Review Reports
- Run Li1,
- Jinzhao Wu1,2,* and
- Wujie Hu3
Reviewer 1: M. Niranjanamurthy Reviewer 2: James E. Pickering Reviewer 3: Simona Violino
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Significance of the main idea(s) : good
Originality : good
Technical quality of the paper : good
Awareness of related work : good
Clarity of presentation : good
Organization of the manuscript: good
References: Acceptable
Paper Length: Acceptable
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Overall, I found the paper to be an interesting read. I would like to see the conclusions containing more aspects of the key findings though (as presented in the abstract).
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The work is well organized. In my opinion, it has no things to improve. Each section is well argued. The bibliography included is complete. The article can be published. Congratulations on the work!
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf