Contemporary clinical medicine relies on the integration of clinical observation with physiological and pathological mechanisms to improve diagnosis, therapeutic decision-making, and patient outcomes. However, most current biomedical research interprets these mechanisms predominantly through the lens of upward emergence, according to which higher-order biological
[...] Read more.
Contemporary clinical medicine relies on the integration of clinical observation with physiological and pathological mechanisms to improve diagnosis, therapeutic decision-making, and patient outcomes. However, most current biomedical research interprets these mechanisms predominantly through the lens of upward emergence, according to which higher-order biological functions arise from the interaction of simpler lower-level components. Although indispensable for understanding visceral diseases, this perspective provides only partial access to biological complexity. Accumulating evidence from neuroscience, developmental biology, endocrinology, psychiatry, and regenerative medicine shows that higher-level systemic functions can also reorganize, modulate, or generate lower-level structures, a phenomenon known as downward emergence. Together, upward and downward emergence form a bidirectional framework that more accurately reflects the complex organizational pattern of biological systems. This editorial argues that clinical practice and biomedical research must explicitly acknowledge this bidirectional dynamic, as many diseases (including malignancy) cannot be fully understood through upward emergence alone. Downward emergent processes explain phenomena such as morphogenesis, regeneration, matrix remodeling, immunological reprogramming, endocrine-neurovegetative integration, and forms of pathological transformation that are difficult to interpret through classical reductionism. Viewing cancer as the pathological expression of a disturbed supracellular program provides a coherent explanation of its complex biology and highlights the possibility that malignant progression could be responsive to higher-order regulatory instructions. In this context, the
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences is undertaking a conceptual and editorial realignment, positioning itself as a journal of bidirectional emergence in health and disease. Rather than diminishing its clinical mission, this shift strengthens it by providing a more comprehensive framework for understanding physiological and pathological organization, one that integrates structure–function and function–structure relationships. As medicine moves toward increasingly integrative and mechanistic models of disease, adopting a bidirectional perspective becomes not only scientifically justified but also necessary for advancing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic innovation, and the development of novel supracellular strategies for human health.
Full article
