Next Article in Journal
Changes in Breathing Patterns after Surgery in Severe Laryngomalacia
Next Article in Special Issue
Speed, Change of Direction Speed, and Lower Body Power in Young Athletes and Nonathletes According to Maturity Stage
Previous Article in Journal
What Are the Psycho-Social and Information Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults Cancer Care Consumers with Intellectual Disability? A Systematic Review of Evidence with Recommendations for Future Research and Practice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The New Generation of Professional Soccer Talent Is Born under the Bias of the RAE: Relative Age Effect in International Male Youth Soccer Championships

by
Benito Pérez-González
1,
Jairo León-Quismondo
2,*,
José Bonal
2,
Pablo Burillo
2 and
Álvaro Fernández-Luna
2
1
Faculty of Business and Communication, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain
2
Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Calle Tajo S/N, Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2021, 8(12), 1117; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121117
Submission received: 11 November 2021 / Revised: 23 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Team Sports for Young Athletes)

Abstract

:
In 2019, numerous championships of youth categories soccer national teams were held. In the present study, we analyzed the existence of the Relative Age Effect (RAE) in four major male championships that, due to their importance and participating teams, most likely brought together the great bulk of the players who will dominate professional soccer in the next decade. Participants were professional and amateur youth male soccer players who participated in the last international championships: UEFA European Under-21 Championship (2017–2019); UEFA European Under-19 Championship (2019); South American Youth Football Championship (also known as Conmebol U-20) (2019); and FIFA U-20 World Cup (2019), with 823 players (20.25 ± 0.84 years). In the four championships analyzed, the existence of RAE was found for all players (p < 0.001). Analyzing the players when considering their position on the pitch and their championship, RAE was found, statistically significant, in 10 of the 16 classifications. New generations of elite soccer players arrive with a clear bias in the selection of talent; an unfair bias, based on unequal opportunities in early categories, which should be reviewed by sports authorities.

1. Introduction

Talent development is a current concern in most sports organizations, struggling to create adequate career paths for players or athletes from the grassroots. In most sports institutions, the organizational strategy at early ages for grouping players or athletes follows a cutoff criterion, similar to most of the school systems [1]. This means that players are grouped according to their date of birth instead of their physical or psychical development. The differences in growth and maturity of players result in disparities of performances, opportunities, and, consequently, unequal presence in competitions according to their age and birth month. This effect of asymmetry in the birth distribution is known as the Relative Age Effect (RAE) [2]. It is an extensively studied bias descriptor that reveals the existence of a lower number of players born in the last months close to the cutoff. In sports, the cutoff is set as 1st of January in most of the competitions, so players born in the firsts months of the year have improved prospects in sports [3].
The RAE was first questioned by Grondin et al. [4] and explored shortly after by Barnsley et al. [5]. Since then, this bias effect has been extensively studied in different sports, including team sports such as soccer [6], basketball [7,8], hockey [9], rugby [10,11], futsal [12], handball [13], baseball [14], Australian football [15] water-polo [6], and volleyball [6]; and individual sports like athletics [16,17,18], alpine ski racing [19], swimming [20,21], tennis [22], and even golf, horse racing, sumo, or badminton [23]. As a consequence, there is a large number of articles that have led to diverse literature reviews and meta-analyses that try to make more accessible all this information [1,24].
One of the sports that has received more attention on RAE is soccer [1]. It is one of the most explored sports regarding asymmetry in the birth distribution, with fewer players born in the last quarter of the year [12]. Researchers have focused on diverse leagues from countries such as the United States [25], Argentina [3], or China [26]. In Europe, this interest has led to work in specific countries and national leagues [27], proving that this phenomenon is present in the top five European leagues (e.g., Premier League, LaLiga, Bundesliga, Serie A, and Ligue 1). This includes research on England [28], Spain [29,30], Germany [31], Italy [32], and France [33]. RAE has also been explored in international competitions such as the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Championship or the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) competitions. For example, a work by González-Víllora et al. [34] studied Under-17, Under-19, and Under-21 elite soccer players in the UEFA Champions League, confirming that RAE was present in those categories. Another example is the case of FIFA competitions, in which Saavedra-García et al. [35] established that RAE exists in male FIFA competitions and its effect is dynamic and complex.
This disparity of distribution of players according to participants’ age is especially critical for youth. Physical and conditioning variables seem to be the causes for higher chances of older players being chosen in the selection process in comparison to younger ones [12]. In soccer, the multifactorial nature of the sport, where many diverse factors interact (anthropometric, body composition, somatotype, physical and physiological factors, or soccer-specific skills) makes it even more difficult to detect new talents at early ages [36,37]. RAE is present in all the stages of the players’ careers. In this regard, some research suggests that the more the competitive level, the higher RAE, since the selection process is more demanding [38]. However, there is also contrasting evidence that RAE influence is greater on younger age categories [34]. In addition, male categories seem to have more RAE. For example, a study conducted by Smith et al. [39] proved that RAE in female soccer is not as powerful as in male categories. Baker et al. [40] observed in their research that gender acts as a moderator of RAE. As can be seen, male soccer continues suffering from unequal representativeness of players by month of birth. Therefore, further information is needed for shedding light on the talent identification process.
With all this background, researchers and practitioners have tried to offer some solutions. One of the proposals for reducing the RAE is bio-banding, consisting of grouping players according to other variables apart from age, such as physical maturity [41]. In this line, recent work has proved this initiative to be efficient for limiting RAE [42,43].
Although the RAE was first reported more than 30 years ago, no structural or organizational changes have been produced for limiting RAE over the past 10 years in soccer. Many soccer fans or authorities should ask themselves: In the best youth soccer competitions, do the best possible players come? Or do the best players from an inefficient talent selection come? Since this bias is critical for equal talent identification, a better understanding would help managers, athletes, sports systems, and sport policymakers to avoid this phenomenon internationally. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the birth dates distribution and RAE by position and competition of professional/amateur youth male soccer players who participated in four recent international championships in different geographical regions: UEFA European Under-21 Championship (2017–2019), UEFA European Under-19 Championship (2019), South American Youth Football Championship (2019), and FIFA Under-20 World Cup (2019). This study allows covering youth soccer from an international perspective, addressing some of the most important worldwide soccer competitions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants in the four aforementioned competitions, UEFA European Under-21 Championship (2017–2019); UEFA European Under-19 Championship (2019); South American Youth Football Championship (also known as Conmebol U-20) (2019); and FIFA U-20 World Cup (2019), were studied (n = 823) using official UEFA and FIFA competitions data. The average age of the players was 20.25 ± 0.84 years.

2.2. Procedure and Data Analysis

The Relative Age Effect (RAE) was detected through Poisson regression [44,45]. The Poisson regression formula y = e (b0 + b1x) serves to explain the frequency count of an event (y) by an explanatory variable x. The data used for Poisson regression were the week of birth (WB), whereby the first week in January was designated WB 1, and time period of birth (tB), describing how far from the beginning of the year a player was born. This last index ranging between 0 and 1 was calculated as tB = (WB − 0.5)/52.
In the Poisson regression, the event (y) was the frequency of birth in a given week and the explanatory variable (x) was tB. We also calculated the index of discrimination (ID) according to Doyle and Bottomley [45] as e-b1. This index measures the relative odds of a player born on day 1 versus day 365 of the competition year being selected. The likelihood ratio R2 was determined according to Cohen et al. [46]. All statistical tests, including descriptive analysis, were performed using the software package SPSS-v20 (Statistical Package for Social Science, IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Birthdate distributions by quartile (Q) and semester (Se) for the players in the different championships are shown in Table 1.
In Figure 1, the predominance of the first quartiles over the following is visually perceived. Poisson regression by frequency analysis revealed the presence of a significant overall RAE across all championships analyzed. The effect was not significant for goalkeepers in the championships analyzed, except for Euro U-21 (p < 0.001). However, for other positions, RAE was significant in most championships including defenders participating in Euro U-19, Conmebol U-20, and World Cup U-20; midfielders in Euro U-21, Euro U-19, and Conmebol U-20; and forwards in Euro U-19, Conmebol U-20, and World Cup U-20 tournaments (Table 2).
Figure 2 represents the Poisson regression fit line of the total number of players for each week of birth (Wb) and divided by quartiles.

4. Discussion

The first results show a high RAE effect for all the U19, U20 and U21 competitions analyzed in the present study independently of the geographical region (Europe, America, or World level competitions). In similar methodological studies targeting Asian U18, U20 male competitions, and U16-U20 female competitions also the presence of the RAE effect was also found having been studied over 1700 players [26], therefore we could say that this is a global factor that affects all types of sport competitions.
As is already established in the scientific literature, the RAE can play a crucial role for young athletes, allowing them to be selected on sportive youth talent programs [38,47] or later on in their careers, facilitating for them a more relevant role during youth competitions, especially regarding different player development aspects [37]. Athletes have been proven to have prolonged involvement in those sports where they are successful [48]. Therefore, the physical and biological advantages that the RAE effect provides to Q1 and Q2 athletes will facilitate their adherence to the sport for longer time periods and ultimately better opportunities to reach the elite footballer status [49]. Other sport discipline studies on the trajectories of elite tennis players [50] and elite basketball players [51] mentioned that there is an increase in the level of players when they play against rivals of a level equal to or higher than theirs. This is important to originate sports opportunities where the best players can play against each other so that the improvement curve grows as much as possible. However, in fact, coaches are often focused on winning matches instead of promoting the development of talent. Some researches highlight how coaches tend to take decisions more to win the next match than to grow up valuable players in the future [52,53].
More S1 players will enjoy such opportunities since they are predominantly picked to conform to the national team that participates in continental and intercontinental tournaments. Furthermore, player development progression will be positively affected for those athletes participating in the studied competitions, specifically regarding their psychological traits and psychological characteristics development [51] and potentially creating a development gap distance between S1 and S2 born footballers. In a certain way, it is also related to the descriptor by Kristiansen et al. [54], who highlighted the growth as athletes and the acquisition of certain psychological benefits to applying in subsequent “big appointments”, by the athletes participating in the Youth Olympic Games [54], with these potential benefits acquired in big events (e.g., junior world championship).
Having a deeper look into the results section, the findings regarding the relationship between player position and RAE effect confirms the presence of RAE in almost all studied tournaments (except Euro U21) for two of the most determining soccer positions: goalkeeper and forward. Aligning with our results, previous studies with large samples have also connected birthdate and position finding strikers to be the predominant positions with more RAE presence in comparison to defenders or midfielders [26,55] (it is worth considering the limited number of participating goalkeepers at each tournament). This may be due to the great influence of these field positions on the final match result.
Reflecting on the future of the young players participating in youth sports tournaments, it is interesting to highlight that in the most important senior European professional football leagues, an RAE effect is observed [56,57,58]. It is important to point out that these competitions are nurtured by younger players who compete or will compete in the near future at the analyzed tournaments by the present investigation.
Different possible solutions to this RAE effect were presented in the review by Webdale et al. [59], where some structural measures were highlighted, such as limiting the number of players belonging to each quartile in the total workforce [5,60], delimiting the chronological bands of participation [1,61,62] or even using numbers that help to identify older players [63].
Specifically, a particularly interesting proposal to solve this RAE effect (due to its characteristics and the fact that it has been implemented experimentally), was presented by Cumming et al. [43], who used the technique known as bio-banded (grouping of the different teams by the degree of biological-sport maturation, replacing the classic chronological age system) with soccer players in the United Kingdom. All participants described the experience as positive, highlighting aspects such as physical demand and technical–tactical adaptation needs (by the early maturing group), as well as the presence of greater opportunities to demonstrate their skills and competencies (by the late-maturing group) [43]. This bio-banded practice has also been recommended by recent important articles, such as Till and Baker [64].
The new generation of professional soccer talents is born under the bias of the RAE. A bias that is probably unconscious during the selection of talent, but that curtails equal opportunities derived solely and exclusively from a political decision (modifiable then): to divide the lower categories from 1st of January. At the moment, they are all merely theoretical proposals, none of these proposals having been implemented in official competition [59], but in order to reduce the RAE effect for Q3 and Q4 born athletes during their development, it would be a good recommendation to start implementing strategies that build a competition system which provides fairer and equal opportunities to all athletes regardless of their date of birth.

5. Conclusions

This study confirms the existence of RAE in youth soccer competitions, regardless of the geographical region. A significantly higher presence of field players benefiting from RAE is observed across most of the championships analyzed (UEFA European Under-21 and Under-19 Championships, Conmebol Under-20, and FIFA Under-20 World Cup). However, in goalkeepers, this effect is significant only in the UEFA European Under-21 tournament.
This article stresses the existing bias depending on the birthdate of soccer players. Although the conclusions are indeed limited to the characteristics of the sample and the sport modality (soccer), coaches and managers of youth clubs should consider the RAE effect for reducing partiality when selecting and developing new talents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.-Q.; methodology, Á.F.-L.; formal analysis, B.P.-G.; data curation, B.P.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, B.P.-G., J.L.-Q., J.B., P.B. and Á.F.-L.; writing—review and editing, J.L.-Q.; supervision, B.P.-G., P.B. and Á.F.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data for this study is available on Euro U-21 https://es.uefa.com/under21/ (accessed on 14 April 2021); Euro U-19 https://es.uefa.com/under19/ (accessed on 14 April 2021); Conmebol U-20 https://www.livefutbol.com/equipos/ecuador-u-20-h-team/u20-h-campeonato-sudamericano-2019-chile/2/ (accessed on 14 April 2021); World Cup U-20 https://www.fifa.com/es/tournaments/mens/u20worldcup/fifa-u-20-world-cup-poland-2019 (accessed on 14 April 2021). Specific data can be obtained by contacting the lead author B.P.-G.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Musch, J.; Grondin, S. Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development: A Review of the Relative Age Effect in Sport. Dev. Rev. 2001, 21, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Helsen, W.F.; Baker, J.; Michiels, S.; Schorer, J.; Van winckel, J.; Williams, A.M. The relative age effect in European professional soccer: Did ten years of research make any difference? J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gonzalez-Bertomeu, J.F. Too late for talent to kick in? The relative age effect in Argentinian male football. Soccer Soc. 2018, 19, 573–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grondin, S.; Deshaies, P.; Nault, L.P. Trimestres de naissance et participation au hockey et au volleyball. Rev. Québécoise Act. Phys. 1984, 2, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnsley, R.; Thompson, A.; Barnsley, P. Hockey success and birthdate: The relative age effect. J. Can. Assoc. Health Phys. Educ. Recreat. 1985, 51, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lupo, C.; Boccia, G.; Ungureanu, A.N.; Frati, R.; Marocco, R.; Brustio, P.R. The Beginning of Senior Career in Team Sport Is Affected by Relative Age Effect. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. López de Subijana, C.; Lorenzo, J. Relative Age Effect and Long-Term Success in the Spanish Soccer and Basketball National Teams. J. Hum. Kinet. 2018, 65, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Saavedra-García, M.; Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Ó.; Fernández-Romero, J.J.; Fernández-Lastra, D.; Eiras-Oliveira, G. Relative age effect in lower categories of international basketball. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2014, 49, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nolan, J.E.; Howell, G. Hockey success and birth date: The relative age effect revisited. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2010, 45, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lemez, S.; MacMahon, C.; Weir, P. Relative Age Effects in Women’s Rugby Union From Developmental Leagues to World Cup Tournaments. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2016, 87, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Till, K.; Cobley, S.; Wattie, N.; O’Hara, J.; Cooke, C.; Chapman, C. The prevalence, influential factors and mechanisms of relative age effects in UK Rugby League. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2009, 20, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lago-Fuentes, C.; Rey, E.; Padrón-Cabo, A.; Prieto-Troncoso, J.; Garcia-Núñez, J. The Relative Age Effect in Professional Futsal Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2020, 72, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. De la Rubia, A.; Bjørndal, C.T.; Sánchez-Molina, J.; Yagüe, J.M.; Calvo, J.L.; Maroto-Izquierdo, S. The relationship between the relative age effect and performance among athletes in World Handball Championships. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230133. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakata, H.; Sakamoto, K. Relative Age Effects in Japanese Baseball: An Historical Analysis. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2013, 117, 276–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tribolet, R.; Watsford, M.L.; Coutts, A.J.; Smith, C.; Fransen, J. From entry to elite: The relative age effect in the Australian football talent pathway. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2019, 22, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brustio, P.R.; Kearney, P.E.; Lupo, C.; Ungureanu, A.N.; Mulasso, A.; Rainoldi, A.; Boccia, G. Relative Age Influences Performance of World-Class Track and Field Athletes Even in the Adulthood. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hollings, S.C.; Hume, P.A.; Hopkins, W.G. Relative-age effect on competition outcomes at the World Youth and World Junior Athletics Championships. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2014, 14, S456–S461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sasano, N.; Katsumata, Y.; Nakata, H. Relative Age Effects in Male Japanese Professional Athletes: A 25-Year Historical Analysis. Sports Med. Open 2020, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Müller, L.; Müller, E.; Hildebrandt, C.; Kornexl, E.; Raschner, C. Influential Factors on the Relative Age Effect in Alpine Ski Racing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cobley, S.; Abbott, S.; Eisenhuth, J.; Salter, J.; McGregor, D.; Romann, M. Removing relative age effects from youth swimming: The development and testing of corrective adjustment procedures. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2019, 22, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cobley, S.; Abbott, S.; Dogramaci, S.; Kable, A.; Salter, J.; Hintermann, M.; Romann, M. Transient Relative Age Effects across annual age groups in National level Australian Swimming. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2018, 21, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ulbricht, A.; Fernandez-Fernandez, J.; Mendez-Villanueva, A.; Ferrauti, A. The relative age effect and physical fitness characteristics in German male tennis players. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2015, 14, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Nakata, H.; Sakamoto, K. Relative Age Effect in Japanese Male Athletes. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2011, 113, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cobley, S.; Baker, J.; Wattie, N.; McKenna, J. Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development. Sports Med. 2009, 39, 235–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Glamser, F.; Vincent, J. The Relative Age Effect among Elite American Youth Soccer Players. J. Sport Behav. 2004, 27, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Z.; Mao, L.; Steingröver, C.; Wattie, N.; Baker, J.; Schorer, J.; Helsen, W.F. Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the ‘one-child’ policy. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Helsen, W.F.; van Winckel, J.; Williams, A.M. The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kelly, A.L.; Wilson, M.R.; Gough, L.A.; Knapman, H.; Morgan, P.; Cole, M.; Jackson, D.T.; Williams, C.A. A longitudinal investigation into the relative age effect in an English professional football club: Exploring the ‘underdog hypothesis’. Sci. Med. Footb. 2020, 4, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castillo-Rodriguez, A.; Onetti-Onetti, W.; Chinchilla-Minguet, J.L. Perceived Quality in Sports Centers in Southern Spain: A Case Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Peña-González, I.; Javaloyes, A.; Sarabia, J.M.; Moya-Ramón, M. Relative age-related differences between different competitive levels and field positions in young soccer players. Res. Sports Med. 2021, 29, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cobley, S.; Schorer, J.; Baker, J. Relative age effects in professional German soccer: A historical analysis. J. Sports Sci. 2008, 26, 1531–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brustio, P.R.; Lupo, C.; Ungureanu, A.N.; Frati, R.; Rainoldi, A.; Boccia, G. The relative age effect is larger in Italian soccer top-level youth categories and smaller in Serie A. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Delorme, N.; Boiché, J.; Raspaud, M. Relative age and dropout in French male soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. González-Víllora, S.; Pastor-Vicedo, J.C.; Cordente, D. Relative Age Effect in UEFA Championship Soccer Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2015, 47, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Saavedra-García, M.; Matabuena, M.; Montero-Seoane, A.; Fernández-Romero, J.J. A new approach to study the relative age effect with the use of additive logistic regression models: A case of study of FIFA football tournaments (1908–2012). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Castillo, D.; Los Arcos, A.; Martínez-Santos, R. Aerobic endurance performance does not determine the professional career of elite youth soccer players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2018, 58, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Castillo, D.; Pérez-González, B.; Raya-González, J.; Fernández-Luna, Á.; Burillo, P.; Lago-Rodríguez, Á. Selection and promotion processes are not associated by the relative age effect in an elite Spanish soccer academy. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Gutierrez-Diaz del Campo, D.; Pastor-Vicedo, J.C.; Gonzalez-Villora, S.; Contreras-Jordan, O.R. The relative age effect in youth soccer players from Spain. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2010, 9, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Smith, K.L.; Weir, P.L.; Till, K.; Romann, M.; Cobley, S. Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2018, 48, 1451–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Baker, J.; Cobley, S.; Winckel, V. Gender, depth of competition and relative age effects in team sports. Asian J. Exerc. Sports Sci. 2009, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  41. Malina, R.M.; Cumming, S.P.; Rogol, A.D.; Coelho-e-Silva, M.J.; Figueiredo, A.J.; Konarski, J.M.; Kozieł, S.M. Bio-Banding in Youth Sports: Background, Concept, and Application. Sports Med. 2019, 49, 1671–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bradley, B.; Johnson, D.; Hill, M.; McGee, D.; Kana-ah, A.; Sharpin, C.; Sharp, P.; Kelly, A.; Cumming, S.P.; Malina, R.M. Bio-banding in academy football: Player’s perceptions of a maturity matched tournament. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2019, 46, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Cumming, S.P.; Brown, D.J.; Mitchell, S.; Bunce, J.; Hunt, D.; Hedges, C.; Crane, G.; Gross, A.; Scott, S.; Franklin, E.; et al. Premier League academy soccer players’ experiences of competing in a tournament bio-banded for biological maturation. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Doyle, J.R.; Bottomley, P.A. Relative age effect in elite soccer: More early-born players, but no better valued, and no paragon clubs or countries. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192209. [Google Scholar]
  45. Doyle, J.R.; Bottomley, P.A. The relative age effect in European elite soccer: A practical guide to Poisson regression modelling. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213988. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cohen, A.S.; Kim, S.-H.; Wollack, J.A. An Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test For Detection of Differential Item Functioning. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1996, 20, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Deprez, D.; Coutts, A.; Fransen, J.; Deconinck, F.; Lenoir, M.; Vaeyens, R.; Philippaerts, R. Relative Age, Biological Maturation and Anaerobic Characteristics in Elite Youth Soccer Players. Int. J. Sports Med. 2013, 34, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Deaner, R.O.; Lowen, A.; Cobley, S. Born at the Wrong Time: Selection Bias in the NHL Draft. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ericsson, K.A. (Ed.) The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  50. Brouwers, J.; De Bosscher, V.; Sotiriadou, P. An examination of the importance of performances in youth and junior competition as an indicator of later success in tennis. Sport Manag. Rev. 2012, 15, 461–475. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bonal, J.; Lorenzo-Jiménez, S.; Lorenzo, A. The Talent Development Pathway for Elite Basketball Players in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Capranica, L.; Millard-Stafford, M.L. Youth Sport Specialization: How to Manage Competition and Training? Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2011, 6, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lupo, C.; Ungureanu, A.N.; Varalda, M.; Brustio, P.R. Running technique is more effective than soccer-specific training for improving the sprint and agility performances with ball possession of prepubescent soccer players. Biol. Sport 2019, 36, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kristiansen, E.; MacIntosh, E.W.; Parent, M.M.; Houlihan, B. The Youth Olympic Games: A facilitator or barrier of the high-performance sport development pathway? Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2018, 18, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Jiang, Y. Relative Age Effect in World Elite Youth Soccer Player. Available online: https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TJTY201301006.htm (accessed on 14 April 2021).
  56. Salinero Martín, J.J.; Pérez-González, B.; Burillo, P.; Lesma, M.L. El efecto de la edad relativa en el fútbol español. Apunt. Educ. Física Deport. 2013, 114, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Perez-Gonzalez, B.; Fernandez-Luna, A.; Castillo, D.; Burillo, P. Are European Soccer Players Worth More If They Are Born Early in the Year? Relative Age Effect on Player Market Value. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yagüe, J.M.; de la Rubia, A.; Sánchez-Molina, J.; Maroto-Izquierdo, S.; Molinero, O. The relative age effect in the 10 best leagues of male professional football of the union of european football associations (UEFA). J. Sports Sci. Med. 2018, 17, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Webdale, K.; Baker, J.; Schorer, J.; Wattie, N. Solving sport’s ‘relative age’ problem: A systematic review of proposed solutions. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2020, 13, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Helsen, W.F.; Starkes, J.L.; Hodges, N.J. Team Sports and the Theory of Deliberate Practice. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1998, 20, 12–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boucher, J.; Halliwell, W. The Novem System: A practical solution to age grouping. CAHPER J. 1991, 57, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  62. Brewer, J.; Balsom, P.; Davis, J. Seasonal birth distribution amongst European soccer players. Sports Exerc. Inj. 1995, 1, 154–157. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mann, D.L.; van Ginneken, P.J.M.A. Age-ordered shirt numbering reduces the selection bias associated with the relative age effect. J. Sports Sci. 2017, 35, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Till, K.; Baker, J. Challenges and [Possible] Solutions to Optimizing Talent Identification and Development in Sport. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Quartile of birth of players by championship.
Figure 1. Quartile of birth of players by championship.
Children 08 01117 g001
Figure 2. Poisson regression fit line regarding the frequency of week of birth (WB).
Figure 2. Poisson regression fit line regarding the frequency of week of birth (WB).
Children 08 01117 g002
Table 1. Birthdate distributions of international youth championships (2017–2019) according to their quartile or semester of birth.
Table 1. Birthdate distributions of international youth championships (2017–2019) according to their quartile or semester of birth.
CategoryMeasureQ1Q2Q3Q4Se1Se2
Euro U-21n8780524416796
%33.130.419.816.763.536.5
Euro U-19n6741321910851
%42.125.820.211.967.932.1
Conmebol U-20n10156522315775
%43.524.122.59.967.632.4
World Cup U-20n6245392210761
%36.926.823.213.163.736.3
All playersn31722217510853928.3
%38.627.021.313.165.634.4
Note: n = number; Q = quartile; Se = Semester.
Table 2. RAE data analysis by position and tournament.
Table 2. RAE data analysis by position and tournament.
PositionMeasureEuro U-21
(n = 263)
Euro U-19
(n = 159)
Conmebol U-20
(n = 233)
World Cup U-20
(n = 168)
Overall
(n = 823)
WB23 ± 1520 ± 1420 ± 1422 ± 14
tB0.43 ± 0.280.38 ± 0.270.38 ± 0.270.41 ± 0.27
b02.0151.7512.1431.669
b1−0.849−1.436−1.461−1.090
ID2.344.204.312.97
R20.760.590.480.72
p value<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Goalkeeper
(n = 107)
WB16 ± 1227 ± 1323 ± 1521 ± 15
tB0.30 ± 0.240.52 ± 0.260.44 ± 0.300.39 ± 0.29
b00.707−1.274−0.167−0.174
b1−2.7410.188−0.748−1.347
ID15.500.832.113.85
R20.760.990.950.85
p value<0.0010.8290.2360.068
Defender
(n = 266)
WB24 ± 1419 ± 1419 ± 1322 ± 13
tB0.45 ± 0.260.37 ± 0.270.36 ± 0.250.41 ± 0.25
b00.7250.6711.1340.621
b1−0.592−1.694−1.724−1.087
ID1.815.445.612.97
R20.940.70−0.650.85
p value0.127<0.001<0.0010.019
Midfielder
(n = 277)
WB23 ± 1521 ± 1420 ± 1324 ± 15
tB0.44 ± 0.280.39 ± 0.270.38 ± 0.240.44 ± 0.28
b00.9730.7320.9150.290
b1−0.699−1.365−1.434−0.698
ID2.013.924.202.01
R20.910.790.730.94
p value0.0470.004<0.0010.159
Forward
(n = 173)
WB25 ± 1618 ± 1420 ± 1620 ± 14
tB0.47 ± 0.300.34 ± 0.270.38 ± 0.310.38 ± 0.27
b00.0650.4500.7510.263
b1−0.342−2.022−1.551−1.501
ID1.417.554.724.49
R20.980.650.730.78
p value0.5000.0020.0020.015
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-González, B.; León-Quismondo, J.; Bonal, J.; Burillo, P.; Fernández-Luna, Á. The New Generation of Professional Soccer Talent Is Born under the Bias of the RAE: Relative Age Effect in International Male Youth Soccer Championships. Children 2021, 8, 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121117

AMA Style

Pérez-González B, León-Quismondo J, Bonal J, Burillo P, Fernández-Luna Á. The New Generation of Professional Soccer Talent Is Born under the Bias of the RAE: Relative Age Effect in International Male Youth Soccer Championships. Children. 2021; 8(12):1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-González, Benito, Jairo León-Quismondo, José Bonal, Pablo Burillo, and Álvaro Fernández-Luna. 2021. "The New Generation of Professional Soccer Talent Is Born under the Bias of the RAE: Relative Age Effect in International Male Youth Soccer Championships" Children 8, no. 12: 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop