You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
  • Article
  • Open Access

13 May 2022

Endosonography and Endosonography Guided Needle Aspiration for Left Adrenal Gland Assessment in Lung Cancer Patients―10 Years’ Experience

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Endoscopy Unit, Pulmonary Hospital, Zakopane, Poland
2
Chair and Department of Thoracic Surgery of Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland
3
Department of Pathology, Pulmonary Hospital, Zakopane, Poland
4
Department of Applied Mathematics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer patients (LCP) require invasive evaluation of left adrenal glands (LAG) if distant metastases (M1b/1c) are suspected in CT or PET-CT. Only few studies showed utility of endosonography and particularly EUS-b-FNA as minimally invasive endoscopic method of LAG analysis. Material and Methods: A retrospective study of consecutive LCP was conducted in two pulmonology centers between January 2010 and December 2019. Records of complete endosonographic staging with use of single ultrasound bronchoscope or two scopes were overviewed. The analysis included cases of enlarged LAG (body size or limbs > 10 mm) examined and sampled by EUS-b-FNA or EUS-FNA. Results: 142 of 2596 LCP staged by complete endosonography (M: 88, F: 54 mean age 64.7) had enlarged LAG, which were biopsied by conventional EUS-FNA (52) and/or by EUS-b-FNA (90). Strong correlation with gland diameter (p < 0.001) was observed. The incidence of LAG metastases in analyzed group was 52.1% (74/142) and regarding histology: SCLC 76.9% (10/13), adenocarcinoma 66.7% (44/66), NSCLC 56.3% (9/16) and SCC 17.5% (7/40). A specificity and PPV for both methods were 100%. A sensitivity, accuracy and NPV for EUS-FNA were 91.7%, 96.2%, 93.3% and for EUS-b-FNA 88%, 93.3% and 87%, respectively and no significant differences for both methods were noted (p = 0.62, 0.44, 0.35). No severe complications afterall biopsies were observed. A six months clinical follow up included all negative LCP with enlarged LAG. Conclusions: After our study EUS-b-FNA seems to be a reasonable method of choice for LAG assesssment in LCP.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.