Abstract
We examine a few mathematical characteristics of Rogers–Ramanujan type identities as a follow-up work. Recently authors interpreted Rogers–Ramanujan type identities combinatorially using signed color partitions. In the present study, we discovered several congruences for the coefficients of powers of q that are in arithmetic progressions modulo powers of 2 and 3.
MSC:
05A17; 11P83; 11P84; 03E05
1. Introduction
The Rogers–Ramanujan identities (RRI) are the two most well-known q-series identities that have impacted studies in many branches of mathematics and science, and are given as
where
These identities were first discovered by Rogers [1] but were appreciated only after Ramanujan rediscovered these sometime before 1913. Despite being over a century old, the Rogers–Ramanujan identities are still the focus of ongoing research. RRI played a major role in algebraic characters [2], partition theory [3], and statistical mechanics [4]. Some of the useful texts on the history of these identities are found in Refs. [3,5,6,7]. These identities are of the form ‘Sum=Product’; therefore, they are sometimes called sum-product identities. MacMahon [8] provided the partition–theoretic interpretations of the RRI given by (1) and (2) as:
Theorem 1.
The number of partitions of n into parts with minimal difference 2 equals the number of partitions of n into parts which are congruent to (mod 5).
Theorem 2.
The number of partitions of n with minimal part 2 and minimal difference 2 equals the number of partitions of n into parts which are congruent to (mod 5).
Recently, P. Afsharijoo [9] added a new companion to the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. This new companion counts partitions with different types of constraints on even and odd parts. Bailey [10] systematically explored the Rogers–Ramanujan type identities (RRTIs). Additionally, a list of 130 identities of the Rogers–Ramanujan type identities was provided by Slater [11]. Furthermore, Chu and Zhang [12] found many RRTIs using certain transformations. The hard hexagon model in statistical mechanics, a specific instance of a solvable family of hard-square-type models, naturally incorporated many Rogers–Ramanujan type identities. Baxter [13] explained that a number of Rogers–Ramanujan type identities occur in the determination of sub-lattice densities and order parameters. Kedem et al. [14] believed that the Rogers–Ramanujan identities represent the partition function of a physical system with quasiparticles that adhered to specific exclusion statistics. The relationship between RRI and fractional statistics is developed by these exclusion statistics, which are related to fractional statistics. Furthermore, the combinatorial interpretations of many RRTIs were studied using different combinatorial tools, and are available in Refs. [15,16,17,18]. Recently, we have found the combinatorial interpretations of many RRTIs, some of which are listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, using signed partitions (for signed partitions, readers are referred to Ref. [19]). Additionally, many mathematicians were interested in finding the arithmetic properties of some restricted partition functions [20,21].
The purpose of this paper is to explore the congruences for RRTI, as given in Section 3, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. We have arranged 17 Rogers–Ramanujan type identities into three groups: Group 1 contains 10 RRTIs, which are listed in Table 1; Group 2 contains 3 identities, which are listed in Table 2; and Group 3 contains 4 identities, which are listed in Table 3.
2. Preliminaries
We require the following definitions and lemmas to prove the main results in the next section. For Ramanujan’s general theta function is defined as
Using Jacobi’s triple-product identity [22] (entry 19, p. 35), (3) becomes
The special cases of are
In some of the proofs, we also employ Jacobi’s identity from Ref. [23] as Equation (1.7.1):
Lemma 1.
We have
Proof.
Using the two-dissection of and from (Ref. [23], Equation (1.9.4) and (1.10.1)), we obtain (8) and (10). On replacing q by in (5), we obtain (9) and (11). Furthermore, (12), (13), (15), (16), and (17) are Equations (30.12.3), (22.1.13), (22.1.14), (30.10.4), and (30.10.3), respectively, in Ref. [23]. Next, (14) follows from (13) by using q instead of . □
Lemma 2.
We have
where
Proof.
The first identity follows from Equations (33.2.1) and (33.2.5) in Ref. [23]. The second identity is equivalent to the three-dissection of (see Ref. [23] Equation (14.3.2)). We obtained (20) by replacing q with and and multiplying the two results, where is the primitive cube root of unity. □
The three-dissection of follows as:
Lemma 3.
We have
Proof.
Identity (22) is Equation (14.3.3) of Ref. [23]. □
Lemma 4.
In Ref. [24], for any prime ,
where
If and , then .
3. Main Results
In Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, the sum sides of RRTIs are the generators for the partitions written in the second column, and the product sides of the RRTIs are written in the third column.
- Group 1
- We now present 10 RRTIs in this group from Ref. [12] with identity nos. 8, 9, 10, 33, 45, 70, 98, 104, 111, and 112, as shown below.
Table 1.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
Table 1.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
| Function | Sum Side | = | Product Side |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = |
- Throughout the remainder of this paper, we use
- From the binomial theorem, we have
Theorem 3.
For , we have
Theorem 4.
For , we have
Theorem 5.
For , we have
Theorem 6.
For , we have
Theorem 7.
For , we have
Theorem 8.
For , we have
Theorem 9.
For , we have
Theorem 10.
For prime
where .
Theorem 11.
For , we have
Theorem 12.
For , we have
Theorem 13.
For , we have
- Group 2
- In this group, we have the following RRTIs with identity nos. 1, 36, and 37 in Ref. [12]. These RRTIs have the same congruences.
Table 2.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
Table 2.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
| Function | Sum Side | = | Product Side |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = |
Theorem 14.
For and , and 13, we have
- Group 3
- In this group, we use the following RRTIs from Ref. [12] with identity nos. 3, 39, 46, and 103. The identities , and , have the same congruences.
Table 3.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
Table 3.
Rogers–Ramanujan type identities.
| Function | Sum Side | = | Product Side |
|---|---|---|---|
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = | |||
| = |
Theorem 15.
For and , we have
Theorem 16.
For and , we have
4. Proofs of Main Results
Proof of Theorem 3.
From (105), we readily reach (27). Putting (10) in (104) and (105), then extracting odd terms from both equations, we obtain (28) and (30), respectively. Consider (102),
Applying (8) in the above relation, extracting odd terms, we have
and again putting (8) then extracting odd terms gives (31) for , and extracting even terms gives
Extracting the odd terms from the above equation, we reach (32). □
Consider
Extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Substituting (8) in (100), on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
From (103), we also reach (26)
and we extract even terms to reach (29). On bringing out the odd terms, from the above equation and using (25), we have
Extracting odd terms from the above equation to obtain (31) for and on extracting even terms, we obtain
Using (22) in the above equation and extracting the terms involving , we divide by and replace by q to obtain (33).
- On substituting (8) in (101), extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Proof of Theorem 4.
Using (8) in above equation, by extracting even and odd terms, we have
Putting (8) in (106) and extracting odd terms, we obtain
Again, extracting odd terms from the above equation to obtain (35), and then extracting even terms, we obtain
On extracting odd terms, we obtain (37).
Then, by extracting odd terms to obtain (34), and on taking modulo 8, we have
By extracting odd terms from above we obtain (36). □
- If we consider (107) and then substitute (8), we have
Proof of Theorem 5.
Consider
Substituting the value from (8), we obtain
Extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Using (10) in both (109) and (110), we then extract the odd terms from both of them to obtain (39) and (40), respectively. Again, from (108),
Using (20) and (22), we have
Then, we extract the terms involving and replace with by q to obtain
Next, extract the terms involving from (111), dividing both sides by and replacing by q to obtain
From the above equation, we readily reach (38). Now, using (9) in (112), we have
On extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
We extract the odd and even terms from (114) and (115), respectively, to obtain (41) for . From (113), we have
Using (15), then extracting the even and odd terms, we obtain
We extract even and odd terms from (116) and (117), respectively, to obtain (41) for . □
Proof of Theorem 6.
Substituting (9) in the above equation to obtain
then extracting even terms, we obtain (118) and on extracting odd terms we obtain (42).
Using (12) in (118), and on extracting odd terms and taking modulo 4, we have
Using (8), and again on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Substituting (13) in (119), extracting even terms, we obtain
Using (8) and extracting odd terms we have
We extract odd terms to obtain (44). Consider (120), and by using (13) upon bringing out the even and odd terms, we obtain
We extract the even and odd terms from (121) and (122), respectively, to obtain (43) for . □
Proof of Theorem 7.
Using (8) in the above equation,
Extracting even terms then using (20), we extract the terms involving the , , and terms, and we obtain (123), (45), and (46), respectively.
Taking modulo 4,
Using (21), we have
Extracting the term involving and , we have (47) and
Using (22) in the above equation, extracting the terms involving and , we obtain (48) and
Using (21) and extracting the terms involving , we obtain (49). □
Proof of Theorem 8.
Using (8) and extracting even and odd terms, we have
Substituting the value from (8) in (125), on extracting the even and odd terms, we have
Taking modulo 4 in (127),
Extracting the odd terms gives (53) (for ), and on extracting even terms gives
Extracting the odd terms gives (56), and on extracting even terms gives
By using Jacobi’s triple-product identity, we have
Since , we obtain (58). Consider (128) and taking modulo 16,
Extracting odd terms from the above equation gives (54). Consider (126) and using (10), by extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Consider (129) and using (8), extracting odd terms gives (53) (for ). Similarly, taking modulo 16 in (130), we obtain
Extracting odd terms gives (54) (for ). Consider (124) and using (19) and (20)
Extracting the terms involving and gives (131), (50), and (51), respectively.
Using (8) and extracting even and odd terms, we have
Using (10) in (132) and extracting odd terms, we have
On extracting even terms we arrive at (57). Consider (133) and using (10), which, on extracting even terms, gives (55). □
Proof of Theorem 9.
Using (19) and (20), we have
By extracting the terms involving , and and taking modulo 4, we have
Extracting the terms involving and dividing by , respectively, by replacing by q, we obtain (60). Consider (135) and using (17), on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Consider (137), on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain (139) and (62) (for ), respectively.
Extracting odd terms from the above equation gives (63). From (138), extracting even and odd terms gives (140) and (62) (for ), respectively.
Using (17), extracting even and odd terms, we have
From (136) and (142), we have Extracting odd terms from (141), we arrive at (64). Consider (136), and by extracting the terms involving , and , we obtain (61). □
Proof of Theorems 10 and 11.
Using (18), by extracting the terms involving and , we have
Taking modulo 2 in (143),
From Lemma 4, we have
By extracting the terms involving , dividing by , and replacing by , we obtain
Extracting the terms involving for ,
which proves (65). Taking modulo 4 in (144), we have
Extracting the terms involving , and from above, we obtain (145), (67), and (68), respectively.
From above, it is easy to conclude (66). □
Proof of Theorem 12.
Using (20), extracting the terms involving , and , we obtain (146), (69), and (70), respectively.
Taking modulo 3, we have
Using (18), we obtain
Extracting the terms involving and replacing by q, we have
On extracting odd terms, we obtain (71). Extracting the terms involving , dividing by q, and replacing by q from (147), we have
On extracting odd terms, we reach (72). □
Proof of Theorem 13.
Using (8), extracting the even and odd terms and taking modulo 4, we have
Using (9) in (148), we obtain
Extracting even and odd terms, we have
Substituting (8) in (150) and extracting odd terms, we have
On extracting odd and even terms, we reach (75) (for ) and
respectively. Extracting odd terms from the above equation, we obtain (76). Consider (149) by extracting odd and even terms to obtain (73) and
respectively. Extracting odd and even terms from the above equation, we have (74) (for ) and
respectively. On extracting odd terms from the above equation, we arrive at (75) (for ). Consider (151), and by extracting odd and even terms, we have (74) and
respectively. Extracting odd and even terms from the above equation, we obtain (75) (for ) and
respectively. We extract the terms involving from the above equation to obtain (77). □
Proof of Theorem 14.
For , we consider
Using (16) in the above equation, and extracting even and odd terms, we have
Using (10) in (153), again extracting the even and odd terms, we obtain
From (156), we obtain (80). Now, on extracting odd terms from (155) and (156), we reach (83) and (85) (for ), respectively. From (153), we have
Using (16), extracting even and odd terms, we have
Substituting the values from (10) in (157) and extracting even terms and odd terms, we obtain
On extracting odd terms from (160), we obtain (88), and extracting even terms gives us
Extracting odd terms gives us (91). Now consider (154), and by using (14) and extracting even and odd terms, we have
Additionally, we obtain (81). From (161), extracting the odd terms gives us (84), while extracting even terms gives
According to Jacobi’s triple product
As , we obtain (90). Consider (162) and extracting the odd terms to obtain (85) (for ), and by extracting even terms and using Jacobi’s triple product, we ultimately reach (89).
Consider (152), using (20), and extracting the terms involving and , we obtain
Additionally,
On extracting odd parts, we obtain (82), and on extracting even parts and using (15), we have
On extracting odd terms, we obtain
On extracting odd terms, we obtain (87). Taking modulo 8 for (166), using (15), and extracting the even terms gives
On extracting odd terms, we reach (86). □
Proof of Theorem 15.
For 15, we consider
Substituting (12) in the above equation and then extracting even and odd terms, we have
Taking modulo 2 in (167), we have
On extracting odd terms from the above equation, we readily reach (92). Consider (168) and substituting (10),
On extracting odd terms, we obtain (93) and (170). Similarly, extracting even terms from the same, we have
Using (12) in (169) and extracting odd terms, we obtain
Extracting odd terms to reach (94). Consider (170) and using (12), on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Extracting odd terms from both the above equations to obtain (95). □
Proof of Theorem 16.
For 17, we consider
Using (17) and extracting even and odd terms, we have
We use (8) in (171) and extract even and odd terms to obtain
Extracting odd terms from (173), we readily reach (97). Consider (172) and using (8), and on extracting even and odd terms, we obtain
Taking modulo 4 in (175),
which implies Now consider (174) and using (10), and on extracting odd terms, we obtain (98). Taking modulo 8 in (176), we have
Using (17) in the above and extracting even and odd terms, we have
Extracting odd terms from the above equations, we obtain (99). □
5. Conclusions
This paper provides some congruences for Rogers–Ramanujan type identities to modulo powers of 2, 3, and 6. As mentioned in Section 1, these ’sum-product’ identities have been studied by many mathematicians in various contexts (see Refs. [5,18,25,26]). However, in the literature, to the best of our knowledge, we have not found any congruences for Rogers–Ramanujan type identities; instead, there is a huge selection of literature that studies congruences for partition functions. For instance, Ramanujan beautiful congruences for partition functions are shown as:
These congruences are generalized and written in the form
where The above three congruences were further extended to arbitrary powers of 5, 7, and 11 (for instance, see Ref. [27]). Thus, our paper adds one more direction to the study of Rogers–Ramanujan type identities. For future research, one could look for further interesting Rogers–Ramanujan type identities or others available in the literature to find their congruence modulo higher primes. Furthermore, one can think of generalizing the congruences that are proved in this paper. Moreover, it will be fascinating to prove these congruences using some other techniques, such as modular forms.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft, V.G.; Writing—review & editing, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The second author is supported by the SERB MATRICS Project Ref. No. MTR/ 2019/000123.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability
The manuscript has no associated data.
References
- Rogers, L.J. Second memoir on the expansion of certain infinite products. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1893, 1, 318–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lepowsky, J.; Milne, S.C. Lie algebraic approaches to classical partition identities. Adv. Math. 1978, 29, 15–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, G.E. Partitions: Yesterday and Today; New Zealand Mathematical Society: Wellington, New Zealand, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Baxter, R.J. Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics; Academic Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, G.E. On the proofs of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities. In q-Series and Partitions; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1989; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Ramanujan, S. Collected Papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1927. [Google Scholar]
- Sills, A.V. An Invitation to the Rogers-Ramanujan Identities; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- MacMahon, P.A. Combinatory Analysis; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2001; Volume 137. [Google Scholar]
- Afsharijoo, P. Even–odd partition identities of Rogers–Ramanujan type. Ramanujan J. 2022, 57, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, W.N. Identities of the Rogers–Ramanujan type. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1948, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, L.J. Further identities of the Rogers–Ramanujan type. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1952, 2, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, W.; Zhang, W. Bilateral bailey lemma and Rogers–Ramanujan identities. Adv. Appl. Math. 2009, 42, 358–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baxter, R.J. Rogers-Ramanujan identities in the hard hexagon model. J. Stat. Phys. 1981, 26, 427–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kedem, R.; Klassen, T.R.; McCoy, B.M.; Melzer, E. Fermionic sum representations for comformal field theory characters. Phys. Lett. B 1993, 307, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, A.K.; Rana, M. Two new combinatorial interpretations of a fifth order mock theta function. J. Indian Math. Soc. 2007, 74, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, M.; Agarwal, A.K. Frobenius partition theoretic interpretation of a fifth order mock theta function. Can. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2009, 3, 859–863. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, M.; Sareen, J.K. On combinatorial extensions of some mock theta functions using signed partitions. Adv. Theor. Appl. Math. 2015, 10, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, A.K. Rogers–Ramanujan identities for n–color partitions. J. Number Theory 1988, 28, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gupta, V.; Rana, M. On some combinatorics of Rogers–Ramanujan type identities using signed color partitions. In Current Trends in Mathematical Analysis and Its Interdisciplinary Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 99–114. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, H.C. Ramanujan’s cubic continued fraction and Ramanujan type congruences for a certain partition function. Int. J. Number Theory 2010, 6, 819–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.L.S. Congruences modulo 27 for cubic partition pairs. J. Number Theory 2017, 171, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berndt, B.C. Number Theory in the Spirit of Ramanujan; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschhorn, M.D. The Power of q. In Developments in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 49. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, S.P.; Gu, N.S.S. Arithmetic properties of l-regular partitions. Adv. Appl. Math. 2013, 51, 507–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, A.K. New classes of infinite 3-way partition identities. Ars Comb. 1996, 44, 33–54. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, A.K. Lattice paths and n-color partitions. Util. Math. 1998, 53, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
- Ahlgren, S.; Ono, K. Congruence properties for the partition function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12882–12884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).