You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Publications
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

7 July 2022

A Comparison of Asian Law Journals Published in Asian and Western Countries

and
1
Judicial Research and Training Institute, 872 Janghang-Dong, Ilsandong-Gu, Goyang 10413, Korea
2
Department of Library and Information Science, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeoldaero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu 42601, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Publications2022, 10(3), 23;https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030023
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare Asian law journals published in Asia with those published in Western countries to determine the characteristics of the journals in relation to the geographic region in which they are published. In this study, Western countries refer to the Anglo-Saxon English-speaking countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom. Using the Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR), 12 Asian law journals published in Asia and 8 Asian law journals published in Western countries were analyzed for performance, authorship, and topical research areas. Human rights issues affecting Asian countries were more prevalent in journals published in Western countries. In terms of journal performance, Asian law journals published in Western countries had a higher h-index, SJR, and citation rate than those published in Asia. Journals published in Western countries are published by reputable commercial publishers or university presses, and journals published in Western countries have longer coverage years. These reasons likely contributed to better visibility, which resulted in better performance.

1. Introduction

Law journals play a crucial role in creating and exchanging scholarly knowledge in the field of law. The collection of law journals published in a particular region may indicate the availability of sources of law originating from that region since legal scholarship is often regarded as an indispensable source of law [1].
As Asia has increasingly drawn the world’s attention in recent years, this study will focus on Asian law journals. As developing nations emerged in the 21st century, the Asian region has become influential in the globalized world [2]. Despite this, it is not surprising that Asia has lagged behind Western countries in the production of legal research and has historically looked to the United States for guidance [3,4]. Compared to the United States, Asian legal journals that are visible globally have not been as widely available for researchers in the international community. One way to gauge the state of Asian legal scholarship today is to examine total journal production by region using the Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR) (https://www.scimagojr.com (accessed on 31 March 2022)). Law journals that are indexed by SJR are indexed in Scopus and are also considered international journals that meet the minimum international standard. Counting journals based on country of publication is one way to assess how a particular country or region performs in producing reputable international journals.
The SJR indexes law journals under the category of law but also includes many journals that focus on law-related areas (e.g., political science and social science journals). Regardless of this categorization, only 18 law journals are published in Asia, compared to other regions of the world. According to the 2020 SJR data, the leading regions that published law journals are Western Europe (441) and North America (216). The United Kingdom (232) and the United States (190) are the two main countries that produced journals published in Western Europe and North America, respectively. One common definition of “Western countries” is the English-speaking Anglo-Saxon countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom. Since these two countries are considered Western countries, we assume that most SJR-indexed journals in the law category are published in Western countries, although the meaning of the term “the West” in Western civilization varies and depends on who is using the term [5]. Thus, in this study, not all countries of continental Europe were considered as Western countries. When the term “Western countries” mainly is referred to the English-speaking Anglo-Saxon countries in assessing the law journals, there is a large gap between Western and non-Western countries.
Nonetheless, comparing Asian law journals published in Asia with those published in Western countries allows us to understand the potential impacts of publishing in Western countries and their characteristics according to their geographical locations. Thus, a particular interest of this study is law journals that are thematically related to the Asian region but are published in Western countries. For example, the Asia Pacific Law Review is an Asian journal published by a publisher from the United Kingdom. The Chinese Journal of International Law is a law journal that focuses on China but is published by Oxford University Press, a renowned publisher from the United Kingdom. Since SJR mainly covers international journals published in English, the production and distribution of law journals could be influenced by the geographical location of the publication.
Examining how and where legal research works are produced is important for many stakeholders involved in the publication process [6]. The stakeholders may include authors, publishers, institutions, editors, and even the home country. These stakeholders may have similar or competing interests in journal publications. Examining law journals based on their publication location may also shed light on the potential impact of publication location on legal topics, as well as the extent to which legal scholars collaborate to produce legal research works. Hence, the objective of this study was to examine how Asian journals published in Asia and those published in Western countries differ in terms of common bibliometric attributes such as the number of publications, author keywords, citations, publishers, country of publishers, authors, and author team size.

3. Methodology

The study examined Asian law journals indexed in 2020 SJR (http://www.scimagojr.com). Research data were collected and analyzed in April 2022. The SJR year 2020 was the last available year for this study. We collected our research data based on two types of Asian law journals: (1) those published in Asian countries and (2) journals published in Western countries. SJR provides many journal attributes, including country of publisher, h-index, number of documents published, SJR score, quartile of journals, coverage years, and citation rate. For the group of Asian law journals, we first considered all law journals published in the Law category in the SJR. Since the SJR contains a wide range of journals that are extremely loosely linked to law, the titles and scopes of these journals had to be reviewed individually. The result was that we identified 12 Asian law journals out of 18 journals published in Asia for the law category. For the group of Asian law journals published outside Asia, we first searched for law journals published in other regions that included either an Asian country name (e.g., China), the adjectival form of the country name (e.g., Chinese), or the name of the region (e.g., Asia). Then, the country in which these journals were published was manually checked. As a result, we found that a total of eight Asian law journals were published in Western countries.
These journals are listed in Table 1. A total of nine Asian countries are represented in this table. The Asian countries listed in this table are either populous (e.g., India) or countries with high-income economies (e.g., Singapore). Six of the eight Asian law journals published outside Asia are published in the United Kingdom, one in the Netherlands, and one in the United States. In this table, the term “regional focus” refers to a topic that is typically limited to Asia. In contrast, “country focus” refers to a specific Asian country that is generally covered by the journal. We considered various types of journal information, including the scope of journals available on their respective websites, Wikipedia, and other relevant websites.
Table 1. Asian Law Journals Published in Asia and Western Countries.
Of the 12 journals published in Asia under the SJR category of law, only the Journal of East Asia and International Law (JEAIL) appears to have a regional focus on Asia, whereas two journals (Frontiers of Law in China (FLC) and the Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (SJLS)) appear to be country focused (China and Singapore). Chinese Law and Government (CLG) is the only Asian journal published in Western countries that focuses on a particular country. In the SJR 2020 data, 33 Asian countries published at least one journal. However, only eight Asian countries publish law journals, and the publishing countries vary widely. Singapore and India publish two law journals, whereas the other Asian countries publish one. As shown, most Asian law journals published in Western countries are published in the United Kingdom. We visited the homepages of these journals to verify their status and collected data such as the year in which the journals were established.
Table 1 also shows varying types of legal studies. As the names of the journals indicate, four journals focus on comparative law (Indonesian Journal of International and Comparative Law (IJIC), Journal of International and Comparative Law (JICL), Asian Journal of Comparative Law (AJCL), and Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (CJCL)), while four others focus on international law (IJIC, JEAIL, Asian Journal of International Law (AJIL), and Chinese Journal of International Law (CJIL)), two on intellectual property rights (Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) and NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management (NJIPLM)), and one on human rights issues (Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law (APJHRL)). Only one of them is a law review journal and is published in a Western country.
In this study, UNIX scripting tools such as sed and awk [29,30] were used to find patterns of authorship in journals published by Asian and Western countries. Microsoft Excel was also used to analyze the results. Author keywords of articles published in each Asian law journal between 2000 and 2020 were also downloaded from Scopus. Analysis of author keywords revealed the legal research interests of authors who contributed to Asian law journals. Using VOSViewer software [31], the topic areas of legal journals published in Asia and in Western countries were compared based on the co-occurring networks of author keywords.

4. Journal Status and SJR Coverage Years

Table 2 shows the status of the various journals and the years of coverage by Scopus. SJR provided us with the status of open access (OA) journals. In OA journals, all articles are freely available online. According to SJR 2020 data, JIPR and UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UJLS) were the only OA journals published in Asia. Elsevier considers journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD) in its classification of open access journals [32]. In contrast to journals published in Asia, no Asian OA law journals are published in Western countries. The number of years covered is displayed for both Asian and Western journals. The average number of years covered by journals published in Asia (10.1) is slightly lower than the average number of years covered by journals published in Western countries (15.8).
Table 2. Open Access Status and SJR Coverage Years.

5. Publishers of Asian Law Journals

We compared the publishers of Asian law journals located in Asia with those in Western countries based on publisher’s age and establishment type (Table 3). Western publishers are generally much older than Asian publishers. Seven of the twelve publishers in Asia have been around since 2000, but in Western countries, almost all the publishers were founded before 1900s. Publishers in Asia are on average 46 years old, while they are 314.5 years old in Western countries. The type of journal publisher also differs slightly. Commercial companies, university presses, and non-profit organizations published law journals in Asian countries, while commercial companies and university presses published law journals in Western countries. Publishers in Western countries are all well-known. Taylor & Francis, Cambridge University Press, and Oxford University Press rank among the top 50 publishers in the world [33].
Table 3. Publishers of Asian Law Journals.

6. Performance Measurement of Asian Law Journals

SJR’s website provides a variety of information on the journal’s performances. Journal performance measurements for Asian law journals were obtained from SJR for 2020. These include total documents (2020), citation rate, h-index, and SJR score (Table 4). The total number of published documents in Asian law journals from Western countries was slightly higher than that of Asian law journals published in Asia. The citation rate is calculated by dividing the number of citations by the number of documents published in the last two years. The H-index takes into account both citation counts and the total number of documents published [34,35]. On average, the citation rate, h-index, and SJR scores were all higher for journals published in Western countries (0.37, 8.75, and 0.23, respectively) than for those published in Asia (0.13, 5.0, and 0.13, respectively). Elsevier uses the SJR score to rank and categorize its indexed journals into four quartiles (Q1 to Q4). The average SJR quartile of journals published in Western countries was lower than those published in Asia (2.6 versus 3.6).
Table 4. Performance Measurements of Asian Law Journals.

7. Countries of Publishers and Authors

We also examined the extent to which authors had published articles in law journals in their own countries. Table 5 shows the frequency of the publishers’ country and the first author’s country. Only first authors were considered, as these are usually the most accurately recorded in Scopus. The shaded cells indicate whether the country of a journal’s publisher matches the country of the first author. In 8 of 12 law journals published in Asia, the countries of the publisher match the most common country of the first author. In 2 of 12 law journals published in Asia, the publisher’s countries match the second most common country of the first author. In contrast, for law journals published in Western countries, none of the most common first author’s countries match the publisher’s country, although three of the publisher’s countries match the second most common first author’s country. In terms of the percentage of documents whose first authors were from the same country as the journal publisher, JILM was the highest (92.5%), while IJIC was the lowest (20.9%).
Table 5. Frequency of Publishers’ Country and the First Author’s Country.

8. Authorship of Asian Law Journals

Utilizing the Scopus data, the authorship of Asian law journals was analyzed in terms of international collaboration and author team size. Table 6 summarizes the results. This table shows the international collaboration intensity (ICI) and the international collaboration rate (ICR) for each journal. The ICI represents the number of publications that contain at least one researcher from outside the country, while the ICR represents the ratio of the ICI to the total number of publications [36]. The journal with the highest ICR is JICL (16.2%). On average, the ICR of journals published in Asia (2.2%) was slightly higher than those published in Western countries (1.9%). Author team size refers to how many authors are involved in producing an article. Journals published in Asia have a larger average author team size (2.2) than journals published in Western countries (1.4). Western countries have a median author team size of only 1.0, indicating that one author writes most articles in law journals. In general, the results suggest that collaboration is more common in Asian law journals published in Asia than in Western law journals.
Table 6. Authorship of Asian Law Journals Published in Asia and Western Countries.

9. Topical Areas of Asian Law Journals

We compared the topical areas of journals published in Asia and those published in Western countries based on author keywords. Figure 1 shows a VOSViewer diagram of author keywords for journals published in Asia and Western countries. Using the top 35 author keywords from each journal type, we examined the number of keywords for each journal type. The keywords relate to the topical areas of the journals published in each region. The size of the node indicates the frequency of occurrence of the keywords, and the lines indicate their co-occurrence. The frequency of keywords “intellectual property”, “copyright”, “trademark”, “infringement”, “innovation” and “intellectual property rights” in journals published in Asia indicates an interest in these topics, with “human rights” also appearing with a high frequency in journals published in Western countries. However, country names (i.e., “China”, “Indonesia”, and “Hong Kong”) were more frequently mentioned as keywords in journals published in Western countries. In comparison, topics on intellectual property were researched more often in journals published in Asia than in Western countries.
Figure 1. VOSViewer Representation of Author Keywords of Asian Law Journals.

10. Discussion and Conclusions

Thus far, we have compared Asian law journals published in Asia with those published in Western countries regarding performance, authorship, and topical research areas. We found that a relatively a few number of countries published Asian law journals as only eight Asian countries and three Western countries are represented in publishing law journals. The most notable difference is the type of publishers and the coverage years of journals. Publishers of Asian law journals in Asia are much younger than publishers of Asian law journals in the West. Judging by the publication years of the journals, Asian law journals published in Western countries have a longer publication period and produce more articles than those published in Asia. There are more non-profit organizations among Asian publishers than among Western publishers, which suggests a lack of commercial interest in law journals published in Asian countries. Most large commercial publishers are based in developed countries to maximize profits from their published journals [37]. We found that Asian law journal publishers are no different in this regard. Other notable differences between the two groups of journals are as follows.
First, the results show that Asian law journals published by Western publishers perform better on several journal evaluation indicators: h-index, SJR, and citation ratio. We need to consider the coverage years of a journal in reputable databases such as Scopus and WoS, as it takes a considerable amount of time for a journal to reach a high score in these metrics.
Second, unlike Western journals, Asian authors are more likely to publish in journals published in their own countries, and Asian journals published in Asian countries may heavily rely on contributions from authors in that country. In almost all Asian law journals published in Asia, the country of the publisher and the country of the first author were identical. An earlier study showed that a similar pattern was found in Asian journals published in the field of library and information science [38]. The result of this study also suggested that journals published in Asia lack internationality compared to those published in Western countries, as they rely heavily on contributions from authors in their own countries. In contrast, journals published in Western countries show a different pattern. While six Asian law journals were published in the United Kingdom, the most common country of the first author in these journals was not the United Kingdom.
Third, Asian law journals have generally shown a low level of collaboration. An earlier study by S. A. Shah et al. [39] suggested that single authorship is more common in law journals than in other disciplines. The difference was that, in the case of Asian law journals, the size of the author team and the frequency of international collaboration did not influence the citation rate.
Lastly, Western law journals have addressed human rights issues to a greater extent than those in Asia, whereas law journals published in Asia published more articles on intellectual property and copyright issues. The growing interest in topics related to human rights is consistent with the findings by Gulyamov and Rustambekov [40]. They suggest that human rights, cyber law, and counterterrorism were the most relevant legal research topics in 2020. In many Asian countries, human rights issues are politically sensitive [41], which may influence researchers to publish articles on human rights issues in law journals published in Western countries. Nevertheless, a relatively small number of articles on human rights issues have been published in law journals based in Asia since 2018.
We have highlighted differences between law journals published in Asian and Western countries. The impact of publishing in Western countries could be measured with the use of citation ratios and h-indices based on scientometrics. However, the differences in topical interests between journals published in Asian countries and those published in Western countries would be more interesting from the perspective of legal scholarship since they reflect contrastive research interests and perspectives.
Since the large multinational publishers are mostly based in Western countries, there seems to be an advantage to publishing in Western countries in terms of visibility. Large publishers such as Elsevier have expertise in publishing journals, have significant operating funding, and manage and publish many journals efficiently. Some have been in the publishing business for hundreds of years [42]. Thus, the increased visibility of law journals is likely due to their longer publication life and the fact that large commercial companies publish these journals. Although this study only examined a small set of data to examine the journal publishing patterns between the two regions, the results of this study suggest that it is useful to examine the topical area coverage based on journal articles published in differing regions in order to identify the contrastive publishing patterns.
Beyond legal studies, the results of this study suggest that a considerable amount of research with a non-Western regional or country focus could be published in Western countries. The results shown in this study can serve as a basis for conducting future studies in order to uncover regional differences in journal publications in other areas of study. Since many non-Western journals have been outsourced to large commercial companies in Western countries in recent years [43], the differences between Western and non-Western journals in other fields of study should be investigated to learn the effects of shifting the location of publication.

Author Contributions

The following contributions were made by the study authors: Conceptualization, E.S.K.; methodology, E.S.K. and E.K.; validation, E.K. and E.K.; formal analysis, E.S.K. and E.K.; investigation, E.S.K.; resources, E.S.K.; data curation, E.S.K. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.K. and E.K.; writing—review and editing, E.S.K. and E.K.; visualization, E.S.K. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shecaira, F. Legal scholarship as a source of law. In Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2013; pp. 35–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morreale, B.L. The Rise of Asian Lions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Adelaide, School of Social Sciences, Adelaide, Australia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gray, W. The challenge of Asian law. Int. Law J. 1995, 19, 1–8. Available online: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol19/iss1/1 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  4. Tan, C. Beyond the “moments” of law and development: Critical reflections on law and development scholarship in a globalized economy. Law Dev. Rev. 2019, 12, 285–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McNeill, W.H. What we mean by the West. ORBIS 1997, 41, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Argyrou, A. Making the case for case studies in empirical legal research. Utrecht Law Rev. 2017, 13, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Peruginelli, G.; Filippo, D.D.; Sanz-Casado, E. International visibilityand impactof national journals. A comparative study of Spanish and Italian legal journals. In Proceedings of the RESSH 2019—Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences & Humanities Conference, Valencia, Spain, 19–20 September 2019; Available online: https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/219361 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  8. Carnelley, M. In search of the perceived quality and impact of accredited South African law journals: Exploring the possibility of a ranking system. A baseline study: 2009–2014. Potchefstroom Electron. Law J. 2018, 21, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Peruginelli, G.; Stojanovski, J.; Elias, S.C.; Agnoloni, T. Assessment of law journals in Croatia, Italy and Spain. In Handbook on Research Assessment in the Social Sciences; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, D.; Singh, B. Contributions of Indian authors in the subject category law of the web of science core collection: A bibliometric analysis. BRICS Law J. 2020, 7, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murray, I.; Skead, N. “Who publishes where?”: Who publishes in Australia’s top law journals and which Australians publish in top global law journals? Univ. West. Aust. Law Rev. 2020, 47, 220–282. [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh, A.; Singh, S.; Rai, P. Trends of law journal publishing by Indian law schools. Int. J. Leg. Inf. 2020, 48, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Clatch, L.; Walters, A.; Borgida, E. How interdisciplinary? Taking stock of decision-making research at the intersection of psychology and law. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2020, 71, 541–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lv, H. Assessment of global law and psychiatry research in the period of 1993–2012: Review and forecast on research emphases and research trends (Part-II). Electron. Libr. 2017, 35, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parks, J. A bibliometric study of LIS literature related to academic law librarianship. Qual. Quant. Methods Libr. 2017, 29–39. Available online: http://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/360 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  16. Osorio, A.; Nielsen, S.; Christensen, R.K. Systematically reviewing American law and public administration: A call for dialogue and theory building. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov. 2021, 4, 100–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blakeney, M. The University of Western Australia Law Review: The first seventy years. Univ. West. Aust. Law Rev. 2018, 43, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Cohen, R.; Schreiber, N. The network of law reviews: Citation cartels, scientific communities, and journal rankings. Mod. Law Rev. 2019, 82, 240–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De la Rasilla, I. A very short history of international law journals (1869–2018). Eur. J. Int. Law 2018, 29, 137–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rech, W. International law as a political language, 1600–1859. In A History of International Law in Italy; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 48–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Macpherson, A.; Peterson, A. The rise of student law journals in Scotland. Jurid. Rev. 2017, 4, 207–217. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jamshed, J.; Naeem, S.; Ahmad, K. Analysis of criminal law literature: A bibliometric study from 2010–2019. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2020, 4296, 1–13. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4296 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  23. Shah, S.A.; Baladi, Z.H.; Ali, T. Bibliometric assessment of research productivity in the subject of contract law published in Scopus-Elsevier indexed journals from 1960–2019. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2021, 5212, 1–13. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5212 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  24. Shah, U.Y.; Loan, F.A.; Jan, N. Open access legal studies journals in DOAJ: An analytical study. In Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), Noida, India, 21–23 February 2018; pp. 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. László, C.; Gergő, H.; Márton, D. Twenty Years of Law Journal Publishing: A Comparative Analysis of International Publication Trends. Publ. Res. Q. 2022, 38, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  26. Møller, J. The West versus the rest: The debate on the great divergence. In State Formation, Regime Change, and Economic Development; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 151–162. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eun, Y.S. Beyond ‘the west/non-west divide’ in IR: How to ensure dialogue as mutual learning. Chin. J. Int. Politics 2018, 11, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeon, A.L. An overview of high impact law journals in Asian countries. UUM J. Leg. Stud. 2021, 12, 253–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aho, A.V.; Kernighan, B.W.; Weinberger, P.J. Awk—A pattern scanning and processing language. Softw. Pract. Exp. 1979, 9, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dougherty, D.; Robbins, A. Sed & Awk: UNIX Power Tools; O’Reilly Media Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSViewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Open Access Indicator 2015. Scopus to Launch Open Access Indicator for Journals on July 29. Available online: https://blog.scopus.com//posts/scopus-to-launch-open-access-indicator-for-journals-on-july-29#.VayHUk8V7vc.twitter (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  33. Wischenbart, R.; Fleischhacker, M.A. Global 50: The World Ranking of the Publishing Industry 2021; Wischenbart Content und Consulting: Vienna, Austria, 2021; Available online: https://www.wischenbart.com/page-60 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  34. Braun, T.; Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 2006, 69, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hodge, D.R.; Lacasse, J.R. Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors? Res. Soc. Work. Pract. 2011, 21, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C.A.; Solazzi, M. Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meneghini, R. Emerging journals: The benefits of and challenges for publishing scientific journals in and by emerging countries. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13, 106–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Kim, E.; Oh, D.G.; Yeo, J. Comparing JISTaP to similar LIS journals published in Asia: Authorship and topics. In Proceedings of the 4th I-LISS International Conference, Online, Chennai, India, 23–26 July 2021; Asok Kumar, S.K., Rajendran, P., Eds.; pp. 365–372. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shah, S.A.; Anjum, R.; Ali, T.; Alqarni, S.A.; Baladi, Z.H. Citation analysis of documents published in ten law journals indexed in Scopus-Elsevier database from 2010–2019. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2020, 4671, 1–11. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4671 (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  40. Gulyamov, S.; Rustambekov, I. Recommendations on the preparation and publication of scientific articles in international peer reviewed journals. Rev. Law Sci. 2020, 4, 132–140. [Google Scholar]
  41. Park, H.S. Human rights regime and East Asia: Major issues and assessments. In East Asia and the United Nations, Proceedings of the 9th Japan-Korea Seminar on the United Nations System, Tokyo, Japan, 11–12 December 2009; Waseda University: Tokyo, Japan, 2009; pp. 30–67. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, E. Publishing international library and information science journals: The changing landscape. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 2022, 09610006221090958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jamali, H.R.; Wakeling, S.; Abbasi, A. Scholarly journal publishing in Australia. Learn. Publ. 2022, 35, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access
Previous
Open Science Knowledge Production: Addressing Epistemological Challenges and Ethical Implications
Next