Next Article in Journal
Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-COVID-19 Vaccination in the Italian General Population: Proactive Clinical Risk Analysis Using Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Suicide Interventions in Spain and Japan: A Comparative Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of the Therapeutic Communication Scale in Nursing Students
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Right to Equal Health: Best Practice Priorities for Māori with Bipolar Disorder from Staff Focus Groups

Healthcare 2024, 12(7), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070793
by Tracy Haitana 1,*, Mau Te Rangimarie Clark 1, Marie Crowe 2, Ruth Cunningham 3, Richard Porter 2, Suzanne Pitama 1, Roger Mulder 2 and Cameron Lacey 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2024, 12(7), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070793
Submission received: 13 February 2024 / Revised: 23 March 2024 / Accepted: 31 March 2024 / Published: 6 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Healthcare Quality)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper looks very interesting and informative.

Though exciting, it is sometimes confusing because it does not set a good tone about the cultural background. 

 

Introduction 

Readers from other countries are not well-oriented with the culture of New Zealand.

Briefly explain the mental health model in New Zealand. 

Please provide a brief background about the Maori and their health models. 

 

 

Lines 

156- please expand on Maori protocols

291- spelling typo - ( 8ecognized )

335- please describe the meaning of Hauora.

 

Limitations 

Sample size 

Also, I feel that nonclinical participants' opinions could be confounding because of their knowledge about bipolar.

 

The discussion was vague about Hauora Maori frameworks and tools.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

It could be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Response to both reviewers included for ease of reference.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study aimed to share evidence about patterns of health service use and Māori patient experiences with participants to develop guidelines for best practice for Māori with BD to address areas of unmet need. There are several issues that should be considered.

 

1.      It is challenging to draw firm conclusions because of the qualitative approach and the limited sample of individuals that were included.

2.      This investigation was carried out in a single mental health facility. The results might not apply to other mental health treatments. There exist regional disparities in New Zealand with regards to the percentage of Māori people and the percentage of people living in socioeconomic deprivation. Since Māori identity is not uniform, the results might only reflect the opinions of people who reside in a certain region.

3.      Recruiting Māori patients and whānau through health care providers may have limited participation to people with positive service experiences.

4.      The conclusion should not include any references or any new information.

 

5.      The ability to handle only one issue at a time and the requirement for a particular level of conformance from all participants make the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) rigid.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. I have included responses to both reviewers for ease of reference.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors address my comments 

Back to TopTop