Abstract
In this paper, we have established the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality for fractional integrals involving preinvex functions. The results presented here provide new extensions of those given in earlier works as the weighted estimates of the left and right hand side of the Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for fractional integrals involving preinvex functions doesn’t exist previously.
1. Introduction
The Hermite–Hadamard inequality for convex functions has been widely addressed due to it’s importance in developing a relationship between the theory of convex functions and integral inequalities. Many generalizations of convex functions have been developed in the recent past and estimates for the Hermite–Hadamard inequality have been obtained for these generalized definitions.
Let be a convex function and with , then
The inequality is known as Hermite–Hadamard inequality for convex functions.
In [1], Fejér gave a weighted generalization of the inequality (1) as follows:
where is non-negative, integrable and symmetric about .
Recently, fractional calculus has proved to be a powerful tool in different fields of sciences. Because of the wide application of fractional calculus and Hermite–Hadamard inequalities, researchers have extended their work on Hermite–Hadamard inequalities in the fractional domain. Hermite–Hadamard inequalities involving fractional integrals for different classes of functions have been established.
In [2], Sarikaya et al. presented Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integral as follows.
Theorem 1.
Let with and . If g is positive and a convex function on , then the following inequalities for fractional integrals hold
In the case of , the fractional integral reduces to the classical integral.
The concept of invex sets was given by T. Antczak [4].
Definition 1.
A set is invex with respect to the map if for every and , The invex set H is also called an η-connected set. Every convex set is an invex set but its converse is not true.
In 1998, Weir and Mond [5], defined preinvex functions as a generalization of convex functions as given below:
Definition 2.
Let be an invex set and a function is said to be preinvex w.r.t η if
∀ and
If , then in classical sense, the preinvex functions become convex functions. A function g is called preconcave if its negative is preinvex.
In 2012, Imdat Iscan ([6]) presented following inqualities for preinvex function in fractional domain.
Theorem 2.
Let H , be an open invex subset with respect to and with Suppose is a preinvex function, then for every with the following equality holds:
where
For more estimates of Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér type inequalities for generalized convex functions see [7,8].
In this paper, we present two new Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér identities for preinvex functions in fractional domains. Using the new identities, we obtain some new weighted estimates connected with the left and right hand side of the Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for the fractional integrals involving preinvex functions.
2. Main Results
Throughout this section, we will let , where is a continuous function, is the derivative of g w.r.t variable t and is the collection of all real-valued Riemann integrable functions defined on
Lemma 1.
Let H be an open invex set where H and η is mapping such that . Suppose there is a differentiable mapping such that and with . If is an integrable mapping, then ∀ with the following equality holds:
where
Proof.
Consider:
From the first integral,
Substituting in (4),
From the second integral,
Substituting in (6),
Upon adding (5) and (7), we get the required result. □
Lemma 2.
If is an integrable function which is also symmetric about with then
where .
Proof.
Since h is symmetric about we have for all Taking
□
Lemma 3.
Let H be an open invex set where H and is a mapping. Suppose there is a differentiable mapping on H such that and with . If is an integrable mapping, then ∀ with the following equality holds:
where
Proof.
Let us consider
From the first integral,
Substituting in (11),
Now for the second integral,
Substituting in (13),
By adding the results of (12) and (14) using (8), we get the required result. □
Theorem 3.
Let H be an open invex set where H and η is mapping such that Suppose there is a differentiable mapping on H such that and with . If is an integrable mapping which is also symmetric with respect to . If is preinvex function on H, then ∀ with the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Applying modulus on both sides of (3),
From preinvexity of on H and Lemma 1, we have
By the change of the order of integration in fisrt term of (17), we have
Making the change of variable for ,
Let ,
Similarly, by changing the order of integration in the second term and using the fact that h is symmetric to we obtain
By the change of variable ,
Knowing that ,
Adding Equations (18) to (19) based on (17), we get our required result. □
Theorem 4.
Let H be the open invex set where H and is a mapping. Suppose there is a differentiable mapping on H such that and with . If is an integrable mapping symmetric to and also is preinvex function on H, then ∀ with the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Applying modulus on both sides of (9),
From preinvexity of on H, we have
After simplification, (22) becomes
By changing the order of integration, we have
By changing the variable and reminding that ,
which is as required. □
3. Conclusions
Some new estimates for the lower and upper boundaries of fractional Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér type inequalities are obtained for preinvex functions, which add up to the literature new error bounds for the lower and upper boundaries of the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality for preinvex functions in fractional domain correspondingly.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.M. and F.Z.; writing-origninal draft preparation, S.M.; writing-review and editing, F.Z. and N.Y.; supervision, F.Z. and N.Y.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Fejér, L. Uber die Fourierreihen, II. J. Math. Naturwiss Anz. Ungar. Akad. Wiss Hung. 1906, 24, 369–390. [Google Scholar]
- Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Yaldiz, H.; Basak, N.; Budak, H. Hermite–Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilbas, A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J.; Budak, H. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 2006, pp. 2403–2407. [Google Scholar]
- Antczak, T. Mean value in invexity analysis. Nonlinear Anal. 2005, 60, 1471–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weir, T.; Mond, B. Preinvex functions in multiple objective optimization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 136, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- İşcan, İ. Hermite–Hadamard’s Inequalities for Preinvex Function via Fractional Integrals and Related Fractional Inequalities. Am. J. Math. Anal. 2013, 1, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
- Delavar, M.R.; Aslani, S.M.; De La Sen, M. Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality related to generalized convex functions via fractional integrals. J. Math. 2018, 2018, 5864091. [Google Scholar]
- Ertuğral, F.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Budak, H. On refinements of Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér type inequalities for fractional integral operators. Appl. Appl. Math. 2018, 13, 426–442. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).