You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
JSANJournal of Sensor and Actuator Networks
  • Article
  • Open Access

7 October 2023

A Salinity-Impact Analysis of Polarization Division Multiplexing-Based Underwater Optical Wireless Communication System with High-Speed Data Transmission

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Wireless Ecosystem Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Department of Electronics Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 143005, India
3
Glasgow College, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

The majority of the Earth’s surface is covered by water, with oceans holding approximately 97% of this water and serving as the lifeblood of our planet. These oceans are essential for various purposes, including transportation, sustenance, and communication. However, establishing effective communication networks between the numerous sub-islands present in many parts of the world poses significant challenges. Underwater optical wireless communication, or UWOC, can indeed be an excellent solution to provide seamless connectivity underwater. UWOC holds immense significance due to its ability to transmit data at high rates, low latency, and enhanced security. In this work, we propose polarization division multiplexing-based UWOC system under the impact of salinity with an on–off keying (OOK) modulation format. The proposed system aims to establish high-speed network connectivity between underwater divers/submarines in oceans at different salinity levels. The numerical simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed system with a 2 Gbps data rate up to 10.5 m range in freshwater and up to 1.8 m in oceanic waters with salinity up to 35 ppt. Successful transmission of high-speed data is reported in underwater optical wireless communication, especially where salinity impact is higher.

1. Introduction

The transmission of data in the presence of water, particularly saline water, presents a widely recognized challenge that significantly impacts the adoption of wirelessly connected devices in a variety of applications [1]. The effects of saline water not only restrict the deployment of underwater devices but also impose stringent limitations on the positioning of data transmission tools in areas with high water salinity [2,3]. This scenario is particularly relevant for floating structures where successful transmissions necessitate antennas to be elevated at specific heights above saline water to overcome its attenuating effects and ensure reliable communication [4]. However, the challenges become even more pronounced when data transmission needs to occur underwater in environments with high salinity. The combination of water and high salinity levels introduces additional complexities and attenuating effects, significantly impacting the range and quality of wireless communication [5]. The presence of high-salinity water further limits the effective deployment of communication systems and necessitates the development of specialized techniques and equipment to mitigate the detrimental effects and ensure reliable data transmission in these challenging underwater environments [6]. Underwater communication can be enhanced by utilizing optical signals instead of sound-based communication methods [7,8]. Underwater optical wireless communication (UWOC) in water offers several advantages over acoustic communication, including higher data rates, increased bandwidth, and reduced signal attenuation [9].
Figure 1 shows the general scenario of the UWOC link. It shows that the UWOC link serves as a crucial means of connecting divers, submarines, and autonomous underwater vehicles in underwater environments. This advanced communication technology uses modulated light signals to establish real-time, high-speed data exchange between divers and submerged submarines. Consequently, the high transmission rate characteristic of UWOC systems has garnered considerable attention in recent years. The rapid advancements in UWOC systems have resulted in increasing demands for long-range and high-speed underwater links. Achieving these requirements poses a challenge for system designers. Establishing such links is crucial for various applications, including oceanography, environmental monitoring, and underwater surveillance. Furthermore, UWOC has emerged as an attractive alternative to traditional RF and acoustic systems for underwater communication [10,11]. With its advantages of high data rates, low latency, short-range wireless links, and low power consumption, UOWC provides a compelling solution to meet communication needs in underwater environments. UWOC technology finds utility in challenging and remote locations, including deep-sea environments, where it enables communication for remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) [12,13]. This is especially important as these vehicles often face limitations in range and maneuverability.
Figure 1. Underwater optical wireless communication link.

3. UWOC Channel Modeling

UWOC offers numerous advantages such as high data rates, larger bandwidth, lower time delay, low latency, and reduced power consumption when compared to acoustic and RF technologies. However, the establishment of a wireless optical link underwater poses significant challenges. The main challenge arises from the fact that the optical signal is heavily impacted by the optical characteristics of the medium and disturbances caused by turbulence [30]. The optical properties of water that significantly impact the propagation of optical signals underwater are absorption and scattering. These properties are associated with absorption and scattering coefficients, represented as a(λ) and b(λ), respectively, and depend on the wavelength of the signal. The combined effect of absorption and scattering coefficients is referred to as the beam extinction coefficient, denoted as c(λ). This coefficient, c(λ), quantifies the overall attenuation experienced by the optical signal in water, encompassing both absorption and scattering phenomena as in Equation (1) [31]:
c λ = a λ + b λ
Absorption coefficient a(λ) measures light absorption in water, influenced by water properties and signal wavelength. Scattering coefficient b(λ) indicates light scattering by particles in water, occurring when the particle size is comparable to the light’s wavelength. The beam extinction coefficient, represented by c(λ), accounts for both the absorption and scattering coefficients, providing a comprehensive measure of the overall attenuation experienced by optical signals in underwater conditions. The overall absorption a(λ) in underwater optical communication is influenced by several factors given as in Equation (2) [32]:
a λ = C w a w λ + C p h y a p h y λ + C g a g λ + C n a n λ  
where aw is the absorption due to pure water, aphy is the absorption due to phytoplankton, ag is the absorption due to dissolved organic matter, and an is the absorption due to non-algal suspended particles. Each of these components contributes to the overall attenuation of optical signals in underwater environments. Cw, Cphy, Cg, and Cn are the absorption coefficients of pure water, phytoplankton, dissolved organic matter, and non-algal suspended particles, respectively. Scattering primarily relies on the dimensions of the particles suspended within a water channel. When the suspended particles are smaller than the wavelength of the optical wave employed for propagation, Rayleigh scattering is observed. Conversely, Mie scattering occurs when the particle size surpasses the wavelength of the optical wave. Various regions of ocean water encompass suspended particles of distinct sizes. In the case of pure ocean water, the predominant presence consists of salts and ions, which possess a size on the same scale as the wavelength of the optical wave used. Consequently, Rayleigh scattering aptly describes the scattering phenomenon in this scenario [33]. The mathematical equation for the Rayleigh scattering coefficient for pure ocean water is given by [31]:
b w λ = 0.005826   400 λ 4.322
The equation provided calculates the Rayleigh scattering coefficient based on the wavelength in nm. While scattering has a significant impact on shorter wavelengths, the overall attenuation in pure ocean water primarily occurs through absorption. When ocean water is located near land, it contains particulate and organic matter, leading to scattering as the primary cause of attenuation for optical waves. The scattering phenomenon in ocean water is significantly influenced by the presence of both organic and inorganic particles. Additionally, salinity, pressure, and temperature are factors that affect the refractive index of sea water, creating an optical boundary that alters the original propagation path of the optical wave. In this scenario, Mie scattering accurately describes the scattering behavior. The scattering coefficients for small and large particles in sea water can be expressed as follows [31]:
b l λ = 1.51302   400 λ 1.17
b s λ = 0.341074   400 λ 0.3
In the given context, bl represents the scattering coefficient for large particles, while bs represents the scattering coefficient for small particles.
Apart from absorption and scattering, turbulence plays a crucial role in influencing underwater optical wireless communication (UWOC). The underwater environment experiences variations in temperature, density, and salinity, which lead to fluctuations in the refractive index of the underwater channel. Consequently, these fluctuations cause variations in the intensity of the received signal, commonly known as turbulence [34,35]. Furthermore, air bubbles present in the water channel contribute to random fluctuations in the refractive index. Turbulence has a detrimental effect on the performance of UWOC, and therefore its impact needs to be thoroughly analyzed. The salinity of water, which is determined by the concentration of dissolved salts, is typically expressed in parts per thousand (ppt) or kilograms of salt in 1000 kg of water. Another commonly used unit for salinity is the practical salinity unit (psu), which is almost equivalent to ppt [36]. In ocean water, the average salinity ranges from 31 to 37 ppt. However, polar regions tend to have salinity levels below 30 ppt, while Antarctic regions typically have salinity levels around 34 ppt. Salinity can be measured using two main methods. The first method involves measuring electrical conductivity (EC), expressed in micro-siemens per centimeter. The second method measures the quantity of salt particles present in the solution, known as total dissolved salts. Sea water typically contains dissolved salts such as chlorides, sulphates, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, calcium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate. The average salinity of ocean water is approximately 35 ppt [37], indicating that 35 g of material is dissolved in every 1000 g of ocean water. In CGS units, where the density of water is 1, this can be equivalently expressed as 35 g per liter (gm/L).

5. Results and Discussion

This section presents and discusses the results obtained from the numerical simulation of polarization division multiplexing (PDM)-enabled underwater optical wireless communication (UWOC) using the on–off keying (OOK) modulation scheme. First, the proposed system is tested under freshwater conditions, assuming a salinity level of 0.2 ppt. Figure 4 shows the measurement of bit error rate (BER) at different distance of UWOC link for both channels by evaluating the performance of NRZ and RZ encoding schemes. It clearly demonstrates that the NRZ modulation scheme outperforms the RZ scheme in terms of BER. As shown in Figure 3a, at a distance of 8 m, the NRZ scheme achieves an impressively low BER of approximately 10 8 . However, as the distance extends to 10.5 m, the BER rises to approximately 10 4 . On the other hand, the RZ curve follows a similar trend but with generally higher BER values compared to NRZ. At a distance of 8 m, the RZ scheme demonstrates a BER of around 10 6 which increases to approximately 10 3 at a distance of 10.5 m. Similarly, for channel 2, for NRZ and RZ encoding scheme, the BER is also reported as 10 4 and 10 3 , respectively, at the distance of 10.5 m.
Figure 4. Measurement of BER under freshwater conditions: (a) channel 1; (b) channel 2.
This indicates that the NRZ modulation scheme provides better communication performance, with lower errors, over longer distances. Figure 5 demonstrates that for both the RZ and NRZ encoding schemes, the eye diagrams show clear openings. This further indicates successful transmission of high-speed data at the distance of 9.5 m underwater.
Figure 5. Measured eye diagrams at 9.5 m distance: (a) channel 1 with RZ encoding; (b) channel 2 with RZ encoding; (c) channel 1 with NRZ encoding; (d) channel 2 with NRZ encoding.
Moreover, as discussed earlier, attenuation increases with the salinity of the water in different oceans. We have tested the proposed system for salinity levels ranging from 32 ppt to 35 ppt.
Figure 6 presents the results of testing the proposed system using NRZ encoding at different salinity levels in UWOC links. As shown in Figure 6a, at a salinity level of 32 ppt, the BER for channel 1 remains relatively low across the distances tested. At a distance of 1.4 m, the BER is approximately 10 13 , and it gradually increases to around   10 6 at a distance of 1.8 m, whereas at a salinity level of 33 ppt the BER values are slightly higher compared to the previous salinity level. At a distance of 1.4 m, the BER is approximately   10 10 increasing to around   10 6 at a distance of 1.8 m. When the salinity level is 34 ppt, we observe a further increase in the BER values. The BER starts at approximately   10 10 at a distance of 1.4 m and rises to about   10 5 at a distance of 1.8 m. Lastly, the salinity level of 35 ppt exhibits the highest BER values among all the curves. Starting at approximately   10 9 at a distance of 1.4 m, the BER increases to around 10 4 at a distance of 1.8 m. Similarly for channel 2, data are successfully transmitted up to a salinity level of 35 ppt with the acceptable BER of 10 3 at the distance of 1.80 m.
Figure 6. Measurement of BER at different salinity levels: (a) channel 1; (b) channel 2.
Thus, Figure 6 shows that as the salinity level of the water increases, the BER values also increase, indicating a degradation in the communication performance of the UWOC system. Higher salinity levels introduce additional signal impairments, leading to a higher likelihood of errors in the transmitted data.
Table 2 presents the comparison of our proposed UWOC with previous works.
Table 2. Comparison with the previous works.

6. Contribution to Sensor and Actuator Networks

The field of sensor and actuator networks plays a pivotal role in modern technological advancements, enabling real-time data collection and remote control across various domains. In this section, we explore how our research on polarization division multiplexing-based underwater optical wireless communication (UWOC) with on–off keying (OOK) modulation format can contribute to the enhancement of sensor and actuator networks.
(I)
Integration with Sensor and Actuator Networks
Our proposed UWOC system offers several features that align with the requirements of sensor and actuator networks. One of the primary strengths of our system is its ability to transmit data at high rates with low latency, making it particularly suitable for real-time data collection and control applications. By seamlessly integrating our UWOC system into sensor networks, we can achieve faster and more efficient data transmission, enabling enhanced decision-making processes and real-time monitoring of remote environments.
(II)
Use Cases and Applications
(a)
Remote Environmental Monitoring
In sensor and actuator networks for environmental monitoring, the timely collection of data from remote sensors is critical. Our UWOC system can enable high-speed data transmission from underwater sensors to central monitoring stations, facilitating the rapid assessment of environmental conditions. This can have applications in monitoring oceanographic data, assessing water quality, and tracking marine life.
(b)
Underwater Robotics and Actuation
In underwater robotics and actuation systems, real-time communication is vital for remote vehicle control and data retrieval. By employing our UWOC technology, underwater robots can benefit from improved data rates and reduced communication delays, leading to more precise control and efficient exploration of aquatic environments.
(III)
Potential Impact
The integration of our proposed UWOC system into sensor and actuator networks can yield significant benefits. It can enhance the capabilities of remote monitoring system:
(a)
Expand the scope of underwater data collection and analysis.
(b)
Improve the reliability of underwater communication networks.
(c)
Enhance real-time control and actuation in aquatic environments.
Thus, our research on polarization division multiplexing-based UWOC with OOK modulation format holds promise for advancing sensor and actuator networks, particularly in underwater and aquatic environments. The high-speed data transmission, low latency, and enhanced security aspects of our system can contribute significantly to the efficiency and effectiveness of sensor and actuator-based applications in challenging underwater settings.

7. Conclusions

In this work, the proposed PDM-UWOC system utilizing the on–off keying (OOK) modulation scheme demonstrates promising results for achieving high-speed network connectivity underwater. The modeling of the UWOC link was carried out in MATLABTM, and the PDM-based transmitter and receiver were designed in OptiSystemTM software. The numerical simulation results indicate that the NRZ modulation scheme outperforms the RZ scheme in terms of BER at varying distances. The NRZ scheme exhibits lower BER values, providing better communication performance over longer distances compared to the RZ scheme. Additionally, the eye diagrams of both encoding schemes show clear openings, confirming the successful transmission of high-speed data at 9.5 m underwater. Furthermore, the investigations conducted at different salinity levels highlight the impact of water salinity on communication performance. As salinity increases, the BER values also increase, indicating a degradation in the system’s performance. Higher salinity levels introduce additional signal impairments, leading to a higher likelihood of errors in transmitted data. These findings emphasize the importance of considering salinity levels in designing and optimizing UWOC systems. Overall, the proposed PDM-enabled UWOC system with NRZ encoding demonstrates its potential for providing seamless and reliable communication in underwater environments, considering both freshwater and varying salinity conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.; methodology, S.C. and A.S.; software, S.C. and A.S.; validation, S.K. and S.S.; formal analysis, S.C. and L.W.; investigation, A.S. and R.U.; resources, A.P.; data curation, R.U. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C.; writing—review and editing, L.W.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, L.W.; project administration, S.C. and L.W.; funding acquisition, S.C. and L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This research project is supported by the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bello, O.; Zeadally, S. Internet of underwater things communication: Architecture, technologies, research challenges and future opportunities. Ad Hoc Netw. 2022, 135, 102933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Menaka, D.; Gauni, S.; Manimegalai, C.T.; Kalimuthu, K. Challenges and vision of wireless optical and acoustic communication in underwater environment. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2022, 35, e5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Mazinani, A.; Othman, N.Q.H.; Amjad, H. Towards the internet of underwater things: A comprehensive survey. Earth Sci. Inform. 2022, 15, 735–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pozzebon, A.; Cappelli, I.; Campagnaro, F.; Francescon, R.; Zorzi, M. LoRaWAN Transmissions in Salt Water for Superficial Marine Sensor Networking: Laboratory and Field Tests. Sensors 2023, 23, 4726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stojanovic, M.; Preisig, J. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2009, 47, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tuna, G.; Gungor, V.C. A survey on deployment techniques, localization algorithms, and research challenges for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2017, 30, e3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Domingo, M.C. An overview of the internet of underwater things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2012, 35, 1879–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Codd-Downey, R.; Jenkin, M. LightByte: Communicating Wirelessly with an Underwater Robot using Light. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics—ICINCO (2), Porto, Portugal, 29–31 July 2018; pp. 309–316. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen, C.; Alkhazragi, O.; Sun, X.; Guo, Y.; Ng, T.K.; Ooi, B.S. Laser-based visible light communications and underwater wireless optical communications: A device perspective. In Novel in-Plane Semiconductor Lasers XVIII; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; Volume 10939, pp. 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Qasem, Z.A.; Ali, A.; Deng, B.; Li, Q.; Fu, H. Unipolar X-Transform OFDM with Index Modulation for Underwater Optical Wireless Communications. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2023, 35, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qasem, Z.A.; Ali, A.; Deng, B.; Li, Q.; Fu, H. Index modulation-based efficient technique for underwater wireless optical communications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 167, 109683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, M.F.; Jayakody, D.N.K.; Chursin, Y.A.; Affes, S.; Dmitry, S. Recent advances and future directions on underwater wireless communications. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2020, 27, 1379–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ali, M.F.; Jayakody, D.N.K.; Li, Y. Recent trends in underwater visible light communication (UVLC) systems. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 22169–22225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X. An investigation on large capacity transmission technologies for UWOC systems. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1920, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, H.; He, N.; Liao, X.; Popoola, W.; Rajbhandari, S. The BER Performance of the LDPC-Coded MPPM over Turbulence UWOC Channels. Photonics 2022, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, P.; Ju, M.; Tan, G. BER Performance of UWOC with APD Receiver in Wide Range Oceanic Turbulence. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 25203–25218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, H.; Niu, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; He, Z.; Chi, N. Low-Complexity Multi-Symbol Multi-Modulus Weighted Lookup Table Predistortion in UWOC System. J. Light. Technol. 2022, 40, 4224–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liang, Y.; Yin, H.; Jing, L.; Ji, X.; Wang, J. Solution for Self-Interference of NOMA-Based Wireless Optical Communication System in Underwater Turbulence Environment. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 30223–30236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salim, O.N.M.; Adnan, S.A.; Mutlag, A.H. Underwater optical wireless communication system performance improvement using convolutional neural networks. AIP Adv. 2023, 13, 045302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharma, A.; Chaudhary, S.; Thakur, D.; Dhasratan, V. A cost-effective high-speed radio over fibre system for millimeter wave applications. J. Opt. Commun. 2020, 41, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, A.; Kaur, S.; Chaudhary, S. Performance analysis of 320 Gbps DWDM—FSO system under the effect of different atmospheric conditions. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deng, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Qasem, Z.A.H.; Li, Q.; Tang, X.; Chen, C.; Fu, H.Y. Polarization Multiplexing Based UOWC Systems Under Bubble Turbulence. J. Light. Technol. 2023, 41, 5588–5598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaudhary, S.; Choudhary, S.; Tang, X.; Wei, X. Empirical evaluation of high-speed cost-effective Ro-FSO system by incorporating OCDMA-PDM scheme under the presence of fog. J. Opt. Commun. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaudhary, S.; Chaudhary, N.; Sharma, S.; Choudhary, B. High speed inter-satellite communication system by incorporating hybrid polarization-wavelength division multiplexing scheme. J. Opt. Commun. 2017, 39, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sharma, A.; Malhotra, J.; Chaudhary, S.; Thappa, V. Analysis of 2 × 10 Gbps MDM enabled inter satellite optical wireless communication under the impact of pointing errors. Optik 2021, 227, 165250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Upadhyay, K.K.; Shukla, N.K.; Chaudhary, S. A high speed 100 Gbps MDM-SAC-OCDMA multimode transmission system for short haul communication. Optik 2020, 202, 163665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choyon, A.S.J.; Chowdhury, R. Nonlinearity compensation and link margin analysis of 112-Gbps circular-polarization division multiplexed fiber optic communication system using a digital coherent receiver over 800-km SSMF link. J. Opt. 2021, 50, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, F.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, B.; Ding, J.; Wang, K.; Liu, C.; Wang, C.; Kong, M.; et al. Delivery of Polarization-Division-Multiplexing Wireless Millimeter-Wave Signal Over 4.6-km at W-Band. J. Light. Technol. 2022, 40, 6339–6346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vasani, E.; Shah, V. An Effective Design of Hybrid Spectrum Slicing WDM–PDM in FSO Communication System Under Different Weather Conditions. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2023, 130, 777–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bosu, R.; Prince, S. Perturbation methods to track wireless optical wave propagation in a random medium. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2016, 33, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaushal, H.; Kaddoum, G. Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1518–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jerlov, N.G. Marine Optics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hulburt, E. Optics of distilled and natural water. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1945, 35, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Korotkova, O.; Farwell, N.; Shchepakina, E. Light scintillation in oceanic turbulence. Waves Random Complex Media 2012, 22, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jamali, M.V.; Nabavi, P.; Salehi, J.A. MIMO Underwater Visible Light Communications: Comprehensive Channel Study, Performance Analysis, and Multiple-Symbol Detection. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 67, 8223–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borowski, B. Characterization of a very shallow water acoustic communication channel. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2009, Biloxi, MS, USA, 26–29 October 2009; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boyd, C.E. Water Quality: An Introduction; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeng, Z.; Fu, S.; Zhang, H.; Dong, Y.; Cheng, J. A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 204–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aravind, J.V.; Prince, S. Localizing an underwater sensor node using sonar and establishing underwater wireless optical communication for data transfer applications. Mar. Georesources Geotechnol. 2023, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ali, M.A.A.; Shaker, F.K. Performance of an underwater non-line-of-sight (NLOS) wireless optical communications system utilizing LED. J. Opt. 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, H.; Gao, Y.; Tong, Z.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J. Omnidirectional optical communication system designed for underwater swarm robotics. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 18630–18644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ren, Y.; Zhu, M.; Cui, K.; Li, L.; Wang, S. Simulation analysis of underwater wireless optical communication based on Monte Carlo method and experimental research in complex hydrological environment. AIP Adv. 2023, 13, 055226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.