by separating it from the loose underlying subcutaneous tissues and transposed to the forelimb defect. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 3. The cutaneous trunci myocutaneous flap is planned and marked similarly to the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. The cutaneous trunci flap is carefully elevated by separating it from the loose underlying subcutaneous tissues and transposed to the forelimb defect. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g003
Pets 02 00041 g004
Figure 4. Outline of the trapezius myocutaneous flap based on anatomic landmarks: 2 cm ventral to the dorsal midline (dorsal, caudal, and cranioventral borders), 2 cm caudal to the scapular spine, and a line between the acromion and transverse process of the third cervical vertebra. The arc of the flap’s rotation to the forelimb is shown.
Figure 4. Outline of the trapezius myocutaneous flap based on anatomic landmarks: 2 cm ventral to the dorsal midline (dorsal, caudal, and cranioventral borders), 2 cm caudal to the scapular spine, and a line between the acromion and transverse process of the third cervical vertebra. The arc of the flap’s rotation to the forelimb is shown.
Pets 02 00041 g004
Pets 02 00041 g005aPets 02 00041 g005b
Figure 5. Trapezius myocutaneous flap (a) A curved incision is performed starting from the distal third of the scapular spine, arching cranially and dorsally toward the midline and terminating 5 cm caudal to the wing of the atlas. A second incision, curving ventrally, is made between these points raising a triangular section of the skin. (b) The cervical part of the trapezius is dissected and its attachments are incised. The incised trapezius is dissected from the cleidocervicalis and omotransversarius muscles, preserving the prescapular branch of the superficial cervical vascular pedicle (black arrow) from which the trapezius muscle receives its vascular supply. (c) The trapezius myocutaneous flap has been rotated to cover a defect involving the proximal third of the forelimb. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 5. Trapezius myocutaneous flap (a) A curved incision is performed starting from the distal third of the scapular spine, arching cranially and dorsally toward the midline and terminating 5 cm caudal to the wing of the atlas. A second incision, curving ventrally, is made between these points raising a triangular section of the skin. (b) The cervical part of the trapezius is dissected and its attachments are incised. The incised trapezius is dissected from the cleidocervicalis and omotransversarius muscles, preserving the prescapular branch of the superficial cervical vascular pedicle (black arrow) from which the trapezius muscle receives its vascular supply. (c) The trapezius myocutaneous flap has been rotated to cover a defect involving the proximal third of the forelimb. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g005aPets 02 00041 g005b
Pets 02 00041 g006
Figure 6. Semitendinosus myocutaneous flap and its arc of rotation to the hindlimb.
Figure 6. Semitendinosus myocutaneous flap and its arc of rotation to the hindlimb.
Pets 02 00041 g006
Pets 02 00041 g007
Figure 7. (a) A transverse skin incision is made 2–3 cm cranial to the ischial tuberosity, followed by two vertical incisions extending distally to the caudal stifle. Left hindlimb. (b) The semitendinosus myocutaneous flap is detached from its origin on the ischial tuberosity and mobilized distally, preserving the distal vascular pedicle (black arrow). (c) The flap is rotated laterally or medially to cover the tibial defects. Left hindlimb, medial surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 7. (a) A transverse skin incision is made 2–3 cm cranial to the ischial tuberosity, followed by two vertical incisions extending distally to the caudal stifle. Left hindlimb. (b) The semitendinosus myocutaneous flap is detached from its origin on the ischial tuberosity and mobilized distally, preserving the distal vascular pedicle (black arrow). (c) The flap is rotated laterally or medially to cover the tibial defects. Left hindlimb, medial surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g007
Pets 02 00041 g008
Figure 8. (a) Flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the caudolateral surface of the antebrachium. The fascial connections of the humeral head of the muscle are dissected, and an incision is made at the junction of the proximal and middle third of the muscle. A vascular pedicle from the caudal interosseous artery enters the distal end of the humeral head near the accessory carpal bone (black arrow). Left front limb. (c) The muscle is rotated medially or laterally to cover the defect. Left front limb, lateral surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 8. (a) Flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the caudolateral surface of the antebrachium. The fascial connections of the humeral head of the muscle are dissected, and an incision is made at the junction of the proximal and middle third of the muscle. A vascular pedicle from the caudal interosseous artery enters the distal end of the humeral head near the accessory carpal bone (black arrow). Left front limb. (c) The muscle is rotated medially or laterally to cover the defect. Left front limb, lateral surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g008
Pets 02 00041 g009
Figure 9. (a) Caudal sartorius muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the medial aspect of the thigh. The caudal sartorius muscle is transected approximately 4 cm distal to its iliac origin. The saphenous artery and medial saphenous vein are ligated near their confluence with the femoral vessels. Care must be taken to preserve the saphenous vasculature as it runs along the medial aspect of the tibia and adjacent to the muscle’s caudal border (black arrow). The flap can extend to the distal tibia, the tarsocrural joint and the proximal metatarsal bones. Left hindlimb, medial surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 9. (a) Caudal sartorius muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the medial aspect of the thigh. The caudal sartorius muscle is transected approximately 4 cm distal to its iliac origin. The saphenous artery and medial saphenous vein are ligated near their confluence with the femoral vessels. Care must be taken to preserve the saphenous vasculature as it runs along the medial aspect of the tibia and adjacent to the muscle’s caudal border (black arrow). The flap can extend to the distal tibia, the tarsocrural joint and the proximal metatarsal bones. Left hindlimb, medial surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g009
Pets 02 00041 g010aPets 02 00041 g010b
Figure 10. (a) Cranial sartorius muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the medial aspect of the thigh. The muscle is exposed, isolated and transected distally at its insertion on the tibia. It is elevated to its vascular pedicle, which enters the proximal and middle third of the muscle caudally, and rotated to adjacent defects. Left hindlimb, medial surface. (c) For defects of the greater trochanteric region the flap is transposed, using either rotational transposition or inversion, depending on the desired arc of coverage. Left hindlimb, lateral surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Figure 10. (a) Cranial sartorius muscle flap and its arc of rotation. (b) A skin incision is made along the medial aspect of the thigh. The muscle is exposed, isolated and transected distally at its insertion on the tibia. It is elevated to its vascular pedicle, which enters the proximal and middle third of the muscle caudally, and rotated to adjacent defects. Left hindlimb, medial surface. (c) For defects of the greater trochanteric region the flap is transposed, using either rotational transposition or inversion, depending on the desired arc of coverage. Left hindlimb, lateral surface. Cr: cranial, Cau: caudal.
Pets 02 00041 g010aPets 02 00041 g010b
Table 1. Flap type, Arc of Rotation, and Indications.
Table 1. Flap type, Arc of Rotation, and Indications.
Flap TypeTransposition/Arc of RotationIndications
Latissimus dorsi myocutaneousWide arc; cranioventral rotation to thorax/forelimbThoracic wall defects, large forelimb wounds
Cutaneous trunci myocutaneousModerate arc; rotated to elbow/antebrachial regionForelimb defects up to elbow
Trapezius myocutaneousRotated to cervical/thoracic regionsNeck, upper thorax, proximal forelimb defects
Semitendinosus myocutaneous (limb reconstruction)Wide arc of rotation 150–180° medially, laterally or distallyDistal hindlimb wounds, tibial/metatarsal defects, Achilles tendon rupture repair, Perineal hernia, fecal incontinence, rectal wall repair
Flexor carpi ulnaris muscleDistally rotated to carpus/metacarpusAntebrachial, carpal, and metacarpal soft tissue defects
Caudal sartorius muscleDistally rotated to tibia/metatarsusDistal tibial wounds, metatarsal defects, osteomyelitis
Cranial sartorius muscleSimple rotation or inversion over trochanterTrochanteric ulcers, abdominal wall reconstruction, femoral hernia
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Markou, M.; Dermisiadou, E.; Karagianni, K.; Flouraki, E.; Tsioli, V. Myocutaneous Flaps and Muscle Flaps for Management of Limbs’ Defects in Dogs and Cats: A Review. Pets 2025, 2, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2040041

AMA Style

Markou M, Dermisiadou E, Karagianni K, Flouraki E, Tsioli V. Myocutaneous Flaps and Muscle Flaps for Management of Limbs’ Defects in Dogs and Cats: A Review. Pets. 2025; 2(4):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2040041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Markou, Mandalena, Eleftheria Dermisiadou, Konstantina Karagianni, Eugenia Flouraki, and Vassiliki Tsioli. 2025. "Myocutaneous Flaps and Muscle Flaps for Management of Limbs’ Defects in Dogs and Cats: A Review" Pets 2, no. 4: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2040041

APA Style

Markou, M., Dermisiadou, E., Karagianni, K., Flouraki, E., & Tsioli, V. (2025). Myocutaneous Flaps and Muscle Flaps for Management of Limbs’ Defects in Dogs and Cats: A Review. Pets, 2(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/pets2040041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop