Review Reports
- Lucia Merlino1,†,
- Agnese Immacolata Volpicelli1,2,† and
- Mattia Dominoni3,4,*
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Kotaro Kitaya Reviewer 2: George Anifandis Reviewer 3: Panagiotis N. Tsikouras Reviewer 4: Nicolae Gica
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Very unique study to be considered for publication.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors tried to find a corretion between vaccination or SARS-Cov-2 infection and the existence of ulcer.
Please described the MM section better as the duration of SARS-Cov-2 infection, the kind of vaccination, doses of vaccination.
Please explain why vaccination promotes the ulcer development, is there any correlation?
Minor typos and laguage editing is needed
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Interesting,no critical remarks
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
Dear author’s
I was pleased to review your article and I have the following comments:
The subject is debatable. We cannot conclude that this pathology is secondary to covid infection or vaccination.
There are multiple repetitive sentences belong the article sections like “ Lipschütz vulvar ulcer was first described in 1913” etc. Please remove the repetitive information.
It will be interesting to add pictures with the colposcopic examination.
It is mandatory to draw a prospective study in order to obtaine accurate results.
Minor English edits.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 4 Report
Thank you for your revised version.