Research on Erosion Wear of Slotted Screen Based on High Production Gas Field

The paper entitled "Research on erosion wear of slotted screen based on high production gas field" is very convoluted. I don't think students bother to read such a paper.

The weak points:

1. -There is no section called "Introduction" and no "Literature Review" section;

2. -The title "Figure 2. Sand sample and nozzle cage erosion diagram." This title is not appropriate for this type: no diagram appears in this figure

3. -It is not understood what is the unit of measurement for the physical size in the authors' expression "gas-oil ratio is 12,389 m3/t"

4. -The following sequence "Fig. 5(b) shows the wall shear scatter plot at different node coordinates along the z-axis of the screen, where the two screen outlets show higher wall shear, and the maximum is Passcal occurs at the top of the outlet (the top end of the yellow dashed box in figure(b) ). Fluid turbulence is more intense at the slotted sleeve outlet, and fluid shear is higher. The flow field in the slotted sleeve exhibits less turbulent kinetic energy as it moves away from the outlet (blue dashed area)." is unintelligible.

5. -There are no markings a) and b) respectively in Fig. 5, 6 and 8.

6. -How did you arrive at the idea of orthogonality in the following sentence:" The study formulated the following orthogonal analysis table simulation scheme to predict the degree of influence of several different sensitive factors on the evaluation index and to quantitatively calculate the maximum erosion rate in the tube by taking five level values for each factor and performing orthogonal tests according to the table developed in orthogonal table  [17] ."

7. - What allows you to brick: "F-value as the ratio of the two means, the higher the F, the more significant the differences between groups. P-value is the indicator of judgment, p-value of flow is less than 0.05, then the null hypothesis can be rejected.". Why do you reject "the null hypothesis"?

8. -In the sentence " Based on the maximum erosion rate data from the orthogonal test in Table 4, the values of the four independent variables are brought into Eq.(8), and the results are compared with the fitting function shown in Fig. 8(b) below.", you talk about Table 4. In the paper you do not have Table 4.

9. -In Fig. 8 right, you talk about regression. Is this approach correct?

10. - In figure 9 you graph "The contour of erosion rate in perforated pipe", and on page 7 you have the following section: "3.1. Effect of different factors on the erosion rate of screen". Basically, what are you studying: "pipe" or "screen"? Maybe you should find another formula for "screen".

11.       I would suggest a grammar check of the text. Here's another example: " The orthogonal tests were synthesized and quantitatively calculated to summarize several different sensitive factors on the erosion law of the screen, and listed in their primary and secondary order.". Hard to understand in English..