Next Article in Journal
A Novel Methodology for Human Kinematics Motion Detection Based on Smartphones Sensor Data Using Artificial Intelligence
Next Article in Special Issue
The U-Net Family for Epicardial Adipose Tissue Segmentation and Quantification in Low-Dose CT
Previous Article in Journal
Visual Performance and Perceptual–Motor Skills of Late Preterm Children and Healthy Controls Using the TVPS-3rd and VMI-6th Editions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infrared Thermal Imaging and Artificial Neural Networks to Screen for Wrist Fractures in Pediatrics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Medical Imaging and Image Processing

1
School of Computing and Mathematic Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
2
Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
4
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2023, 11(2), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020054
Submission received: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 5 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical Imaging & Image Processing III)
Medical imaging (MI) [1] utilizes various technologies to produce images of the human body’s internal structures and functions [2]. Healthcare professionals (HPs) [3] use these medical images for four purposes: diagnosis [4], treatment planning [5], monitoring [6], and research.
Firstly, the HPs utilize medical images to identify and diagnose medical conditions that may be complicated or impossible to spot without imaging. Secondly, medical images help HPs to plan and prepare for medical procedures. For example, computed tomography (CT) [7,8] scans assist HPs in planning radiation therapy for cancer patients by enabling the identification of the location and size of the tumor regions. Third, medical images have been used to monitor the progression of diseases over time. Finally, scientists can use medical images to study the anatomy and physiology of the human body [9] and investigate the effects of diseases and treatments on the body [10].
MI is now becoming essential in different biomedical research and clinical practice fields. Biologists study cells and generate 3D confocal microscopy data sets [11]. Neuroscientists detect regional metabolic brain activity from positron emission tomography (PET) [12,13], functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetic resonance spectrum imaging (MRSI) [14] scans. Virologists generate 3D reconstructions of viruses from micrographs [15]. Radiologists can identify and quantify tumors from MRI and CT scans [16].
Additionally, MI includes several other techniques: X-rays, ultrasounds, nuclear medicine imaging (NMI), etc. X-ray scans [17] use X-rays to create images of bones. Ultrasounds employ sound waves to build images of internal organs. The NMI [18] uses a small amount of radioactive material to create images of the body’s internal structures and functions, such as blood flow, metabolism, and organ function.
On the other hand, medical image processing remains a challenge for researchers. MIP roughly contains seven common tasks, as shown in Figure 1. Image acquisition involves acquiring medical images from various MI modalities such as X-rays, CT scans, MRI scans, and ultrasound scans. Preprocessing [19] helps to clean and enhance medical images by removing noise, correcting distortion, and enhancing contrast. Segmentation [20] separates the region of interest from the background and separates different structures within the image. Registration [21] aligns different medical images to create a composite image that provides a more comprehensive view of the anatomy and pathology. Feature extraction extracts important features from medical images, such as various structures’ size, shape, texture, and intensity. Classification classifies different structures within medical images based on their features and properties. Visualization [22] builds visual representations of medical images in 2D or 3D to aid diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
Firstly, MIP can be used to determine the diameter, volume, and vasculature of a tumor or organ [23], flow parameters of blood [24] or other fluids, and microscopic changes that have yet to raise any otherwise discernible flags. Secondly, MIP creates realistic simulations and models of the human body, which are used for medical education [25] and training purposes [26]. Thirdly, MIP provides real-time guidance and visualization during surgical procedures [27], allowing surgeons to navigate complex anatomical structures more effectively. Finally, MIP helps in crafting custom prosthetic devices [28], such as implants and orthotics [29], that are tailored to the patient’s anatomy and needs.
Currently, MI and MIP entail several challenges [30], such as low-resolution quality, high-level noise, low contrast, geometric deformations, presence of artifacts [31], small-size dataset [32], large computational burdens [33], long training time, etc. In our previous successful Special Issues, ‘Medical Imaging & Image Processing’ in 2015 and ‘Medical Imaging & Image Processing II’ in 2018, the authors partially solved the aforementioned challenges and reported their research outputs.
In conclusion, we propose the third Special Issue in this series, ‘Medical Imaging & Image Processing III’, which aims to provide a diverse but complementary set of contributions to demonstrate new theoretical and technological developments and applications in medical imaging and image processing. All submissions will be thoroughly reviewed through a single-blind peer-review process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. & Z.D.; methodology, Y.Z.; software, Y.Z.; validation, Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.Z.; investigation, Y.Z.; resources, Y.Z. & Z.D.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. & Z.D.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper is partially supported by MRC, UK (MC_PC_17171); Royal Society, UK (RP202G0230); BHF, UK (AA/18/3/34220); Hope Foundation for Cancer Research, UK (RM60G0680); GCRF, UK (P202PF11); Sino-UK Industrial Fund, UK (RP202G0289); LIAS, UK (P202ED10, P202RE969); Data Science Enhancement Fund, UK (P202RE237); Fight for Sight, UK (24NN201); Sino-UK Education Fund, UK (OP202006); BBSRC, UK (RM32G0178B8).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeong, M.K. Suppression of side lobe and grating lobe in ultrasound medical imaging system. J. Acoust. Soc. Korea 2022, 41, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. de Souza, M.A.; Cordeiro, D.C.A.; de Oliveira, J.; de Oliveira, M.F.A.; Bonafini, B.L. 3d multi-modality medical imaging: Combining anatomical and infrared thermal images for 3d reconstruction. Sensors 2023, 23, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Heinrich, C.H.; McHugh, S.; McCarthy, S.; Donovan, M.D. Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care facilities: A qualitative investigation into the opinions of healthcare professionals in ireland. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2022, 31, 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, Y.H.; Chinnaperumal, S.; Marappan, R.; Raju, S.K.; Sadiq, A.T.; Farhan, A.K.; Srinivasan, P. Multi-layered non-local bayes model for lung cancer early diagnosis prediction with the internet of medical things. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vasiljevs, D.; Kakurina, N.; Pontaga, N.; Kokina, B.; Osipovs, V.; Sorokins, N.; Pikta, S.; Trusinskis, K.; Lejnieks, A. Culprit versus complete revascularization during the initial intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome using a virtual treatment planning tool: Results of a single-center pilot study. Medicina 2023, 59, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lopez-Jaime, F.J.; Benitez, O.; Caballero, N.; Berrueco, R.; Alvarez, E.; Fernandez-Bello, I.; Blanquer, M.B.; Montano, A. Esplorhem: Evaluation of spanish experience of using florio (r) haemo digital medical device for treatment monitoring in hemophilia patients. A preliminary report. Blood 2022, 140, 8460–8461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Onder, M.; Evli, C.; Turk, E.; Kazan, O.; Bayrakdar, I.S.; Celik, O.; Costa, A.L.F.; Gomes, J.P.P.; Ogawa, C.M.; Jagtap, R.; et al. Deep-learning-based automatic segmentation of parotid gland on computed tomography images. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheslerean-Boghiu, T.; Hofmann, F.C.; Schulthei, M.; Pfeiffer, F.; Pfeiffer, D.; Lasser, T. Wnet: A data-driven dual-domain denoising model for sparse-view computed tomography with a trainable reconstruction layer. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2023, 9, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Candel, S.; Tyrkalska, S.D.; Perez-Sanz, F.; Moreno-Docon, A.; Esteban, A.; Cayuela, M.L.; Mulero, V. Analysis of 16s rrna gene sequence of nasopharyngeal exudate reveals changes in key microbial communities associated with aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nzekwe, S.; Morakinyo, A.; Ntwasa, M.; Oguntibeju, O.; Oyedapo, O.; Ayeleso, A. Influence of flavonoid-rich fraction of monodora tenuifolia seed extract on blood biochemical parameters in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in male wistar rats. Metabolites 2023, 13, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.S.; Du, Y.L.; Deng, N.; Peng, X.; Wong, H.; Xie, H.T.; Zhang, M.C. Characteristics of in vitro culture and in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with fungal keratitis in a tertiary referral hospital in central china. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tozer, D.J.; Brown, R.B.; Walsh, J.; Hong, Y.T.; Williams, G.B.; O’Brien, J.T.; Aigbirhio, F.I.; Fryer, T.D.; Markus, H.S. Do regions of increased inflammation progress to new white matter hyperintensities?: A longitudinal positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2023, 54, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghanem-Zoubi, N.; Kagna, O.; Dabaja-Younis, H.; Atarieh, M.; Nasrallah, E.; Kassis, I.; Keidar, Z.; Paul, M. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of brucellosis: An observational cohort study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023, 10, ofac704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kakkar, C.; Gupta, S.; Kakkar, S.; Gupta, K.; Saggar, K. Spectrum of magnetic resonance abnormalities in leigh syndrome with emphasis on correlation of diffusion-weighted imaging findings with clinical presentation. Ann. Afr. Med. 2022, 21, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poblete, S.; Guzman, H.V. Structural 3d domain reconstruction of the rna genome from viruses with secondary structure models. Viruses 2021, 13, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, Y. A survey of computer-aided tumor diagnosis based on convolutional neural network. Biology 2021, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, M.; Yanko, E.; Huynh, M.; Chan, G. X-ray therapy safety and awareness education for medical trainees and attending physicians. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 2023, 17, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heo, G.S.; Diekmann, J.; Thackeray, J.T.; Liu, Y.J. Nuclear methods for immune cell imaging: Bridging molecular imaging and individualized medicine. Circ. -Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 16, e014067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ivanescu, R.C. A statistical evaluation of the preprocessing medical images impact on a deep learning network’s performance. Ann. Univ. Craiova-Math. Comput. Sci. Ser. 2022, 49, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodriguez-Amenedo, J.L.; Gomez, S.A.; Zubiaga, M.; Izurza-Moreno, P.; Arza, J.; Fernandez, J.D. Medical ultrasound image segmentation with deep learning models. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 10254–10274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ellis, R.; Cleland, J.; Scrimgeour, D.S.G.; Lee, A.J.; Brennan, P.A. A cross-sectional study examining the association between mrcs performance and surgeons receiving sanctions against their medical registration. Surg.-J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. Irel. 2022, 20, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Laso, S.; Flores-Martin, D.; Herrera, J.L.; Galan-Jimenez, J.; Berrocal, J. Identification and visualization of a patient’s medical record via mobile devices without an internet connection. Electronics 2023, 12, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Andleeb, F.; Katta, N.; Gruslova, A.; Muralidharan, B.; Estrada, A.; McElroy, A.B.; Ullah, H.; Brenner, A.J.; Milner, T.E. Differentiation of brain tumor microvasculature from normal vessels using optical coherence angiography. Lasers Surg. Med. 2021, 53, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Al-Griffi, T.A.J.; Al-Saif, A.S.J. Analytical investigations for the joint impacts of electro-osmotic and some relevant parameters to blood flow in mildly stenosis artery. J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 2023, 9, 274–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arif, T.B.; Munaf, U.; Ul-Haque, I. The future of medical education and research: Is chatgpt a blessing or blight in disguise? Med. Educ. Online 2023, 28, 2181052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wilson, J.; Agha, O.; Wiggins, A.J.; Diaz, A.; Jones, K.J.; Feeley, B.T.; Pandya, N.K.; Wong, S.E. Gender and racial diversity among the head medical and athletic training staff of women’s professional sports leagues. Orthop. J. Sport. Med. 2023, 11, 23259671221150447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O’Brien, K.; Petra, V.; Lal, D.; Kwai, K.; McDonald, M.; Wallace, J.; Jeanmonod, R. Gender-coding in physician job advertisements and sex disparities in medical and surgical fields. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022, 60, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Papancea, A.; Ciuntu, B.M.; Georgescu, S.O.; Toma, S.; Zabara, M.; Trofin, A.M.; Vintila, D.; Vasilescu, A.; Lozneanu, L.; Lupascu, C.D. Role of the prosthetic medical devices in management of abdominal parietal defects. Med.-Surg. J.-Rev. Med.-Chir. 2022, 126, 528–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Resnik, L.J.; Borgia, M.L.; Clark, M.A.; Heinemann, A.W.; Ni, P.S. Measuring satisfaction with upper limb prostheses: Orthotics and prosthetics user survey revision that includes issues of concern to women. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 103, 2316–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Altaf, F.; Islam, S.M.S.; Akhtar, N.; Janjua, N.K. Going deep in medical image analysis: Concepts, methods, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 99540–99572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, Y.; Hu, S.B.; Du, Y.Y. Research on optimization scheme for blocking artifacts after patch-based medical image reconstruction. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 2022, 2177159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.F.; Xu, C.; Ding, W.P.; Sun, S.C.; Yue, X.D.; Fujita, H. Target-aware u-net with fuzzy skip connections for refined pancreas segmentation. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022, 131, 109818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jin, T.; Song, H.Q.; Mon-Nzongo, D.L.; Ipoum-Ngome, P.G.; Liao, H.Z.; Zhu, M.L. Virtual three-level model predictive flux control with reduced computational burden and switching frequency for induction motors. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Seven common tasks in medical image processing.
Figure 1. Seven common tasks in medical image processing.
Technologies 11 00054 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z. Medical Imaging and Image Processing. Technologies 2023, 11, 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020054

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Dong Z. Medical Imaging and Image Processing. Technologies. 2023; 11(2):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yudong, and Zhengchao Dong. 2023. "Medical Imaging and Image Processing" Technologies 11, no. 2: 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020054

APA Style

Zhang, Y., & Dong, Z. (2023). Medical Imaging and Image Processing. Technologies, 11(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020054

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop