Next Article in Journal
Preface: VII Poster Sunset Session—ESSUAlg 2024
Previous Article in Journal
The Immune Tumor Microenvironment in Gliomas: May CITED2 Play a Role?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Prediction of Atmospheric Ozone Concentrations with a Temperature-Modulated Gas Sensor Array †

Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097178
Published: 11 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference)

Abstract

:
Ozone is one of the most important pollutant gases. The excellent sensitivity and low limit of detection of gas sensors based on Semiconducting Metal Oxides (SMOXs) make them ideal candidates to accurately monitor outdoor air quality. We present a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture that is trained on the resistance readout of a multi-pixel SMOX gas sensor array operated in temperature modulation. The trained model outperforms a ridge regressor in the quantification of ozone concentrations in real outdoor air.

1. Introduction

Tropospheric ozone (O3) is a reactive trace gas that is tightly linked to other natural and anthropogenic pollutants that act as ozone precursors [1]. To monitor air pollution on a global scale and maintain guidelines, small, cheap, and reliable sensor solutions are needed. Thanks to their low cost, excellent sensitivity, and low limit of detection, sensors based on Semiconducting Metal Oxides (SMOXs) are among the most commonly used in a plethora of applications, such as automotive, medical, safety, and environmental contexts [2]. To quantify analyte gases in a complex matrix, gas sensor arrays have been turned to, combining multiple, ideally orthogonal, sensing materials or sensor types [3]. Additionally, temperature modulation and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to be promising approaches for various analytical tasks [4]. In this work, we demonstrate the superior performance of a temperature-modulated SMOX sensor array in combination with CNNs in the prediction of ozone in real outdoor air.

2. Materials and Methods

An SGP30 (Sensirion AG, Stäfa, Switzerland) sensor array was operated outside of our laboratory on the Morgenstelle Campus in Tübingen, Germany. The operating temperature was cycled continuously, increasing from room temperature to 375 °C and decreasing again, with a dip of the temperature in the middle [4]. For calibration and testing, the ozone concentration, as published by the German Umweltbundesamt (UBA), from the closest air-quality monitoring station (Tübingen Derendingen—DEBW107) was used [5]. The approach is similar to the one described by Mueller et al. for the field calibration of sensor units in Zurich [6]. The complete data set covers two months, and the hourly mean concentration was interpolated using cubic splines to yield concentrations corresponding to the measurement time of the sensor array.

3. Results and Discussion

The predicted ozone concentrations of the test set are plotted against the real ones for the best-performing CNN and ridge regression model in Figure 1.
The CNN model outperforms the ridge regression with mean relative errors in the test set of 16.1% and 26.9%, respectively. There are significantly fewer outliers for the CNN prediction, and the trend line is closely followed, especially for concentrations above 30 ppm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B. and A.K.; data analysis, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, N.B.; supervision, U.W. and N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fuhrer, J.; Martin, M.V.; Mills, G.; Heald, C.L.; Harmens, H.; Hayes, F.; Sharps, K.; Bender, J.; Ashmore, M.R. Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 8785–8799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Izawa, K.; Ulmer, H.; Staerz, A.; Weimar, U.; Barsan, N. Application of SMOX-based sensors. In Gas Sensors Based on Conducting Metal Oxides; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 217–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stetter, J.R.; Penrose, W.R. Understanding chemical sensors and chemical sensor arrays (Electronic Noses): Past, Present, and Future. Sens. Update 2002, 10, 189–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kobald, A.; Weimar, U.; Barsan, N. Regression Model for the Prediction of Pollutant Gas Concentrations with Temperature Modulated Gas Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN), Aveiro, Portugal, 29 May–1 June 2022; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dokumentation|Umweltbundesamt. Available online: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/luft/luftdaten/doc (accessed on 14 October 2022).
  6. Mueller, M.; Meyer, J.; Hueglin, C. Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2017, 10, 3783–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Predicted vs. real concentrations of ozone for (a) the CNN model and (b) the ridge regression.
Figure 1. Predicted vs. real concentrations of ozone for (a) the CNN model and (b) the ridge regression.
Proceedings 97 00178 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kobald, A.; Weimar, U.; Bârsan, N. Prediction of Atmospheric Ozone Concentrations with a Temperature-Modulated Gas Sensor Array. Proceedings 2024, 97, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097178

AMA Style

Kobald A, Weimar U, Bârsan N. Prediction of Atmospheric Ozone Concentrations with a Temperature-Modulated Gas Sensor Array. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kobald, Arne, Udo Weimar, and Nicolae Bârsan. 2024. "Prediction of Atmospheric Ozone Concentrations with a Temperature-Modulated Gas Sensor Array" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097178

APA Style

Kobald, A., Weimar, U., & Bârsan, N. (2024). Prediction of Atmospheric Ozone Concentrations with a Temperature-Modulated Gas Sensor Array. Proceedings, 97(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097178

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop