Abstract
In the theory of analytic and univalent functions, coefficients of functions’ Taylor series representation and their related functional inequalities are of major interest and how they estimate functions’ growth in their specified domains. One of the important and useful functional inequalities is the Fekete-Szegö inequality. In this work, we aim to analyze the Fekete-Szegö functional and to find its upper bound for certain analytic functions which give parabolic and petal type regions as image domains. Coefficient inequalities and the Fekete-Szegö inequality of inverse functions to these certain analytic functions are also established in this work.
MSC:
Primary 30C45, 33C10; Secondary 30C20, 30C75
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let be the class of functions f of the form
which are analytic in the open unit disk and be the class of functions from which are univalent in . One of the classical results regarding univalent functions related to coefficients of a function’s Taylor series, named as the Fekete-Szegö problem, introduced by Fekete and Szegö [1], is defined as follows:
If and is of the form (1), then
This result is sharp. The Fekete-Szegö problem has a rich history in literature. Several results dealing with maximizing the non-linear functional for various classes and subclasses of univalent functions have been proved. The functional has been examined for to be both a real and complex number. Several authors used certain classified techniques to maximize the Fekete-Szegö functional for different types of functions having interesting geometric characteristics of image domains. For more details and results, we refer to [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The function f is said to be subordinate to the function written symbolically as if there exists a schwarz function w such that
where for Let P denote the class of analytic functions p such that and For details, see [12].
In 1991, Goodman [13] initiated the concept of a conic domain by introducing generalized convex functions which generated the first parabolic region as an image domain of analytic functions. He introduced and defined the class of uniformly convex functions as follows:
Later on, Rønning [14], and Ma and Minda [7] independently gave the most suitable one variable characterization of the class and defined it as follows:
This characterization gave birth to the first conic (parabolic) domain
This domain was then generalized by Kanas and Wiśniowska [15,16] who introduced the domain
The conic domain represents the right half plane for hyperbolic regions when parabolic region for and elliptic regions when For more details, we refer [15,16]. This conic domain has been extensively studied in [17,18,19]. The domain was also generalized by Noor and Malik [20] by introducing the domain
The domain represents the petal type region, for more details, we refer to [20]. Now, we consider the following class of functions which take all values from the domain
Definition 1.
A function is said to be in the class if and only if
where ,
It can be seen that . This fact leads us to the following implications of different well-known classes of analytic functions.
- the well-known class of functions with real part greater than see [12].
- the well-known class of functions, introduced by Kanas and Wiśniowska [4,21].
Now we consider the following classes of uniformly Janowski convex functions and of corresponding Janowski starlike functions (see [20] ) as follows.
Definition 2.
A function is said to be in the class if and only if
or equivalently,
Definition 3.
A function is said to be in the class if and only if
or equivalently,
It can easily be seen that It is clear that and the well-known classes of uniformly convex and corresponding starlike functions respectively, introduced by Goodman [13] and Rønning [22].
In 1994, Ma and Minda [7] found the maximum bound of Fekete-Szegö functional for uniformly convex functions of class and then Kanas [21] investigated the same for the functions of class Our aim is to solve this classical Fekete-Szegö problem for the functions of classes and We need the following lemmas (see [7]) to prove our results.
Lemma 1.
If is a function with positive real part in then, for any complex number μ,
and the result is sharp for the functions
Lemma 2.
If is a function with positive real part in then, for any real number v,
When or , the equality holds if and only if is or one of its rotations. If , then, the equality holds if and only if or one of its rotations. If , the equality holds if and only if,
or one of its rotations. If then, the equality holds if and only if is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case of . Although the above upper bound is sharp, when , it can be improved as follows:
and
2. Main Results
Theorem 1.
Let , and of the form Then, for a complex number we have
and for a real number we have
When or the equality in (7) holds for the function or one of its rotations. If , then, the equality in (7) holds for the function or one of its rotations. If , the equality in (7) holds for the function
or one of its rotations. If then, the equality in (7) holds for the functions which is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case for .
Proof.
For and of the form we consider
where is such that and It follows easily that
This implies that
If then equating coefficients of z and one may have
Now for a complex number consider
This implies that
Using Lemma 1, one may have
where
Corollary 1.
Let and of the form Then, for a complex number we have
and for real number we have
These inequalities are sharp.
In [4,21], Kanas studied the class which consists of functions who take all values from the conic domain . Kanas [21] found the bound of Fekete-Szegö functional for the class whose particular case for is as follows:
Let Then, for real number we have
We observe that Corollary 1 improves the bounds of the Fekete-Szegö functional for the functions of class .
Theorem 2.
Let , and of the form (1). Then, for a real number we have
This result is sharp.
Proof.
If , then it follows from relations (2)–(4),
where is such that and The right hand side of above expression gets its series form from (13) and reduces to
If then one may have
This implies, by using (21), that
Now, for a real number consider
where
Applying Lemma 2 leads us to the required result. The inequality (18) is sharp and equality holds for or when is or one of its rotations, where is defined such that If , then, the equality holds for the function or one of its rotations, where is defined such that If , the equality holds for the function or one of its rotations, where is defined such that If then, the equality holds for , which is such that is reciprocal of one of the function such that equality holds in the case of . □
For the above result takes the following form which is proved by Ma and Minda [8].
Corollary 2.
Let and of the form (1). Then, for a real number
This result is sharp.
Theorem 3.
Let , and of the form (1). Then, for a real number
This result is sharp.
Proof.
The proof follows similarly as in Theorem 2. □
For the above result reduces to the following form.
Corollary 3.
Let and of the form (1). Then, for a real number
Now we consider the inverse function which maps petal type regions to the open unit disk , defined as and we find the following coefficient bound for inverse functions. As the classes and are the subclasses of Thus the existence of such inverse functions to the functions from and is assured.
Theorem 4.
Let and Then,
Proof.
Since so it is easy to see that
Using the values of we get
Applying the bounds see [23], and see [7] to the right hand side of (27) and using the fact that we have and this completes the proof. □
For the above result takes the following form which is proved by Ma and Minda [8].
Corollary 4.
Let and Then,
Theorem 5.
Let and Then, for a real number we have
This result is sharp.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.R.; Formal analysis, M.R.; Funding acquisition, S.M.; Investigation, S.F.; Methodology, S.N.M. and S.F.; Supervision, S.N.M.; Validation, S.M.; Visualization, S.Z.; Writing—original draft, S.Z.; Writing—review and editing, S.Z.
Funding
This research is partially supported by Sarhad University of Science and I.T, Ring Road, Peshawar 25000.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Fekete, M.; Szegö, G. Eine bemerkung uber ungerade schlichte funktionen. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1933, 8, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, S. Coefficient estimates for some classes of functions associated with q-function theory. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2017, 95, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahuja, O.P.; Jahangiri, M. Fekete–Szegö problem for a unified class of analytic functions. Panam. Math. J. 1997, 7, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Kanas, S. An unified approach to the Fekete–Szegö problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 8453–8461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keogh, F.R.; Merkes, E.P. A coefficient inequality for certain classes of analytic functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1969, 20, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koepf, W. On the Fekete-Szegö problem for close to convex functions I and II. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1987, 101, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, W.; Minda, D. A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analysis, Tianjin, China, 19–23 June 1992; Conference on Proceedings Lecture Notes for Analysis. International Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 157–169. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, W.; Minda, D. Uniformly convex functions II. Ann. Polon. Math. 1993, 8, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, M.; Malik, S.M. Upper bound of the third Hankel determinant for a class of analytic functions related with lemniscate of Bernoulli. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokół, J.; Darwish, H.E. Fekete–Szegö problem for starlike and convex functions of complex order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 777–782. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, D.K.; Verma, S. Invaience of the coefficients of strongly convex functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2017, 95, 436–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, A.W. Univalent Functions; Mariner Publishing Company: Tempa, FL, USA, 1983; Volumes I–II. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, A.W. On uniformly convex functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 1991, 56, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rønning, F. On starlike functions associated with parabolic regions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A 1991, 45, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
- Kanas, S.; Wiśniowska, A. Conic regions and k-uniform convexity. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1999, 105, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanas, S.; Wiśniowska, A. Conic domains and starlike functions. Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 2000, 45, 647–657. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, S.N. Some topics in Geometric Function Theory; LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, S.N.; Raza, M.; Arif, M.; Hussain, S. Coefficient estimates of some subclasses of analytic functions related with conic domains. Anal. Univ. Ovidius Const. Ser. Mat. 2013, 21, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, K.I.; Malik, S.N. On generalized bounded Mocanu variation associated with conic domain. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor, K.I.; Malik, S.N. On coefficient inequalities of functions associated with conic domains. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62, 2209–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanas, S. Coefficient estimates in subclasses of the Caratheodory class related to conical domains. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2005, 74, 149–161. [Google Scholar]
- Rønning, F. Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1993, 118, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Libera, R.J.; Złotkiewcz, E.J. Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1982, 85, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).