Nanotechnology has made enormous progress over the last few decades, and the current use of nanomaterials is rapidly increasing. As a result, the continuous release of engineered nanomaterials (ENPs) into air, water, and soil has raised concerns about the possible adverse consequences for environmental and human health.
In this Special Issue, we aim to present a multidisciplinary overview of recent scientific articles that delve into various aspects of nanomaterials’ ecotoxicity evaluation associated with their occurrences, behavior, fate, and bioavailability. Such an evaluation is critical for scientists, legislators, business leaders, and the public to understand and develop effective solutions to the potential impacts of nanomaterials. Two reviews are also noteworthy. To address the risks of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment, Yuan et al. reviewed the environmental impact of nanomaterials with inorganic sunscreens []. For the risks of nanomaterials in the soil environment, Suazo-Hernández et al. reviewed the impact of ENPs on the physical and chemical properties of soils [].
The toxicity of nanomaterials remains a significant issue. Lu et al. studied how low concentrations of silver nanoparticles induced novel toxic effects on aquatic ferns []. Environmental factors can also affect the environmental behavior of nanomaterials and change their toxic effects, for example, humic acid affects the adsorption and suspension behavior of carbon nanotubes [].
The co-effect of nanomaterials and heavy metal pollutants remains a concern. On the one hand, the combined effect of nanomaterials and heavy metals leads to higher ecological risks. Zhou et al. studied CuO and Fe3O4 nanomaterials to enhance the bioaccumulation and toxicity of arsenic in marine mussels []. Similarly, Wang et al. found that CuO NPs promoted the phytotoxicity and accumulation of cadmium in vegetables []. On the other hand, the application of nanomaterials will reduce the accumulation of heavy metals in crops. Nano-Fe may modify the microbial community and decrease the soil-available Cd and As contents, inhibit the absorption of Cd and As by the roots, and decrease the transport of Cd and As in rice grains and the risk of intake in humans [].
The effects of nanoplastics on organisms have attracted much attention. Wang et al. identified multiple mechanisms of toxicity on microalgae induced by nanoplastics []. The synergistic impact of microplastics and organic pollutants remains poorly understood in the marine environment. Zhou et al. implied that MPs in synergy with organic pollutants can be more harmful to marine organisms [].
Nanopesticides are increasingly considered an emerging alternative due to their higher efficiency and lower environmental impacts. Although the public is not familiar with nanopesticides, they have positive attitudes toward their future development and support labeling nanoscale ingredients on products []. Ganilho et al. also assessed the environmental risks of lipid nanoparticles loaded with lambda-cyhalothrin [].
To conclude, this Special Issue presents several examples of the latest advancements in assessing nanomaterials’ ecotoxicity. We hope readers will enjoy reading these articles and find them useful in their research.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank all the editors in the Editorial Office of Nanomaterials, and all the reviewers for their valuable support on this Special Issue, and thank Ciara Chun Chen (Shantou University) for her outstanding coordination works, and Wei Qian (Hainan University) for his help in preparing this Editorial. The work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077227), the Hainan Key Research and Development Program (ZDYF2022SHFZ317), and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515010158).
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Yuan, S.; Huang, J.; Jiang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Cai, Z. Environmental Fate and Toxicity of Sunscreen-Derived Inorganic Ultraviolet Filters in Aquatic Environments: A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suazo-Hernández, J.; Arancibia-Miranda, N.; Mlih, R.; Cáceres-Jensen, L.; Bolan, N.; Mora, M.d.l.L. Impact on Some Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Caused by Metal and Metallic Oxide Engineered Nanoparticles: A Review. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Z.; Yin, L.; Li, W.; Jiang, H.-S. Low Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles Inhibit Spore Germination and Disturb Gender Differentiation of Ceratopteris thalictroides (L.) Brongn. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1730. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Fang, M.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Niu, L.; Wu, F. Effect of Tube Diameters and Functional Groups on Adsorption and Suspension Behaviors of Carbon Nanotubes in Presence of Humic Acid. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhou, S.; Qian, W.; Ning, Z.; Zhu, X. Enhanced Bioaccumulation and Toxicity of Arsenic in Marine Mussel Perna viridis in the Presence of CuO/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Fu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y. Phytotoxicity and Accumulation of Copper-Based Nanoparticles in Brassica under Cadmium Stress. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, T.; Li, J.; Zhan, X.; Wang, X.; He, B.; Cao, F.; Liao, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; et al. Application of Exogenous Iron Alters the Microbial Community Structure and Reduces the Accumulation of Cadmium and Arsenic in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.-C.; Liu, F.-F.; Huang, T.-Y.; Fan, J.-L.; Gao, Z.-Y.; Liu, G.-Z. Effects of Nanoplastics on the Dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae Hulburt from the Perspectives of Algal Growth, Oxidative Stress and Hemolysin Production. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Lan, W.; Jiang, H.; Pan, K. Short-Term Exposure to MPs and DEHP Disrupted Gill Functions in Marine Bivalves. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4077. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu, P.; Zheng, X.; Shangguan, S.; Zhao, L.; Fang, X.; Huang, Y.; Hermanowicz, S.W. Public Perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay for Nanopesticides. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1292. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ganilho, C.; da Silva, M.B.; Paiva, C.; de Menezes, T.I.; dos Santos, M.R.; Pereira, C.M.; Pereira, R.; Andreani, T. Environmental Safety Assessments of Lipid Nanoparticles Loaded with Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).