Abstract
We study the Terracini loci of an irreducible variety X embedded in a projective space: non-emptiness, dimensions and the geometry of their maximal dimension’s irreducible components. These loci were studied because they describe where the differential of an important geometric map drops rank. Our best results are if X is either a Veronese embedding of a projective space of arbitrary dimension (the set-up for the additive decomposition of homogeneous polynomials) or a Segre–Veronese embedding of a multiprojective space (the set-up for partially symmetric tensors). For an arbitrary X, we give several examples in which all Terracini loci are empty, several criteria for non-emptiness and examples with the maximal defect possible a priori of an element of a minimal Terracini locus. We raise a few open questions.
Keywords:
Terracini loci; minimal Terracini loci; secant variety; partially symmetric tensor rank; Segre–Veronese variety; Veronese variety MSC:
14N05; 14N07; 15A69
1. Introduction
To compute the dimension of the set of all complex tensors with a prescribed format and a prescribed tensor rank, usually one uses algebro-geometric tools. The same tools are used for computing the dimension of objects of fixed rank (e.g., for partially symmetric tensors or for additive decompositions of homogenous polynomials of prescribed degree and number of variables). This integer, i.e., the dimension of the set we are interested in, is often computed by the dimension of the tangent space of at a “general” point [1]. The data are an embedded variety and we fix a positive integer x. We consider points in the linear span of x points of X. For the equivalence classes (up to the multiplication by a non-zero scalar) of non-zero tensors the integer x would be the tensor rank, the variety X would be a multiprojective space Y and the dimensions of the factors of Y give the format of the tensor. The same Y (but with a different embedding and r) works for partially symmetric tensors. For the additive decomposition of degree d forms in variables the variety X is the order d Veronese embedding of and . We explain now the set-up and the main results and open questions of our paper.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate variety. Set . For any closed subscheme Z of , let denote the linear span of Z, i.e., the intersection of all hyperplanes H containing Z, with the convention if no hyperplane contains Z. For any , the X-rank of q is the minimal cardinality of a finite set such that . Fix a positive integer x. The closure (in the Zariski or Euclidean topology) of the set of all of X-rank is called the x-secant variety of S. For any , i.e., for any smooth point of X, let or just denote the closed subscheme of X with as its ideal sheaf. Let denote the set of all with cardinality x. For any , let (or just ) denote the union of all , . We have and, hence, . By the Terracini lemma ([2] (Cor. 1.11)) for a general . In this paper (as in [3]), we consider for non-general and call the x-Terracini locus of X the set of all such that . As in [3], we say that is minimal and write if for any . In this paper, we also study the geometric properties of the minimal Terracini loci. Set and . There are only finitely many nonempty addenda in the union appearing in the definition of (part (c) of Proposition 1). By a theorem of Chevalley ([4] (Ex. II.3.22)), the set is a finite union of quasi-projective varieties. Hence, is well-defined if we use the convention if . Moreover, the maximal integer such that is well-defined if we use the convention if . In the definition of , infinitely many x may occur ([3] (Th. 1.1(iii))). By the definition of , we have and if for all , i.e., if x is the first integer such that . In particular, if and only if . This is our only use of the full Terracini locus. For all finite sets, such that the non-negative integer is called the defect of S. For any we have (Remark 8). For any x such that , let be the maximum of all , . Let denote the maximum of all for all , with the convention if . For any integer , we give an example of an n dimensional embedded variety X such that (Example 3).
In Section 4 and Section 5, we study these notions for the Veronese embeddings of projective spaces. Our main results are for the case . Fix positive integers n and d. Let , , denote the order d Veronese embedding of . For any positive integer x, let (resp. ) denote the set of all such that (resp. ) and . Set . The set is a locally closed subset of a finite union of locally closed subsets of and, hence, it is a quasi-projective variety (quite often reducible). We call the maximal dimension of an irreducible component of with the convention if .
We call the maximal integer x such that with the convention if for all .
Remark 1
([3] (Prop. 3.6)). Fix integers and such that for . We have .
In Section 4, we prove the following theorems.
Theorem 1.
Fix integers and , then there is a positive real number such that . Moreover, .
Note that , up to terms of order . For fixed n and large d, we may take (Remark 11).
Theorem 2.
Fix an integer such that . Then, . Moreover, is a quasi-projective algebraic set of dimension with a unique component of dimension .
As a corollary of Theorem 2, we prove the following result.
Corollary 1.
Fix an integer such that . Then, , and has a unique irreducible component of dimension .
In Section 2, we fix the notation and provide some observations.
Section 3 considers arbitrary embedded varieties . We provide some examples with and several criteria for the non-emptiness of . Among these criteria, we single out Proposition 3 and Corollary 2.
Section 4 and Section 5 are devoted to the Veronese embeddings. In Section 4, we prove Theorems 1 and 2. In Section 5, we provide complete descriptions of for many x.
Section 6 contains an extension of Theorem 1 to the case of Segre–Veronese embeddings of multiprojective spaces (Theorem 4), i.e., the embedded variety X whose X-rank is equal to the partially symmetric rank of partially symmetric tensors.
I want to thank the referees for their useful observations.
2. Preliminaries
Remark 2.
Let X be an integral projective variety. Set . For each positive integer x, we have , and is irreducible. Thus, each algebraic subset has dimension at most and if and only if T contains a non-empty open subset of .
Remark 3.
Let be a zero-dimensional scheme. We have . For any , we have . Z is said to be linearly independent if . If Z is linearly independent, then all subschemes of Z are linearly independent.
Let W be any projective variety, and let be any effective Cartier divisor of W. For any zero-dimensional scheme , let denote the residual scheme of Z with respect to D, i.e., the closed subscheme of W with as its ideal sheaf. We have and . If , then and . For any line bundle on W the following sequence
is exact and often called the residual exact sequence of Z with respect to D.
3. Arbitrary Embedded Varieties
Remark 4.
We explain here the difference between for an arbitrary X and the same symbol for the Veronese embedding of or the Segre–Veronese embedding of a multiprojective space Y). Elements of are subsets of , not , and an element of in the finite set S has the additional condition (often called concision) that no proper projective subspace of contains S. A similar restriction is required for Segre–Veronese embeddings of a multiprojective space. In [3], the following cases have : ([3] (Lemma 3.4)), and ([3] (Lemma 3.6)) and ([3] (Lemma 3.5)). In the case , we have . In the other case we have for some x (for take , for take with S formed by 3 collinear points).
Remark 5.
Recall that , and that if x is the minimum integer such that , then . Thus, if and only if . If , we quoted a case with (the rational normal curve). There are many other examples of smooth embedded curves with . For instance, if X is a linearly normal embedding of a smooth curve of genus and degree . Curves are never secant defective and so part (a) of Proposition 6 only applies to some varieties of dimension .
Now we explain a few cases with and .
Remark 6.
Obviously, for all x if . Now assume . We have if and only if , and this is the case if and only if there is a hyperplane H tangent to 2 distinct points of . For instance, if and , we have if and only if X is singular. Call the dimension of the vertex E of the quadric cone . Fix a general -dimensional linear subspace and set . Note that , is a smooth quadric hypersurface of L, and X is the cone with vertex E and as a basis. A set is an element of if and only if there is such that S is contained in the linear span of E and p. Thus, is irreducible of dimension .
Proposition 1.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate projective variety. Set .
(a) Assume that X is secant defective, and call s the minimal integer such that . Then, for all , contains a non-empty open subset of , and has a unique irreducible component of dimension .
(b) Assume that X is not secant defective. Then, and .
(c) In both cases and .
Proof.
Take the set-up of part (a). By the Terracini Lemma ([2] (Cor. 1.11)), we have for a general . Since (by the definition of secant defectivity), we have . Take a general . Each is a general element of . By the definition of s, the secant variety has the expected dimension. By the Terracini Lemma ([2] (Corollary 1.11)), . Thus, S is minimal.
Observation 1: Take any . Since for a general , the semicontinuity theorem gives .
Fix any and any . Take any such that . The set A and Observation 1 show that . The other statements of (a) are proved as in part (b) of the proof of Theorem 2.
Now we prove part (b). Since , we have . Fix an integer . Take any and any such that . Either or . Thus, .
Since in (a) we have , part (c) follows from parts (a) and (b). □
Proposition 2.
Let be a dual defective variety in the sense of [5]. Call the dual defect of X, i.e., let be the codimension of the dual variety . Set . Then, and .
Proof.
Since we are in characteristic 0 and X has dual defect t, a general tangent hyperplane is tangent to along a t-dimensional linear space L. Since and any with is an element of , gives a -dimensional subvariety of . The set of all such L is parametrized by a variety of dimension . If is an element of , then it must be contained in some . We have . □
Proposition 3.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate variety. Assume one of the following two conditions:
(i) and there is a hyperplane such that has a multiple component not contained in ;
(ii) and there is a hyperplane H such that has at least two irreducible components whose intersection is not contained in .
Then, .
Proof.
Assume , and the hyperplane such that has a multiple component not contained in . Call T the reduction of this multiple component. By construction for all finite sets . Thus, if , then . Take the minimal integer x such that a general gives an element of and hence (since each subsets of X are general element of T) .
With the assumption of (ii), take as T an irreducible component of the intersection of two different irreducible components of . □
As an example in which we may apply Proposition 3, we define the following corollary.
Corollary 2.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate variety. We have if X is a linearly normal embedding of a complete linear system with very ample and one of the following conditions is satisfied:
(i) and with ample and spanned;
(ii) and with and ample and spanned.
Proof.
First assume and with ample and spanned. Fix a general . Since is spanned, . Take to apply part (i) of Proposition 3.
Now assume and with and ample and spanned. Take a general and a general . Since and are ample and spanned and . Apply part (ii) of Proposition 3. □
Proposition 4.
Let and be integral and non-degenerate varieties. Let denote the Segre embedding of . Set . Then, if and only if and .
Proof.
If , we apply part (ii) of Proposition 3. Now assume . If , and hence , we have because W is a smooth quadric surface (Remark 6). Now assume . With no loss of generality, we may assume and hence . Set . Fix . Take a general such that and take . Since , Remark 3 gives . Thus, if , we have and hence . Now assume , i.e., . The latter inequality is always false because . □
Take a subset . We say that is a covering family if is Zariski dense in X, i.e., it contains a non-empty open subset of . Assume that is a covering family and take a general . Let denote the set of all such that . Let denote the connected component containing p of the closure in of . The non-negative integer only depends on and it is called the local covering dimension of .
Example 1.
Take X as in Proposition 2, i.e., assume X is dual defective with dual defect . The family is a covering family with t as its local covering dimension.
Example 2.
Take X as in part (a) of Proposition 1, i.e., assume X secant defective with s the first integer such that . Obviously, . We saw that contains a non-empty open subset of . Thus, is a covering family. Since , has local covering dimension n. Now assume and take any n-dimensional such that is a covering family of local dimension 2. We get that contains a general element of and hence by the Terracini lemma.
Theorem 3.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate variety. Set . Assume the existence of a variety such that and the linear span of W has dimension . Set . If , then and the minimal integer w such that satisfies .
Proof.
For a very large integer a, we have for all sets such that and hence is not linearly independent. Let z be the minimal integer such that for a general such that . If the non-degenerate embedded variety is secant defective, then z is the minimal integer such that . If X is not secant defective, then . Since and A is general in W, . Remark 3 gives . Since and , . Thus, . Hence, and the minimal integer w such that satisfies . □
Proposition 5.
Let be an integral and non-degenerate variety. Set . Assume the existence of a variety such that and the linear span of W has dimension . Set . Assume that W is secant defective in and call s the minimal integer such that . If , then and the minimal integer w such that satisfies .
Proof.
Take a general . Since and A is general in W, . We conclude as in the proof of Theorem 3. □
Remark 7.
Many examples are easy using Theorem 3 or a small adaptation of its proof. For instance, if X contains a line , it is sufficient to assume to obtain because for any such that , we have and .
Remark 8.
Take and set . Since , we have . Fix any such that and set . Since , . Remark 3 gives . If and , then increases with x. Thus, all cases of the embedded variety, quite frequently, with for infinitely many x have the property that is the supremum of all , . For , this phenomenon does not occur because if .
Example 3.
Fix an integer and let be a smooth hypersurface such that there is a hyperplane tangent to X at at least two points. Fix such that and H is tangent at each point of . Note that and hence . We have (Remark 6). Since , and , we have . Hence, .
4. Proofs of Theorems 2 and 1
Remark 9.
Fix such that . Since , we obviously have . Now assume and that . By the Alexander–Hirschowitz Theorem, the order d Veronese embedding of is not secant defective. Thus, either or for a general . Thus, . Since , by the definition of the integer , we have . If and , then (Corollary 1).
Proof
(Proof of Theorem 2). Set . Remark 1 gives for all . Thus, to prove the first part of the theorem, it is sufficient to prove that .
(a) Let denote the Severi variety of all integral and nodal curves of degree d and geometric genus , i.e., all integral nodal curves of degree d and with exactly x nodes ([6]). Fix a general and set . Thus, . Since , . Thus, . The Bézout Theorem gives . Thus, to prove that , it is sufficient to prove that for all such that . Since has dimension and C is general in , ([7] (Theorem 3.9)). Since , we have . Thus, we have . It is sufficient to prove that for all such that .
Claim 1: The monodromy group of nodes of is the full symmetric group .
Proof of Claim 1.
Let denote the closure of in the Hilbert scheme of . We use the first two lemmas in [6]. We have . Fix a general . At , the variety has branches, each of them corresponding to a subset of with cardinality (the prescribed nodes). Thus, the monodromy group of the nodes of is the full symmetric group. □
By Claim 1, to get a contradiction, we may assume that for all , such that . We saw that the set of all , , , , depends on parameters and, hence, a general such that satisfies , where A is a general element of . Thus, by the Alexander–Hirschowitz Theorem.
(b) The fact that has a unique irreducible component E of maximal dimension is a consequence of the irreducibility and dimension of and the proof that contains a non-zero open subset of . If , we have (Remark 2), concluding the proof that has a unique irreducible component of maximal dimension. □
Proof of Corollary 1.
Take an irreducible component E of such that , and assume . Theorem 2 gives . Remark 2 gives with strict inequality, unless . Note that . Thus, to prove the corollary, it is sufficient to use the last assertion of Theorem 2. □
Remark 10.
Assume . Thus is secant defective. By part (a) of Proposition 1, we have , , and .
Proof of Theorem 1.
Set . Take general , , and set . By the Bertini and Bezout Theorems ([4] (Ex. II.6.2 and Cor. III.10.9)), C is a smooth complete intersection curve of degree . The adjunction formula gives ([4] (Prop. II.8.20)) and, hence, C has genus . Since , we have . Riemann–Roch gives ([4] (Th. IV.1.3)). Note that is very near to a polynomial of degree d with the leading coefficient a positive real number only depending on d and n (it is a polynomial if is an integer). Set . Fix a general such that . Every with cardinality is a general subset of C with cardinality y. By [8] and the definition of x, we have and for all .
Observation 1: We have proved that for all .
Since S is contained in a hypersurface of degree , is contained in the multiple hypersurface and hence . Since , . Fix . To conclude the proof it is sufficient to prove that . Set . For set . Note that and that each , , is a complete intersection of i hypersurfaces of degree c. Each is smooth, connected, of degree and dimension .
Observation 2: Fix a positive integer t. Since each , , is a complete intersection, for every zero-dimensional scheme , we have if and only if . Observation 1 gives and, hence, for all .
Claim 1: Fix and assume . Then, .
Proof of Claim 1.
It is sufficient to prove that (Observation 2). Note that is the residual scheme of with respect to the divisor of . Since is the complete intersection of and , the residual exact sequence
By assumption . Since , Observation 2 gives . Thus, the long cohomology exact sequence of (2) gives . □
Recall that , and that (Observation 1). Thus, applying times Claim 1, we get . Hence, S is minimal.
Remark 11.
The proof of Theorem 1 gives with . Thus, for a fixed n for large d we may take .
Remark 12.
In the definition of , each is assumed to span . Dropping this condition (i.e., considering , , the order d Veronese embedding) would not change Theorem 2 and Corollary 1. The case ([3] (Lemma 3.4)) shows that sometimes .
5. Examples in the Plane
For any zero-dimensional scheme , , let denote the last integer t such that . Note that implies and that if and only if .
Remark 13.
Let be a non-empty zero-dimensional scheme. Set and . Assume . Then either there is a line L such that or there is a conic D such that or , and Z is the complete intersection of a plane cubic and a degree d plane curve ([9] (Remarques at p. 116)).
Remark 14.
Let be a zero-dimensional scheme. Fix an integer . Since W is zero-dimensional, . Hence, the long cohomology exact sequence of the exact sequence
gives .
We recall the following result [3] (Proposition 5.2), which only used Remark 13.
Proposition 6.
Fix integers and .
(a) If , then .
(b) Take . if and only if S is contained in a reduced conic D and, if D is reducible, say with L and R lines, then d is odd, and .
(c) Assume . Then, for all x such that .
Moreover, for d even and and d odd and , there are examples proving that ([3] (§4.1)).
The aim of this section is to give a complete classification of all for even d and and for all odd d and . From the complete description, we obtain for all d and x considered in Propositions 7–9 (Remark 16).
We need the following observation, which contains the definition of the critical scheme ([3] (§2)).
Remark 15.
Let be a finite set such that . There is a zero-dimensional scheme such that , and each connected component of W has degree 2 ([3] (lemma 2.8)). A scheme such that and for each ([3] (Definition 2.9)). Any such scheme Z is called a critical scheme for S. We have ([3] (Lemma 2.10)) and ([3] (Th. 3.1(i)) and the inclusion ). Now assume . We have ([3] (Lemma 2.10)).
We prove the following three propositions, which give some restrictions on x, S and the critical schemes of S. See the three subsections for the existence parts in all cases listed in the proposition. Thus, the conditions in Propositions 7–9 are necessary and sufficient conditions on x, S and the critical schemes of S.
Proposition 7.
Assume and even. Fix , and let Z be a critical scheme for S. Then, , and Z is the complete intersection of a reduced plane cubic C and a curve of degree d. If C is reducible, then and any line contains points of S.
If , then S has a unique critical scheme, and S is contained in a unique cubic C.
Proof.
Since , Remark 13 gives that either Z is the complete intersection of a cubic C and a degree d curve or there is a line L such that or there is a conic D such that . The existence of the line L is excluded, because we would have and hence S would not be minimal. The existence of the conic D is excluded because we would have and hence S would not be minimal. The minimality of S also gives that C has no multiple components because and we excluded the cases where is a line or a conic. Since , C is the unique cubic containing the complete intersection Z. Set . Consider the residual exact sequence of C:
Assume . Since , we have . By Remark 13, either there is a line R such that (excluded by the minimality of S because ), or there is a conic D such that , excluded because the minimality of S gives and ). Thus, . Hence, . We have . Take a degree d curve T such that . If , then the residual exact sequence of T gives . Assume . We exclude the case of three lines through a common point belonging to S because at least one of these lines would contain at least points of S. The minimality of S also implies that C has no multiple components. Thus, C is reducible and there is a line such that , where and D is a conic, perhaps reducible. Since and , either or . Thus, S is not minimal, a contradiction.
Now assume , i.e., assume . Take another critical scheme and call the unique plane cubic containing . Assume . Since (Remark 15), we would have . Since , C and would have in common an irreducible component, , with . Write , with and . Consider the residual exact sequence of :
Since and (Remark 14), the long cohomology exact sequence of (4) gives . Since S is minimal and , we get , a contradiction. Thus, every critical scheme is contained in C, and it is a complete intersection. If , then is the unique critical scheme of S. Now assume . First, assume that C is integral and, hence, has a unique singular point, p. By assumption , set . The scheme Z is the union of the degree scheme and a degree 2 scheme with . The sheaf has no torsion because is locally free. Since by Riemann–Roch, for the rank 1 torsion-free sheaf , is unique and, hence, Z is unique. Now assume that C is reducible. Since S is minimal, for any irreducible component of C such that . Since , each point of S lies in a unique irreducible component of C. Hence, Z is unique. □
Proposition 8.
Assume and odd. Fix , and let Z be a critical scheme for S. Then, Z is contained in a unique plane cubic C and one of the following cases occurs:
(i) , a unique connected components of Z has degree 1, and Z is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. If , S has a unique critical scheme.
(ii) and no with is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. If , and S has a unique critical scheme, .
Proof.
First, assume . By Remark 13 and the minimality of S, the scheme Z is the complete intersection of a unique cubic C and a degree d plane curve T and, in particular, . Thus, exactly one of the connected components of Z has degree 1. Assume . For each line L, we have . Since , (3) gives that C contains every critical scheme of S. As in the proof of Proposition 7, we get that S has a unique critical scheme.
Now assume . Thus, all connected components of Z have degree 2. Recall that and (Remark 15), i.e., (here we use that ). We use the case of [9] (Cor. 2). Since , Ref. [9] (Cor. 2) gives the existence of an integer and a degree t plane curve C such that
Since S is minimal, (5) excludes the cases . Thus, . Since , . Thus, the residual exact sequence of C gives . Since Z is critical, .
Now assume . We have , because and for all lines L by the minimality of S. Thus, (4) with C instead of , which gives that every critical scheme of S is contained in C. If , then we obtain the uniqueness of the critical scheme. The case of a singular C is solved as in the proof of Proposition 7. □
Proposition 9.
Assume and even. Fix , and let Z be a critical scheme for S. Then, Z is contained in an integral plane cubic C and one of the following cases occurs:
(i) , and Z is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. If , S has a unique critical scheme.
(ii) , and no is the complete intersection of C and a degree d plane curve. Moreover, C is integral. If , S is contained in a unique plane cubic. If , S has a unique critical scheme.
Proof.
Remark 15 gives . Remark 13 gives . Since S is minimal, for every line and for every conic. Thus, if S is contained in a plane cubic C, then C is irreducible.
(a) Assume . Remark 13 gives that Z is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. If , then .
(b) Assume . Since , . Since , we may use [9] (Cor. 2) as in the proof of Proposition 8. We first get the existence of a cubic C such that and, hence, . The residual exact sequence of C gives . Since , for any zero-dimensional scheme such that . Since for all , . A necessary condition for being critical is that no such that is the complete intersection of C and a degree d plane curve. Now we prove the uniqueness of the cubic curve. Assume with a cubic and . Since , C and have a common component, J. We obtain a contradiction and hence the uniqueness of the critical scheme as in the proof of Proposition 7. □
In the next subsections, we show the existence parts for Propositions 7–9 with a description of the sets and their critical schemes.
5.1. d even and
For simplicity, we assume . Take and a plane cubic . Proposition 7 gives and, hence, is a line bundle such that . We show here that in many cases S is not the complete intersection of C and a degree curve. Take an integral plane cubic. The multiplication by 2 is a surjective map between the connected one-dimensional algebraic group and itself. Set . The group G has cardinality 4 if C is smooth, cardinality 2 if C is nodal and cardinality 1 if C is cuspidal. Thus, if C is cuspidal, S is a complete intersection, while if S is either smooth or nodal, we may take such that . Take any such . Since , is base free and . Thus, there are reduced sets such that . Each such A is an element of but not a complete intersection.
Remark 16.
Assume d even and . The last two lines of the proof of Proposition 7 give that each is contained in a unique plane cubic, C, and that if C is reducible, then . We have . On each integral , there are only finitely (and at least one) line bundles such that . Note that . Riemann–Roch gives . Moreover, a general is formed by distinct points. If C is reducible, we get the same conditions (finitely many ’s and ) because C is reduced and each degree w irreducible component T of C contains exactly points of S. Thus, .
5.2. d odd and
We prove that case (i) of Proposition 8 may be realized. We only assume . Fix an integral plane curve C and . Set . Since is even, there is a degree line bundle on C such that . Since , the line bundle is non-special and base point free. Take formed by smooth points of C, none of them being p. Set and . By construction, . Since C is arithmetically Cohen–Macaulay, Z is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. The minimal free resolution of the complete intersection Z gives . Take . Since , and, hence, . Since is contained in the integral curve C and , .
Remark 17.
Assume d odd and . We proved that with and (resp. ) formed by the set of all with a critical scheme of degree (resp. ). Since , each minimal S has a unique critical scheme Z. Let , , denote the set of all criticals associated with some . Since each has a unique critical scheme, and are isomorphic as algebraic sets.
(a) In this step, we describe . The examples given before this remark give a family of dimension because if C is smooth (resp. with a node, resp. with a cusp), the possible ’s are 4 (resp. 2, resp. 1). Take an integral and singular . Set . No may have p as a connected component of its critical scheme Z because Z would not be a complete intersection of C and another curve. Now assume that the cubic C is reducible. Since Z is a complete intersection, the degree 1 connected component is contained in . Thus, .
(b) Now we describe . Fix an integral . To obtain an element of , it is sufficient to take such that and then consider as critical scheme Z for S the only scheme such that and each connected component of Z has degree 2; we only need to exclude a lower dimensional family of sets S which would give an element of . We find that the subset of obtained in this way is an irreducible quasi-projective variety of dimension . Now assume C integral and singular. Call p the singular point of C and assume . There is a one-dimensional family of degree two connected schemes such that . We get a lower-dimensional family. Now assume C is reducible. Any line L (resp. smooth conic) contains at most (resp. ) points of S. Thus, and we see that this family has a lower dimension. Thus, .
5.3. d even and
We prove that case (i) of Proposition 9 occurs. Fix an integral cubic plane curve C and , . Set . Since is even, there is a degree line bundle on C such that . Since , the line bundle is non-special and base point free. Take formed by smooth points of C, none of them being p. Set and . By construction . Since C is arithmetically Cohen–Macaulay, Z is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. The minimal free resolution of the complete intersection Z gives . Take . Since , and hence if and only if is the complete intersection of C and a degree d curve. Since is contained in the integral curve C, and , . Thus, and hence .
Remark 18.
The family just constructed has pure dimension . Now assume that C is singular with . The family with p as one of the degree 1 connected components of the critical scheme has a lower dimension.
6. Partially Symmetric Tensors
Fix integers , , and . Set and . Y is a multiprojective space, and . Every line bundle on Y is of the form for a unique . Let denote the self-intersection number of n copies of the line bundle . The positive integer is the degree of the image of Y by its Segre embedding. The integer is known and computed using hyperdeterminants ([5] ([Ch. 14])).
Theorem 4.
Fix integers , , and . Set , and assume for all i. Let c be the maximal integer such that for all i. Set and . Let be the image of the Segre–Veronese embedding of multidegree of Y. There is a positive real number (only depending on k, and and for fixed growing of order n in ) such that . Moreover, .
In the last part of the proof of Theorem 4, we give an explicit value of in terms of k, and . From this value, one can play, keeping some of the integers , and sending the other to infinity. The easiest case is when and .
Proof of Theorem 4.
The “ Moreover part ” follows from Proposition 1.
The definition of c gives . Let general elements of the linear system . Set . By the Bertini Theorem ([4] (Cor. III.10.9)), C is a smooth and connected curve. Since , the adjunction formula gives ([4] (Prop. II.8.20)).
Observation 1: The Künneth formula gives for all if for all .
Set . For , set . By Bertini’s Theorem, each is a smooth and connected variety, and . Note that . By the definition of c, we have . Thus, using the Koszul complex of the equations of , we get the surjectivity of the restriction map . The surjectivity of all these maps, Ref. [8] and the generality of S in C are enough to mimic the proof of Theorem 1. We now compute in terms of c the real number . We first need to obtain the integer . Since the intersection product is multilinear, and C is the complete intersection of c hypersurfaces of multidegree , . Let g be the genus of C. Recall that . Thus, . Since , Riemann–Roch gives ([4] (Th. IV.1.3)). Thus, quoting [8], we see that we may take . □
Remark 19.
In the definition of , we assumed that each has the property that Y is the minimal multiprojective space containing S. Dropping this assumption, i.e., taking instead of , would not change Theorem 4.
We raise the following four open questions:
- Is for for all not in the Alexander–Hirschowitz list, i.e., all ?
- Let , , the Segre embedding of . Obviously, . Proposition 4 gives and for all . Is ? If so, what is the order of increasing of and ? Give lower and upper bounds for , . The same for .
- Let , , and , denote the Segre embedding of . Give lower and upper bound on and for fixed k for .
- Fix integer , and . Let , , denote the embedding of . Study and as a function of d and compute upper/lower bounds for their limits for .
7. Methods
There are no experimental data and no part of a proof is completed numerically. All results are given with full proofs.
8. Conclusions
Let be a smooth variety. For each positive integer x let be the set of all subsets of X formed by x. The Terracini loci of X are subsets of (the element of at which a certain differential drop rank), which are the finite union of algebraic varieties. For some X they are empty. We study their non-emptiness, the maximal dimension of their irreducible components and the maximal and minimal x such that . Our best results are if X is either a Veronese embedding of a projective space , all (the set-up for the additive decomposition of homogeneous polynomials) or a Segre–Veronese embedding of an arbitrary multiprojective space (the set-up for partially symmetric tensors). For the Veronese embedding of the plane, we describe exactly the Terracini loci for low x values. For an arbitrary X, we provide several examples in which all Terracini loci are empty, several criteria for non-emptiness and examples with the maximal defect a priori possible of an element of a Terracini locus. We list four open questions.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All proofs are contained in the body of the paper. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Landsberg, J.M. Tensors: Geometry and Applications; Graduate Studies in Mathematics; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2012; Volume 128. [Google Scholar]
- Ådlandsvik, B. Joins and higher secant varieties. Math. Scand. 1987, 61, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballico, E.; Brambilla, M.C. On minimally Terracini finite sets of points in projective spaces. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.07161. [Google Scholar]
- Hartshorne, R. Algebraic Geometry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Gelfand, I.M.; Kapranov, M.M.; Zelevinsky, A.V. Discriminants, Resultants and Multidimensional Determinants; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, J. On the Severi problem. Invent. Math. 1986, 84, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treger, R. Plane curves with nodes. Can. J. Math. 1989, 41, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciliberto, C.; Miranda, R. Interpolations on curvilinear schemes. J. Algebra 1998, 203, 677–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellia, P.; Peskine, C. Groupes de points de P2: Caractère et position uniforme. In Algebraic Geometry, Proceedings of the International Conference, L’Aquila, Italy, 30 May–4 June 1988; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).