Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find attached my remarks and suggestions

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript ID processes-1381539 is interesting and concerns the still current issue related to the bisphenol A removal from aqueous solutions . It fully corresponds to the Processes journal profile.

In my opinion, this is a well-prepared manuscript.

Meets the standards for the technical language, presentation of research methodology, and discussion of the results.

Graphical abstract will be very useful for readers.

If the authors write about "low cost", the costs incurred in relation to other adsorbents should be presented. This should be completed in the discussion.

I believe that a used statistical analysis of the results is necessary in order to determine the significance of the differences between efficiency of methane production. Please introduce to methodology section.

In how many repetitions the experiments and analyses were performed. This should be supplemented in the research methodology.

Standard deviations, not just average values, should be included in the results, tables and graphs.

No axis descriptions in the charts and no units. It needs to be completed.

In my opinion, after the introduction of these additions, the manuscript may be published.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made the required revision and I now find the article suitable for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript has been improved agree with my comments and in my opinion it can be publish in current form.