Abstract
Adequate medical facilities on passenger ships are essential to ensuring the quality of medical care and public health actions. Their design and construction is complex, as they have to comply with several regulations and recommendations from different authorities (IMO, ILO, EU, WHO), national flag legislation and advices from scientific societies. Therefore, proper authorization procedures become very important. The working guideline, developed in the light of our experience gained in new Italian cruise ships/ferries’ medical facilities’ authorization processes is presented. Innovative points are the participative continuous approach “from the board to the sea” and the Dynamic-Planning Method based on “what if” scenario model. A careful balance of the required features and standards against costs without compromising the quality of care is possible. The guidelines are open to be continually reviewed, updated, and expanded with the contribution of stakeholder’s. Readers are encouraged to provide feedback and to contribute material for further updates.
1. Introduction
A ship’s medical facilities play a very important role on board, not only when injuries occur, but also for infectious disease control.
They must be able to provide quality care (stabilization, therapeutic maneuvers for critically ill or unstable patients, adequate care for diseases, and support for medical evacuation when appropriate), diagnoses, investigations, and surveillance, and must possess adequate isolation capabilities in case of infectious disease outbreaks.
The design and construction of adequate medical facilities is complex, as they have to comply with several regulations and recommendations from a number of different authorities (e.g., the IMO, ILO, EU, WHO, SHIPSAN Manual, national flag legislation, and advice from scientific societies). However, experience shows that these regulations are not always followed, and that even compliance with existing regulations does not always produce an optimal result.
The aim of this article is to provide, after an overview of the main international reference documents, a useful working guideline on the requirements of a ship’s medical facilities from a practical viewpoint that takes into account both clinical and public health issues. The contents have been developed in the light of our experience gained in new Italian cruise ships/ferries’ medical facilities’ authorization processes.
In this document, we also recommend solutions that are not formally required by regulations but constitute recommended ways of complying with the specifications of the health-related best practices from onshore hospitals (e.g., the clinical risk management system). These guidelines are open to be continually reviewed, updated, and expanded with the contribution of all stakeholders. Reader re encouraged to provide feedback and to contribute material for further updates.
2. Material and Method
The Guidelines include the following items (Table 1):
Table 1.
Contents of Guidelines.
3. Results
We have provided an operative checklist for reviewing the design, furnishing, and operation of passenger ships’ medical facilities. Real case histories from our experience gained in the authorization process of cruise ships and ferries, in a construction-phase shipyard, have been presented.
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Adequate medical facilities on passenger ships are essential to ensuring the quality of emergency treatments, medical care, and public health actions. Therefore, they need to be efficiently planned and competently designed and equipped; in this perspective, proper authorization procedures become very important.
Since a one-step authorization procedure limited to the end of the building phase, without consultation with stakeholders, is completely ineffective, we have adopted a participative process involving the ship’s owner, the shipping company’s medical department, the ship’s designers, the shipyard construction supervisor, the ship’s doctor association, and the classification company.
A continuous approach “from the board to the sea” with intervention in the different building phases (planning as well as inspection in the shipyard and upon entry into service) is of fundamental importance alongside careful monitoring after launch, especially in the first year of service.
According to this participative/continuous approach, the Maritime Health Authority will endeavor to identify any design- and construction-related non-compliance to be eliminated before launch.
We have also observed that although the quality of design and construction has a major impact on the quality of health care, it is not the only influence. Management practices, staff quality, and the regulatory framework have a potentially greater impact. Consequently, functional and organizational requirements are important as well as structural ones.
While in the past the main focus was on structural criteria (the number of beds and isolation capability), nowadays, it is important to design the new medical facilities according to a “A Health Ship Service Planner” that also considers benchmarks and the type of navigation and information used to determine the raw demand (Occasions of Service, Average Length of Stay, and Presentations Per Annum).
According to this Dynamic-Planning Method, a “what if” scenario approach is always necessary. This is an effective way to detect potential problems and can be lifesaving as well as cost saving. Some scenarios have been described in the document (contagious disease outbreaks, fire, falls, crush accidents, the transfer of sick or injured people, and evacuation, training), though the list is not intended to be exhaustive.
In our experience, improve the quality of ship’s medical facilities’ requirements does not necessarily increase costs; on the contrary, it can have economic benefits resulting from an optimal management of clinical and health-related public issues on board. A careful balance of the required features and standards against costs without compromising the quality of care is possible.
These guidelines are open to be continually reviewed, updated, and expanded with the contribution of scientific societies, ships’ designers and builders, ship owners, maritime organizations, authorities, inspectors, and the ship’s crew and medical staff. Readers are encouraged to provide feedback and to contribute material for further updates.
In the future, it would be important for maritime health authorities to share the precious experience gained from ships’ medical facilities’ authorization procedures rather than waste it in order to achieve common, globally accepted guidance.
Author Contributions
A.C. contributed to the design and implementation of the guidelines. All authors write the manuscript together. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Ethical approval not required.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The content represents the views of the author only and is their sole responsibilit; it cannot be considered to reflect the views of Italian Ministry of Health or any other body of Italian Government.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).