In recent years, plastic use and pollution have gained a lot of attention. Plastic particles have been identified from the Mariana Trench [1] to high mountains [2]. However, the impact of plastic goes beyond that of particles [3]. Plastics are chemically very diverse. In addition to the principal polymeric component, plastics contain over 10,000 different additives [4] that may be non-intentional (e.g., production impurities) or intentional (functional) for obtaining certain properties. Flexibility is an important property for which plasticizers, a group of functional additives, are used. Until recently, phthalates have been the most widely used plasticizers, but advanced knowledge on the hazardous properties of several commonly used phthalate plasticizers has led to their strict regulation in the European Economic Area since 2020. This has created the need for alternative plasticizers, especially in sensitive human applications. The plastic industry has started producing and using novel non-phthalate plasticizers and high-molecular-weight phthalate plasticizers to the extent that they have become emerging contaminants [5,6]. Due to their hydrophobicity, plasticizers sorb to particulate matter and tend to accumulate in, e.g., wastewater treatment sludge. In the current research, sludge from wastewater treatment plants was sampled from all over Estonia (20 samples) to analyse the occurrence of selected novel plasticizers in the Estonian environment. Samples were analysed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The first results showed that the most widely used DEHT (Bis(2-ethylhexylterephthalate), DPHP (Di(2-propylheptyl)phthalate), DINCH (1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid diisonyl ester) were above the GC-MS quantification limits in the majority of the analysed samples, and their levels were comparable to those of the regulated phthalate plasticizer DEHP (Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.H.; methodology, H.V.; software, H.V.; investigation, M.H. and H.V.; resources, M.H.; data curation, M.H. and H.V.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.; writing—review and editing, I.B.; project administration, M.H.; funding acquisition, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Estonian Research Council grant PRG1427.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The wastewater treatment plants leaders’ willingness to cooperate is highly appreciated. Sampling was performed by Janek Reinik. The authors wish to thank Regine Nagorka and Jan Koschorreck from the German Environment Agency for advising on the plasticizer GC-MS protocol’s optimization.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Jamieson, A.J.; Brooks, L.S.R.; Reid, W.D.K.; Piertney, S.B.; Narayanaswamy, B.E.; Linley, T.D. Microplastics and synthetic particles ingested by deep-sea amphipods in six of the deepest marine ecosystems on Earth. Roy. Soc. Open sci. 2019, 6, 180667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsering, T.; Sillanpää, M.; Viitala, M.; Reinikainen, S.-P. Variation of microplastics in the shore sediment of high-altitude lakes of the Indian Himalaya using different pretreatment methods. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 849, 157870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zimmermann, L.; Dierkes, G.; Ternes, T.A.; Völker, C.; Wagner, M. Benchmarking the in Vitro Toxicity and Chemical Composition of Plastic Consumer Products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11467–11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiesinger, H.; Wang, Z.; Hellweg, S. Deep Dive into Plastic Monomers, Additives, and Processing Aids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 9339–9351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemke, N.; Murawski, A.; Lange, R.; Weber, T.; Apel, P.; Dębiak, M.; Koch, H.M.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Substitutes mimic the exposure behaviour of REACH regulated phthalates—A review of the German HBM system on the example of plasticizers. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2021, 236, 113780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagorka, R.; Birmili, W.; Schulze, J.; Koschorreck, J. Diverging trends of plasticizers (phthalates and non-phthalates) in indoor and freshwater environments—why? Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022, 34, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).