Keywords:
sustainable; energy; production; process; CO2 carbon capture; pinch; assessment; coal-fire Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies play a critical role in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, which is essential for achieving global climate goals. Pinch assessment techniques offer a systematic approach to optimizing carbon capture efficiency and energy utilization within these facilities. By integrating heat exchange networks and identifying optimal heat transfer points, a pinch analysis enables the reduction in energy consumption and the environmental impact associated with carbon capture processes. In the context of coal-fired power plants, achieving high-purity CO2 capture is a key objective. The use of a 30% MEA solution, despite introducing an initial 17.6% energy premium, results in a significant 12.3% reduction in overall energy consumption. This translates to a substantial 50% decrease in energy requirements for carbon capture operations, along with an impressive 90% CO2 capture efficiency. These findings underscore the potential of pinch assessment techniques to enhance the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of carbon capture technologies. Furthermore, the implementation of a pinch analysis offers a pathway towards achieving cleaner energy production and reducing environmental footprints. The systematic optimization of heat exchange networks not only leads to energy savings but also contributes to operational efficiency improvements within coal-fired power plants. By strategically matching hot and cold streams, the consumption of water and energy in carbon capture processes can be minimized, paving the way for greener and more sustainable power generation practices. In conclusion, the comprehensive application of pinch assessment techniques presents a promising opportunity for enhancing carbon capture efficiency and advancing clean energy technologies in coal-fired power plants.
Author Contributions
N.J.: did the literature review part of the research and the conclusion part of the research findings. I.C.: data collection and data analysis. O.F.W.: methodology development and experimentation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).