What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development? A Theoretical Review with Perspectives on Digital Inequality
Abstract
1. Introduction: Addressing Digital Well-Being in Schools
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. From References to Citations: Forward and Backward Search
2.2. Patterns and Propositions: A Concept-Centric Analysis
3. What Does Digital Well-Being Mean?
3.1. Environment
3.2. Intervention
3.3. Inequality
3.4. Education
4. What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development?
5. Critical Reflections
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Authors/Concepts | Environment | Intervention | Inequality | Education | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I 1 | S 2 | M 3 | I | S | M | I | S | M | I | S | M | |
(Vanden Abeele, 2021) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Gui et al., 2017) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | - |
(Gui & Büchi, 2021) | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | - |
(Büchi, 2021) | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | - |
(Büchi et al., 2019) | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | + | - | - |
(Meier, 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Büchi et al., 2018) | + | + | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | - | - |
(Schneider et al., 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Gui et al., 2023) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | + | + | - |
(Gennari et al., 2023) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + |
(Büchi & Hargittai, 2022) | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | - | - |
(Dennis, 2021) | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024) | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - |
(Prinsloo et al., 2024) | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
(Feerrar, 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | - |
(Roy, 2022) | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | - |
(Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - |
(Valasek, 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - |
(Radtke et al., 2022) | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Rosenberg & Vogelman-Natan, 2022) | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Islambouli et al., 2024) | + | - | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Nguyen et al., 2024) | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | - |
(Vanden Abeele et al., 2022) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Reinecke et al., 2022) | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(Mayiwar et al., 2024) | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
References
- Annemann, C., Menge, C., & Gerick, J. (2024). Beanspruchung von Lehrkräften durch digitale Medien in der Schule. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 14, 439–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bos, W., Eickelmann, B., Gerick, J., Goldhammer, F., Schaumburg, H., Schwippert, K., Senkbeil, M., Schulz-Zander, R., & Wendt, H. (Eds.). (2014). ICILS 2013. Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in der 8. Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burr, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2313–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Büchi, M. (2021). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media & Society, 26(1), 172–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2018). How social well-being is affected by digital inequalities. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3686–3706. Available online: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8780 (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2019). Digital overuse and subjective well-being in a digitized society. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 2056305119886031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büchi, M., & Hargittai, E. (2022). A need for considering digital inequality when studying social media use and well-being. Social Media + Society, 8, 20563051211069125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chambers, F., Jones, A., Murphy, O., & Sandford, R. (2019). Design thinking for digital well-being: Theory and practice for educators. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Cramer, M., & Hosenfeld, I. (2023). Arbeitsanforderungen und Ressourcen der digitalen Mediennutzung bei Lehrkräften. Prävention & Gesundheitsförderung, 19, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadaczynski, K. (2024). Schulleitungen und Gesundheit: Überblick über Perspektiven, Befunde und Ansätze für die schulische Gesundheitsförderung. Die Deutsche Schule, 116(4), 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehmel, L., Meister, D. M., & Gerhardts, u. L. (2023). Die Entgrenzung von Kommunikationskulturen in Lehrpersonenkollegien: Reflexion einer unbeabsichtigten Begleiterscheinung der Arbeit mit Tablets. MedienPädagogik, 53, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennis, M. J. (2021). Digital well-being under pandemic conditions: Catalysing a theory of online flourishing. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Lima, P., & Higgins, A. (2021). Social media engagement and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) in primary school children. Educational Psychology in Practice, 37(3), 320–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eickelmann, B., Bos, W., Gerick, J., Goldhammer, F., Schaumburg, H., Schwippert, K., Senkbeil, M., & Vahrenhold, J. (Eds.). (2019). ICILS 2018 #Deutschland: Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking (pp. 7–31). Waxmann. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eickelmann, B., Fröhlich, N., Bos, W., Gerick, J., Goldhammer, F., Schaumburg, H., Schwippert, K., Senkbeil, M., & Vahrenhold, J. (Eds.). (2024). ICILS 2023 #Deutschland: Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking von Schülerinnen im internationalen Vergleich. Waxmann. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eickelmann, B., & Gerick, J. (2017). Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien—Zielsetzungen, Rahmenbedingungen und Implikationen für die Schulentwicklung. In K. Scheiter, & T. Riecke-Baulecke (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien: Strategien, internationale Trends und pädagogische Orientierungen (pp. 54–81). Oldenbourg. [Google Scholar]
- Feerrar, J. (2022). Bringing digital well-being into the heart of digital media literacies. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 14(2), 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, C. J., Kaye, L. K., Branley-Bell, D., & Markey, P. (2025). There is no evidence that time spent on social media is correlated with adolescent mental health problems: Findings from a meta-analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 56(1), 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraundorfer, A. (2021). Gesund unterrichten: Warum die (psychosoziale) Gesundheit von Lehrkräften an Bedeutung gewonnen hat. In NCoC (Ed.), Gesundsein und Gesundbleiben im Schulalltag: Wissenswertes und Praktisches zur Lehrer: innengesundheit. Available online: https://www.schulpsychologie.at/fileadmin/upload/psychologische_gesundheitsfoerderung/LehrerInnengesundheit/LehrerInnengesundheit_Handreichung.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Gennari, R., Matera, M., Morra, D., Melonio, A., & Rizvi, M. (2023). Design for social digital well-being with young generations: Engage them and make them reflect. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 173, 103006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradl, J. (2022). Bedeutung des Belastungs-Beanspruchungszusammenhangs von Lehrkräften für Schulleitungshandeln zum Lehren und Lernen mit und über digitale Medien—eine vergleichende Studie [Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg]. Available online: https://open.fau.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/92964715-e8c2-451c-9e86-e2b1d05b40c6/content (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Gui, M., & Büchi, M. (2021). From use to overuse: Digital inequality in the age of communication abundance. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, M., Fasoli, M., & Carradore, R. (2017). “Digital well-being.” Developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, M., Gerosa, T., Argentin, G., & Losi, L. (2023). Mobile media education as a tool to reduce problematic smartphone use: Results of a randomised impact evaluation. Computers & Education, 194, 104705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helsper, E. J. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Hepp, A. (2016). Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft in datengetriebenen Zeiten. Publizistik, 61(3), 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hundeloh, H. (2012). Gesundheitsmanagement an Schulen—Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung als Aufgaben der Schulleitung. Beltz. [Google Scholar]
- Islambouli, R., Ingram, S., & Gillet, D. (2024, June 3–6). Understanding digital wellbeing through smartphone usage intentions and regrettable patterns. IEEE 12th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) (pp. 426–435), Orlando, FL, USA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jisc. (2024). Building digital capabilities framework: The six elements defined (January 2024 update). Jisc Data Analytics. Available online: https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/8846/1/2022_Jisc_BDC_Individual_Framework.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Kammerl, R. (2024). Exzessive Nutzung von Games und Social Media. Welchen Beitrag leisten manipulative Gestaltungsmittel? In Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendschutz (Ed.), Viel oder zu viel? (Exzessive Mediennutzung von Kindern und Jugendlichen) (pp. 7–24). Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendschutz. [Google Scholar]
- Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2024). Orientierungsrahmen für Schulleitungen: Strategische Gestaltung von Schulentwicklung im digitalen Wandel. Available online: https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2024/2024_12_13-Orientierungsrahmen-Schulleitungen.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Li, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauss, A. (2020). Digitalpakt Schule und Digitalisierung an Schulen: Ergebnisse einer GEW-Mitgliederbefragung 2020. Available online: https://www.gew.de/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=97283&token=1fff3c48386bb347b9cd047b05652541d9cc0cba&sdownload=&n=202004-Mitgliederbefr-Digitalisierung.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Mayiwar, L., Asutay, E., Tinghög, G., Västfjäll, D., & Barrafrem, K. (2024). Determinants of digital well-being. AI & Society, 40(4), 3063–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, A. (2022). Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being? Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 272–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monge Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2023). Teaching and learning “digital wellbeing”. Future Generation Computer Systems, 149, 494–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mußmann, F., Hardwig, T., Riethmüller, M., & Klötzer, S. (2021). Digitalisierung im Schulsystem 2021: Arbeitszeit, Arbeitsbedingungen, Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven von Lehrkräften in Deutschland; Ergebnisbericht. Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, M. H., Büchi, M., & Geber, S. (2024). Everyday disconnection experiences: Exploring people’s understanding of digital well-being and management of digital media use. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3657–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, M. H., & Hargittai, E. (2024). Digital disconnection, digital inequality, and subjective well-being: A mobile experience sampling study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), zmad044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özgür, H. (2020). Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: A structural equation modeling. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paschke, K., & Thomasius, R. (2024). Digitale Mediennutzung und psychische Gesundheit bei Adoleszenten—Eine narrative Übersicht [Digital media use and mental health in adolescents-a narrative review]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 67(4), 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Passey, D. (2021). Digital technologies—And teacher wellbeing? Education Sciences, 11(3), 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prinsloo, P., Khalil, M., & Slade, S. (2024). Vulnerable student digital well-being in AI-powered educational decision support systems (AI-EDSS) in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 2075–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radtke, T., Apel, T., Schenkel, K., Keller, J., & von Lindern, E. (2022). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinecke, L., Gilbert, A., & Eden, A. (2022). Self-regulation as a key boundary condition in the relationship between social media use and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rolff, H.-G. (1998). Entwicklung von Einzelschulen: Viel Praxis, wenig Theorie und kaum Forschung—Ein Versuch, Schulentwicklung zu systematisieren. In H.-G. Rolff, K.-O. Bauer, K. Klemm, & H. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung. Daten, Beispiele und Perspektiven (Vol. 10, pp. 295–326). Beltz Juventa. [Google Scholar]
- Rolff, H.-G. (2004). Gesundheitsförderung und Schulqualität. In H. Hundeloh, G. Schnabel, & N. Yurdatap (Eds.), Dokumentation Kongress Gute und gesunde Schule: 15. + 16. November 2004, Kongresszentrum Westfalenhallen Dortmund (pp. 42–58). Landesunfallkasse Nordrhein-Westfalen. Available online: https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/q/upload/Doku_Kongress_GugS.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Rosenberg, H., & Vogelman-Natan, K. (2022). The (other) two percent also matter: The construction of mobile phone refusers. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S. M. (2022). Deconstructing the notion of “digital wellbeing” through a postmodern lens. In Critical perspectives on digital wellbeing (pp. 267–278). Peter Lang. Available online: https://www.peterlang.com/document/1175495 (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Schmechtig, N., Puderbach, R., Schellhammer, S., & Gehrmann, A. (2020). Einsatz von und Umgang mit digitalen Medien und Inhalten in Unterricht und Schule. Befunde einer Lehrkräftebefragung zu beruflichen Erfahrungen und überzeugungen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern in Sachsen 2019. TU, Zentrum für Lehrerbildung, Schul- und Berufsbildungsforschung (ZLSB). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, F. M., Lutz, S., Halfmann, A., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2022). How and when do mobile media demands impact well-being? Explicating the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM3UNE). Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 251–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz-Zander, R. (2001). Lernen mit neuen Medien in der Schule. In J. Oelkers (Ed.), Zukunftsfragen der Bildung (S. 181–195). Beltz. (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Supplement to the Journal of Educational Science, 43). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for ducation? Polity Press. Available online: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/is-technology-good-for-education (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Skinner, B., Leavey, G., & Rothi, D. (2019). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 73(1), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommer, K.-G. (2020). Kommunikation von Lehrkräften mittels Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien an Schulen unter dem Aspekt der Belastung [Ph.D. thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen]. Available online: https://duepublico2.uni-due.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/duepublico_derivate_00073101/Sommer_Diss.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valasek, L. (2022). Disciplining the akratic user: Constructing digital (un)wellness. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Halfmann, A., & Lee, E. W. J. (2022). Drug, demon, or donut? Theorizing the relationship between social media use, digital well-being and digital disconnection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the special issue. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2017). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Verständig, D., Klein, A., & Iske, S. (2016). Zero-Level Digital Divide: Neues Netz und neue Ungleichheiten. Siegen: Sozial—Analysen, Berichte, Kontroversen (SI:SO), 21(1), 50–55. Available online: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11973 (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Wang, Z., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Liu, L., & Lv, C. (2023). Navigating technostress in primary schools: A study on teacher experiences, school support, and health. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1267767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319?seq=1 (accessed on 16 July 2025).
- Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Literature Sources via Backward Search | Citations on SCOPUS | Cited by the Following Included Literature Sources | Literature Sources via Forward Search |
---|---|---|---|
Vanden Abeele (2021). Digital Wellbeing as a Dynamic Construct. | 199 | (Büchi, 2021; Roy, 2022; Gennari et al., 2023; Gui et al., 2023; Meier, 2022) | Vanden Abeele and Nguyen (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the Special Issue. Valasek (2022). Disciplining the akratic user: Constructing digital (un)wellness. Radtke et al. (2022). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Rosenberg and Vogelman-Natan (2022). The (other) two percent also matter: The construction of mobile phone refusers. Islambouli et al. (2024). Understanding Digital Wellbeing Through Smartphone Usage Intentions and Regrettable Patterns Nguyen et al. (2024). Everyday disconnection experiences: Exploring people’s understanding of digital well-being and management of digital media use Vanden Abeele et al. (2022). Drug, demon, or donut? Theorizing the relationship between social media use, digital well-being and digital disconnection. Reinecke et al. (2022). Self-regulation as a key boundary condition in the relationship between social media use and well-being. |
Gui et al. (2017). “Digital Well-Being”. Developing a New Theoretical Tool For Media Literacy Research. | 95 | (Büchi, 2021; Büchi et al., 2018, 2019; Feerrar, 2022; Gui & Büchi, 2021; Roy, 2022; Valasek, 2022; Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022; Vanden Abeele, 2021; Islambouli et al., 2024; Gui et al., 2023; Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024; Nguyen et al., 2024; Islambouli et al., 2024) | – |
Gui and Büchi (2021). From Use to Overuse: Digital Inequality in the Age of Communication Abundance. | 74 | (Büchi & Hargittai, 2022; Büchi et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2024; Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024; Büchi & Hargittai, 2022; Valasek, 2022) | – |
Büchi (2021). Digital Well-Being Theory and Research. | 66 | (Prinsloo et al., 2024; Gennari et al., 2023; Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022; Büchi & Hargittai, 2022; Nguyen et al., 2024) | Mayiwar et al. (2024). Determinants of digital well-being. |
Büchi et al. (2019). Digital Overuse and Subjective Well-Being in a Digitized Society. | 60 | (Büchi, 2021; Roy, 2022; Vanden Abeele, 2021; Nguyen et al., 2024; Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024) | – |
Meier (2022). Studying problems, not problematic usage: Do mobile checking habits increase procrastination and decrease well-being? | 45 | (Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024; Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022; Islambouli et al., 2024; Nguyen & Hargittai, 2024; Vanden Abeele et al., 2022; Reinecke et al., 2022) | |
Büchi et al. (2018). How Social Well-Being is Affected by Digital Inequalities. | 39 | (Büchi, 2021; Büchi & Hargittai, 2022; Büchi et al., 2019) | – |
Schneider et al. (2022). How and when do mobile media demands impact wellbeing? Explicating the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM3UNE). | 33 | (Gui et al., 2023; Vanden Abeele et al., 2022; Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022) | |
Gui et al. (2023). Mobile media education as a tool to reduce problematic smartphone use: Results of a randomised impact evaluation. | 23 | – | – |
Gennari et al. (2023). Design for social digital well-being with young generations: Engage them and make them reflect. | 21 | – | – |
Büchi and Hargittai (2022). A Need for Considering Digital Inequality When Studying Social Media Use and Well-Being. | 16 | – | – |
Dennis (2021). Digital well-being under pandemic conditions: catalysing a theory of online flourishing. | 16 | (Vanden Abeele & Nguyen, 2022) | – |
Nguyen and Hargittai (2024). Digital disconnection, digital inequality, and subjective well-being: a mobile experience sampling study. | 3 | – | – |
Prinsloo et al. (2024). Vulnerable student digital well-being in AI-powered educational decision support systems (AI-EDSS) in higher education. | 2 | – | – |
Feerrar (2022). Bringing digital well-being into the heart of digital media literacies. | 1 | – | – |
Roy (2022). Deconstructing the notion of “digital wellbeing” through a postmodern lens. | – | – | – |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Weber, P.M.; Kammerl, R.; Schiefner-Rohs, M. What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development? A Theoretical Review with Perspectives on Digital Inequality. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 948. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080948
Weber PM, Kammerl R, Schiefner-Rohs M. What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development? A Theoretical Review with Perspectives on Digital Inequality. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(8):948. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080948
Chicago/Turabian StyleWeber, Philipp Michael, Rudolf Kammerl, and Mandy Schiefner-Rohs. 2025. "What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development? A Theoretical Review with Perspectives on Digital Inequality" Education Sciences 15, no. 8: 948. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080948
APA StyleWeber, P. M., Kammerl, R., & Schiefner-Rohs, M. (2025). What Does Digital Well-Being Mean for School Development? A Theoretical Review with Perspectives on Digital Inequality. Education Sciences, 15(8), 948. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080948