Disabilities, Volume 6, Issue 3 (June 2026) – 9 articles

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition that is often characterised by differences in social communication, sensory processes, and cognition. Due to the underdiagnosis of autism in women and girls, their voices are often missing from research, limiting our understanding of their experiences at school. This study addressed the gap around the factors which impacted women’s late and/or pre-diagnosed experiences of school by using semi-structured interviews with ten autistic women; among them, eight were diagnosed after school. The interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes and areas of insight were constructed from the data: (1) The impact of social norms on peer relationships. (2) We found ways of coping, but at what cost? (3) How schools could help someone like me. The findings show that all women in the study had negative school experiences, with diagnosis during school also being linked to identity and mental health difficulties. Schools should enhance pastoral support, foster positive relationships, improve communication, and use strengths-based approaches to improve outcomes for autistic girls. Proactively adopting neuroaffirming modifications may improve support during autistic girls’ formative years, leading to a lasting impact on their lives. This is particularly important for autistic girls, who face marginalisation on two levels: neurotypical expectations for females and stereotyped expectations of autism. The implications of these findings are discussed with suggestions for future research and practical implementations within mainstream school settings. Full article

Inclusion has become a central concept in disability policy, education, and welfare state reform, yet its practical implementation remains ambivalent. While inclusion is promoted as a rights-based ideal grounded in equality, it can also function as an administrative label that obscures persistent exclusion. Drawing on critical disability studies, this article analyses inclusion as a contested, power-laden concept and develops a three-stage framework—access, participation, and agency—to distinguish formal inclusion from substantive belonging and influence. The framework is applied to key domains of disabled people’s lives—education, housing, service systems, working life, crises, and digitalised everyday life—showing how ableist norms, managerial governance, and institutional logics can reproduce exclusion within ‘inclusive’ reforms, including forms of transformed institutionalisation. The article argues that meaningful inclusion requires dismantling ableist norms, addressing structural power relations, resourcing supports, and strengthening disabled people’s agency in decision-making. Full article

Objective: To analyse the rhetorical strategies employed in formal complaints regarding adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism assessments, specifically where no service failure was identified. Methods: A rhetorical analysis was conducted on 48 complaints determined to be not upheld overall, submitted to a UK NHS Trust between 2024 and 2025. Results: Complainants demonstrated high rhetorical sophistication, frequently deploying a “Triple Core” strategy: Causal Attribution (blaming the service for life failures), Emotional Impact Description (framing dissatisfaction as medical trauma), and Procedural Challenge (alleging administrative breach). A minority (18.8%) employed economic arguments, whilst 81.2% included specific outcome demands, such as a prescription or a specific diagnosis. Conclusions: Complaints in this area of clinical practice demonstrate sophisticated rhetorical construction, functioning as instruments of organisational pressure. The “Triple Core” strategy creates an epistemic conflict where clinical judgement is contested by the patient’s lived experience narrative. These findings suggest that high complaint volumes may reflect a systemic gap between public expectation and clinical criteria rather than safety failures. Full article

Stress is increasingly recognised as a key factor underlying health and behavioural problems in people with intellectual disabilities. However, little is known about chronic stressors embedded in residential care environments. This study aimed to identify chronic stressors in residential care for people with intellectual disabilities from the perspective of stakeholders. A group concept mapping design was used, combining qualitative data generation with quantitative clustering analyses. Direct support workers, family members, and experts by experience generated statements describing situations perceived as stressful in residential care settings. After data cleaning, 125 unique statements were retained. Participants subsequently clustered and rated these statements on frequency, impact, and controllability. Thirty-eight statements were identified as daily stressors with high frequency and impact. Ward’s hierarchical cluster analysis grouped the statements into eight clusters representing broader conditions within residential care environments. Several clusters contained multiple high-frequency, high-impact stressors and were therefore interpreted as potential chronic stressors. These clusters reflected structural characteristics of residential care, including dependence on support staff, limited autonomy, and shared living environments. Identifying chronic stressors provides a framework for studying chronic stress in people with intellectual disabilities and may inform organisational and environmental interventions aimed at reducing exposure to such stressors. Full article

Purpose: Recent studies have shown that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) can improve cardiometabolic health in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, many barriers remain for individuals with spinal cord injury to participate in exercise such as lack of time, accessible equipment and facilities, and transportation. The use of telehealth interventions may be a form of exercise delivery that can ease the burden on the participant and lead to greater exercise participation. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a home-based telehealth HIIT arm crank exercise training program for individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to 16 weeks of telehealth HIIT arm crank exercise training or a no-exercise control group. Body composition, resting energy expenditure (REE), blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, aerobic capacity (VO₂ max), and a qualitative interview were assessed at baseline and at 16 weeks post intervention. Results: Six individuals (four male and two female, mean age 52.7 ± 10.2 years) with spinal cord injury were recruited for this study. Four out of five HIIT participants showed improvements in aerobic capacity, insulin sensitivity, and resting energy expenditure. Three qualitative themes emerged: (1) convenience and perceived benefits were critical elements of engagement; (2) high-intensity exercise elicited time-sensitive responses; and (3) trainers played a key role in promoting strong program adherence. Conclusions: Overall, we found that this program could be easily implemented and per-formed at home in individuals with spinal cord injury. We also found that participants enjoyed the 1:1 training sessions with a telecoach and that the intervention was easy to adhere to, as demonstrated by participant attendance. There is a need for future randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of telehealth exercise training for improving cardiometabolic health in spinal cord injury. Full article

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by social communication deficits, restricted/repetitive behaviors, sensory processing atypicalities, and impaired adaptive functioning. Neuropsychomotor Therapy of Early Development (TNPEE) integrates motor, cognitive, and socio-emotional domains, promoting functional skills, while Therapy in Aquatic Motor Activities (TAMA) targets motor and sensory engagement. This multicenter, 18-month study compared TNPEE, TAMA, and their combination, hypothesizing that TNPEE would drive core symptom and adaptive improvements, with TAMA providing complementary benefits. Methods: Seventy-seven children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (31.6% females) were recruited from four Italian centers (Palermo, Perugia, Sarno, Messina) and allocated to three groups: TAMA only, TNPEE combined with TAMA, and TNPEE only. Assessments included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2), the Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition (CARS-2), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Sensory Processing Measure and HAARS at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Results: By 18 months, children receiving TNPEE, alone or combined with TAMA, exhibited significant reductions in autism severity, significant improvements in adaptive functioning, and enhanced sensory processing. In contrast, the TAMA-only group demonstrated improvements in aquatic competence (HAARS) but no statistically significant changes in ASD severity or adaptive functioning. Conclusions: TNPEE was the intervention most consistently associated with improvements in ASD severity, adaptive functioning, and sensory processing, whereas TAMA alone showed a more limited impact on broader developmental outcomes. Full article

Despite the known benefits of workforce participation, many individuals with disabilities remain excluded. This exploratory study utilises selected analytical tools from constructivist grounded theory to investigate how 46 diverse stakeholders perceive disability during the transition from higher education to employment. Additionally, it examines how these perceptions influence efforts toward inclusion and the advice given regarding disability disclosure. Six workshops were conducted to facilitate dialogue on pathways to work for students with disabilities. The constructivist approach to analysis leads to the development of several concepts that capture stakeholders’ perspectives on disability, their strategies for promoting inclusion, and their recommendations regarding disclosure. Disabilities are conceptualised as an asset, a liability, or as insignificant. The views of disability as an asset or a liability influence advocacy strategies and disclosure recommendations, ranging from celebrating to concealing. These attitudes also shape how individuals who disclose disabilities are perceived. Society often expects people with disabilities to disclose their conditions to promote inclusion, even though performing such can involve risks like stigma and exclusion. At the same time, employers share responsibility for creating inclusive environments through universal design and supportive practices. The findings show that both disclosure and concealment can lead to inclusion or exclusion, emphasising the importance of universally designed institutions. Full article

The Disability Royal Commission in Australia has reinforced concerns that segregated employment settings can increase risks of exploitation, violence and abuse, including within Australian Disability Enterprises (ADEs), strengthening the case for community-based employment options for people with intellectual disability. This qualitative study examined how features of supported employment might inform the design of an inclusive job guarantee (JG) model. Drawing on 77 interviews with supported employees and staff, we identified enabling conditions that support wellbeing and participation (including customised roles, structured routines, peer connection, and holistic support), alongside structural constraints that can limit inclusion and progression. While participants and staff described clear well-being benefits from supported employment, they also highlighted frustrations associated with disconnection from the wider community, low pay, and limited pathways to advancement or transition. Given that transition rates between supported and mainstream employment remain very low, the findings emphasise that any JG model seeking to include people with intellectual disability will need investment in supports and credible transition pathways. This paper concludes by outlining how these design implications intersect with the broader economic logic of unemployment and what an inclusive JG could contribute as part of a wider disability employment reform agenda. Full article

Population aging requires residential environments that go beyond basic accessibility. This study theorizes and validates the Accessibility Gap (the divergence between regulatory compliance and the functional lived experience of older adults) using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool. The research uses a weighted linear aggregation model based on user-centered design and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Thirty dwellings—apartments, single-story, and two-story houses—were evaluated in Chile’s Metropolitan Region. The model applies 40 indicators, normalized on a 0–100% scale across six dimensions, and weighted by older adults and caregivers. Results reveal fragmented accessibility gap: basic features often meet standards; yet important deficits remain in highly prioritized areas—autonomy, safety, and communication. The Global Performance Index (GPI) identifies “accessibility gaps” that traditional assessments miss. By combining objective metrics with subjective experiences, this study delivers a replicable, evidence-based framework. It shows that specific design choices, rather than architectural configuration, better support functional independence. The MCDA approach provides a robust tool for guiding housing rehabilitation and public policies that support aging in place and ensure homes meet the needs of an aging population. Full article