Abstract
The bacterial susceptibility and the translocation of fluoroquinolones (FQs) are influenced by pH, since it determines the proportion of microspecies of the drug. Norfloxacin (NOR) and oxalic acid (AO) are antibacterial compounds. In this work, we evaluated the antibacterial activity of the NOR–AO combination on the Escherichia coli American Type Culture Collection 25922 strain using the checkerboard method. In addition, we analyzed the effect of pH on the NOR-AO combination. We determined the extent of NOR ionization equilibrium and calculated the apparent logP to establish the lipophilicity of NOR at the different pHs assayed. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) obtained for AO and NOR was 1250 µg/mL and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively. The interaction of NOR–AO was indifferent to the concentrations tested (Fractional Inhibitory Concentration 1.12). However, an atypical behavior was observed in E. coli growth. We observed that at pH values below 5.8 and log D below −0.3, the cationic species of NOR predominates, decreasing its activity. As pH increased, the predominant species is zwitterionic with increased lipophilicity and restoration of NOR activity. Therefore, the acid conditions given by the presence of AO decreased the concentration of the neutral species of NOR and therefore the amount of drug capable of diffusing directly through the membrane. There is controversy in the literature regarding the mechanism of FQ translocation through the bacterial membrane; however, our results show that the pH of the medium is a determining factor that directly impacts the antibacterial activity. To deepen this study, we will continue testing new concentrations and combinations with other organic acids.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ECMC2022-13226/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, R.A.G.; M.C.B.; G.P.V.; methodology, R.A.G.; validation, R.A.G.; M.C.B.; G.P.V.; formal analysis, R.A.G.; G.P.V.; investigation, R.A.G.; resources, G.P.V.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.G.; writing—review and editing, R.A.G.; G.P.V.; visualization, M.C.B.; G.P.V.; supervision, M.C.B.; G.P.V.; project administration, M.C.B.; G.P.V.; funding acquisition, G.P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Res. R/10 N° 218/22, PI N° 1712 and by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data is available in the Supplementary Material.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).