Next Article in Journal
The Response to Impactful Interactivity on Spectators’ Engagement in a Digital Game
Next Article in Special Issue
StARboard & TrACTOr: Actuated Tangibles in an Educational TAR Application
Previous Article in Journal
Preschoolers’ STEM Learning on a Haptic Enabled Tablet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Decades of Touchable and Walkable Virtual Reality for Blind and Visually Impaired People: A High-Level Taxonomy
Article

The Cost of Production in Elicitation Studies and the Legacy Bias-Consensus Trade off

1
Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Department of Computer Science, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
3
Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4(4), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040088
Received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 2 December 2020 / Published: 4 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Human–Computer Interaction)
Gesture elicitation studies are a popular means of gaining valuable insights into how users interact with novel input devices. One of the problems elicitation faces is that of legacy bias, when elicited interactions are biased by prior technologies use. In response, methodologies have been introduced to reduce legacy bias. This is the first study that formally examines the production method of reducing legacy bias (i.e., repeated proposals for a single referent). This is done through a between-subject study that had 27 participants per group (control and production) with 17 referents placed in a virtual environment using a head-mounted display. This study found that over a range of referents, legacy bias was not significantly reduced over production trials. Instead, production reduced participant consensus on proposals. However, in the set of referents that elicited the most legacy biased proposals, production was an effective means of reducing legacy bias, with an overall reduction of 11.93% for the chance of eliciting a legacy bias proposal. View Full-Text
Keywords: legacy bias; elicitation; gesture; Wizard of Oz; methodology legacy bias; elicitation; gesture; Wizard of Oz; methodology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, A.S.; Garcia, J.; De Zayas, F.; Hernandez, F.; Sharp, J.; Ortega, F.R. The Cost of Production in Elicitation Studies and the Legacy Bias-Consensus Trade off. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040088

AMA Style

Williams AS, Garcia J, De Zayas F, Hernandez F, Sharp J, Ortega FR. The Cost of Production in Elicitation Studies and the Legacy Bias-Consensus Trade off. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2020; 4(4):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Adam S., Jason Garcia, Fernando De Zayas, Fidel Hernandez, Julia Sharp, and Francisco R. Ortega 2020. "The Cost of Production in Elicitation Studies and the Legacy Bias-Consensus Trade off" Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, no. 4: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040088

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop