Abstract
Healthy food and drink guidance for early learning services (ELS) provided by the Ministry of Health (MoH) assists ELS to develop policies and practices to promote healthy eating habits in childhood. This study aimed to assess alignment of food and drinks served to NZ children in ELS with the MoH Healthy Food and Drink and choking guidance. Menus (n = 271) collected remotely from 148 ELS between November 2020 and March 2021 were analysed for their nutritional quality (percentage of ‘green’, ‘amber’, and ‘red’ menu items) using a scoring system based on the MoH guidance. Points were awarded based on the availability of healthy (green) menu items and the exclusion of unhealthy (red) menu items. Overall, of all menus, 2.6% met the MoH Healthy Food and Drink guidance and one-fifth (18.5%) met the MoH choking guidance. Menus for children over two-year-olds (over-2s) scored, on average, 12% higher than menus for children under two-year-olds (under-2s; p < 0.01). Services with a Health Heart Award from the NZ Heart Foundation provided more green items to over-2s (p = 0.04) and under-2s (p = 0.01) and less red items to over-2s (p = 0.04). Providing more green menu items was inversely correlated with providing less high-choking-risk foods (p < 0.01, r = −0.347 over-2s, r = −0.504 under-2s, respectively). Menu scores did not vary by service location, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation or type (services operating independently versus those part of an education group chain). Alignment with MoH nutritional guidance is low, particularly in ELS caring for very young children (under-2s). Service characteristics, except for Healthy Heart Award status, are a poor predictor of nutritional quality of menus at ELS. Greater uptake of the Healthy Heart Award scheme could assist ELS to provide healthier food and drinks, which may also reduce food-related choking risk.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A. and C.W.; methodology, A.A., C.W. and O.H.; software O.H.; validation O.H.; formal analysis, O.H.; investigation, O.H.; resources, O.H.; data curation, O.H.; writing—original draft preparation, O.H.; writing—reviewing and editing, A.A., C.W. and O.H.; visualization O.H.; supervision, A.A. and C.W.; project administration O.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Code of Ethical Conduct for Research, Teaching and Evaluations involving Human Participants and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of MASSEY UNIVERSITY (NOR 20/07).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).