Next Article in Journal
Effect of Salt Stress on the Activity, Expression, and Promoter Methylation of Succinate Dehydrogenase and Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase in Maize (Zea mays L.) Leaves
Next Article in Special Issue
Large–Scale Transposon Mutagenesis Reveals Type III Secretion Effector HopR1 Is a Major Virulence Factor in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae
Previous Article in Journal
Stomatal Ratio Showing No Response to Light Intensity in Oryza
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Morphophysiological Traits in Huanglongbing-Affected Mandarin Hybrid Populations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/plants12010067
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins

by
Lara Esch
1,†,
Christian Kirsch
1,†,
Lara Vogel
1,
Jana Kelm
1,
Nikolai Huwa
2,
Maike Schmitz
1,
Thomas Classen
3 and
Ulrich Schaffrath
1,*
1
Department of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany
2
Institute for Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 52425 Jülich, Germany
3
Institute for Bio- and Geosciences 1: Bioorganic Chemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010067
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Plant Protection)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
MonocotJRLs are Poaceae-specific two-domain proteins that consist of a jacalin-related lectin (JRL) and a dirigent (DIR) domain which participate in multiple developmental processes, including disease resistance. For OsJAC1, a monocotJRL from rice, it has been confirmed that constitutive expression in transgenic rice or barley plants facilitates broad-spectrum disease resistance. In this process, both domains of OsJAC1 act cooperatively, as evidenced from experiments with artificially separated JRL- or DIR-domain-containing proteins. Interestingly, these chimeric proteins did not evolve in dicotyledonous plants. Instead, proteins with a single JRL domain, multiple JRL domains or JRL domains fused to domains other than DIR domains are present. In this study, we wanted to test if the cooperative function of JRL and DIR proteins leading to pathogen resistance was conserved in the dicotyledonous plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In Arabidopsis, we identified 50 JRL and 24 DIR proteins, respectively, from which seven single-domain JRL and two single-domain DIR candidates were selected. A single-cell transient gene expression assay in barley revealed that specific combinations of the Arabidopsis JRL and DIR candidates reduced the penetration success of barley powdery mildew. Strikingly, one of these pairs, AtJAX1 and AtDIR19, is encoded by genes located next to each other on chromosome one. However, when using natural variation and analyzing Arabidopsis ecotypes that express full-length or truncated versions of AtJAX1, the presence/absence of the full-length AtJAX1 protein could not be correlated with resistance to the powdery mildew fungus Golovinomyces orontii. Furthermore, an analysis of the additional JRL and DIR candidates in a bi-fluorescence complementation assay in Nicotiana benthamiana revealed no direct interaction of these JRL/DIR pairs. Since transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing OsJAC1-GFP also did not show increased resistance to G. orontii, it was concluded that the resistance mediated by the synergistic activities of DIR and JRL proteins is specific for members of the Poaceae, at least regarding the resistance against powdery mildew. Arabidopsis lacks the essential components of the DIR-JRL-dependent resistance pathway.

1. Introduction

Jacalin-related lectins (JRLs) are carbohydrate-binding proteins and they have been shown to be involved in regulatory processes and plant stress responses [1]. JRLs are conserved among various groups of organisms and were present before the divergence of monocots and dicots [2]. In the Brassicaceae and Poaceae families, respectively, a total number of 324 and 157 JRLs were identified [2]. In dicots, the majority of JRL proteins exist as mero- and hololectins, i.e., proteins consisting only of a single or multiple JRL domains, respectively, but JRLs are also part of chimeric proteins where they are combined with other domains [1]. In Arabidopsis, a total of 48 JRLs exist as mero-, holo-, or chimeric JRLs [3], while, in rice, Han et al. (2018) [2] identified 30 JRL proteins in total, from which 16 have a single JRL domain, 1 contains three repeated-JRL domains, and 13 JRLs occur in chimeric proteins. Chimeric JRL proteins are especially prevalent in the Poaceae family [2]. Chimeric proteins of JRL domains fused to dirigent (DIR) or nucleotide-binding adaptor shared by APAF-1, R proteins, and CED-4 (NB_ARC) domains exist exclusively in members of the Poaceae [1]. Rice, for example, has a total of seven proteins of these two types, with three of the NB_ARC- and four of the DIR-type [2]. Interestingly, all chimeric DIR-JRL proteins are located on rice chromosome 12, suggesting their origin was from gene duplication, possibly followed by neo-functionalization [4].
The function of the JRL domain has been studied extensively and shown to exhibit, for example, agglutination activity and binding to monosaccharides with varying specificity [5]. There have been various reports showing the involvement of JRL proteins in developmental processes and stress responses. The Arabidopsis protein AtJAC1, i.e., a holo-jacalin with three JRL domains, positively controls flowering [6]. On the other hand, the two Arabidopsis mero-jacalins AtJAX1 and AtRTM1 contribute to early and late restriction of virus movement, respectively [7,8]. In rice, the single-domain JRL, SalT, has been shown to respond to abiotic stress [9]. Additionally, the constitutive expression of a wheat JRL, TaJRLL1 consisting of two JRL domains, in transgenic Arabidopsis plants resulted in enhanced resistance against necrotrophic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium graminearum and Botrytis cinerea [10]. Contrarily, the function of DIR-domain proteins is not well understood [5]. Initially, DIR proteins were thought to be involved solely in the stereospecific coupling of monolignols to yield lignans or modified lignin [11]. However, evidence for stress-induced expression of DIR proteins has suggested a role of these proteins in adaptive responses to various external stimuli [12].
Recently, a function in pathogen resistance was reported for chimeric DIR-JRL proteins from rice and wheat. Weidenbach et al. (2016) [4] have shown that OsJAC1, a chimeric rice DIR-JRL protein, is involved in broad-spectrum disease resistance against bacteria, oomycetes, and fungi when it is constitutively expressed in rice or barley. In addition, both OsJAC1 domains (JRL and DIR) were shown to recognize saccharide-containing mannose/glucose and galactose/galactobiose, respectively [13]. Wheat chimeric DIR-JRL proteins substantially diversified after separation from other cereal species and gained novel functionalities [14]. They are divided into three groups and TaJA1 (syn. TaMCJ1), TaMCJ2, and TaMCJ3 are members from these separate groups [5]. Overexpression of TaJA1 (syn. TaMCJ1) in transgenic tobacco significantly enhanced resistance against wildfire disease caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae. This was not the case for the other two proteins TaMCJ2 and TaMCJ3 [5,15], indicating a divergence in function between the three groups. This is also reflected by the particular functions of the DIR-JRL wheat proteins TaVER2, TaWCI-1, and TaHfr-1 which play a role in vernalization, acquired resistance, and defense against insects, respectively (see Ma and Han 2021 and references therein).
In this study, we established that the cooperativeness of JRL and DIR domains in pathogen resistance is conserved in plants that originally contain chimeric monocotJRLs. The Rosetta stone theory proposes that the existence of such chimeric proteins predicts that proteins with the same domains but in separate proteins, as present in different species, function in the same biochemical pathway and may physically interact [16]. We challenged this hypothesis for Arabidopsis JRL and DIR proteins, and our results negate a cooperative function for JRL and DIR proteins in pathogen defense in Arabidopsis.

2. Results

2.1. Domain-Swap Experiments Reveal Functional Conservation for Domains of Chimeric monocotJRLs from Different Species

We have shown previously that constitutive expression of the rice monocotJRL OsJAC1 in transgenic barley and wheat enhances resistance to powdery mildew. It was further demonstrated that both OsJAC1 domains, the N-terminal DIR and the C-terminal JRL domain, are required for pathogen resistance [4]. A phylogenetic analysis led to the identification of the OsJAC1 orthologues TaJA1 (syn. TaMCJ1, located on chr. 2B; see [5]) and HvJAC1 (chr. H5, [4]) in wheat and barley, respectively. Transient overexpression (TOX) of TaJA1 and HvJAC1 in single barley epidermal cells, using particle bombardment, indicated that both proteins increased the resistance of transformed cells to barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei, Bgh), similar to OsJAC1 [4].
To test if the cooperative function of the DIR and JRL domain of the monocotJRLs was conserved across species, we performed a domain-swap experiment, combining the DIR and JRL domains of OsJAC1 with the respective, heterologous domains of TaJA1 or HvJAC1. In a TOX assay, we confirmed that the transient overexpression of OsJAC1 significantly lowered the rate of successful penetration of Bgh by 47%, compared to the control which was set to 0% (Figure 1). The penetration success of Bgh on barley epidermal cells transformed with an empty vector ranged from 27 to 45% in three independent experiments. The TOX of the constructs encoding for the separated OsJAC1-DIR or -JRL domain in combination with the respective domains of the barley orthologue HvJAC1 resulted in a 67% and 54% reduction of Bgh penetration of transformed cells for the pairs of OsJAC1-DIR/HvJAC1-JRL and HvJAC1-DIR/OsJAC1-JRL, respectively. Similarly, the combination of TaJA1-DIR/OsJAC1-JRL decreased the penetration efficiency to 46%. The transient overexpression of the OsJAC1-DIR domain and the JRL domain of TaJA1 lowered the Bgh penetration rate less, but still significantly (−28%) (Figure 1). These results indicate that the function of the individual monocotJRL domains is highly conserved among the Poaceae species.

2.2. Transient Overexpression of Arabidopsis AtJAX1 and AtDIR19 Increases Resistance of Barley to Powdery Mildew, but AtJAX1 Is Not Required for Powdery Mildew Resistance in Arabidopsis

Chimeric proteins containing a JRL and DIR domain were reported to have evolved exclusively in monocotyledonous plants [1]. In Arabidopsis, by contrast, no such fusion proteins exist. Instead, we identified 50 proteins with JRL and 24 proteins with DIR domains (Figure S1). Out of them, a total of seven JRL and 22 DIR proteins contain only a single domain while the others have duplicated JRL domains or are fused to other functional domains. Weidenbach et al. (2016) [4] and the domain-swap experiment discussed above clearly demonstrated a cooperative effect in plant defense of single DIR or JRL domains of artificially separated chimeric monocotJRLs. Therefore, we tested if proteins from Arabidopsis with a single DIR or JRL domain also cooperate in a similar way.
It has been established that neighboring genes are often co-regulated [17,18]. Interestingly, we identified that two genes encoding for a protein with a single DIR domain (AtDIR19, AtT1G58170) and a single JRL domain (AtJAX1, At1G58160), respectively, are located directly next to each other on chromosome 1 (Table 1). To evaluate a potential effect of these proteins in plant defense, we, again, used the TOX assay described above (Figure 2). The transient overexpression of the positive control (OsJAC1) significantly reduced cell penetration rate of Bgh by 40%, compared to the control which was set to 0% (penetration rate of Bgh in the control ranged between 22 and 48%). For AtDIR19 and AtJAX1, overexpression did not significantly decrease the penetration rate of Bgh. The co-transformation of AtDIR19 and the construct encoding for the JRL domain of OsJAC1 (OsJAC1-JRL), as well as AtJAX1 and the construct encoding for separate DIR domain of OsJAC1 (OsJAC1-DIR), also did not lead to increased penetration resistance of transformed cells against Bgh. However, the co-expression of AtDIR19 and AtJAX1 significantly lowered the penetration rate of Bgh by 36%. From the literature data, it is known that the AtJAX1 sequence of Col-0 contains a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) leading to a premature stop at the amino acid position 37 [7] (Figure S2). The co-bombardment of this truncated version of AtJAX1STOP with AtDIR19 did not significantly reduce the rate of penetration of Bgh on transformed cells (−10%) (Figure 2), indicating the full-length AtJAX1 protein is necessary for AtJAX1/AtDIR19-mediated resistance of barley epidermal cells against the penetration of Bgh.
To test whether this pair of proteins also affected pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis, we used the database generated by the 1001 Genomes Project [19,20] and identified Bay-0 to have the full length AtJAX1 protein, which was also reported by Yamaji et al. (2012) [7]. We inoculated Col-0 plants, expressing the truncated version of AtJAX1, and Bay-0 plants with the Arabidopsis powdery mildew fungus G. orontii (Figure 3a). Interestingly, the leaves of Col-0 appeared more diseased than Bay-0 at seven days after inoculation. An observation at a higher magnification (400×) revealed a lower amount of conidia on the leaves of Bay-0 compared to the leaves of Col-0, and quantification of conidia from the infected leaves of both ecotypes confirmed this observation (Figure 3b).
To further explore the natural variation in AtJAX1, we selected additional Arabidopsis ecotypes expressing the full-length AtJAX1 protein (Cvi-0 and No-0) or the truncated AtJAX1-STOP protein version (Kin-0 and La-0) (Figure S3). Quantification of conidia from the leaves infected with G. orontii at seven days post inoculation (d p.i.) showed that, while the pathogen was able to produce a significant higher number of spores on La-0, encoding for a truncated AtJAX1-STOP protein, the number of conidia was reduced on Kin-0, also encoding for the truncated AtJAX1-STOP protein. The number of conidia produced on Cvi-0 and No-0, expressing the full-length AtJAX1, was similar to the number counted for Kin-0. This led to the conclusion that, at least for the tested ecotypes, the differences in resistance to G. orontii cannot be traced back to allelic variation of the AtJAX1 gene. Interestingly, even though overexpression of AtJAX1 and AtDir19 in barley epidermal cells increased resistance to barley powdery mildew, the complementation of Col-0 with the full-length AtJAX1 did not increase resistance to the Arabidopsis powdery mildew G. orontii as the number of conidia at 7 d p.i. was not significantly different between the transgenic and azygous control plants (Figure 3c). We therefore concluded that, in Arabidopsis, AtJAX1 is not required for resistance to powdery mildew.

2.3. Several Pairs of Arabidopsis JRL and DIR Proteins Affect Resistance of Barley to Powdery Mildew

Using the TOX assay, we next tested the remaining six single-domain Arabidopsis JRL genes and one gene with three JRL domains for their ability to enhance resistance in barley against Bgh. The penetration rates of Bgh were reduced significantly when the plants were transformed with the constructs encoding for AtJAL24 (−31%) and AtJAL39 (−30%), compared to the control (set to 0%) (Figure 4a). This reduction was similar to the reduction observed in the plants transformed with OsJAC1 (−41%). Interestingly, the transient expression of the constructs encoding for AtJAL2 (+40%) and AtJAL19 (+33%) increased the cell entry rate, i.e., leading to reduced resistance. The transient overexpression of AtRTM1, AtJAL3, and AtJAL25 did not influence Bgh penetration rates in this experiment.
Next, we examined whether there is a cooperative effect of Arabidopsis JRLs and the DIR protein AtDIR19 on the resistance of barley epidermal cells to Bgh, as it was observed for AtJAX1 and AtDIR19. The TOX assay revealed that only the combinations of AtDIR19/AtJAL24 and AtDIR19/AtJAL39 resulted in a significantly reduced cell entry rate (−32% and −13%) compared to the control (Figure 4b). Co-transforming AtDIR19 and AtJAL19, instead, increased the cell entry rate of Bgh by 18%. Interestingly, the co-expression of the selected JRL proteins with AtDIR19 affected the Bgh penetration rate on transformed barley epidermal cells similar to what was observed for these single JRLs. This might indicate that AtDIR19 only has a minor contribution to the observed Bgh resistance phenotype and negate the hypothesis of a cooperative effect between the proteins in question.
From the 22 single-domain DIR proteins (Figure S1), we selected AtDIR11 (At1g22900) because it shares the highest similarity at the amino acid sequence level with the DIR domain of OsJAC1. AtDIR11 was tested together with seven single-domain JRL candidates, including AtJAX1, and with AtJAL3 (hololectin with three JRL domains) in a complementary set-up as described above. Remarkably, AtDIR11 significantly reduced the cell entry rate of Bgh (−25%) when expressed individually, although to a lesser extent than OsJAC1 (Figure 4c). This effect was enhanced by the co-expression of AtDIR11 with the constructs encoding for AtJAL2 and AtJAL39, which led to a reduction in cell entry rate of 50% and 48%, respectively. Particularly interesting was the reduction in cell entry rate associated with the co-expression of AtDIR11/AtJAL2 (−50%) because this reversed the effect we observed for the single AtJAL2 (+40%; Figure 4a) and the pair AtDIR19/AtJAL2 (Figure 4b).

2.4. Arabidopsis Protein Pairs AtDIR11/AtJAL2 and AtDIR11/AtJAL39 Do Not Physically Interact

It was shown that separated DIR and JRL domains of OsJAC1 physically interact [4]. We therefore investigated whether the pairs AtDIR11/AtJAL2 and AtDIR11/AtJAL39, which both enhance powdery mildew resistance in barley, physically interact with each other in the dicotyledonous plant Nicotiana benthamiana in a bi-fluorescence complementation assay (BiFC) (Figure 5). Firstly, protein expression was confirmed using Western blot analysis (Figure S5). The protein pair AtCaM7/AtPEN3 [21] and OsJAC1, which was reported to form oligomeric species [13], were used as the positive controls. Strikingly, neither the combination of AtDIR11/AtJAL2 nor AtDIR11/AtJAL39 resulted in YFP fluorescence, negating a physical interaction of these proteins (Figure 5). This contrasts the described interaction of artificially separated OsJAC1 domains [4]. The differences observed for the cooperativeness of JRLs and DIR proteins in dicots and monocots might indicate the involvement of other, yet unidentified, factors as part of the OsJAC1-resistance pathway that did evolve solely in monocotyledonous plants.

2.5. Constitutive Expression of OsJAC1 in Arabidopsis Does Not Affect Powdery Mildew Resistance

So far, the TOX-experiments revealed that several pairs of DIR and JRL proteins are able to reduce cell entry rates of Bgh in barley epidermal cells. However, none of these pairs seem to physically interact with each other or mediate resistance in dicotyledonous plants. To further examine this observation, transgenic Arabidopsis plants that constitutively expressed a construct encoding for OsJAC1-GFP were generated. The functionality of the OsJAC1-GFP fusion protein in the resistance to powdery mildew had been demonstrated previously in a TOX-assay [4]. Plants from three independent lines were inoculated with G. orontii. Segregants, which did not contain the transgene, served as the control (azygous siblings). A microscopic quantification of micro-colony formation revealed no differences in the number of powdery mildew colonies between the OsJAC1-GFP transgenic and azygous plants (Figure 6a). Quantitative PCR confirmed OsJAC1-GFP expression in all transgenic lines, although at different expression levels (Figure 6b). The pronounced effect of OsJAC1-GFP on powdery mildew resistance in transgenic barley and wheat, and the lack of this effect in transgenic Arabidopsis plants, tempt us to speculate that a resistance pathway, similar to OsJAC1, does not exist in Arabidopsis, at least not against powdery mildew.

2.6. In Silico Analyses of Binding Properties of Selected JRL and DIR Domains

Structural modelling was used to compare the DIR and JRL domains from different monocotJRLs to the single-domain DIR and JRL proteins of Arabidopsis. Although the native ligand of OsJAC1 is still unknown, crystallisation with surrogates has already shown that both domains, DIR and JRL, bind carbohydrates [23]. We hypothesized that similarities in the binding sites might point to a conserved mode of action for the aforementioned DIR and JRL domains. Molecular models were generated using the TopModel server. For the DIR domain, the sugar moiety (galactobiose) is bound by three feature sites: a bottom fixing the ligand via H-bond/polar interaction (Figure 7, OsJAC1-DIR Q39, N143), similarly a peripheral H-bond system (OsJAC1-DIR E111), and a hydrophobic pocket providing a π-system as the van der Waals interface, shielding the substrate from the solvent site (OsJAC1-DIR H79, W85, V110). Both DIR protein domains from T. aestivum and H. vulgare, i.e., TaJA1-DIR and HvJAC1-DIR, match these three features sufficiently, so that the putative molecular interactions could be satisfied. In the case of AtDIR19, the binding site appears altered to some extent, compared with those of its Poaceaen pendants. The hydrophobic pocket in AtDIR19 is formed by Y101, L111, and V137. Immanently, the shielding tryptophan is missing. The bottom H-bond system is given by D48. Together with the fact that there is a cavity for a putative carbohydrate ligand, the aberrant, but similar, binding site might render the very same mode of action as in the Poaceaen homologs. All structures have been modelled as apo-form. The ligand shown in Figure 7 is only a superimposition from pdb 7YWF [23] to highlight the binding site. However, the structures from TaJA1-DIR and HvJAC1-DIR could well represent the mechanistic intermediates. For example, the binding site of TaJA1-DIR is more open compared to the holo-binding site of OsJAC1-DIR. This can be seen particularly well in W82, which could not fulfil its function as a solvent shield here. This could be an open conformation that favours ligand binding. In contrast, the binding site in HvJAC1-DIR is closed to the extent that the sugar cannot bind at all. It could be speculated that these are the intermediates of a conformational selection mechanism with which even a large carbohydrate ligand can be specifically bound. The DIR domain of OsJAC1 exhibits a previously unknown carbohydrate binding property [13,23]. The similarity in the homologues underline that these are true orthologues, both structurally and functionally.
The carbohydrate binding for the lectin-related domain depends on two binding features: Polar interactions to the hydroxy groups are satisfied via the amid-backbone of a complementarily shaped loop. Furthermore, van der Waals interactions are provided by S249, Y295, and K294. In OsJAC1, there is only a bottom polar interaction provided by N297. To put it in a nutshell, TaJA1 and HvJAC1 provide these features as well as including a similarly shaped loop, forming the binding-site ground. Seemingly, there is no induced fit or conformational selection upon binding. In contrast, AtJAX1 comprises a different binding site. On the one hand, the loop, which is homologous to K294/Y295 in OsJAC1-JRL, namely K115/N116, is softly bent towards the putative saccharide-binding site. This might be seen as a closed state because, after all, amino acids with similar physicochemical properties as in the homologues are found at this position. On the other hand, the loop, which is homologous to S249 in OsJAC1, namely D71-D73, is significantly shorter in AtJAX1 compared to their homologues. All together, these features might point to mechanistic differences mediated by the JRL domains of AtJAX1 and those of the monocotsJRLs.

3. Discussion

Flowering plants can be grouped into monocots and dicots which are estimated to have split from a common ancestor approximately 200 million years ago. Today, and as result of the separation, species of both groups differ in habitus and organ morphology and are not interfertile. It is worthy to notice that, despite the monocot–dicot split dating back a long time, some components of the plant immune response are conserved in both groups of plants. This is true, e.g., for the barley HvMLO (mildew locus o) and Arabidopsis AtMLO2 proteins which both function as susceptibility factors in powdery mildew diseases [25,26]. Signaling components acting downstream of the pattern recognition receptors OsXa21 (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae resistance 21) and AtERF (ethylene response factor) have also been shown to be conserved, indicating their importance in essential functions [27,28]. On the other hand, the immune receptors known as TIR-NBS-LRRs (toll/interleukin-1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat, TNLs), for example, have evolved, and expanded massively, in dicots only, while being absent in monocots [29].
OsJAC1 is a two-domain protein consisting of a DIR and a JRL domain and is involved in broad-spectrum disease resistance of rice [4]. This class of chimeric proteins exists exclusively in monocots [1]. In dicots, by contrast, these respective domains are only present in separate proteins. This observation raised the question whether particular members of those single-domain proteins of dicots function cooperatively as it was shown for artificially separated domains of OsJAC1. We addressed this question in two subsequent blocks of experiments by firstly verifying whether artificially separated domains of OsJAC1 interact with the respective domains of heterologous proteins from wheat or barley, and by secondly testing the combinations of selected Arabidopsis single-domain JRLs and DIR proteins for a mutual contribution to plant resistance.
It has been shown previously that the constitutive expression of OsJAC1 not only enhances disease resistance in rice but also in wheat and barley, which indicates that all components necessary for OsJAC1-mediated resistance are shared between those monocots [4]. It has been demonstrated further that the co-expression of constructs encoding for separated JRL or DIR domains of OsJAC1 in a TOX assay is sufficient to enhance powdery mildew resistance in barley [4]. In a domain-swap experiment with constructs encoding for single domains of OsJAC1, and its potential orthologs TaJA1 and HvJAC1, all domain pairs tested lowered the success rate of penetration of Bgh, although to different extents (Figure 1). Interestingly, the heterologous combinations of JRL and DIR domains from rice and barley increased the penetration resistance of barley to powdery mildew more than the combination of single-domain proteins from rice and wheat or the full-length, wild-type OsJAC1.
We selected Arabidopsis genes encoding JRL or DIR proteins based on their domain composition and sequence similarity to OsJAC1, and by literature mining (Table 1). Strikingly, one pair, AtJAX1 and AtDIR19, is located directly next to each other on chromosome 1. It has been suggested that neighboring genes can be involved in common biological processes, such as metabolic clusters [30]. In addition, a function for AtJAX1 in defense against potexviruses was already published [7]. Using the TOX assay in barley [31], we found that only the co-expression of AtJAX1 and AtDIR19, but not the expression of single genes, lowered the penetration rate of Bgh to a similar extent as that observed for the OsJAC1 gene (Figure 2). To further substantiate this observation, we made use of a naturally occurring allelic variation of the AtJAX1 gene [7]. In Col-0, this allelic variation leads to a premature STOP. The co-expression of this shorter version of the protein together with AtDIR19 abolished the effect on the penetration rates of Bgh (Figure 2). These results suggested a cooperative effect of the full-length AtJAX1 and AtDIR19 in the resistance of barley to Bgh, similar to what was previously shown for the artificially separated domains of OsJAC1 [4]. To see if AtJAX1 and AtDIR19 are also involved in the resistance of the dicot Arabidopsis against powdery mildew, we inoculated Bay-0 and Col-0 plants, containing a full-length and a truncated version of AtJAX1, respectively, with G. orontii. Both Arabidopsis ecotypes showed mildew disease symptoms, however, the number of conidia was reduced on Bay-0 (Figure 3). This result seemed to point to a role for AtJAX1 in powdery mildew resistance of barley and Arabidopsis. Surprisingly, the transgenic Col-0 lines complemented with the full-length AtJAX1 did not differ in their resistance to powdery mildew compared to the azygous control lines (Figure 3). An investigation of additional Arabidopsis ecotypes, which also either express the truncated or full-length AtJAX1, also indicated that there was no correlation between the presence of the full-length AtJAX1 and resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis (Figure S3). Because previous studies suggested that AtJAX1 and the JRL AtRTM1 contribute to early and late restriction of virus movement, respectively [7,8], we concluded that there are mechanistic differences in JRL-associated resistance against different classes of pathogens in Arabidopsis. Similarly, the results from the structural modelling account for the similarities, but also the differences, among the DIR and JRL domains from the monocotJRLs in comparison to AtDIR19 and AtJAX1 (Figure 7). This is especially true for the hydrophobic pocket of AtDIR19, formed by Y101, L111, and V137, which appears different to those of monocotJRLs because the shielding tryptophan is missing. In the case of AtJAX1, structural differences make the binding of a different ligand likely.
Although AtJAX1 was able to increase resistance to Bgh when transiently overexpressed in barley in combination with AtDIR19, in Arabidopsis, AtJAX1 did not seem to be involved in the resistance to powdery mildew. We, therefore, tested more single-domain Arabidopsis JRL and DIR proteins in combination and identified additional pairs that were able to enhance resistance to barley powdery mildew when co-expressed in barley (Figure 4). In the dicot plant N. benthamiana, however, a BiFC experiment revealed that these pairs did not physically interact with each other (Figure 5). This result led to the conclusion that, while JRL and DIR proteins in a monocotyledonous plant, such as barley, are able to function cooperatively to increase disease resistance to powdery mildew, this function does not seem to be conserved in dicot plants, such as N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis. This was confirmed when transgenic Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing OsJAC1-GFP did not show enhanced resistance against powdery mildew (Figure 6). Because the overexpression of OsJAC1 in Arabidopsis was reported to increase resistance against ionizing radiation [32], a general incapability of OsJAC1 functionality in Arabidopsis can be excluded. Rather, it seems that, in dicots, resistance to powdery mildew might be independent of OsJAC1 or, more generally, OsJAC1-like JRL and DIR proteins. Therefore, we concluded that monocotyledonous plants, such as rice, barley, and wheat, share downstream components required for OsJAC1-mediated resistance which are lacking in the dicot Arabidopsis. This, in turn, might also be the reason why BiFC in N. benthamiana did not work for the candidate protein pairs tested. TaJA1 (syn. TaMCJ1), the wheat ortholog of OsJAC1, enhances resistance against wildfire disease caused by the bacterium P. syringae in transgenic tobacco [5]. Therefore, the functionality of Poaceae-specific DIR–JRL chimera in pathogen defense of dicots cannot be negated in general. More likely, it seems that the DIR–JRL resistance pathway is specific for particular combinations of plant species and certain diseases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material, Fungal Isolates, and Inoculation

Barley cv. Ingrid (MPI for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne) was grown in soil in controlled environmental conditions (18 °C, 65% relative humidity, 16 h photoperiod, and 200–250 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity). Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh, Isolat K1) [33] was received from Paul Schulze-Lefert (MPI for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne) and cultivated on barley cv. IngridMlo at 18 °C, 65% relative humidity, a 16-h photoperiod, and 130–150 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity. The inoculation was performed as described in Weidenbach et al. (2014) [34]. Bgh infection success was quantified 48 h after inoculation using a light microscope. Leaf chlorophyll was removed with ethanol, chloroform (4/1; v/v), and 0.15% trichloroacetic acid. Fungal structures were stained with ink acetic acid (10% blue ink, 25% acetic acid). A minimum of 50–100 infection sites were counted per leaf and categorized.
For pathogen assays, Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Col-0, Bay-0, Cvi-0, No-0, Kin-0, and La-0 (collection RWTH Aachen University) and their respective overexpression lines were grown in soil in a controlled environment (22 °C, 60% relative humidity, 8.5 h photoperiod, and 120 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity). Golovinomyces orontii (Ralph Panstruga, RWTH Aachen University) was cultivated on Arabidopsis plants Col-0 or eds1-2 at 20–22 °C, 50–60% relative humidity, a 16-h photoperiod, and 80 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity. The inoculation was performed via leaf-to-leaf inoculation or by brushing conidiospores from infected leaves through a 100 µm sieve onto detached leaves, which were placed on water agar (1% [w/v] agar-agar) in a 120 cm (height) settling tower at an average spore density of five conidiospores mm−2. After the settling of conidiospores for 1 h, the plants or detached leaves were returned to the growth cabinets and cultivated under the conditions described above. G. orontii infection was quantified seven days after inoculation by washing off conidiospores of five infected leaves. The leaves were vortexed for 1 min with 30 mL 0.1% Tween-20 solution in a 50 mL tube. The leaves were then discarded, and the spore suspension was centrifuged at 4000× g for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded by slowly aspirating from the top and spores were resuspended in 500 µL of the remaining supernatant. Spores were counted using a counting chamber (Thoma Haemocytometer).
The overexpression lines CaMV35S::AtJAX1 and CaMV35S::OsJAC1-GFP in the Col-0 background were stably transformed using the floral dip method with Agrobacterium tumefaciens cultures, as described in Zhang et al. (2006) [35], carrying the constructs AtJAX1-pEarleyGate100 and OsJAC1-pEarleyGate103, respectively. AtJAX1 was amplified from Arabidopsis genomic DNA flanked with attB1 and attB2 recombination sites and OsJAC1 was previously cloned [4]. The fragments were cloned into pEarleyGate100 and pEarleyGate103, respectively [36], using the Gateway technology (Invitrogen). For reproduction, the Arabidopsis plants were transferred to controlled conditions at 22 °C, 60% relative humidity, a 16-h photoperiod, and 110 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity. Abundance of transcripts from the transgene were quantified by qRT-PCR using a 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) and the Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG with ROX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The parameters were set according to manufacturer’s data (50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min, using 40 cycles and followed by melting point analysis).

4.2. Transient Overexpression Assay (TOX) on Single Barley Cells

The TOX assay was performed as described in Weidenbach et al. (2016) [4] and Schweizer et al. (1999) [31]. In short, the coding sequences (CDS) of the respective genes were obtained by PCR using cDNA of the corresponding plant and primers, as indicated in the supplement. Using restriction digestion enzymes, CDS was cloned into pIPKTA09 behind the CaMV 35S promoter. The primary leaves of seven-day-old barley plants (IngridMLO) were co-transformed via gold particle bombardment with the pIPKTA09 vector carrying the gene(s) of interest and a second vector (pUBI:GUS), leading to the expression of the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene which enabled the identification of transformed cells. At 24 h after bombardment, the leaves were inoculated with Bgh and GUS-stained after an additional 48 h. The surface structures of Bgh were stained with ink-acetic acid solution (10% blue ink, 25% acetic acid) and analyzed using light microscopy. Therefore, cells which successfully blocked Bgh penetration and cells which were invaded by the pathogen were categorized and the data were used to calculate the cell entry rates of Bgh. Firstly, statistical analysis was performed with these data. Thereafter, for the sake of simplicity, the results are shown in plots in which the control was set to 0%. In this way, the effect of a test candidate gene to reduce the penetration success of Bgh could intuitively be obtained from the plotted data as negative value. A list of primers is available in Table S1.

4.3. Identification of JRL- or DIR-Domain-Containing Proteins in Arabidopsis

Jacalin-related lectin (JRL) and DIR protein candidates from Arabidopsis thaliana were identified using the Protein Search function (PF01419 and PF03018 as query) and the BLAST-Tool of The Arabidopsis Information Resources (TAIR, [37]. Additionally, the NCBI Batch Web CD search tools was used [38,39]. The numbers obtained in our study slightly differ from those published earlier by other groups [3,12].
The phylogenetic tree of Arabidopsis JRL and DIR proteins was constructed in MEGA7 based on ClustalW alignment using a Maximum Likelihood method based on the Jones–Taylor–Thornton Matrix model with 1000 replicates to retain bootstrap values [40,41,42,43].

4.4. Bi-Fluorescence Complementation Assay (BiFC)

Nicotiana benthamiana plants (Thomas Lahaye, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen) were grown in soil in a controlled environment (24 °C, 75% relative humidity, 15-h photoperiod, and 350 μmol photons s−1 m−2 light intensity). The leaves of 4–6-week-old N. benthamiana plants were co-infiltrated using a syringe with A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 carrying the pDEST-GWVYNE, pDEST-VYNE(R)GW, pDEST-GWVYCE, or pDEST-VYCE(R)GW vector with the corresponding gene [44]. Infiltrated leaf area was cut out two days after treatment and vacuum infiltrated with water. The evaluation of BiFC signal (restored YFP) was performed using a Leica SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope (objective: HC PL APO CS2 20×/0.75 IMM, excitation at 514 nm using an Argon laser, and detection at 518–550 nm 514 nm)

4.5. Phenolic Total Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Protein extraction was performed as described in Thomas et al. (2015) [45] using approximately 150 µL of ground leaf tissue of N. benthamiana. The protein samples were mixed with a 2× protein gel loading buffer (NuPAGETM LDS Sample Buffer (4X) and NuPAGETM Sample Reducing Agent (10X)) and incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. Next, the samples were separated on a Bis–Tris gel as described in Huwa et al. (2021) [13], and the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for immunodetection using Anti-HA (rabbit, 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and Anti-cMyc antibodies (mouse, 1:2000, obtained from U. Commandeur, RWTH Aachen) as the primary antibodies. Anti-rabbit-HRP (goat, 1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and Anti-mouse-HRP (horse, 1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) were used as the secondary antibodies.

4.6. Structural Modelling

Molecular models for TaJA1-DIR, HvJAC1-DIR, AtDIR19, TaJA1-JRL, AtJAX1, and HvJAC1-JRL were generated using the TopModel server, a template-based, deep-learning algorithm [46,47]. The molecular models of OsJAC1-DIR (pdb 7YWF) and OsJAC1-JRL are obtained from Huwa et al. (2022) [23]. The ligand for the JRL proteins is a superposition of galactose from pdb 1UGW [24].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12010067/s1, Figure S1: Localization of the JRL and DIR genes across Arabidopsis chromosomes; Figure S2: Sequence analysis of AtJAX1 from Col-0 and Bay-0; Figure S3: Disease severity of Arabidopsis ecotypes La-0, No-0, Cvi-0, and Kin-0 inoculated with G. orontii; Figure S4: Molecular phylogenetic analysis of DIR and JRL proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana and MonocotJRLs using a Maximum Likelihood method; Figure S5: Protein abundance in the BiFC experiment with AtDIR11 and AtJAL2/AtJAL39; Table S1: Primer used in this study.

Author Contributions

All authors have been personally involved in this study. L.E. and C.K. performed most of the experiments, analyzed the results, and supervised L.V., J.K. and M.S. N.H. and T.C. were involved in the design of the experiments and structural modelling, and helped in the interpretation of the results. The manuscript was drafted by L.E., C.K. and U.S. U.S. designed the experiments and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by a joined DFG (German Research Foundation) project awarded to Ulrich Schaffrath (SCHA 631/10-1) and Thomas Classen (369034981). L.E. and C.K. received a RWTH Aachen University scholarships for Doctoral Students.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The group of Uwe Conrath (RWTH Aachen University) is kindly acknowledged for providing the positive control for the BiFC assay (PEN3-VYCE, CaM7-VYNE). Part of the work was funded by RWTH Aachen University scholarship for Doctoral Students awarded to Lara Esch and Christian Kirsch. Additional funding for this work came from a joined DFG (German Research Foundation) project awarded to Ulrich Schaffrath (SCHA 631/10-1) and Thomas Classen (369034981). Denise Weidenbach (RWTH Aachen University) was kindly acknowledged for the cloning of the OsJAC1-GFP construct and the generation of transgenic Arabidopsis plants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Esch, L.; Schaffrath, U. An Update on Jacalin-like Lectins and Their Role in Plant Defense. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Han, Y.J.; Zhong, Z.H.; Song, L.L.; Stefan, O.; Wang, Z.H.; Lu, G.D. Evolutionary Analysis of Plant Jacalin-Related Lectins (JRLs) Family and Expression of Rice JRLs in Response to Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 1252–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Nagano, A.J.; Fukao, Y.; Fujiwara, M.; Nishimura, M.; Hara-Nishimura, I. Antagonistic Jacalin-Related Lectins Regulate the Size of ER Body-Type β-Glucosidase Complexes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Weidenbach, D.; Esch, L.; Möller, C.; Hensel, G.; Kumlehn, J.; Höfle, C.; Hückelhoven, R.; Schaffrath, U. Polarized Defense Against Fungal Pathogens Is Mediated by the Jacalin-Related Lectin Domain of Modular Poaceae-Specific Proteins. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ma, Q.H.; Han, J.Q. Identification of Monocot Chimeric Jacalin Family Reveals Functional Diversity in Wheat. Planta 2021, 253, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xiao, J.; Li, C.; Xu, S.; Xing, L.; Xu, Y.; Chong, K. JACALIN-LECTIN LIKE1 Regulates the Nuclear Accumulation of GLYCINE-RICH RNA-BINDING PROTEIN7, Influencing the RNA Processing of FLOWERING LOCUS C Antisense Transcripts and Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2102–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yamaji, Y.; Maejima, K.; Komatsu, K.; Shiraishi, T.; Okano, Y.; Himeno, M.; Sugawara, K.; Neriya, Y.; Minato, N.; Miura, C.; et al. Lectin-Mediated Resistance Impairs Plant Virus Infection at the Cellular Level. Plant Cell Online 2012, 24, 778–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mahajan, S.K.; Chisholm, S.T.; Whitham, S.A.; Carrington, J.C. Identification and Characterization of a Locus (RTM1) That Restricts Long-Distance Movement of Tobacco Etch Virus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 14, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Garcia, A.B.; De Almeida Engler, J.; Claes, B.; Villarroel, R.; Van Montagu, M.; Gerats, T.; Caplan, A. The Expression of the Salt-Responsive Gene SalT from Rice Is Regulated by Hormonal and Developmental Cues. Planta 1998, 207, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiang, Y.; Song, M.; Wei, Z.; Tong, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, L.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y. A Jacalin-Related Lectin-like Gene in Wheat Is a Component of the Plant Defence System. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5471–5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Davin, L.B.; Lewis, N.G. Dirigent Proteins and Dirigent Sites Explain the Mystery of Specificity of Radical Precursor Coupling in Lignan and Lignin Biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Paniagua, C.; Bilkova, A.; Jackson, P.; Dabravolski, S.; Riber, W.; Didi, V.; Houser, J.; Gigli-Bisceglia, N.; Wimmerova, M.; Budínská, E.; et al. Dirigent Proteins in Plants: Modulating Cell Wall Metabolism during Abiotic and Biotic Stress Exposure. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3287–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Huwa, N.; Weiergräber, O.H.; Kirsch, C.; Schaffrath, U.; Classen, T. Biochemical and Initial Structural Characterization of the Monocot Chimeric Jacalin OsJAC1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, M.; Xu, W.; Xiang, Y.; Jia, H.; Zhang, L.; Ma, Z. Association of Jacalin-Related Lectins with Wheat Responses to Stresses Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 84, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, Q.H.; Tian, B.; Li, Y.L. Overexpression of a Wheat Jasmonate-Regulated Lectin Increases Pathogen Resistance. Biochimie 2010, 92, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marcotte, E.M.; Pellegrini, M.; Ng, H.L.; Rice, D.W.; Yeates, T.O.; Eisenberg, D. Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences. Science 1999, 285, 751–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, W.H.; de Meaux, J.; Lercher, M.J. Co-Expression of Neighbouring Genes in Arabidopsis: Separating Chromatin Effects from Direct Interactions. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Reimegård, J.; Kundu, S.; Pendle, A.; Irish, V.F.; Shaw, P.; Nakayama, N.; Sundström, J.F.; Emanuelsson, O. Genome-Wide Identification of Physically Clustered Genes Suggests Chromatin-Level Co-Regulation in Male Reproductive Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 3253–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Alonso-Blanco, C.; Andrade, J.; Becker, C.; Bemm, F.; Bergelson, J.; Borgwardt, K.M.M.; Cao, J.; Chae, E.; Dezwaan, T.M.M.; Ding, W.; et al. 1,135 Genomes Reveal the Global Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 2016, 166, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cao, J.; Schneeberger, K.; Ossowski, S.; Günther, T.; Bender, S.; Fitz, J.; Koenig, D.; Lanz, C.; Stegle, O.; Lippert, C.; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Multiple Arabidopsis thaliana Populations. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Campe, R.; Langenbach, C.; Leissing, F.; Popescu, G.V.; Popescu, S.C.; Goellner, K.; Beckers, G.J.M.; Conrath, U. ABC Transporter PEN3/PDR8/ABCG36 Interacts with Calmodulin That, like PEN3, Is Required for Arabidopsis Nonhost Resistance. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huwa, N.; Weiergräber, O.H.; Fejzagić, A.V.; Kirsch, C.; Schaffrath, U.; Classen, T. The Crystal Structure of the Defense Conferring Rice Protein OsJAC1 Reveals a Carbohydrate Binding Site on the Dirigent-like Domain. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jeyaprakash, A.A.; Katiyar, S.; Swaminathan, C.P.; Sekar, K.; Surolia, A.; Vijayan, M. Structural Basis of the Carbohydrate Specificities of Jacalin: An X-Ray and Modeling Study. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Büschges, R.; Hollricher, K.; Panstruga, R.; Simons, G.; Wolter, M.; Frijters, A.; Van Daelen, R.; Van der Lee, T.; Diergaarde, P.; Groenendijk, J.; et al. The Barley Mlo Gene: A Novel Control Element of Plant Pathogen Resistance. Cell 1997, 88, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Consonni, C.; Humphry, M.E.; Hartmann, H.A.; Livaja, M.; Durner, J.; Westphal, L.; Vogel, J.; Lipka, V.; Kemmerling, B.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; et al. Conserved Requirement for a Plant Host Cell Protein in Powdery Mildew Pathogenesis. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 716–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Humphry, M.; Bednarek, P.; Kemmerling, B.; Koh, S.; Stein, M.; Göbel, U.; Stüber, K.; Piślewska-Bednarek, M.; Loraine, A.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; et al. A Regulon Conserved in Monocot and Dicot Plants Defines a Functional Module in Antifungal Plant Immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21896–21901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Holton, N.; Nekrasov, V.; Ronald, P.C.; Zipfel, C. The Phylogenetically-Related Pattern Recognition Receptors EFR and XA21 Recruit Similar Immune Signaling Components in Monocots and Dicots. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sun, X.; Pang, H.; Li, M.; Chen, J.; Hang, Y. Tracing the Origin and Evolution of Plant TIR-Encoding Genes. Gene 2014, 546, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R. Co-Regulation of Clustered and Neo-Functionalized Genes in Plant-Specialized Metabolism. Plants 2020, 9, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schweizer, P.; Pokorny, J.; Abderhalden, O.; Dudler, R. A Transient Assay System for the Functional Assessment of Defense-Related Genes in Wheat. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 1999, 12, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jung, I.J.; Ahn, J.W.; Jung, S.; Hwang, J.E.; Hong, M.J.; Choi, H.I.; Kim, J.B. Overexpression of Rice Jacalin-Related Mannose-Binding Lectin (OsJAC1) Enhances Resistance to Ionizing Radiation in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hinze, K.; Thompson, R.D.; Ritter, E.; Salamini, F.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-Mediated Targeting of the Ml-o Resistance Locus in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 3691–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Weidenbach, D.; Jansen, M.; Franke, R.B.; Hensel, G.; Weissgerber, W.; Ulferts, S.; Jansen, I.; Schreiber, L.; Korzun, V.; Pontzen, R.; et al. Evolutionary Conserved Function of Barley and Arabidopsis 3-KETOACYL-CoA SYNTHASES in Providing Wax Signals for Germination of Powdery Mildew Fungi. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, X.; Henriques, R.; Lin, S.S.; Niu, Q.W.; Chua, N.H. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana Using the Floral Dip Method. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Earley, K.W.; Haag, J.R.; Pontes, O.; Opper, K.; Juehne, T.; Song, K.; Pikaard, C.S. Gateway-Compatible Vectors for Plant Functional Genomics and Proteomics. Plant J. 2006, 45, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Berardini, T.Z.; Reiser, L.; Li, D.; Mezheritsky, Y.; Muller, R.; Strait, E.; Huala, E. The Arabidopsis Information Resource: Making and Mining the ‘Gold Standard’ Annotated Reference Plant Genome. Genesis 2015, 53, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; et al. CDD: NCBI’s Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D222–D226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bo, Y.; Han, L.; He, J.; Lanczycki, C.J.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: Functional Classification of Proteins via Subfamily Domain Architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D200–D203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jones, D.T.; Taylor, W.R.; Thornton, J.M. The Rapid Generation of Mutation Data Matrices from Protein Sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992, 8, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gehl, C.; Waadt, R.; Kudla, J.; Mendel, R.R.; Hänsch, R. New GATEWAY Vectors for High Throughput Analyses of Protein-Protein Interactions by Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Thomas, M.; Huck, N.; Hoehenwarter, W.; Conrath, U.; Beckers, G.J.M. Combining Metabolic 15N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome. In Plant Phosphoproteomics; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mulnaes, D.; Porta, N.; Clemens, R.; Apanasenko, I.; Reiners, J.; Gremer, L.; Neudecker, P.; Smits, S.H.J.; Gohlke, H. TopModel: Template-Based Protein Structure Prediction at Low Sequence Identity Using Top-Down Consensus and Deep Neural Networks. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 1953–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mulnaes, D.; Koenig, F.; Gohlke, H. TopSuite Web Server: A Meta-Suite for Deep-Learning-Based Protein Structure and Quality Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 12 00067 g001 550
Figure 1. Domain-swap experiment with DIR and JRL domains of chimeric proteins from rice, barley, and wheat. Primary leaves of barley were transiently co-transformed with constructs encoding for the artificially separated domains of OsJAC1, TaJA1, and HvJAC1. At 48 h p.i., the effect of overexpression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated. Host cell entry rates were determined from the ratio of sites with successful penetration to the total number of interaction sites of spores with transformed cells. The negative control (empty vector) was set to 100%, and significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA and are labeled with asterisks (P < 0.05: *; P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with 50 to 300 evaluated interaction sites on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation. For visualization, the values of the control are taken as baseline (equal to “0%”) and, hence, the negative values for the test candidates can be read intuitively as a reduction in penetration success.
Figure 1. Domain-swap experiment with DIR and JRL domains of chimeric proteins from rice, barley, and wheat. Primary leaves of barley were transiently co-transformed with constructs encoding for the artificially separated domains of OsJAC1, TaJA1, and HvJAC1. At 48 h p.i., the effect of overexpression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated. Host cell entry rates were determined from the ratio of sites with successful penetration to the total number of interaction sites of spores with transformed cells. The negative control (empty vector) was set to 100%, and significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA and are labeled with asterisks (P < 0.05: *; P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with 50 to 300 evaluated interaction sites on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation. For visualization, the values of the control are taken as baseline (equal to “0%”) and, hence, the negative values for the test candidates can be read intuitively as a reduction in penetration success.
Plants 12 00067 g001
Plants 12 00067 g002 550
Figure 2. Testing of Arabidopsis candidate genes in a TOX assay. Primary leaves of barley were transiently transformed with constructs encoding for AtDIR19 (At1g58170), AtJAX1 (At1g58160), and the variant AtJAX1-STOP and combinations thereof. The effect of transient expression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated at 48 h p.i. Host cell entry rates were determined from the ratio of sites with successful penetration to the total number of interaction sites of spores with transformed cells. The negative control (empty vector) was set to 100%, and significant differences were determined using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test and are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with a total of 50 to 300 interaction sites evaluated on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation. For visualization, the values of the control are taken as baseline (equal to “0%”) and, hence, the values of the test candidates can be read as differences in penetration success.
Figure 2. Testing of Arabidopsis candidate genes in a TOX assay. Primary leaves of barley were transiently transformed with constructs encoding for AtDIR19 (At1g58170), AtJAX1 (At1g58160), and the variant AtJAX1-STOP and combinations thereof. The effect of transient expression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated at 48 h p.i. Host cell entry rates were determined from the ratio of sites with successful penetration to the total number of interaction sites of spores with transformed cells. The negative control (empty vector) was set to 100%, and significant differences were determined using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test and are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with a total of 50 to 300 interaction sites evaluated on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation. For visualization, the values of the control are taken as baseline (equal to “0%”) and, hence, the values of the test candidates can be read as differences in penetration success.
Plants 12 00067 g002
Plants 12 00067 g003 550
Figure 3. Disease severity of Arabidopsis Col-0 and Bay-0 inoculated with Golovinomyces orontii. Arabidopsis plants of ecotype Col-0 (AtJAX1Stop) and Bay-0 (AtJAX1) were inoculated with G. orontii. (a) Macroscopic evaluation was performed at seven and eight days post inoculation (d p.i.) as indicated, scale bars equal 100 µm. (b) Quantification of disease severity was performed by rinsing five infected leaves of twelve plants of each ecotype with water and counting of conidia at seven d p.i. (c) Disease severity of Col-0 plants complemented with a full length AtJAX1 construct (+) and azygous sibling plants (−) was calculated from five infected leaves of each plant at seven d p.i. by rinsing with water and counting of conidia. Mean values are given in (b,c) ± standard deviation. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test and are indicated with an asterisk (P < 0.001: ***).
Figure 3. Disease severity of Arabidopsis Col-0 and Bay-0 inoculated with Golovinomyces orontii. Arabidopsis plants of ecotype Col-0 (AtJAX1Stop) and Bay-0 (AtJAX1) were inoculated with G. orontii. (a) Macroscopic evaluation was performed at seven and eight days post inoculation (d p.i.) as indicated, scale bars equal 100 µm. (b) Quantification of disease severity was performed by rinsing five infected leaves of twelve plants of each ecotype with water and counting of conidia at seven d p.i. (c) Disease severity of Col-0 plants complemented with a full length AtJAX1 construct (+) and azygous sibling plants (−) was calculated from five infected leaves of each plant at seven d p.i. by rinsing with water and counting of conidia. Mean values are given in (b,c) ± standard deviation. Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test and are indicated with an asterisk (P < 0.001: ***).
Plants 12 00067 g003
Plants 12 00067 g004 550
Figure 4. Transient expression of Arabidopsis DIR and JRL candidate genes. Primary leaves of barley were transiently transformed with the constructs as indicated. JRL-containing genes were expressed either alone (a), together with AtDIR19 (b), or with AtDIR11 (c). The effect of transient gene expression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated at 48 h p.i. Calculation of host cell entry rates and statistically analyses were performed in analogy to Figure 2. Significant differences (P = 0.01) were determined using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test and are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The values presented are transformed to enable direct visualization of increased or reduced penetration success of Bgh. The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with a total of 50 to 300 interaction sites evaluated on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Transient expression of Arabidopsis DIR and JRL candidate genes. Primary leaves of barley were transiently transformed with the constructs as indicated. JRL-containing genes were expressed either alone (a), together with AtDIR19 (b), or with AtDIR11 (c). The effect of transient gene expression on the penetration success of Bgh was evaluated at 48 h p.i. Calculation of host cell entry rates and statistically analyses were performed in analogy to Figure 2. Significant differences (P = 0.01) were determined using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test and are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01: **; P < 0.001: ***). The values presented are transformed to enable direct visualization of increased or reduced penetration success of Bgh. The bars represent the mean values of at least three experiments with a total of 50 to 300 interaction sites evaluated on three leaves (n = 3) ± standard deviation.
Plants 12 00067 g004
Plants 12 00067 g005 550
Figure 5. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay of Arabidopsis JRL and DIR candidates. Leaves of N. benthamiana were transformed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, resulting in the co-expression of the constructs as indicated. The pairs AtPEN3 and AtCAM7, as well as OsJAC1/OsJAC1, served as the positive controls. An evaluation of YFP fluorescence (YFP) was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy two days after the transformation at 20× magnification, excitation at 514 nm, and detection at 518–550 nm (n = 3). Additionally, bright-field pictures were taken, and merged images of the aforementioned pictures are shown for the localization of the YFP signal. Scale bar: 300 µm.
Figure 5. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay of Arabidopsis JRL and DIR candidates. Leaves of N. benthamiana were transformed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, resulting in the co-expression of the constructs as indicated. The pairs AtPEN3 and AtCAM7, as well as OsJAC1/OsJAC1, served as the positive controls. An evaluation of YFP fluorescence (YFP) was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy two days after the transformation at 20× magnification, excitation at 514 nm, and detection at 518–550 nm (n = 3). Additionally, bright-field pictures were taken, and merged images of the aforementioned pictures are shown for the localization of the YFP signal. Scale bar: 300 µm.
Plants 12 00067 g005
Plants 12 00067 g006 550
Figure 6. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing OsJAC1-GFP. (a) Arabidopsis plants (Col-0) were transformed with CaMV35S::OsJAC1-GFP (Col-0 CaMV35S::OsJAC1-GFP) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Four rosette leaves from three to four plants of different T1 lines (line1, line 6, and line 11) were inoculated with G. orontii. Transgenic plants (+) and azygous sibling plants (−) from the same events were used. Microcolony formation of G. orontii on these plants were examined microscopically after 48 h p.i. and calculated as the rate of successful invasion related to the total number of attacked cells. The mean values are shown in percent with standard deviation. No statistically significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (P ≤ 0.96). (b) The transcript abundance of OsJAC1-GFP in plants of line 1, line 6, and line 11 was determined using qRT-PCR from the pooled RNA samples of four to five leaves and calculated relative to AtActin, according to Livak and Schmittgen (2001) [22]. The mean values from three technical replicates are shown with standard deviation.
Figure 6. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing OsJAC1-GFP. (a) Arabidopsis plants (Col-0) were transformed with CaMV35S::OsJAC1-GFP (Col-0 CaMV35S::OsJAC1-GFP) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Four rosette leaves from three to four plants of different T1 lines (line1, line 6, and line 11) were inoculated with G. orontii. Transgenic plants (+) and azygous sibling plants (−) from the same events were used. Microcolony formation of G. orontii on these plants were examined microscopically after 48 h p.i. and calculated as the rate of successful invasion related to the total number of attacked cells. The mean values are shown in percent with standard deviation. No statistically significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test (P ≤ 0.96). (b) The transcript abundance of OsJAC1-GFP in plants of line 1, line 6, and line 11 was determined using qRT-PCR from the pooled RNA samples of four to five leaves and calculated relative to AtActin, according to Livak and Schmittgen (2001) [22]. The mean values from three technical replicates are shown with standard deviation.
Plants 12 00067 g006
Plants 12 00067 g007 550
Figure 7. Structural models of selected DIR and JRL domains. Left column from top to bottom: Superposition of molecular models of OsJAC1-DIR [orange, from pdb 7YWF [23]], TaJA1-DIR [yellow], AtDIR19 [light purple], and HvJAC1-DIR [red]. The ligand galactobiose is superimposed from OsJAC1-DIR to illustrate the putative binding site. Right column from top to bottom: Superposition of molecular models of OsJAC1-JRL [green, from pdb 7YWG], TaJA1-JRL [blue], AtJAX1 [turquoise], and HvJAC1-JRL [purple]. The ligand is a superposition of galactose from pdb 1UGW [24]. The grey frame in the top row illustrates the selected perspective of the close-ups. The models for TaJA1-DIR, HvJAC1-DIR, AtDIR19, TaJA1-JRL, AtJAX1, and HvJAC1-JRL have been generated using TopModel.
Figure 7. Structural models of selected DIR and JRL domains. Left column from top to bottom: Superposition of molecular models of OsJAC1-DIR [orange, from pdb 7YWF [23]], TaJA1-DIR [yellow], AtDIR19 [light purple], and HvJAC1-DIR [red]. The ligand galactobiose is superimposed from OsJAC1-DIR to illustrate the putative binding site. Right column from top to bottom: Superposition of molecular models of OsJAC1-JRL [green, from pdb 7YWG], TaJA1-JRL [blue], AtJAX1 [turquoise], and HvJAC1-JRL [purple]. The ligand is a superposition of galactose from pdb 1UGW [24]. The grey frame in the top row illustrates the selected perspective of the close-ups. The models for TaJA1-DIR, HvJAC1-DIR, AtDIR19, TaJA1-JRL, AtJAX1, and HvJAC1-JRL have been generated using TopModel.
Plants 12 00067 g007
Table
Table 1. Arabidopsis DIR and JRL candidate genes tested in this study.
Table 1. Arabidopsis DIR and JRL candidate genes tested in this study.
DirigentJRL (# Domains)Protein IDDomainOsJAC1 Sequence Similarity (E-Value)
At1G05760 (1)RTM1Jacalin-like superfamily-
At1G05770 (1)JAL2Jacalin-like superfamily-
At1G19715 (3) JAL3Jacalin-like superfamily3 × 10−12
Jacalin-like superfamily
Jacalin-like superfamily
At1G22900 DIR11Dirigent superfamily0.00006
At1G58160 (1) JAX1Jacalin-like superfamily7.1
At1G58170 DIR19Dirigent superfamily-
At1G73040 (1) JAL19Jacalin-like superfamily5 × 10−14
At2G43730 (1) JAL24Jacalin-like superfamily0.48
At2G43740 (1) JAL25Jacalin-like superfamily-
At3G59620 (1)JAL39Jacalin-like superfamily -
Arabidopsis DIR and JRL domains were identified via a NCBI Batch Web CD search. To determine sequence similarity, a TAIR protein BLAST was performed using OsJAC1 as the query. The table shows the E-values (smallest number of hits obtained at random in the search for similar sequences to OsJAC1 in the TAIR database). Gene identification numbers (Gene ID) of respective Arabidopsis DIR and JRL candidate genes are given. Protein names are given as well and the numbers in brackets indicate the number of JLR domains per protein.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esch, L.; Kirsch, C.; Vogel, L.; Kelm, J.; Huwa, N.; Schmitz, M.; Classen, T.; Schaffrath, U. Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins. Plants 2023, 12, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010067

AMA Style

Esch L, Kirsch C, Vogel L, Kelm J, Huwa N, Schmitz M, Classen T, Schaffrath U. Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins. Plants. 2023; 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esch, Lara, Christian Kirsch, Lara Vogel, Jana Kelm, Nikolai Huwa, Maike Schmitz, Thomas Classen, and Ulrich Schaffrath. 2023. "Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins" Plants 12, no. 1: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010067

APA Style

Esch, L., Kirsch, C., Vogel, L., Kelm, J., Huwa, N., Schmitz, M., Classen, T., & Schaffrath, U. (2023). Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins. Plants, 12(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop