Abstract
In this paper, we study the existence of solutions to a fractional -difference equation equipped with separate local boundary value conditions. The uniqueness of solutions is established by means of Banach’s contraction mapping principle, while the existence results of solutions are obtained by applying Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem and the Leary–Schauder alternative. Some examples illustrating the main results are also presented.
Keywords:
Caputo fractional (p, q)-difference equations; boundary conditions; existence and uniqueness; Leray–Schauder alternative; fixed-point theory MSC:
05A30; 26A51; 26D10; 26D15
1. Introduction
Fractional calculus, dealing with the integrals and derivatives of arbitrary order, constitutes an important area of investigation in view of its extensive theoretical development and applications during the last few decades. For some interesting results on fractional differential equations ranging from the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the analytic and numerical methods for finding solutions, we refer the reader to the following articles: [1,2,3,4,5]. Concerning the applications of fractional differential equations in engineering, clinical disciplines, biology, physics, chemistry, economics, signal and image processing, and control theory, for example, see [6,7,8,9,10] for more details.
The study of q-calculus was introduced by Jackson in 1910, see [11,12] for more details. As one of the major driving forces behind the modern mathematical analysis, q-calculus has played important roles in both mathematical and physical problems. For instance, Fock [13] has studied the symmetry of hydrogen atoms using the q-difference equation. The concepts of q-calculus found numerous applications in a variety of fields, such as combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, number theory, quantum theory, quantum mechanics, and theory of relativity for details, see [14,15,16], and the references cited therein. One can find the basic concepts of q-calculus in the text by Kac and Cheung [17], while some details about fractional q-difference calculus can be found in [14,18,19,20,21].
The subject of -calculus is known as the extension of q-calculus to its two-parameter variant and has efficient applications in many fields. One can find some useful information about the -calculus in [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
In 2021, Neang et al. [31] considered the nonlocal boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional -difference equations with taking care of solutions of existence and uniqueness results obtained by
where , are constants, denoted by Caputo fractional type, while denoted by first-order -derivative.
Qin and Sun [32] studied on a nonlinear fractional -difference Schrödinger equation in 2021, given by the following:
where is a Riemann–Liouville-type fractional -difference operator, and
Moreover, Qin and Sun [33] studied positive solutions for fractional -difference boundary value problems given by the following:
where is a Riemann–Liouville-type fractional -difference operator, and is a non-negative continuous function.
However, even though Neang et al. [31] investigated and proved the nonlocal boundary value problems by considering on existence results of a class of fractional -difference equations, it still was a bit complicated with the domain of a function when the authors applied the fractional -integral operators. In this paper, to make this paper more smooth and convenient, we have investigated the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the local boundary value problem of fractional -difference equation with a new function obtained , given by the following:
where are constants, denoted by Caputo fractional type, while denoted by the first-order -derivative.
2. Preliminaries
In this part, some fundamental results and definitions of the -calculus, which can be found in [14,23,25] are given.
Let be an interval with and be constants,
For , the q-analogue of the power function is given by
For , the -analogue of the power function is given by
The generalization of q-gamma function is called -gamma is given by
Remark 1.
and
The definition of -beta function for is defined by
and (13) can also be written as
see [34,35] for more details.
Definition 1
([23]). Let Then, the -derivative of f is defined by
and , provided that g is differential at
Definition 2
([23]). Let be an arbitrary function, and t be a real number. The -integral of g is defined as
provided that the series of the right-hand side in (16) converges.
Theorem 1
([23]). Let be differentiable on with a constant λ. Then,
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- ;
- (iii)
- ;
- (iv)
- ,
where for .
Theorem 2
([30]). Let g be a continuous function on . Then,
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
- ;
- (iii)
- , for .
Definition 3
([34]). Let g be a continuous function defined on . Then, the Riemann–Liouville fractional -integral type is stated by for
where . Notice that if , then
Definition 4
([34]). Let g be a continuous function defined on . Then, the Riemann–Liouville fractional -derivative type is stated by
where is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α. Notice that if , then
Definition 5
([34]). Let g be a continuous function defined on . If , then the Caputo fractional -derivative is stated by
where is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α. Notice that if , then .
To obtain the sufficient condition of existence and uniqueness of solutions of (7)–(8), employing the following Lemmas of fractional -calculus play an important role in those main results.
Lemma 1
([34]). Let g be a continuous function on . Then,
- (i)
- ;
- (ii)
Lemma 2
([34]). Let g be a continuous function on . If , and , then the following equality holds:
Lemma 3
([34]). Let g be a continuous function on . If and , then
Lemma 4.
In order to prove (7) and (8), we first give a useful Lemma, as follows:
is defined by
where
and it is supposed that
3. Main Results
Let denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from to , endowed with norm, defined by
In view of Lemma 4, we define an operator as
where
Observe that x is a solution to (7) and (8) if—and only if—x is a fixed-point of For convenience, we denote
where
Theorem 3.
Let g be a continuous function on and there exists a integrable function , such that
- , for each and
If , then (7) and (8) has a unique solution.
Proof.
We transform the problem (7) and (8) into a fixed-point problem where the operator is given by (24). Applying Banach’s contraction mapping principle, we will show that has a unique fixed point. Define a ball, , with the radius, r, satisfying
where
and . We have
This shows that .
This is because , is a contraction. Therefore, (7) and (8) has a unique solution. The proof is completed. □
Remark 2.
If g is a continuous function on , and there exists a constant with
then (7) and (8) has a unique solution, if .
Lemma 5
(Kranoselskii’s fixed-point theorem [36]). Let M be a closed, bounded, convex, and non-empty subset of a Banach space X. Let be two operators, such that:
- (i)
- whenever ;
- (ii)
- A is compact and continuous;
- (iii)
- B is a contraction mapping.
Then, there exists , such that
Theorem 4.
Let g be a continuous functions on , satisfying Assume that
- there exists a function, , and a non-decreasing function, , withwhere
Proof.
Define where
where and define the operators and on as
and
Observe that For we have
Thus, By and (27), is a contraction mapping. By continuity of f, we obtain that is continuous. It is easy to see that
Thus, the set is uniformly bounded. is compact. First, Let
and let with Then, we obtain
which is independent of x, and tends to zero as So, the set is equicontinuous. By the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem, is compact on Thus, (7) and (8) has at least one solution on □
Remark 3.
Let g be a continuous function on , satisfying Assume that
Lemma 6
(Nonlinear alternative for single value maps [37]). Let E be a Banach space, a closed, convex subset of E and an open subset of with Suppose that is a continuous, compact function; that is, is a relatively compact subset of map. Then, either
- (i)
- has a fixed point in or
- (ii)
- there is a (the boundary of in ) and with
Theorem 5.
Let g be a continuous function on . Assume that
- there exists functions and a non-decreasing function, , such that
- there exists a number, , such thatwhere
Then, (7) and (8) has at least one solution on
Proof.
Notice that defined by (24). is continuous. Let be a sequence of the function, such that on Since
Therefore, we obtain
which implies that
Thus, the operator is continuous.
Next, we show that maps a bounded set into a bounded set in For a positive number let Then, for any we have
We have
Next, maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of Let with be two points and be a bounded ball in For , we obtain
Obviously, the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of as Thus, it follows by the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem that is completely continuous. Now, the operator satisfies all the conditions of Lemma 6; therefore, by its conclusion, either condition or condition holds.
Now, we show that the conclusion is not possible. Let
with Then, it can be shown that
Suppose there exists and , such that Then, for such choices of x and , we have
Thus, it leads to a contradiction. Accordingly, by Lemma 6, is fixed point of . Therefore, x a solution of the problem (7) and (8). This completes the proof. □
Remark 4.
If in are continuous, then where A is defined by (26).
4. Examples
Example 1.
Let Given a non-negative function, Consider
Since
it follows that the condition holds. Let From (25), by direct computation, we obtain and . It easy to see that
This satisfies Theorem 3. Accordingly, by Theorem 3, (30) and (31) has a unique solution.
Example 2.
Let and . Given a non-negative function
Consider
By applying Theorem 5, through simple calculation, we have and .
Since
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we investigated the local separated boundary value problem of a class of fractional -difference equations involving the Caputo fractional derivative. By applying some well-known tools in fixed-point theory, such as Banach’s contraction mapping principle, Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem, and the Leary–Schauder nonlinear alternative, we derive the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the problem. Moreover, some illustrating examples were also presented.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.N. and K.N.; investigation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; methodology, P.N. and K.N.; validation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; visualization, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; writing—original draft, P.N. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, P.N. and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received funding support from the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), Thailand.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank anonymous referees for comments which are helpful for improvement in this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Gopal, N.S.; Jagan, M.J. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to a nabla fractional difference equation with dual nonlocal boundary conditions. Foundations 2022, 2, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Agarwal, R.P. On nonlocal fractional boundary value problems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 2011, 18, 535–544. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y. Positive solutions for a nonlocal fractional differential equation. Nonlinear. Anal. 2011, 74, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, N.J.; Morgado, M.L. Fractional boundary value problems: Analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2011, 14, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K. Nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order and multi-strip boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Diethelm, K. The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Application of the Fractional Differential Equations; North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lakshmikantham, V.; Leela, S.; Devi, J.V. Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systyms; Cambridge Scientific Publishers: Cottenham, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Accademic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure. Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. q-Difference equations. Amer. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fock, V. Zur Theorie des Wasserstoffatoms. Z. Physik. 1935, 98, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, R. Nontrivial solutions for fractional q-difference boundary value problems. Electron J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 2010, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aral, A.; Gupta, V.; Agarwal, R.P. Applications of q-calculus in Operator Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. A study of second-order q-difference equations with boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Salam, W.A. Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 1967, 15, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Purnaras, I.K. Existence results for nonlinear q-difference equations with nonlocal boundary conditions. Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 19, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
- El-Shahed, M.; Al-Askar, F. Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations. ISRN Math. Anal. 2011, 2011, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ferreira, R.A.C. Positive solutions for a class of boundary value problems with fractional q-difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aral, A.; Gupta, V. Applications of (p, q)-gamma function to Szász durrmeyer operators. Publ. l’Inst. Math. 2017, 102, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p, q)-calculus and some (p, q)-taylor formulas. Results Math. 2018, 73, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usman, T.; Saif, M.; Choi, J. Certain identities associated with (p, q)-binomial coefficients and (p, q)-Stirling polynomials of the second kind. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadjang, P.N. On the (p, q)-gamma and the (p, q)-beta functions. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1506.07394. [Google Scholar]
- Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. On (p, q)-analogues of Bernstein operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 278, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabseang, J.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J. (p, q)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and (p, q)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamsrisuk, N.; Promsakon, C.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Nonlocal boundary value problems for (p, q)-difference equations. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2018, 10, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Promsakon, C.; Kamsrisuk, N.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. On the second-order (p, q)-difference equation with separated boundary conditions. Adv. Math. Phys. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M.; Göv, E. (p, q)-Integral inequalities. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Neang, P.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Ahmad, B. Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional (p, q)-Difference Equations. Fractal. Fract. 2021, 5, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Sun, S. On a nonlinear fractional (p, q)-difference Schrödinger equation. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Sun, S. Positive solutions for fractional (p, q)-difference boundary value problems. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soontharanon, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. On fractional (p, q)-calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milovanović, G.V.; Gupta, V.; Malik, N. (p, q)-beta functions and applications in approximation. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2018, 24, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnoselskii, M.A. Two remarks on the method of successive approximations. Uspekhi. Mat. Nauk. 1995, 10, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
- Granas, A.; Dugundji, J. Fixed point Theory and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).