You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Education Sciences
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

19 December 2025

Integrating Reading, Writing, and Digital Tools in Science: A Participatory-Design Study of the InSPECT Framework

,
,
and
1
Learning Engineering Institute, Arizona State University, Interdisciplinary B, 1120 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
2
Department of Learning Sciences, College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, 30 Pryor Street, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci.2026, 16(1), 6;https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010006 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Reading and Writing in the Digital Age: Supporting Language and Literacy Development for Students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to engage high school science teachers as co-design partners in refining and extending instructional frameworks to support multiple-document reading and writing in science classrooms. Using a participatory mixed-methods design, the project adapted the InSPECT framework for secondary science, developed professional development (PD) materials to introduce the framework, and explored the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in lesson planning. Five virtual focus group sessions guided the co-design of PD activities, followed by a pilot implementation in one biology classroom. Data included focus group and interview transcripts, surveys, and student work artifacts. Analyses examined teachers’ perceptions of PD features, framework usability, and student engagement. Teachers valued PD that was practical, relevant, and feasible within classroom constraints and described the frameworks as clear, stepwise structures that supported lesson design and literacy integration. Student work showed that paraphrasing was an accessible entry point, while bridging, elaboration, and source evaluation required additional modeling. Teachers viewed generative AI as a promising planning aid but expressed concerns about accuracy and ethics. Findings informed revisions emphasizing discipline-specific exemplars, scaffolds for higher-order strategies, and AI-literacy modules, illustrating how participatory design can yield feasible, teacher-centered PD.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.