You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

8 July 2024

Beyond the Orthodoxy: An Overview of the Potential of ‘Other’ Coffee Species for Crop Use and Their Associated Challenges †

Crops & Global Change, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK
Presented at the International Coffee Convention 2024, Mannheim, Germany, 17–18 October 2024.
This article belongs to the Proceedings ICC 2024

Abstract

Coffea arabica (Arabica) and C. canephora (Robusta, Conilon) have satisfied the requirements of the coffee sector for the last 125 years. In the face of myriad challenges, most notably climate change, the coffee species crop portfolio requires diversification to ensure the long-term sustainability of coffee production. In addition, the specialty coffee sector relies on continual diversification and creativity to satisfy the requirements of its adherents, including the enrichment and diversification of the sensory experience. In this contribution, a review is presented on the status of ‘other’ coffee species to supplement C. arabica and C. canephora, based on research and first-hand experience. The aim is to address misinformation (e.g., global production figures, yields, climate tolerances, and cup profiles) concerning wild and ‘other’ species, identify opportunities, and highlight constraints. In the short-term, Libericoid coffee species, including C. liberica (Liberica) and C. dewevrei (Excelsa) coffee, offer substantial opportunities, especially for climate resilience. Over the longer term, other species (such as C. stenophylla) and inter-species hybrids offer considerable promise. Unlike C. arabica and C. canephora, research and development for other Coffea crop species is in its infancy and will require significant development. One of the other major constraints for Coffea crop species development is access to genetic resources. In the face of climate change, the coffee breeding challenge is now more demanding than ever.

Funding

This research was funded by the Darwin Initiative (UK) [Project 27-014], the Amar-Franses and Foster-Jenkins Trust, the Calleva Foundation, the Jean Rose Legacy, and Sucafina.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.