You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
  • Reply
  • Open Access

24 September 2024

Reply to Bouva et al. Comment on “Dijkstra et al. A False-Negative Newborn Screen for Tyrosinemia Type 1—Need for Re-Evaluation of Newborn Screening with Succinylacetone. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 66”

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Section of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
3
Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
4
Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
This article belongs to the Special Issue Newborn Screening for Disorders of Amino Acid Metabolism
We thank the authors for their comments []. We are happy that they agree with the content of the report [] and underline the importance of having optimal cut-off values of succinylacetone in order to—on the one hand—not miss patients like the one presented in this report and, on the other hand, to exclude false positive results, for example, due to a MAAI deficiency. As stated in the original article (Van Vliet et al. 2023, []), this might mean that the succinylacetone cut-off in the newborn screening needs to be lowered, while adding additional biomarkers that can be used to distinguish children with mild Tyrosinemia type I who need treatment from those with MAAI deficiency, who do not need treatment at all.
Regarding this aim, the results from the mutual project on the improvement of newborn screening for Tyrosinemia type I, as mentioned in the comment, are needed.
We further call attention to other institutes who have children with a (suspected) MAAI deficiency to send us dried blood spots and urine to increase our knowledge on MAAI deficiency.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bouva, M.J.; Maase, R.E.; van Elburg, R.M. Comment on Dijkstra et al. A False-Negative Newborn Screen for Tyrosinemia Type 1—Need for Re-Evaluation of Newborn Screening with Succinylacetone. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 66. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dijkstra, A.M.; Evers-van Vliet, K.; Heiner-Fokkema, M.R.; Bodewes, F.A.J.A.; Bos, D.K.; Zsiros, J.; van Aerde, K.J.; Koop, K.; van Spronsen, F.J.; Lubout, C.M.A. A False-Negative Newborn Screen for Tyrosinemia Type 1—Need for Re-Evaluation of Newborn Screening with Succinylacetone. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. van Vliet, K.; Dijkstra, A.M.; Bouva, M.J.; van der Krogt, J.; Bijsterveld, K.; van der Sluijs, F.; de Sain-van der Velden, M.G.; Koop, K.; Rossi, A.; Thomas, J.A.; et al. Maleic acid is a biomarker for maleylacetoacetate isomerase deficiency; implications for newborn screening of tyrosinemia type 1. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2023, 46, 1104–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.