Next Article in Journal
Saccharomyces arboricola and Its Hybrids’ Propensity for Sake Production: Interspecific Hybrids Reveal Increased Fermentation Abilities and a Mosaic Metabolic Profile
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiological and Metagenomic Analysis to Assess the Effect of Container Material on the Microbiota of Feta Cheese during Ripening
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Characterization of Yeasts from Bombino Bianco, a Grape Variety of Apulian Region, and Selection of an Isolate as a Potential Starter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality

Departamento de Química y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria S/N, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Fermentation 2020, 6(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010013
Submission received: 13 January 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2020 / Accepted: 16 January 2020 / Published: 19 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality)
Since the beginning of enology and fermentation research, wine quality has been parametrized from a chemical and sensory point of view. The main chemical compounds employed nowadays to parameterize the quality of wine or other fermented beverages are acids, polyphenols, volatile particles, and polysaccharide compounds [1]. All these chemical compounds directly influence sensory parameters commonly perceived by consumers such as general acidity, variety character, aroma quality, structure, and overall impression [1].
Before starting to study technologies that enhance alcoholic fermentation quality parameters, there is a need to reduce the incidence of spoilage microorganisms such as Brettanomyces/Dekkera or Zygosaccharomyces rouxii able to produce undesirable molecules such as ethyl phenols or acetic acid [2,3] that mask the influence of positive molecules. Traditionally additives such as SO2 were used to inhibit these undesirable microorganisms. However, modern legislation started to regulate their use due to allergenic food safety problems [4]. A new technology that reduces the incidence of spoilage microorganisms without generating any health collateral effects for specific consumers, is the use of bio controller technologies [3]. Selected strains of yeast species such as Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Metschnikowia pulcherrima have been proven to be especially efficient against undesirable spoilage microorganisms [3].
Color is the first perception that a wine consumer appreciate in a sensory analysis. This quality parameter depends mainly on the anthocyanin concentration. Modern enology has studied ways to increase the extraction and to increase the stability of these molecules during the winemaking process. Recent technologies such as must replacement and hot pre-fermentative maceration increase the phenolic content and enhance the chromatic characteristics of wine while inactivating polyphenol oxidases enzymes able to degrade colored molecules and promoting condensation between anthocyanins and tannins [5]. Other modern technologies to increase wine color from a microbiological point of view are related to the production of highly stable forms of anthocyanins during alcoholic fermentation. Specific yeasts are able to produce high levels of pyruvic acid that increases the formation of high stable anthocyanins such as vitisin A [1,6] or allow to avoid the malolactic fermentation process [7,8] where color intensity usually gets reduced.
The modern food safety standards demanded by most popular food distributors require wines free of hazards compounds. Additionally, most countries start to stablish legal limits for some hazardous molecules. This fact oblige winemakers to control these undesirable compounds form a winemaking point of view. The main parameters to control are ochratoxin A, biogenic amines [9], ethyl carbamate, sulfur dioxide, allergens, pesticides, genetically modified organisms, physical hazards and phthalates [4].
Modern wine consumers usually prefer wines with moderate ethanol levels. This fact promoted the development of new strategies to reduce the high ethanol levels, especially in warm viticulture areas. One interesting strategy is the use of less efficient yeasts than S. cerevisiae in the conversion of sugar into ethanol. Sequential fermentation inoculations involving Hanseniaspora uvarum show interesting results in ethanol reduction while also increase wine quality parameters such as fruity aroma or color intensity [10]. Additionally, climate change is making it difficult in some countries/regions to control some quality parameters during alcoholic fermentation such as the presence of undesirable microorganisms, excessive sugar, lack of acidity, high pH, imbalanced color, undesirable flavors or food safety problems. Modern wine microbiology management offers interesting alternatives to mitigate these problems [11].
Although traditionally some non-Saccharomyces species have been considered spoilage microorganisms [2]. The use of some specific non-Saccharomyces species allow to control and to improve several wine quality parameters [1,12]. The most popular ones are Torulaspora delbrueckii [13], Lachancea thermotolerans [14,15,16], Metschnikowia pulcherrima [12,17], Schizosaccharomyces pombe [18], Hanseniaspora uvarum [10] and Pichia kluyveri [12]. Some groups are studying the microbiota of vineyards and soils to look for other microorganism different from S. cerevisiae able to enhance quality parameters of alcoholic and malolactic fermentation [19].
Modern biotechnologies based on the use of some conventional and non-conventional yeasts allow to produce wine or beer with functional properties for human health [20]. The last studies show interesting results to improve the content of specific neuroprotectives and neurotrasmitters such as serotonin or melatonin [20].
Most studies involving fermentative industries are focused on alcoholic fermentation. However, during the last decade the knowledge regarding malolactic fermentation has increased due to the industrial difficulties that this process shows in some occasions. The use of lactic bacteria species different from Oenococus oeni and the use of combinations of non-Saccharomyces and lactic bacteria are of current interest [21]. Combinations between Hanseniaspora uvarum, S. cerevisiae and Lactobacilus plantarum show improvements in malolactic fermentation time, wine body and aroma [21].
Other new alcoholic beverages different from wine and beer start to be developed and optimized. One of those modern alternatives to grape wine is cashew apple fermentation. This alcoholic beverage show interesting properties such as low ethanol content and significant amounts of antioxidants such as ascorbic acid or polyphenols. The fermentation process of cashew apple has been optimized using Hanseniospora guillermondii that increases phenyl ethanol and acetate ester [22]. Additionally, the fermentation industry is being optimized in industries different from wine, beer or other alcoholic industries. One interesting example of this is the optimization of itaconic acid production using Aspergillus terrus [23].
Saccharomyces cerevisiae remains the main option to perform alcoholic fermentation due to its high fermentation reliability. Nevertheless, the genome of S. cerevisiae is huge and there is a high variability depending on the selected strain. The use of commercial strains can produce standardized wines without personal differentiations. For that reason, some researchers are developing S. cerevisiae selection processes applied to specific regions and grape varieties to enhance their typicity, a good example is Narince wines [24]. Specific selected autochthonous S. cerevisae strains are able to enhance specific esters and terpenes that increase the sensory quality parameters such as floral and fruity characters. Selections of S. cerevisiae strains from “Vinos de Madrid” viticultural region (D.O.) show a way to preserve regional sensory properties different from those of commercial strains that promote biodiversity while improve the personality of wine in parameters such as fruity or floral characters [25]. Recent studies for Bombino bianc wine show how it is possible to select specific S. cerevisiae strains able to enhance arbutin splitting (β-glucosidase) and with moderate pectolytic activity that improves the quality of wine [26].

References

  1. Benito, Á.; Calderón, F.; Benito, S. The Influence of Non-Saccharomyces Species on Wine Fermentation Quality Parameters. Fermentation 2019, 5, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Benito, S.; Palomero, F.; Morata, A.; Calderón, F.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. A method for estimating Dekkera/Brettanomyces populations in wines. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kuchen, B.; Maturano, Y.P.; Mestre, M.V.; Combina, M.; Toro, M.E.; Vazquez, F. Selection of native non-Saccharomyces yeasts with biocontrol activity against spoilage yeasts in order to produce healthy regional wines. Fermentation 2019, 5, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Benito, S. The Management of Compounds that Influence Human Health in Modern Winemaking from an HACCP Point of View. Fermentation 2019, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Piccardo, D.; González-Neves, G.; Favre, G.; Pascual, O.; Canals, J.M.; Zamora, F. Impact of Must Replacement and Hot Pre-Fermentative Maceration on the Color of Uruguayan Tannat Red Wines. Fermentation 2019, 5, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Benito, S.; Palomero, F.; Gálvez, L.; Morata, A.; Calderón, F.; Palmero, D.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Quality and composition of red wine fermented with Schizosaccharomyces pombe as sole fermentative yeast, and in mixed and sequential fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 52, 376. [Google Scholar]
  7. Benito, Á.; Calderón, F.; Benito, S. Combined use of S. pombe and L. thermotolerans in winemaking. Beneficial effects determined through the study of wines’ analytical characteristics. Molecules 2016, 21, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Benito, A.; Calderón, F.; Benito, S. The combined use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Lachancea thermotolerans—Effect on the anthocyanin wine composition. Molecules 2017, 22, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mylona, A.E.; Del Fresno, J.M.; Palomero, F.; Loira, I.; Bañuelos, M.A.; Morata, A.; Calderón, F.; Benito, S.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Use of Schizosaccharomyces strains for wine fermentation—Effect on the wine composition and food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 232, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mestre, M.V.; Maturano, Y.P.; Gallardo, C.; Combina, M.; Mercado, L.; Toro, M.E.; Carrau, F.; Vazquez, F.; Dellacassa, E. Impact on sensory and aromatic profile of low ethanol malbec wines fermented by sequential culture of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae native yeasts. Fermentation 2019, 5, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Berbegal, C.; Fragasso, M.; Russo, P.; Bimbo, F.; Grieco, F.; Spano, G.; Capozzi, V. Climate changes and food quality: The potential of microbial activities as mitigating strategies in the wine sector. Fermentation 2019, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Dutraive, O.; Benito, S.; Fritsch, S.; Beisert, B.; Patz, C.-D.; Rauhut, D. Effect of Sequential Inoculation with Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces Yeasts on Riesling Wine Chemical Composition. Fermentation 2019, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Benito, S. The impact of Torulaspora delbrueckii yeast in winemaking. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 3081–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vilela, A. Lachancea thermotolerans, the Non-Saccharomyces Yeast that Reduces the Volatile Acidity of Wines. Fermentation 2018, 4, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Benito, S. The impacts of Lachancea thermotolerans yeast strains on winemaking. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 6775–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Porter, T.J.; Divol, B.; Setati, M.E. Lachancea yeast species: Origin, biochemical characteristics and oenological significance. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruiz, J.; Belda, I.; Beisert, B.; Navascués, E.; Marquina, D.; Calderón, F.; Rauhut, D.; Santos, A.; Benito, S. Analytical impact of Metschnikowia pulcherrima in the volatile profile of Verdejo white wines. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8501–8509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Benito, S. The impacts of Schizosaccharomyces on winemaking. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 4291–4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alonso, A.; De Celis, M.; Ruiz, J.; Vicente, J.; Navascués, E.; Acedo, A.; Ortiz-Álvarez, R.; Belda, I.; Santos, A.; Gómez-Flechoso, M.Á.; et al. Looking at the origin: Some insights into the general and fermentative microbiota of vineyard soils. Fermentation 2019, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Vilela, A. The importance of yeasts on fermentation quality and human health-promoting compounds. Fermentation 2019, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Du Plessis, H.; Du Toit, M.; Nieuwoudt, H.; Van der Rijst, M.; Hoff, J.; Jolly, N. Modulation of wine flavor using Hanseniaspora uvarum in combination with different Saccharomyces cerevisiae, lactic acid bacteria strains and malolactic fermentation strategies. Fermentation 2019, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gamero, A.; Ren, X.; Lamboni, Y.; de Jong, C.; Smid, E.J.; Linnemann, A.R. Development of a low-alcoholic fermented beverage employing cashew apple juice and non-conventional yeasts. Fermentation 2019, 5, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Komáromy, P.; Bakonyi, P.; Kucska, A.; Tóth, G.; Gubicza, L.; Bélafi-Bakó, K.; Nemestóthy, N. Optimized pH and its control strategy lead to enhanced itaconic acid fermentation by Aspergillus terreus on glucose substrate. Fermentation 2019, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Çelik, Z.D.; Erten, H.; Cabaroglu, T. The influence of selected autochthonous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on the physicochemical and sensory properties of narince wines. Fermentation 2019, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. García, M.; Esteve-Zarzoso, B.; Crespo, J.; Cabellos, J.M.; Arroyo, T. Influence of Native Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains from D.O. “Vinos de Madrid” in the Volatile Profile of White Wines. Fermentation 2019, 5, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Speranza, B.; Campaniello, D.; Petruzzi, L.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R.; Bevilacqua, A. Preliminary Characterization of Yeasts from Bombino Bianco, a Grape Variety of Apulian Region, and Selection of an Isolate as a Potential Starter. Fermentation 2019, 5, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benito, S. Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality. Fermentation 2020, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010013

AMA Style

Benito S. Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality. Fermentation. 2020; 6(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benito, Santiago. 2020. "Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality" Fermentation 6, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010013

APA Style

Benito, S. (2020). Modern Technologies and Their Influence in Fermentation Quality. Fermentation, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop