Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Analysis of Environmental Electromagnetic Interference in Multiple-Channel Neural Recording Systems for High Common-Mode Interference Rejection Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Gold–Graphene Quantum Dot Hybrid Nanoparticle for Smart Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Transducer Elements Based on Different Material Configurations for Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Biosensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Indolium-Based Fluorescent Probe for Fast Detection of Cyanide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics

1
National Narcotics Laboratory Beijing Regional Center, Beijing 100164, China
2
School of Emergency Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2024, 14(7), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070342
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 7 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 15 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Biosensors for Detection and Monitoring (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
Misusage of tetracycline (TC) antibiotics residue in animal food has posed a significant threat to human health. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop highly sensitive and robust assays for detecting TC. In the current study, gold and platinum nanoparticles were deposited on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) through the superposition method (Au@Pt/CNTs-s) and one-pot method (Au@Pt/CNTs-o). Au@Pt/CNTs-s displayed higher enzyme-like activity than Au@Pt/CNTs-o, which were utilized for the development of sensitive magnetic immunoassays. Under the optimized conditions, the limits of detection (LODs) of magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o against TCs could reach 0.74 ng/mL and 1.74 ng/m, respectively, which were improved 6-fold and 2.5-fold in comparison with conventional magnetic immunoassay. In addition, the measurement of TC-family antibiotics was implemented by this assay, and ascribed to the antibody used that could recognize TC, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, and doxycycline with high cross-reactivity. Furthermore, the method showed good accuracy (recoveries, 92.1–114.5% for milk; 88.6–92.4% for pork samples), which also were applied for determination of the targets in real samples. This study provides novel insights into the rapid detection of targets based on high-performance nanocatalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tetracycline (TC) antibiotics, including oxytetracycline (OTC), chlortetracycline (CTC), and doxycycline (DC), are widely used in clinical treatments and animal husbandry due to their broad-spectrum antibacterial effects [1,2,3]. However, TC can be discharged into the environment through medical wastewater, aquaculture wastewater, and livestock manure, which negatively impacts the ecological environment, such as by causing toxicity to microbial communities, and promoting drug resistance [4,5]. Additionally, TC can persist in animal-derived products through the food chain and pose health risks to humans via chronic toxicity, allergic symptoms, abnormal bone development, and even liver damage [6,7]. Thus, China has established the maximum residue limit of 100 μg/kg in milk and 200 μg/kg in muscle for TC, OTC, and CTC. For DC, the MRL is 100 μg/kg in muscle. Therefore, it is crucial to establish an accurate and sensitive detection method to screen the TC residues in food.
Traditional analytical techniques have been utilized to analyze TC antibiotics, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [8,9], mass spectrometry (MS) [10,11], fluorescence methods [12], and immunoassays. However, instrumental methods and fluorescence methods have some disadvantages, including tedious operation, complicated sample preparations, and need for professional personnel [13]. Immunoassays are widely used in clinical testing, food safety, environmental monitoring, and other fields due to their high efficiency, low cost, and suitability for high-throughput screening characteristics [14,15]. Enzymes are the most commonly used signal probes due to their extremely strong catalytic activity. However, most biological enzymes, such as horse-radish peroxidase (HRP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), present some shortcomings, including poor stability, easy deactivation, and high cost, which could interfere with the performance of immunoassays [16]. The search for highly efficient and robust catalysts as a promising alternative to natural enzymes has become a popular research topic.
In recent years, nanomaterials with an inherent natural enzyme, named nanozymes, have attracted considerable attention. Since Gao et al. initially found that iron trioxide (Fe3O4) displayed peroxidase-like activity in 2007, more than 300 nanozymes have been reported to date [17,18,19,20]. Additionally, nanozymes were rated as one of “Top Ten Emerging Chemical Technologies” by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) in 2022. Compared with natural enzymes, nanozymes have advantages such as high stability, low preparation cost, and easy regulation of activity. Different types of novel nanozymes have been widely introduced in the biosensors [21,22], environment protection [23,24], and healthcare [25,26] fields in recent decades.
In the reported nanocatalysts, platinum (Pt) stands out as a highly promising nanocatalyst due to its exceptional activity for both hydrogen oxidation and oxygen reduction reactions (ORR) [27,28]. Considering the high cost, one potentially promising strategy is to produce a core–shell structure to expose the Pt layer on the surface, since only the outmost layer of the catalyst would participate in the reaction [29,30]. Pt-based multi-metallic NPs, such as AuPt [31] and PdPt [32] nanoparticles, have been extensively studied. These nanoparticles capitalize on the synergistic effect between metals, resulting in enhanced catalytic activity. In our research group, Au@Pt nanozyme was synthesized by a one-step method and showed superior catalytic efficiency compared to HRP [31].
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted tremendous attention in electronics, energy, sensor, and others applications due to their large surface area, high conductivity, and low cost [33,34]. Many studies have focused on nanocatalysts supported by CNTs to enhance the catalytic behavior in the energy [34], sensor [35,36], and antibacterial [37] fields. Chen et al. designed a Pt-based nanozyme with ultra-thin Fe2O3 decoration in the inverse catalyst model with enhanced peroxidase activity and a colorimetric sensor for glucose determination based on 2Fe2O3/30Pt/CNTs, which improved almost 10 times in terms of sensitivity [36]. Cai et al. reported that CNTs-PdAu/Pt trimetallic nanoparticles exhibited an electrocatalytic peak current of up to 4.4 A mgPt−1 and high stability over 7000 s, which were far superior to Pt-based bimetallic NPs [38]. Inspired by these exciting results, designing nanocomposites that combine CNTs and Pt-based NPs holds great promise for creating high-performance catalysts as nanozyme labels.
In this study, gold and platinum nanoparticles were decorated on CNTs by the superposition method and one-pot method. The hybrid nanocatalysts were characterized and compared. Antibodies against TC were immobilized on magnetic beads orientation-ally via goat anti-mouse antibody as a linker. Novel immunomagnetic bead assays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs were established to monitor the concentration of TCs in food. Milk samples and pork samples from a local market were collected and analyzed using the new method. This innovative approach promises to improve the monitoring and safety of food products by providing a sensitive and accurate detection method for TC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

1-(3-(Dimethylamino)-propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, N-hydroxysulosuccinimide (NHS), Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and goat anti-mouse antibody (GAM) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The standards of TC, OTC, CTC, DC, Streptomycin (STR), chloramphenicol (CHL), cephalosporin (CEP), and enrofloxacin (ENR) were obtained from Beijing Zhongke Quality Inspection Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The monoclonal antibody against TC was obtained from Beijing WKHH Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Carboxylated MWCNTs (L = 5–30 μm) were purchased from Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Other reagents were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Immunomagnetic beads (IMBs) were purchased from Suzhou Weidu Biological Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China). Absorbance measurements were implemented with an M1000 PRO microplate reader by TECAN Inc. (Durham, NC, USA).

2.2. Development of OVA-TC and OVA-HRP

A quantity of 20 mg of PABA was dissolved in 4.5 mL of 0.2 mol/L HCl by stirring at 4 °C for 10 min. Then, 18 mg of NaNO2 in 0.5 mL of H2O was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was kept at 4 °C in the dark for 4 h to obtain solution A. Next, 5 mg of TC was dissolved in 3 mL of 0.05 mol/L ice-cold borax buffer solution, and 2 mL of solution A was added dropwise to this mixture. After mixing at 4 °C in the dark for 2 h, HBO3 was used to adjust the pH of the solution to 7.4. Subsequently, 10 mg of OVA or HRP, 10 mg of EDC, and 8 mg of NHS were added and stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The products, OVA-TC or HRP-TC, were purified by dialysis in PBS for 24 h, aliquoted, and stored at −20 °C.

2.3. Synthesis of Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid Catalyst by Superposition Method

To begin, 58.32 mg of K2PtCl6, 49.44 mg of HAuCl4·4H2O, and 60 mg of Pluronic F127 were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water. After thorough mixing, 105.6 mg of ascorbic acid was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 24 h at room temperature. The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The precipitate was then washed three times with water to remove any excess reagents. The collected product, Au@Pt, was dried at 37 °C for 24 h. To explore the enzyme activity of Au@Pt, the synthesis conditions were optimized by varying the amounts of K2PtCL6 and HAuCL4. The concentrations of K2PtCL6 were 0.4 mM, 2 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, and 30 mM at 20 mM of HAuCL4, while the concentrations of HAuCL4 were 0.4 mM, 0.8 mM, 2 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, and 50 mM at 30 mM of K2PtCL6.
Next, 0.2 mg of carboxylated MWCNTs was resuspended in 1 mL of MES buffer using ultrasonic agitation for 20 min. Subsequently, 50 μg of Au@Pt was added to the mixture and stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The resulting composite material, referred to as Au@Pt/CNTs-s, was centrifuged, washed twice with water, and dried at 37 °C for 24 h.

2.4. Synthesis of Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid Catalyst by One-Pot Method

Quantities of 5.83 mg of K2PtCl6 solution, 4.94 mg of HAuCl4.4H2O, 6 mg of Pluronic F127, and 0.2 mg of carboxylated MWCNTs were mixed in 2 mL of ultrapure water. To this mixture, 20 mg of ascorbic acid in 1 mL of ultrapure water was added dropwise, followed by sonication for 15 min. Next, the mixture was stirred magnetically at room temperature for 24 h. The obtained product, Au@Pt/CNTs-o, was washed with ultrapure water and separated by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min.

2.5. Characteristic of Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid

TEM images were obtained using a Tecnai G2 spirit BioTwin (FEI, Hillsborough, OR, USA) electron microscope operated at 120 kV. To monitor the enzyme-like property of the Au@Pt/CNTs nanohybrid, TMB/H2O2 solution in acetate buffer solution was utilized to indicate the color change.

2.6. Immobilization of GAM on IMBs

Quantities of 100 μL IMB, 10 mg EDC, and 10 mg NHS were mixed in 1 mL MES buffer for 2 h at 4 °C. By the aid of magnetism, activated IMB was removed from excess EDC and NHS, and washed with MES buffer twice. Then, an amount of GAM was reacted with the activated IMB with stirring for 12 h at 4 °C. After the magnetic separation and washing step, IMB-GAM was obtained and stored in MES buffer containing 2% BSA.

2.7. Combination of Color Probe Based on Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid

A quantity of 200 μL of Au@Pt/CNTs-s or Au@Pt/CNTs-o obtained was added with 15 μL of OVA-TC, and stirred at 4 °C for 2 h. After centrifuging at 5000 rpm for 10 min, the pellet was washed by PBST twice and then the products were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS (containing 2% BSA) solution at 4 °C for later use.

2.8. Establishment of Magnetic Immunoassay Assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid

Quantities of 50 μL of IMB-GAM in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.01% Tween-20, 50 μL of TC antibody, 50 μL of Au@Pt/CNTs-o/OVA-TC or Au@Pt/CNTs-s/OVA-TC, and 50 μL of TC standards were mixed together and reacted at 37 °C for 30 min. By the aid of the magnetic separation, the supernatant was discarded and the participates was washed by PBS thrice. Then, 200 mL of freshly prepared TMB/H2O2 was adopted and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. After adding 100 mL of 2 mol/L H2SO4, the supernatants absorbed by magnet were transferred onto a 96-well plate to test the absorbance value at 450 nm.

2.9. Optimization of Magnetic Immunoassay Assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs

Virous reaction conditions may interfere with the performance of immunoassay. In sample buffer, several parameters were estimated, including pH (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 7.4, 8.0, and 9.0), the concentrations of Na+ (0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 1 mol/L), acetonitrile (0, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 50%, m/v), and unrelated protein (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%, m/v). The maximum absorbances (B0) were recorded and IC50 was the concentration at which 50% of the antibodies were bound to the analyte.

2.10. Sample Preparation and Analysis

Milk samples and pork samples were collected from local markets in Zhenjiang, China. Each 5 mL milk sample was mixed with 5 mL of 1% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid, and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min, the supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.45 µm membranes. To mitigate the matrix effect from the milk, the supernatant was diluted before the detection process. For the pork samples, we followed the pretreatment method specified in the “National Standard of the People’s Republic of China” (GB 31658.6-2021) [39]. Briefly, 5 g of the homogenized pork sample was mixed with 20 mL of EDTA.2Na-Mcllvaine buffer solution and shaken for 10 min. Subsequently, 5 mL of sulfuric acid solution and 5 mL of sodium tungstate solution were added. After vortexing for 5 min, the mixture was centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was then filtered using neutral filter paper and prepared for analysis.
To evaluate the recovery rate of the new method, a certain concentration of TCs was spiked in milk and pork samples. Following the preparation process above, the recovery rate was calculated. Eight commercial milk samples and eight pork samples from a local dairy farm were collected and determined by magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs and UHPLC/MS.

3. Results

3.1. Construction, Optimization, and Characterization of Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid

To explore the effect of the synthesis on the catalytic activity of nanohybrids, two approaches were adopted. For Au@Pt/CNTs-s, Au@Pt developed were precipitated on CNTs, while for Au@Pt/CNTs-o, AuNPs and Pt nanoparticles were directly reduced onto CNTs (Figure 1). To enhance the enzyme activity of Au@Pt/CNTs-s, the synthesis conditions were optimized by varying the amounts of K2PtCL6 and HAuCL4 first (Figures S1–S3). As seen in Figure S1, only gold nanoparticles were present when the concentration of K2PtCl6 was 0.4 mM and 2 mM. With increasing K2PtCl6 concentration, Pt gradually recombined on the surface of gold nanoparticles, forming a dandelion-like structure. The catalytical results indicated a positive correlation between absorbance and K2PtCl6 concentration (Figure S3a). When the concentration of HAuCl4 ranged from 0.8 mM to 20 mM, the size of the composite particles decreased significantly, but increased sharply at 50 mM HAuCl4 (Figure S2). The maximum absorbance was observed at 2 mM HAuCl4 (Figure S3b). Therefore, the optimal conditions were determined to be 30 mM K2PtCl6 and 2 mM HAuCl4, and the average diameter was 54 nm for the obtained Au@Pt particles (Figure S4).
Next, Au@Pt nanoparticles were assembled on MWCNTs. SEM and TEM images revealed various dandelion-shaped nanoparticles embedded on the surface of CNTs [Figure 2a,b,d,e]. For Au@Pt/CNTs-s, uniformly sized Au@Pt particles with an average diameter of about 50 nm covered the CNTs. In contrast, Au@Pt/CNTs-o exhibited Au@Pt particles with diameters ranging from 20 nm to 200 nm. It is speculated that the presence of CNTs in the solution may have hindered the reduction reaction of K2PtCl6 and HAuCl4, leading to variations in reagent concentrations in local areas and resulting in differently sized Au@Pt particles. SEM/EDS element maps of these two hybrid nanomaterials showed that the Au@Pt particles were uniformly decorated on the surface of CNTs for both nanohybrids and the Pt content in Au@Pt/CNTs-s was significantly higher than that in Au@Pt/CNTs-o [Figure 2c,f].

3.2. Enzyme Mimetic Activity of Au@Pt/CNTs Nanohybrid

Further, the peroxidase-like activities of these nanomaterials were evaluated with the help of TMB/H2O2 solution (Figure 3). MWCNTs and carboxylated MWCNTs did not catalyze TMB solution to turn blue, whereas Au@Pt, Au@Pt/CNTs-s, and Au@Pt/CNTs-o displayed significant peroxidase-like activity (Figure 3a). To investigate the enzymatic kinetic curves, the catalysts were added to 100 μL TMB chromogenic solution and the absorbance values were measured at 30 s intervals. As seen from Figure 3b, the absorbance of Au@Pt/CNTs-s began to level out after 7 min, while that of Au@Pt and Au@Pt/CNTs-o plateaued after 8 min. In contrast, HRP’s absorbance leveled out after 12 min. These results indicated that Au@Pt/CNTs-s exhibited the highest enzymatic reaction rate.
The apparent kinetic parameters of these catalysts were calculated from the double reciprocal of the Michaelis–Menten equation (Figure 3c–f). Since the higher Km indicates the lower affinity towards the substrate, Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o showed higher affinity with TMB and H2O2 compared with HRP and other Pt-based nanohybrids, including GOCNT-Pt [35], CNT-Pt [35], 2Fe2O3/30Pt/CNTs [36], and30Pt/CNTs [37]. In comparison with other nanohybrid catalysts (Table 1), Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o displayed the highest affinity. Additionally, it was found the catalytical activity of Au@Pt/CNTs-s was higher than that of Au@Pt/CNTs-o. Since Au@Pt nanoparticles played an essential role in peroxidase-like activities of these two materials, it was believed that the variation in Au@Pt nanoparticle size in Au@Pt/CNTs-o might have led to a reduction in catalytic efficiency compared to Au@Pt/CNTs-s.

3.3. Optimization of Magnetic Immunoassay Assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs

To capture the trace target in samples, it is essential to first develop specific anti-body-decorated IMBs. In this study, GAM was utilized as a linker to immobilize antibodies in an oriented manner through their Fc fragments. The synthesis conditions for IMB-GAM were optimized, including the concentration of GAM, the amount of IMB-GAM used, and the choice of blocking reagents. The absorbance increased with the rising concentration of GAM, reaching a plateau beyond 0.5 mg/mL GAM. The maximum absorbance was achieved when 20 mL of IMB-GAM was used (Figure 4a,b), thus identifying the optimal conditions. Appropriate blocking conditions are crucial to reduce background interference and enhance the method’s performance. Various reagents, including BSA, gelatin, and skimmed milk powder, were tested at different concentrations. It was found that 2% BSA provided the lowest background interference, indicating it to be the most effective blocking reagent (Figure 4c).
To obtain the chromogenic probe, Au@Pt/CNTs were linked with OVA-TC by physical absorbance. After reacting with IMB-GAM, it was observed by TEM that these nanohybrids were tightly combined with IMB (Figure 4d,e), which indicated the successful development of the chromogenic probe. Next, the usages of the chromogenic probe were optimized, as shown in Figure 4f. The absorbance enhanced with the increasing volume of the probe. At 20 μL of Au@Pt/MWCNTs-s and 20 μL of Au@Pt/MWCNTs-o, the value reached the platform, which was applied in further tests.
The physical parameters in the immunoassay were evaluated, including Na+ concentration, pH, protein concentration, and Tween-20. As shown in Figure 5, the optimal pH was identified as 8.4 for Au@Pt/CNTs-s and 7.4 for Au@Pt/CNTs-o, as these conditions yielded the maximum B0/IC50 and the lowest IC50. The presence of Na+ resulted in a decline in B0/IC50 for both immunoassays based on Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o, indicating decreased sensitivity. Adding a certain amount of unrelated protein could reduce nonspecific binding and background noise. The results demonstrated that 0.1% BSA in the buffer achieved the highest B0/IC50 for both magnetic immunoassays, corresponding to the highest sensitivity. In our experiment, we observed that these nanohybrids tended to adsorb to polystyrene, resulting in higher background levels. To improve the dispersion of enzyme-like materials, surfactants such as Tween-20 were added. A concentration of 0.2% Tween-20 in the buffer provided the best performance for both magnetic immunoassays.

3.4. Analytical Performance of Magnetic Immunoassays Assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs

Based on these optimal conditions, we developed magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs nanohybrids. The standard curves, obtained through a four-parameter fitting, are depicted in Figure 6. Notably, the curves of magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs exhibited a significant leftward shift compared to conventional magnetic immunoassays, indicating enhanced sensitivity. The limits of detection (LODs) for magnetic immunoassays based on Au@Pt/CNTs-s, Au@Pt/CNTs-o, and HRP-TC were determined to be 0.74 ng/mL, 1.74 ng/mL, and 4.25 ng/mL, respectively. These corresponded to detection ranges of 1.10–6.57 ng/mL, 2.53–12.34 ng/mL, and 4.85–15.25 ng/mL, respectively. Moreover, the magnetic immunoassays based on Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o exhibited a 6-fold and 2.5-fold improvement in sensitivity, respectively, compared to conventional magnetic immunoassays.

3.5. Analysis of Samples

The proposed magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s was utilized to determine the concentration of TC in real samples. To ensure the specificity of the assay, its cross-reactivity was assessed. The results demonstrated that this assay could accurately analyze TC-family antibiotics with the cross-reactivity of 75.7%, 54%, and 12% for OTC, CTC, and DC, respectively. Additionally, no cross-reactivity was observed with other antibiotics, such as STR, CHL, CEP, and ENR (Figure 7). Further, to evaluate the applicability of the prepared sensor for practical applications, recovery rates were tested by spiking TC into milk and pork samples. The recovery rates ranged from 92.1% to 114.5% for milk and from 88.6% to 92.4% for pork (Table 2), indicating that the magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s is a reliable tool for TC detection in real samples. Most of the samples did not contain detectable levels of TCs, except for sample No. 7 in milk, which had 1.05 ng/mL, and sample No. 5 in pork, which had 5.57 ng/mL of TCs (Table 3). The detection rates were 87.5% for both milk and pork samples, and all collected samples met the maximum residue limit (MRL) standards in China.

4. Discussion

Nanocatalysts have garnered increasing interest due to their high and robust catalytic activity, low cost, and good stability under harsh conditions. Pt-based nanozymes are among the most efficient catalytic materials, owing to their high enzyme-like activity. However, the high cost of Pt and the kinetic limitations of its oxygen reduction reactions have hindered broader applications. To minimize Pt consumption and optimize catalytic performance, significant efforts have been directed towards synthesizing Pt-based multi-metallic nanoparticles and supporting Pt on nanomaterials with high specific surface areas. In the realm of Pt-based multi-metallic NPs, combinations such as AuPt [31], PdPt NPs [32], and PdAu/Pt [38] have been extensively explored. These nanozymes demonstrate enhanced performance due to the possible synergistic effects between the metals. Another effective strategy involves using carbon-based materials, like CNTs or graphene, as supports. For example, Yang et al. reported that small Pt nanoparticles (0.55–2.81 nm) were loaded on CNTs via atomic layer deposition, and 30Pt/CNTs nanozymes with a size of 1.69 nm exhibited significantly higher peroxidase-like activity [36]. In this study, we combined both strategies by supporting Au@Pt core–shell nanoparticles on CNTs using the superposition method and the one-pot method. The resulting hybrids, particularly Au@Pt/CNTs-s, exhibited higher activity compared to GOCNT-Pt [35], CNT-Pt [35], 30Pt/CNTs [36], and 2Fe2O3/30Pt/CNTs [37]. This confirms that integrating these approaches is a promising strategy for designing and synthesizing effective nanocatalysts. Additionally, for both Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o, Au@Pt particles were uniformly immobilized on CNTs, which would help to maximize the utilization efficiency of active sites, thereby improving the efficiency and selectivity of catalytic reactions [40,41]. Furthermore, it was reported that AuPt bimetallic nanoparticles presented a plasmonic effect [42,43]. To avoid the interfere of this feature on absorbance, the supernatants without any nanomaterials were collected and tested.
Detection methods integrated with various nanozymes have been explored for TC in recent years (Table 4). Electrochemical and colorimetric sensors have been established using aptamers [44] or molecular imprinting polymers (MIP) [45] as capture elements. Additionally, multi-mode assays have been developed and evaluated, leveraging the diverse characteristics of nanozymes. For instance, Gogoi et al. prepared novel borophene quantum dots (QDs) for the colorimetric detection of TC, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.02 μM [46]. Furthermore, the fluorescence of borophene QDs was quenched by TC through the inner filter effect mechanism, resulting in a fluorescence sensor with an LOD of 1.08 μM. In comparison with the listed methods, the methods developed in this study exhibited the better performance. Additionally, it was observed that those magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs demonstrated improved sensitivity compared with conventional magnetic immunoassays, with LODs 6-fold and 2.5-fold higher for Au@Pt/CNTs-s and Au@Pt/CNTs-o. Magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s showed better sensitivity than those using Au@Pt/CNTs-o, which may be attributed to the higher catalytic activity of Au@Pt/CNTs-s.
Furthermore, it was noticed that this novel assay could recognize the TC family of antibiotics, while most of the methods listed presented specific binding with TC. It was speculated that the antibody used in this study displayed class specificity towards TC analogs. Due to the similar structure of TCs, some antibodies can bind more than one TC and consistent results have been reported. For example, Chen et al. established an ELISA based on a broad-spectrum monoclonal antibody with the IC50 of 0.72 ng/mL for TC, 3.2 ng/mL for OTC, and 6.4 ng/mL for CTC [47]. According to the government regulations, the total tetracycline residues, including TC, OTC, CTC, and DC, need to be monitored in animal-origin food. Therefore, this study provides an efficient and convenient tool for the evaluation of TC pollution in food.
Table 4. Nanoparticle-based sensors for the detection of TCs.
Table 4. Nanoparticle-based sensors for the detection of TCs.
NanoparticlesBiosensorsLODTargetsRef.
Ni2+-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (Ni-HHTP)electrochemical aptasensor1.9 pMTC[44]
Fe3O4 @MIPColorimetric
biosensor
0.4 μMTC[45]
borophene quantum dots (QDs)Colorimetric biosensors1.02 μMOTC, TC[46]
Fluorescent biosensors1.08 μMOTC, TC
non-spherical gold nanoparticle/black phosphorus nanocomposite (BP-nsAu NPs)Colorimetric
biosensor
90 nMTC[48]
NH2-MIL-88 B (Fe, Ni)Colorimetric biosensors0.182 μMTC, OTC, CTC, DC[49]
Fluorescent biosensors0.0668 μMTC, OTC, CTC, DC
Au@Pt/CNTs-sColorimetric
immunoassay
0.74 ng/mLTC, OTC, CTC, DCThis work
Au@Pt/CNTs-oColorimetric
immunoassay
1.74 ng/mLTC, OTC, CTC, DCThis work

5. Conclusions

In this study, Au@Pt nanoparticles were decorated on the surface of CNTs using two different strategies. Au@Pt/CNTs-s exhibited higher enzyme-like activity compared to Au@Pt/CNTs-o and other Pt-based nanocatalysts. Magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs were established and compared, with the method assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s showing the highest performance, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.74 ng/mL. This novel assay could recognize TC-family antibiotics, including TC, OTC, CTC, and DC. The recovery rates were 92.1–114.5% for milk and 88.6–92.4% for pork samples. In real samples, the concentrations of TCs ranged from ND to 1.05 ng/mL in milk, and from ND to 5.57 ng/mL in pork. This study highlights that Au@Pt/CNTs nanoparticles can offer novel strategies for mimic-enzyme labels in biosensing for food safety.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios14070342/s1, Figure S1. TEM images of Au@Pt using 20 mM HAuCl4 and certain concentration of K2PtCL6. Figure S2. TEM images of Au@Pt using 30 mM K2PtCL6 and certain concentration of HAuCl4. Figure S3. Absorbance of Au@Pt at different concentrations of K2PtCL6 and HAuCl4. Figure S4. DLS analysis of Au@Pt at optimal conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and K.Z.; methodology, R.H.; validation, formal analysis and data curation, R.H. and K.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Z.; writing—review and editing, supervision and funding acquisition, Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the special scientific research project of School of Emergency Management, Jiangsu University, grant number KY-C-11 and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fuoco, D. Classification framework and chemical biology of tetracycline-structure-based drugs. Antibiotics 2012, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Amangelsin, Y.; Semenova, Y.; Dadar, M.; Aljofan, M.; Bjørklund, G. The impact of tetracycline pollution on the aquatic environment and removal strategies. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Mehedi, H.M.; Rong, Y.; Liu, R.; Li, H.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. An upconversion nanosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of tetracycline in food based on magnetic-field-assisted separation. Food Chem. 2022, 373, 131497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gan, Z.; Hu, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zou, X.; Shi, J.; Zheng, K.; Arslan, M. A portable test strip based on fluorescent europium-based metal-organic framework for rapid and visual detection of tetracycline in food samples. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Talebi Bezmin Abadi, A.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Haertlé, T.; Blatt, N.L. World health organization report: Current crisis of antibiotic resistance. BioNanoScience 2019, 9, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, Q.; Wang, W.; Regev-Yochay, G.; Lipsitch, M.; Hanage, W.P. Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: How worried should we be? Evol. Appl. 2015, 8, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liang, N.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, W.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, R.; Shen, T.; Zou, X.; et al. Ratiometric Sensing for Ultratrace Tetracycline Using Electrochemically Active Metal-Organic Frameworks as Response Signals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 7584–7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Karageorgou, E.; Armeni, M.; Moschou, I.; Samanidou, V. Ultrasound assisted dispersive extraction for the high-pressure liquid chromatographic determination of tetracycline residues in milk with diode array detection. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Phomai, K.; Supharoek, S.-A.; Vichapong, J.; Grudpan, K.; Ponhong, K. One-pot co-extraction of dispersive solid phase extraction mploying iron-tannic nanoparticles assisted cloud point extraction for the determination of tetracyclines by high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 2023, 252, 123852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moreno-González, D.; García-Campaña, A.M. Salting-out assisted liquid–liquid extraction coupled to ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of tetracycline residues in infant foods. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Susakate, S.; Poapolathep, S.; Chokejaroenrat, C.; Tanhan, P.; Hajslova, J.; Giorgi, M.; Saimek, K.; Zhang, Z.; Poapolathep, A. Multiclass analysis of antimicrobial drugs in shrimp muscle by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 27, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Y.; Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Yan, H.; Qiao, F.; Qiao, X. One pot synthesis of magnetic graphene/carbon nanotube composites as magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction adsorbent for rapid determination of oxytetracycline in sewage water. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1422, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, P.; Bai, J.; He, P.; Zeng, J. One pot synthesis of nanofiber-coated magnetic composites as magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction adsorbents for rapid determination of tetracyclines in aquatic food products. Molecules 2023, 28, 7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeng, K.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Meng, H.; Wu, Q.; Yang, J.; Liang, H. Gold nanoparticle-carbon nanotube nanohybrids with peroxidase-like activity for the highly-sensitive immunoassay of kanamycin in milk. Int. J Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 6028–6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmed, S.; Ning, J.; Peng, D.; Chen, T.; Ahmad, I.; Lei, Z.; Chen, G.; Yuan, Z. Current advance in immunoassays for the detection of antibiotics residues: A review. Food Agric. Immunol. 2020, 31, 268–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ashrafi, A.M.; Bytesnikova, Z.; Barek, J.; Richtera, L.; Adam, V. A critical comparison of natural enzymes and nanozymes in biosensing and bioassays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 192, 113494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, L.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Wang, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.; Perrett, S.; et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ai, Y.J.; Hu, Z.N.; Liang, X.P.; Sun, H.B.; Xin, H.B.; Liang, Q. Recent advances in nanozymes: From matters to bioapplications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Shang, J.; Shao, W.; Jin, L.; Quan, C.; Li, J. Emerging nanozyme-based multimodal synergistic therapies in combating bacterial infections. Theranostics 2022, 12, 5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zandieh, M.; Liu, J. Nanozymes: Definition, Activity, and Mechanisms. Adv. Mater. 2023, 36, 2211041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, Z.; Lu, N.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, M. Metal-nanoparticle-supported nanozyme-based colorimetric sensor array for precise identification of proteins and oral bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 11156–11166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.; Qi, Z.; Yang, Y.; Lu, N.; Tang, Z. Enhanced “electronic tongue” for dental bacterial discrimination and elimination based on a DNA-encoded nanozyme sensor array. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 11228–11238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Meng, Y.T.; Li, W.F.; Pan, X.L.; Gadd, G.M. Applications of nanozymes in the environment. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 1305–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elkomy, H.A.; El-Naggar, S.A.; Elantary, M.A.; Gamea, S.M.; Ragab, M.A.; Basyouni, O.M.; Mouhamed, M.S.; Elnajjar, F.F. Nanozyme as detector and remediator to environmental pollutants: Between current situation and future prospective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 3435–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morajkar, R.; Fatrekar, A.P.; Vernekar, A.A. single-atom nanozyme cascade for selective tumor-microenvironment-responsive nanocatalytic therapy. ChemMedChem 2023, 18, e202200585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jiang, Y.X.; Rong, H.T.; Wang, Y.F.; Liu, S.; Xu, P.; Guo, L.M.; Zhu, T.; Rong, H.P.; Wang, D.S.; Zhang, J.T.; et al. Single-atom cobalt nanozymes promote spinal cord injury recovery by anti-oxidation and neuroprotection. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 9752–9759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, B.; Hu, D.; Kuang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by an ionic-liquid polymer: Dispersion of Pt and PtRu nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes and their electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2009, 48, 4751–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zeng, Z.; Tan, C.; Huang, X.; Bao, S.; Zhang, H. Growth of noblemetal nanoparticles on single-layer TiS2 and TaS2 nanosheets forhydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Jin, M.; Xia, Y. Enhancing the catalytic and electro-catalytic properties of Pt-based catalysts by forming bimetallic nanocrystals with Pd. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 8035–8049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. You, H.J.; Fang, J.X. Particle-mediated nucleation and growth of solution-synthesized metal nanocrystals: A new story beyond the LaMer curve. Nano Today 2016, 11, 145–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, B.; Zeng, K. Using bimetallic Au@Pt nanozymes as a visual tag and as an enzyme mimic in enhanced sensitive lateral-flow immunoassays: Application for the detection of streptomycin. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1126, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xie, S.; Liu, F.; Abdiryim, T.; Liu, X.; Jamal, R.; Song, Y.; Niyaz, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tang, X. PEDOT-embellished Ti3C2Tx nanosheet supported Pt-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles as efficient and stable methanol oxidation electrocatalysts. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 16345–16355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cheng, J.; Wang, X.; Nie, T.; Yin, L.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, H.; Mei, H. A novel electrochemical sensing platform for detection of dopamine based on gold nanobipyramid/multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrids. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 2433–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Singh, K.; Maurya, K.K.; Malviya, M. Electrochemical determination of dopamine using Ni Pd bimetallic nanoparticles decorated on MWCNT: An amperometric sensor. J. Nanopart. Res. 2024, 26, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, H.; Li, S.; Si, Y.; Zhang, N.; Sun, Z.; Wu, H.; Lin, Y. Platinum nanocatalysts loaded on graphene oxide-dispersed carbon nanotubes with greatly enhanced peroxidase-like catalysis and electrocatalysis activities. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 8107–8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, J.; Ren, X.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, X.Z.; Zhang, R.; Bai, P.R.; Du, B.J.; Li, L.P.; Zhao, S.C.; Qin, Y.; et al. Mechanistic and kinetic insights into size-dependent activity in ultra-small Pt/CNTs nanozymes during antibacterial process. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 101238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Yuchi, Q.X.; Li, T.; Yang, G.H.; Miao, J.J.; Huang, C.Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Li, A.P.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, L.B. Precise engineering of ultra-thin Fe2O3 decorated Pt-based nanozymes via atomic layer deposition to switch off undesired activity for enhanced sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2020, 305, 127436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, X.L.; Liu, C.H.; Liu, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhong, Y.N.; Nie, K.Q.; Xu, J.L.; Gao, X.; Sun, X.H.; Wang, S.D. Synergistic Effects in CNTs-PdAu/Pt Trimetallic Nanoparticles with High Electrocatalytic Activity and Stability. Nano-Micro. Lett. 2017, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of Tetracyclines Residues in Animal Derived Food by High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method. China Patent GB 31658.6-2021, 16 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumar, R.; Ahmed, Z.; Rai, R.; Gaur, A.; Kumari, S.; Maruyama, T.; Bagchi, V. Uniformly Decorated Molybdenum Carbide/Nitride Nanostructures on Biomass Templates for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Applications. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 14155–14161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.P.; Zhu, L.Y.; Feng, P.; Dang, C.C.; Li, M.; Lu, H.L.; Gao, L.M. Bimetallic AuPt alloy nanoparticles decorated on ZnO nanowires towards efficient and selective H2S gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2022, 367, 132024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.D.; Xianyu, Y.L. Tuning the plasmonic and catalytic signals of Au@Pt nanoparticles for dual-mode biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 237, 115553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chang, K.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, J.; Kuang, Q. MOF Encapsulated AuPt bimetallic nanoparticles for improved plasmonic-induced photothermal catalysis of CO2 hydrogenation. Chemistry 2022, 28, e202104514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gao, F.; Zhao, Y.; Dai, X.; Xu, W.; Zhan, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Aptamer tuned nanozyme activity of nickel-metal-organic framework for sensitive electrochemical aptasensing of tetracycline residue. Food Chem. 2024, 430, 137041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, B.X.; Zhu, H.J.; Feng, R.L.; Wang, M.Z.; Hu, P.W.; Pan, J.M.; Niu, X.H. Facile molecular imprinting on magnetic nanozyme surface for highly selective colorimetric detection of tetracycline. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2022, 370, 132451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gogoi, D.; Hazarika, C.; Neog, G.; Mridha, P.; Bora, H.K.; Das, M.R.; Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. Borophene quantum dots as novel peroxidase-mimicking nanozyme: A dual-mode assay for the detection of oxytetracycline and tetracycline antibiotics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 14645–14660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, Y.N.; Kong, D.Z.; Liu, L.Q.; Song, S.S.; Kuang, H.; Xu, C.L. Development of an ELISA and immunochromatographic assay for tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and chlortetracycline residues in milk and honey based on the class-specific monoclonal antibody. Food Anal. Methods 2016, 9, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alsulami, T.; Alzahrani, A. Enhanced nanozymatic activity on rough surfaces for H2O2 and tetracycline detection. Biosensors 2024, 14, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Shao, C.; Liu, T.; Sun, M.; Wu, C.; Su, G.; Wang, Y.; Ye, J.; Hu, H.; et al. Nanozyme-induced deep learning-assisted smartphone integrated colorimetric and fluorometric dual-mode for detection of tetracycline analogs. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2024, 1297, 342373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The diagram of magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs.
Figure 1. The diagram of magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs.
Biosensors 14 00342 g001
Figure 2. Characterizations of Au@Pt/CNTs nanohybrid. (ac) SEM, TEM, and EDS images of Au@Pt/CNTs-s; (df) SEM, TEM, and EDS images of Au@Pt/CNTs-o.
Figure 2. Characterizations of Au@Pt/CNTs nanohybrid. (ac) SEM, TEM, and EDS images of Au@Pt/CNTs-s; (df) SEM, TEM, and EDS images of Au@Pt/CNTs-o.
Biosensors 14 00342 g002
Figure 3. (a) Identification of enzyme−like probes: 1 uncarboxylated MWCNTs; 2 Au@Pt; 3 carboxylated MWCNTs; 4 Au@Pt/CNTs-s; 5 Au@Pt/CNTs-o. (b) Kinetic curve of enzymatic reaction; the double reciprocal plot of the activity of Au@Pt/CNTs-s (c,d) and Au@Pt/CNTs-o (e,f).
Figure 3. (a) Identification of enzyme−like probes: 1 uncarboxylated MWCNTs; 2 Au@Pt; 3 carboxylated MWCNTs; 4 Au@Pt/CNTs-s; 5 Au@Pt/CNTs-o. (b) Kinetic curve of enzymatic reaction; the double reciprocal plot of the activity of Au@Pt/CNTs-s (c,d) and Au@Pt/CNTs-o (e,f).
Biosensors 14 00342 g003
Figure 4. Optimization of reaction parameters: (a) concentration of GAM; (b) volume of IMB-GAM; (c) blocking buffer. TEM images of combination between IMB and Au@Pt/CNTs-s (d) or Au@Pt/CNTs-o (e); IMBs are circled in red. Optimization of the volume of probes (f).
Figure 4. Optimization of reaction parameters: (a) concentration of GAM; (b) volume of IMB-GAM; (c) blocking buffer. TEM images of combination between IMB and Au@Pt/CNTs-s (d) or Au@Pt/CNTs-o (e); IMBs are circled in red. Optimization of the volume of probes (f).
Biosensors 14 00342 g004
Figure 5. Optimal conditions in magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s (ad) and Au@Pt/CNTs-o (eh).
Figure 5. Optimal conditions in magnetic immunoassay assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s (ad) and Au@Pt/CNTs-o (eh).
Biosensors 14 00342 g005
Figure 6. Standard curves of magnetic immunoassays assisted by HRP-TC, Au@Pt/CNTs-s, and Au@Pt/CNTs-o.
Figure 6. Standard curves of magnetic immunoassays assisted by HRP-TC, Au@Pt/CNTs-s, and Au@Pt/CNTs-o.
Biosensors 14 00342 g006
Figure 7. Cross-reactivity of magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s.
Figure 7. Cross-reactivity of magnetic immunoassays assisted by Au@Pt/CNTs-s.
Biosensors 14 00342 g007
Table 1. Apparent kinetic parameters of different Pt-based catalysts and HRP.
Table 1. Apparent kinetic parameters of different Pt-based catalysts and HRP.
CatalystSubstrateKm
(mM)
Vm
(10−8 Ms−1)
Reference
HRPTMB0.3297.64[31]
H2O21.46822.88
Au@PtTMB2.431 × 10−34.43[31]
H2O24.08 × 10−36.01
Au@Pt/CNTs-sTMB1.01 × 10−33.63This work
H2O22.37 × 10−34.39
Au@Pt/CNTs-oTMB3.14 × 10−34.72This work
H2O23.46 × 10−35.69
GOCNT-PtTMB0.0750.302[35]
H2O21.821.27
CNT-PtTMB0.1520.422[35]
H2O26.242.18
2Fe2O3/30Pt/CNTsTMB0.1718.1[36]
H2O20.0536.79
30Pt/CNTsTMB1.1518.9[37]
H2O272.91103
Table 2. Recovery and precision of the established method (n = 4).
Table 2. Recovery and precision of the established method (n = 4).
Spiked
Concentration
(ng/mL)
Found
Concentration
(ng/mL)
Recovery RateCV
(%)
Milk0<LOD
22.28 ± 0.08114.5%7.8%
55.32 ± 0.43106.4%10.9%
109.21 ± 1.3992.1%11.5%
pork0<LOD
21.79 ± 0.2389.5%11.9%
54.43 ± 0.5688.6%11.6%
109.24 ± 1.3492.4%10.5%
Table 3. Measurement of TCs in milk and pork samples.
Table 3. Measurement of TCs in milk and pork samples.
Sample NumberResults of Milk Samples
(ng/mL)
Results of Pork Samples (ng/mL)
By the Established MethodBy UPLC-MS/MSBy the Established MethodBy UPLC-MS/MS
1ND 1NDNDND
2NDNDNDND
3NDNDNDND
4NDNDNDND
5NDND5.576.78
6NDNDNDND
71.052.15NDND
8NDNDND1.43
1 ND: not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, J.; Huang, R.; Zeng, K.; Zhang, Z. Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics. Biosensors 2024, 14, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070342

AMA Style

Lv J, Huang R, Zeng K, Zhang Z. Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics. Biosensors. 2024; 14(7):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Jianxia, Rui Huang, Kun Zeng, and Zhen Zhang. 2024. "Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics" Biosensors 14, no. 7: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070342

APA Style

Lv, J., Huang, R., Zeng, K., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Magnetic Immunoassay Based on Au Pt Bimetallic Nanoparticles/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Sensitive Detection of Tetracycline Antibiotics. Biosensors, 14(7), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop