Next Article in Journal
Gene Therapy Using Efficient Direct Lineage Reprogramming Technology for Neurological Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Influence of Wound-Treatment-Relevant Buffer Systems on the Colloidal and Optical Properties of Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Tuning the Luminescence Response of an Air-Hole Photonic Crystal Slab Using Etching Depth Variation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Applications of Liposomes for the Delivery of Vitamins: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/nano13101679
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hard–Soft Core–Shell Architecture Formation from Cubic Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles

by
Marco Sanna Angotzi
1,2,
Valentina Mameli
1,2,*,
Dominika Zákutná
3,
Fausto Secci
1,
Huolin L. Xin
4 and
Carla Cannas
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria S.S. 554 Bivio per Sestu, 09042 Monserrato, Italy
2
Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali (INSTM), Via Giuseppe Giusti 9, 50121 Florence, Italy
3
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Charles University, Hlavova 2030, 128 40 Prague 2, Czech Republic
4
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(10), 1679; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101679
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 17 May 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morphological Design and Synthesis of Nanoparticles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cubic bi-magnetic hard–soft core–shell nanoarchitectures were prepared starting from cobalt ferrite nanoparticles, prevalently with cubic shape, as seeds to grow a manganese ferrite shell. The combined use of direct (nanoscale chemical mapping via STEM-EDX) and indirect (DC magnetometry) tools was adopted to verify the formation of the heterostructures at the nanoscale and bulk level, respectively. The results showed the obtainment of core–shell NPs (CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4) with a thin shell (heterogenous nucleation). In addition, manganese ferrite was found to homogeneously nucleate to form a secondary nanoparticle population (homogenous nucleation). This study shed light on the competitive formation mechanism of homogenous and heterogenous nucleation, suggesting the existence of a critical size, beyond which, phase separation occurs and seeds are no longer available in the reaction medium for heterogenous nucleation. These findings may allow one to tailor the synthesis process in order to achieve better control of the materials’ features affecting the magnetic behaviour, and consequently, the performances as heat mediators or components for data storage devices.

1. Introduction

In the field of nanotechnology, the combination of different materials for the obtainment of heterostructured multifunctional nanoparticles (NPs) [1,2,3] or nanocomposites [4,5,6,7,8] has driven the efforts of researchers with the aim of exploiting the physical (magnetic, optical, electrical, etc.) and chemical (thermal stability, reactivity, bonding ability, dispersibility, solubility, etc.) properties of single components in a combined or synergistic manner for selected applications. When two (or more) different phases are put in contact at the nanoscale, new phenomena may arise from their coupling, with a crucial role played by the interface extent. One of the most prominent examples is core–shell nanoarchitectures, consisting of an inner core covered by an external layer (shell) of a different material. The nature of the contact between the core and the shell is fundamental for these structures to show their peculiar properties; particularly, a net change in the chemical composition with no chemically mixed layers between the phases is desired. Diverse materials such as ferrites, perovskites, silica, titania, noble metals, elemental carbon, alloys, and polymers have been coupled to form inorganic/organic or inorganic/inorganic core–shell systems [9]. The choice of the materials to be coupled, the core–shell volume ratio, and the synthesis method are elements to play with. Core–shell heterostructures featuring a heterojunction between two different materials have an extensive range of applications, such as photocatalysis [10,11], gas sensing [12,13], water purification [14], and hydrogen production [15,16]. In these materials, the electron phenomena taking place at the interface between the two phases play a crucial role [17,18].
In the case of magnetic materials, since the discovery of exchange bias phenomena in a ferromagnet (FM)/antiferromagnet (AFM) system (Co/CoO core–shell NPs) by Meiklejohn and Bean [19], and by Kneller and Hawig [20], other interfaces have been built, such as AFM/ferrimagnet (FiM), or hard–soft FM or FiM [21,22,23,24,25]. The development of the core–shell heterostructure is favoured by the choice of isostructural crystalline phases, which should grow epitaxially one upon the other. In this context, spinel ferrite (MIIFe2O4, MII = Fe2+, Co2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, etc.) bi-magnetic core–shell NPs have been studied and proposed in different application fields, such as magnetic recording, permanent magnets, spintronics, microwave absorption, biomedicine, magnetic heat generation for catalysis [26,27,28,29], or magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. In this framework, the adoption of core–shell heterostructures was demonstrated to be efficient to improve the heating abilities of spinel ferrites or their energy product as permanent magnets [21,25,32,39,46]. The spinel ferrite core–shell NPs offer a tuneable range of hard and soft magnetic behaviours by properly changing the chemical composition. They can be successfully prepared with good crystallinity and good control over the composition, the particle’s morphology, and heterostructure interface by seed-mediated approaches applied to thermal decomposition and solvothermal methods [32,39,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61].
Seed-mediated synthesis approaches consist of introducing pre-formed nanoparticles (seeds) into the medium containing the precursors of the shell material. The nucleation of the secondary material onto the surface of the seeds (heterogeneous nucleation) has a lower energy barrier than the formation of new particles of the secondary material (homogeneous nucleation), thus giving rise to the formation of the core–shell structures [62].
In particular, the magnetic behaviour of the core–shell NPs can also be modified according to the shape, in addition to the size, for instance, due to surface anisotropy effects. Regarding this effect, a remarkable influence of the NPs’ shape on their magnetic properties was observed by several authors [9,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Concentric spherical core–shell NPs are the most common systems [9].
Recently, we set up a versatile solvothermal synthesis method able to produce single-phase spherical particles [70,71], chemically mixed spinel phases [72,73], homogeneous spherical bi-magnetic core–shell NPs [46,70,74,75], and flower-like Ag-spinel ferrite nanoarchitectures [1] with high crystallinity, low size dispersity, and precise control of the shell growth.
Herein, we studied the formation of cubic cobalt ferrite nanoparticles and their bi-magnetic heterostructure counterparts by coating cubic cobalt ferrite nanoseeds with manganese ferrite to form CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4 with the same oleate-based solvothermal method adopted in our previous studies. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and chemical mapping at the nanoscale, performed through STEM-EDX, together with the Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and DC magnetometry, were employed to study morphological, structural, and magnetic properties.
The study aimed to provide precious details on the formation mechanism of core–shell heterostructures by starting from larger (15 nm versus 6–8 nm) and anisotropic (cubic versus spherical) cobalt ferrite nanoparticles compared with our previous studies. To understand how the different morphologies of the seeds affect the final product, a combination of direct microscopic and indirect macroscopic characterisation techniques was adopted. The chemical mapping at the nanoscale via STEM-EDX allowed us to probe the local chemical composition of a few nanoparticles with a good resolution, while DC magnetometry provided a bulk-level view of the average physical behaviour, beyond the representativeness limits of electron microscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Oleic acid (>99.99%), 1-pentanol (99.89%), hexane (84.67%), and toluene (99.26%) were purchased from Lach-Ner, Neratovice, Czech Republic; 1-octanol (>99.99%) and Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (>97.0%) from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; absolute ethanol and Co(NO3)2·6H2O (99.0%) from Penta, Prague 10, Czech Republic; NaOH (>98.0%) from Fluka, Muskegon, MI, USA; Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (98.0%) from Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic.

2.2. Methods

Cobalt ferrite NPs and core–shells were prepared as described in previous work [46,70], starting from metal oleates. The synthesis conditions are summarised in Table S1.

2.3. Characterisation

Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded in the region from 400 to 4000 cm−1 by using a FT/IR-4X Spectrometer from Jasco, Easton, MD, USA. Samples were measured in a KBr pellet.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves were obtained by using a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) STA 6000, in the 25–850 °C range, with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under 40 mL min−1 O2 flow.
The samples were characterised via X-ray diffraction (XRD), using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK) with Cu Kα radiation (1.5418 Å), a secondary monochromator, and a PIXcel position-sensitive detector. The peak position and instrumental width were calibrated using powder LaB6 from NIST. The refinement of the structural parameters was carried out using the Rietveld method in the FullProf software [76] using a pseudo-Voigt profile function. For mean crystallite shapes, the spherical harmonics function was used [77]:
T h = T ϑ , φ = ∑ l = 0 , 2 , 4 … n ∑ m = − l l a l , m Y l , m ϑ , φ
where  ϑ  and  φ  are polar and azimuthal angles describing the direction of the normal to the family of the lattice plane in a Cartesian coordinate system,  a  is the lattice parameter, and  Y  is the Lorentzian isotropic size broadening.
TEM micrographs were acquired using a JEOL 200CX electron microscope (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 160 kV. The size of more than 1000 particles was measured using Pebbles software [78], selecting a cubic or spherical shape in order to determine the particle size distribution. The average particle diameter was calculated together with the percentage ratio between the standard deviation and the mean value to provide the size dispersity. Additional TEM micrographs and EDX data for the Co:Mn:Fe molar ratios were obtained by using a JEOL JEM 1400 Plus (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 120 kV.
HRTEM micrographs and STEM-EDX measurements were carried out using an FEI Talos F200X (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a field-emission gun operating at 200 kV and a four-quadrant 0.9 sr energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer.
The Quantum Design PPMS DynaCool system with a maximum magnetic field of 9 T and the VSM module was used to investigate the DC magnetic properties of powders. The magnetisation values were normalised based on thermogravimetric analyses to account for the inorganic phase. Various magnetic measurements were conducted, including studying the field dependence of magnetisation at 10 K and 300 K within a range of 7 to −7 T. The saturation magnetisation values (Ms300K and Ms10K) were evaluated using the following equation:
M = M s 1 − a H − b H 2
For H tending to ∞, the magnetisation curve was fit from 4 to 7 T [79]. The anisotropy field was calculated as a 3% difference between the magnetisation and demagnetisation curves at 10 K. The temperature dependence of magnetisation was analysed using the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) protocols. The sample was cooled to 5 K without any magnetic field, and then, the signals were recorded under a static magnetic field of 100 Oe. During the warm-up from 5 to 380 K, MZFC was measured, and MFC was recorded during the cooling process.

3. Results and Discussion

Cobalt ferrite NPs (labelled Co) with cubic shapes were obtained by following an adapted one-pot solvothermal procedure previously set up for spherical NPs [46,70,74,80,81,82], decreasing the concentration of the mixed Co-Fe oleate precursor to produce larger NPs (Figure 1, Table S1). This sample was used as seed material for the growth of a manganese ferrite shell through a second solvothermal treatment in the presence of mixed FeIII-MnII oleate to synthesise CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4 NPs (labelled Co@Mn). Indeed, in previous works [46,70,74], the seed-mediated growth approach in solvothermal conditions permitted the preparation of manganese-ferrite-coated cobalt ferrite NPs with different core sizes and shell thicknesses, starting from spherical particles.
The samples were characterised via FTIR and TGA to ascertain the presence of oleate molecules capping at the NPs’ surfaces (Figure S1). The FTIR spectra (Figure S1a) displayed vibrational modes of carboxylates (νas(COO−), νs(COO−)) at around 1550 and 1430 cm−1, respectively, as well as hydrocarbon chain modes in the 3000 cm−1 region. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA, Figure S1b) demonstrated a comparable decrease in weight for the two samples in the temperature range of 200–350 °C, attributable to the decomposition of about 10%wt. of oleate molecules (Table 1). The slight shift in the temperature of the TGA curves and dTGA curves (Figure S1c) towards lower values for the Co@Mn sample (minima in the dTGA shifted by 15 °C) might suggest weaker bonds between the oleate molecules and the manganese cations [83], different coordinations [84], or differences in the morphological properties of the two samples (e.g., different curvature) having effects in stabilising the bonds between the carboxylate and the cations (e.g., through the proximity of the hydrocarbon chains) [85].
TEM micrographs of CoFe2O4 present well-defined cubic and spheroidal particles, quantified as about 64% and 36%, and having similar particle sizes of about 14 nm and 15 nm, respectively (Figure 1b,c and Figure S2, Table 1) with low size dispersity (σTEM = 11%, 15%). On the contrary, the TEM micrographs of the core–shell system (Figure 1e,f and Figure S3) reveal the obtainment of NPs with various shapes from spheroidal to faceted of about 15 nm (Table 1) and only a few well-defined cubic particles. EDX analysis was adopted to determine the molar ratio between the cations in the two samples. Almost stoichiometric cobalt ferrite (Co/Fe = 0.48) was obtained, in agreement with previous results on other spherical cobalt ferrite nanoparticles prepared using the same synthesis method [70]. For the core–shell sample, assuming that the cobalt content is associated with a cobalt ferrite with the molar ratio obtained for the Co sample, we can hypothesise a Mn/Fe molar ratio equal to 0.55, also revealing an almost stoichiometric manganese ferrite.
The XRD patterns of both samples show the formation of a spinel ferrite structure (Figure 1d,g). The crystallite size of Co, obtained from Rietveld refinement (Figure S4a, Table S2), is smaller (10.1(3) nm) than the mean physical size of the NPs obtained via TEM (14–15 nm, Table 1). This discrepancy might be due to the presence of structural disorder at the nanoparticle surface or to the limits of the Rietveld method in describing samples with populations of differently shaped NPs (cubic and spherical). In addition, the refinement of the Co@Mn sample using only one structural spinel phase leads to a coherent domain size smaller than the original core size (7.2(4) nm and 10.1(3) nm, respectively, Table S2). Therefore, an attempt to refine the XRD data with two spinel structures (Figure S4b, Table S3), one corresponding to CoFe2O4 and another to MnFe2O4, resulted in a better description of the XRD data. The crystallite size of the Co@Mn sample was, in this case, equal to 10.7(9) nm for the cobalt ferrite phase and 8.3(4) nm for the manganese ferrite counterpart. Moreover, the core–shell sample features a larger cell parameter (8.4030(9) Å for cobalt ferrite phase and 8.4684(7) Å for manganese ferrite) than the original core (8.3914(2) Å), in agreement with the inclusion of manganese in the spinel structure (Table 1). The adoption of the spherical harmonics function in the Rietveld refinement allowed us to visualise an average shape of the crystallites, revealing a cubic shape with rounded corners for the core sample and more faceted cuboidal particles for the core–shell one (Figure S4). The two contributions for the interpretation of the XRD pattern of the Co@Mn sample with almost constant or smaller crystallite sizes compared to the core and a slightly higher lattice parameter suggests the homogeneous nucleation of manganese ferrite, along with the formation of core–shell heterostructures with thin manganese ferrite shells, and also the occurrence of structural disorder phenomena. These findings suggest the role of the shape and the chemical nature of the metal cations involved in determining the success of the obtainment of core–shell heterostructures. To further investigate these features, HRTEM and STEM-EDX chemical mapping at the nanoscale were adopted.
STEM-EDX chemical mapping and HRTEM images of the cobalt ferrite sample are reported in Figure 2a–c and Figure S5. The nanoscale chemical mapping (Figure 2a–c and Figure S5) reveals the spread of cobalt and iron throughout the particles, which appear differently oriented towards the electron beam, with hexagonal projections besides cubic ones being visible. Interestingly, the presence of the organic capping seems to be visible in the micrograph reported in Figure S5b with a size of the layer coherent with the hydrocarbon chain length [86]. HRTEM images (Figure 2d–f) show highly crystalline cubic-shaped particles with rounded corners, revealing the typical inter-lattice distances of spinel ferrite crystals and with the planes regularly aligned through the particle to the surface. The high crystallinity of the cobalt ferrite nanoparticles proved via HRTEM further suggests that the observed discrepancy between the particle and crystallite sizes is more related to the difficulties in describing two populations of differently shaped NPs via the Rietveld method.
STEM-EDX images of the core–shell sample are shown in Figure 3, where the obtainment of core–shell NPs with very thin shells (Figure 3a,b) accompanied by the formation of manganese ferrite NPs with similar sizes and shapes (Figure 3c,d) is proved. Single-phase cobalt ferrite NPs were not detected. These results indicate that the cubic cobalt ferrite seeds of about 14 nm were homogenously coated and that the heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleations of MnFe2O4 are competitive phenomena in the selected synthetic conditions. On the contrary, the obtainment of highly crystalline NPs exclusively in a core–shell architecture was previously achieved on cobalt ferrite spherical seeds of 6 and 8 nm in size with both manganese ferrite and spinel iron oxide as the coating shell, as proven via STEM-EDX, STEM-EELS, and HRTEM [46,70]. Therefore, we can hypothesise that the bigger size as well as the faceted shape of the cobalt ferrite seeds might be the main reason for the different formation mechanism of the final products. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the presence of uncoated seeds was never revealed in the final products obtained using this oleate-based solvothermal method, regardless of the shape and size of the seeds. As expected, at the beginning of the synthesis process, the heterogenous nucleation seems to be favoured in comparison with the homogenous nucleation. Moreover, it seems that the heterogeneous nucleation (i.e., formation of the core–shell heterostructures) goes on until a critical size is reached (about 15 nm), at which, the particles lose their colloidal stability in the liquid medium and settle at the bottom of the Teflon liner. Therefore, in the liquid medium, only Mn and Fe oleates remain, and manganese ferrite nanoparticles nucleate and grow. Figure 3a depicts cubic core–shell NPs with manganese ferrite shells of about 1.4 nm, while Figure 3b represents a core–shell nanoparticle where the manganese ferrite grew in a different direction, generating a staggered cube with respect to the cubic core.
This behaviour can also be observed in the HRTEM image of the same nanoparticle, reported in Figure 4. The particle, pointed along the <110> zone axis, reveals twins between the {220} planes of the cubic core and the {111} planes of the shell, as better evidenced in the ellipsoidal spots visible in the FFT image (Figure 4b) and in the dashed-line white squares in the inversed masked FFT images (Figure 4e,f). Figures S6 and S7 report other structural defects found for the sample. The results obtained via HRTEM and STEM-EDX agree with the scenario hypothesised for this sample on the basis of the XRD and conventional TEM data, as previously discussed. In order to verify if these compositional and structural inhomogeneities at the nanoscale level strictly related to the faceted shape of the NPs affect the macroscopic behaviour of the sample, the magnetic properties were investigated through DC magnetometry (Figure 5).
The Co sample shows hysteresis at 10 K with a large coercive field of 1.91 T and high saturation magnetisation of about 90 Am2kg−1, while the Co@Mn sample coercivity is only 0.13 T with wasp-waisted-shaped hysteresis that arises from the superposition of the hard behaviour of the core–shell architectures and the soft behaviour of the manganese ferrite NPs (Figure 5a, Table 2). This two-stage hysteresis loop at 10 K resembles those of a physical mixture, as previously observed for an ad hoc reference sample prepared by mixing two single-phase NPs (CoFe2O4 and MnFe2O4) of similar sizes (Figure 4 of [46]). A single-stage hysteresis loop with lower coercivity compared with the cobalt ferrite seeds would be instead expected as a unique contribution for core–shell heterostructures with thin shells, proving the rigid coupling between the two spinel ferrite phases. Magnetisation isotherms at 300 K (Figure 5b) still show small hysteresis with coercivity of 0.06 T for the Co sample, indicating the presence of magnetically blocked particles. Furthermore, the slightly wasp-waisted shape is still present at 300 K for the Co@Mn sample, consistent with the expected behaviour of the physical mixture of the core–shell and manganese ferrite NPs.
The temperature-dependent magnetisation curves (ZFC-FC curves of Figure 5c) confirmed the presence of magnetically blocked NPs in the two samples at room temperature (with a temperature of the maximum above 350 K), but with the presence of a shallow maximum in the ZFC curve (at about 140 K)) for the Co@Mn sample was associated with the presence of the magnetically soft MnFe2O4 NPs.

4. Conclusions

A one-pot solvothermal approach was exploited with the aim of obtaining cubic cobalt ferrite NPs and further coupled with a seed-mediated growth strategy to build core–shell hard–soft heterostructures. Direct proof of the obtainment of highly crystalline, cubic and spherical, stoichiometric cobalt ferrite nanoparticles was obtained via TEM, STEM-EDX, and HRTEM. These techniques, and in particular the chemical mapping at the nanoscale via STEM-EDX, allowed us to verify the production of bi-magnetic hard–soft core–shell NPs (CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4) with a very thin shell in a physical mixture with manganese ferrite NPs. Additionally, the magnetic properties were diagnostic of the superposition of two contributions: the hard behaviour of the core–shell NPs and the soft one of the manganese ferrite NPs. Indeed, a double-stage hysteresis loop in the 10 K magnetisation isotherm and a maximum in the ZFC at about 140 K associated with a magnetically soft phase were observed. These findings allowed us to hypothesise a formation mechanism in which the heterogeneous nucleation (growth of a shell on the preformed seeds) and homogeneous nucleation (formation of new particles from the metal precursors) compete. From the comparison with previous achievements in which only core–shell NPs starting from small (6–8 nm) spherical NPs were achieved, it seems that starting from bigger and faceted spinel ferrite seeds might direct the formation process of the core–shell heterostructures towards systems with very thin shells, due to a critical size being reached that made these particles no longer stable in the mother solution and made them settle down at the bottom of the synthesis reactor. Thus, the formation of new manganese ferrite nuclei occurred after this phase separation.
In this view, the obtainment of a homogenous sample of core–shell NPs might be achieved in these experimental conditions via the proper selection of the ratio between the number of preformed seeds and the metal oleate added in the seed-mediated growth process in order to avoid single-phase nucleation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13101679/s1, Table S1: Synthesis condition for the samples; Table S2: Refined structural parameters obtained via Rietveld refinement of the XRD patterns of Co and Co@Mn samples by using one spinel ferrite phase (CoFe2O4) for both samples; Table S3: Refined structural parameters obtained via Rietveld refinement of the XRD patterns of Co and Co@Mn samples by using two spinel ferrite phases (CoFe2O4, MnFe2O4) for the Co@Mn sample; Figure S1: FTIR spectra (a), TGA curves (b), and corresponding derivatives (c) of the Co and Co@Mn samples; Figure S2: TEM micrographs of the Co sample; Figure S3: TEM micrographs of the Co@Mn sample; Figure S4: Rietveld refinement via FullProf software of the XRD patterns of Co (pattern at the bottom) and Co@Mn (pattern in the upper part) samples by using (a) one spinel ferrite phase (CoFe2O4) for both samples and (b) two spinel ferrite phases (CoFe2O4, MnFe2O4); Figure S5: STEM-EDX chemical mapping (a–c) for the sample Co; Figure S6: HRTEM images (a,c,d) of the sample Co@Mn revealing structural defects; (b) represents the masked inversed FFT image of (a); Figure S7: HRTEM micrographs (a–c) of the sample Co@Mn revealing structural defects. Reference [87] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.S.A. and C.C.; investigation, M.S.A., V.M., D.Z. and F.S.; resources, H.L.X. and C.C.; data curation, M.S.A., V.M., D.Z. and F.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.A., V.M., F.S. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, M.S.A., V.M., D.Z., F.S., H.L.X. and C.C.; supervision, C.C.; project administration, C.C.; funding acquisition, C.C., D.Z. and H.L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

CESA Project—RAS Piano Sulcis (CUP: E58C16000080003) is gratefully acknowledged for financing the post-doctoral fellowship of V. Mameli and M. Sanna Angotzi. MIUR—National Program PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020 (CUP J88D19001040001) is acknowledged for the Ph.D. grant of Fausto Secci. “Fondazione di Sardegna, Italy (FdS)” Project: CUP F72F20000240007(2019): “Surface-tailored Materials for Sustainable Environmental Applications” is acknowledged for the post-doctoral fellowship of Fausto Secci. This work was supported by Charles University Research Centre program No. UNCE/SCI/014. This research used resources of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, which is a U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Andrea Ardu and to the “Centro Servizi di Ateneo per la Ricerca (CeSAR)” for the TEM measurements performed with JEOL JEM 1400 PLUS. Thanks are also due to Centro Servizi di Ateneo per la Ricerca (CeSAR) for the use of the PPMS DynaCool facility for the DC magnetometry measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Cara, C.; Grillo, V.; Enzo, S.; Musinu, A.; Cannas, C. Defect-assisted synthesis of magneto-plasmonic silver-spinel ferrite heterostructures in a flower-like architecture. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, X.; Frey Huls, N.; Sigdel, A.; Sun, S. Tuning Exchange Bias in Core/Shell FeO/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Lidbaum, H.; López-Ortega, A.; Estrader, M.; Leifer, K.; Sort, J.; Suriñach, S.; Baró, M.D.; Nogués, J. Two-, Three-, and four-component magnetic multilayer onion nanoparticles based on iron oxides and manganese oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16738–16741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, P.; Yao, Z.; Ng, V.M.H.; Zhou, J.; Kong, L.B.; Yue, K. Facile synthesis of ultrasmall Fe3O4 nanoparticles on MXenes for high microwave absorption performance. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 115, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, P.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Z.; Kong, L.B. Small magnetic Co-doped NiZn ferrite/graphene nanocomposites and their dual-region microwave absorption performance. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 9738–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vacca, M.A.; Cara, C.; Mameli, V.; Sanna Angotzi, M.; Scorciapino, M.A.; Cutrufello, M.G.; Musinu, A.; Tyrpekl, V.; Pala, L.; Cannas, C. Hexafluorosilicic Acid (FSA): From Hazardous Waste to Precious Resource in Obtaining High Value-Added Mesostructured Silica. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 14286–14300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Cara, C.; Borchert, K.B.L.; Steinbach, C.; Boldt, R.; Schwarz, D.; Cannas, C. Meso- and macroporous silica-based arsenic adsorbents: Effect of pore size, nature of the active phase, and silicon release. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 6100–6113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Domingo, N.; Testa, A.M.; Fiorani, D.; Binns, C.; Baker, S.; Tejada, J. Exchange bias in Co nanoparticles embedded in an Mn matrix. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 316, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurian, M.; Thankachan, S. Structural diversity and applications of spinel ferrite core—Shell nanostructures—A review. Open Ceram. 2021, 8, 100179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Li, N.; Xu, Q.; Li, H.; Lu, J. Fabricating 1D/2D Co3O4/ZnIn2S4 core–shell heterostructures with boosted charge transfer for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 610, 155272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, B.; Zhang, C.; Jia, D.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, P. NiAl-LDH-Modified Core–Shell Rod-like ZnO@ZnS Heterostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Precipitation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 2908–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; He, X.; Wang, X. Synthesis of MoO3 (1D) @SnO2 (2D) core-shell heterostructures for enhanced ethanol gas sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 382, 133484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, K.; Jiang, Y.; Tao, W.; Wang, T.; Liu, F.; Wang, C.; Yan, X.; Lu, G.; Sun, P. MOF Structure engineering to synthesize core-shell heterostructures with controllable shell layer thickness: Regulating gas selectivity and sensitivity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 378, 133117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, Y.; Tao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, Z. Construction of core–shell CeO2 nanorods/SnIn4S8 nanosheets heterojunction with rapid spatial electronic migration for effective wastewater purification and H2O2 production. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 304, 122385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, W.; Jiang, T.; Fang, X.; Fan, Y.; Qian, S.; Gao, Y.; Cheng, N.; Xue, H.; Tian, J. Interface engineering of S-doped Co2P@Ni2P core–shell heterostructures for efficient and energy-saving water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 439, 135743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xiao, Y.; Wang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, Z.; Deng, W. Hierarchical Sb2S3/ZnIn2S4 core–shell heterostructure for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production and pollutant degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 623, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shafiee, A.; Rabiee, N.; Ahmadi, S.; Baneshi, M.; Khatami, M.; Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Core–Shell Nanophotocatalysts: Review of Materials and Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 55–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mulla, R.; Dunnill, C.W. Core–shell nanostructures for better thermoelectrics. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meiklejohn, W.H.; Bean, C.P. New Magnetic Anisotropy. Phys. Rev. 1957, 105, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kneller, E.F.; Hawig, R. The exchange-spring magnet: A new material principle for permanent magnets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1991, 27, 3588–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-ortega, A.; Estrader, M.; Salazar-alvarez, G. Applications of exchange coupled bi-magnetic hard/soft and soft/hard magnetic core/shell nanoparticles. Phys. Rep. 2015, 553, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. López-Ortega, A.; Tobia, D.; Winkler, E.; Golosovsky, I.V.; Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Estradé, S.; Estrader, M.; Sort, J.; González, M.A.; Suriñach, S.; et al. Size-Dependent Passivation Shell and Magnetic Properties in Antiferromagnetic/Ferrimagnetic Core/Shell MnO Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9398–9407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kavich, D.W.; Dickerson, J.H.; Mahajan, S.V.; Hasan, S.A.; Park, J.-H. Exchange bias of singly inverted FeO/Fe3O4 core-shell nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 174414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Winkler, E.L.; Lima, E.; Tobia, D.; Saleta, M.E.; Troiani, H.E.; Agostinelli, E.; Fiorani, D.; Zysler, R.D. Origin of magnetic anisotropy in ZnO/CoFe2O4 and CoO/CoFe2O4 core/shell nanoparticle systems. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 252405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lottini, E.; López-Ortega, A.; Bertoni, G.; Turner, S.; Meledina, M.; Van Tendeloo, G.; de Julián Fernández, C.; Sangregorio, C. Strongly Exchange Coupled Core|Shell Nanoparticles with High Magnetic Anisotropy: A Strategy toward Rare-Earth-Free Permanent Magnets. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4214–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kirschning, A.; Kupracz, L.; Hartwig, J. New Synthetic Opportunities in Miniaturized Flow Reactors with Inductive Heating. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baig, R.B.N.; Varma, R.S. Magnetically retrievable catalysts for organic synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 752–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Polshettiwar, V.; Luque, R.; Fihri, A.; Zhu, H.; Bouhrara, M.; Basset, J.-M. Magnetically Recoverable Nanocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3036–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, D.; Zhou, C.; Sun, Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Zhang, T. Magnetically recyclable nanocatalysts (MRNCs): A versatile integration of high catalytic activity and facile recovery. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Viñas, S.L.; Simeonidis, K.; Li, Z.-A.; Ma, Z.; Myrovali, E.; Makridis, A.; Sakellari, D.; Angelakeris, M.; Wiedwald, U.; Spasova, M.; et al. Tuning the magnetism of ferrite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 415, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, H.; An, M.; Eom, W.; Lim, S.W.; Shim, I.-B.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, S.J. Crystallographic and magnetic properties of the hyperthermia material CoFe2O4@AlFe2O4. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2017, 70, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, J.-H.; Jang, J.; Choi, J.; Moon, S.H.; Noh, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, I.-S.; Park, K.I.; Cheon, J. Exchange-coupled magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heat induction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liébana-Viñas, S.; Simeonidis, K.; Wiedwald, U.; Li, Z.-A.; Ma, Z.; Myrovali, E.; Makridis, A.; Sakellari, D.; Vourlias, G.; Spasova, M.; et al. Optimum nanoscale design in ferrite based nanoparticles for magnetic particle hyperthermia. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 72918–72925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, Q.; Castellanos-Rubio, I.; Munshi, R.; Orue, I.; Pelaz, B.; Gries, K.I.; Parak, W.J.; del Pino, P.; Pralle, A. Model Driven Optimization of Magnetic Anisotropy of Exchange-Coupled Core–Shell Ferrite Nanoparticles for Maximal Hysteretic Loss. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7380–7387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Robles, J.; Das, R.; Glassell, M.; Phan, M.H.; Srikanth, H. Exchange-coupled Fe3O4/CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for advanced magnetic hyperthermia. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 056719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hammad, M.; Nica, V.; Hempelmann, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Bi-Magnetic Core/Shell Nanoparticles for Hyperthermia Applications. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2017, 53, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yelenich, O.V.; Solopan, S.O.; Greneche, J.M.; Belous, A.G. Synthesis and properties MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co) nanoparticles and core–shell structures. Solid State Sci. 2015, 46, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, M.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, H.J.; Yoo, K.-H.; Hahn, E. Effect hyperthermia in CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4 nanoparticles studied by using field-induced Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2013, 63, 2175–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noh, S.; Na, W.; Jang, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, E.J.; Moon, S.H.; Lim, Y.; Shin, J.-S.; Cheon, J. Nanoscale Magnetism Control via Surface and Exchange Anisotropy for Optimized Ferrimagnetic Hysteresis. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3716–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, L.; Wei, J.; Yang, H.; Yang, S.; Zhao, J. CoFe2O4 @MnFe2O4/polypyrrole nanocomposites for in vitro photothermal/magnetothermal combined therapy. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7349–7355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pilati, V.; Cabreira Gomes, R.; Gomide, G.; Coppola, P.; Silva, F.G.; Paula, F.L.O.; Perzynski, R.; Goya, G.F.; Aquino, R.; Depeyrot, J. Core/Shell Nanoparticles of Non-Stoichiometric Zn–Mn and Zn–Co Ferrites as Thermosensitive Heat Sources for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 3028–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Yan, Y.; Wang, M.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Peng, C.; Yang, S. An integrated nanoplatform for theranostics via multifunctional core–shell ferrite nanocubes. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1908–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Solopan, S.O.; Nedelko, N.; Lewińska, S.; Ślawska-Waniewska, A.; Zamorskyi, V.O.; Tovstolytkin, A.I.; Belous, A.G. Core/shell architecture as an efficient tool to tune DC magnetic parameters and AC losses in spinel ferrite nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 788, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fabris, F.; Lima, E.; De Biasi, E.; Troiani, H.E.; Vásquez Mansilla, M.; Torres, T.E.; Fernández Pacheco, R.; Ibarra, M.R.; Goya, G.F.; Zysler, R.D.; et al. Controlling the dominant magnetic relaxation mechanisms for magnetic hyperthermia in bimagnetic core–shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 3164–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Angelakeris, M.; Li, Z.A.; Hilgendorff, M.; Simeonidis, K.; Sakellari, D.; Filippousi, M.; Tian, H.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Spasova, M.; Acet, M.; et al. Enhanced biomedical heat-triggered carriers via nanomagnetism tuning in ferrite-based nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 381, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Cara, C.; Musinu, A.; Sangregorio, C.; Niznansky, D.; Xin, H.L.; Vejpravova, J.; Cannas, C. Coupled hard–soft spinel ferrite-based core–shell nanoarchitectures: Magnetic properties and heating abilities. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 3191–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cannas, C.; Ardu, A.; Musinu, A.; Suber, L.; Ciasca, G.; Amenitsch, H.; Campi, G. Hierarchical Formation Mechanism of CoFe2O4 Mesoporous Assemblies. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7277–7286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zeng, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.L.; Liu, J.P.; Sun, S. Bimagnetic Core/Shell FePt/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Masala, O.; Hoffman, D.; Sundaram, N.; Page, K.; Proffen, T.; Lawes, G.; Seshadri, R. Preparation of magnetic spinel ferrite core/shell nanoparticles: Soft ferrites on hard ferrites and vice versa. Solid State Sci. 2006, 8, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. López-Ortega, A.; Estrader, M.; Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Estradé, S.; Golosovsky, I.V.; Dumas, R.K.; Keavney, D.J.; Vasilakaki, M.; Trohidou, K.N.; Sort, J.; et al. Strongly exchange coupled inverse ferrimagnetic soft/hard, MnxFe3−xO4/FexMn3−xO4, core/shell heterostructured nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, J.; Ye, X.; Oh, S.J.; Kikkawa, J.M.; Kagan, C.R.; Murray, C.B. Bistable Magnetoresistance Switching in Exchange-Coupled CoFe 2 O 4 –Fe 3 O 4 Binary Nanocrystal Superlattices by Self-Assembly and Thermal Annealing. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 1478–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Estrader, M.; López-Ortega, A.; Estradé, S.; Golosovsky, I.V.; Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Vasilakaki, M.; Trohidou, K.N.; Varela, M.; Stanley, D.C.; Sinko, M.; et al. Robust antiferromagnetic coupling in hard-soft bi-magnetic core/shell nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gavrilov-Isaac, V.; Neveu, S.; Dupuis, V.; Taverna, D.; Gloter, A.; Cabuil, V. Synthesis of Trimagnetic Multishell MnFe2O4 @CoFe2O4 @NiFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Small 2015, 11, 2614–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Song, Q.; Zhang, Z.J. Controlled synthesis and magnetic properties of bimagnetic spinel ferrite CoFe2O4 and MnFe2O4 nanocrystals with core-shell architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10182–10190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thanh, N.T.K.; Maclean, N.; Mahiddine, S. Mechanisms of nucleation and growth of nanoparticles in solution. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7610–7630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xia, Y.; Gilroy, K.D.; Peng, H.-C.; Xia, X. Seed-Mediated Growth of Colloidal Metal Nanocrystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Cannas, C.; Musinu, A.; Peddis, D.; Piccaluga, G. Synthesis and Characterization of CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles Dispersed in a Silica Matrix by a Sol−Gel Autocombustion Method. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 3835–3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, S.; Zeng, H.; Robinson, D.B.; Raoux, S.; Rice, P.M.; Wang, S.X.; Li, G. Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Niederberger, M.; Pinna, N. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Organic Solvents. Synthesis, Formation, Assembly and Application; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cannas, C.; Musinu, A.; Ardu, A.; Orrù, F.; Peddis, D.; Casu, M.; Sanna, R.; Angius, F.; Diaz, G.; Piccaluga, G. CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4/SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles: Magnetic and spectroscopic study. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3353–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cannas, C.; Ardu, A.; Peddis, D.; Sangregorio, C.; Piccaluga, G.; Musinu, A. Surfactant-assisted route to fabricate CoFe2O4 individual nanoparticles and spherical assemblies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 343, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nobile, C.; Cozzoli, P.D. Synthetic Approaches to Colloidal Nanocrystal Heterostructures Based on Metal and Metal-Oxide Materials. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ghosh Chaudhuri, R.; Paria, S. Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Classes, Properties, Synthesis Mechanisms, Characterization, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2373–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Qin, J.; Šepelák, V.; Bergmann, I.; Vasilakaki, M.; Trohidou, K.N.; Ardisson, J.D.; Macedo, W.A.A.; Mikhaylova, M.; Muhammed, M.; et al. Cubic versus Spherical Magnetic Nanoparticles: The Role of Surface Anisotropy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13234–13239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gavilán, H.; Posth, O.; Bogart, L.K.; Steinhoff, U.; Gutiérrez, L.; Morales, M.P. How shape and internal structure affect the magnetic properties of anisometric magnetite nanoparticles. Acta Mater. 2017, 125, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Niraula, G.; Coaquira, J.A.H.; Zoppellaro, G.; Villar, B.M.G.; Garcia, F.; Bakuzis, A.F.; Longo, J.P.F.; Rodrigues, M.C.; Muraca, D.; Ayesh, A.I.; et al. Engineering Shape Anisotropy of Fe3O4-γ-Fe2O3 Hollow Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 3148–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Roca, A.G.; Gutiérrez, L.; Gavilán, H.; Fortes Brollo, M.E.; Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S.; Morales, M. del P. Design strategies for shape-controlled magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 138, 68–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, Z.; Mohapatra, J.; Wei, K.; Liu, J.P.; Sun, S. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Anisotropy, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021, 123, 3904–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Peddis, D.; Muscas, G.; Mathieu, R.; Kumar, P.A.; Varvaro, G.; Singh, G.; Orue, I.; Gil-Carton, D.; Marcano, L.; Muela, A.; et al. Studying nanoparticles’ 3D shape by aspect maps: Determination of the morphology of bacterial magnetic nanoparticles. Faraday Discuss. 2016, 191, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Musinu, A.; Mameli, V.; Ardu, A.; Cara, C.; Niznansky, D.; Xin, H.L.; Cannas, C. Spinel Ferrite Core-Shell Nanostructures by a Versatile Solvothermal Seed-Mediated Growth Approach and Study of Their Nanointerfaces. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7889–7900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Cara, C.; Ardu, A.; Nizňanský, D.; Musinu, A. Oleate-Based Solvothermal Approach for Size Control of MIIFe2IIIO4 (MII ═ MnII, FeII) Colloidal Nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 4954–4963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Musinu, A.; Nizňanský, D. 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy for the Study of Nanostructured Mixed Mn–Co Spinel Ferrites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 5008–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Zákutná, D.; Kubániová, D.; Cara, C.; Cannas, C. Evolution of the Magnetic and Structural Properties with the Chemical Composition in Oleate-Capped MnxCo1−xFe2O4 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 20626–20638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Cara, C.; Peddis, D.; Xin, H.L.; Sangregorio, C.; Mercuri, M.L.; Cannas, C. On the synthesis of bi-magnetic manganese ferrite-based core–shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 1612–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Khanal, S.; Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Veverka, M.; Xin, H.L.; Cannas, C.; Vejpravová, J. Self-Limitations of Heat Release in Coupled Core-Shell Spinel Ferrite Nanoparticles: Frequency, Time, and Temperature Dependencies. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bergmann, J.; Monecke, T.; Kleeberg, R. Alternative algorithm for the correction of preferred orientation in Rietveld analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mondini, S.; Ferretti, A.M.; Puglisi, A.; Ponti, A. Pebbles and PebbleJuggler: Software for accurate, unbiased, and fast measurement and analysis of nanoparticle morphology from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Morrish, A.H. The Physical Principles of Magnetism; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1965; ISBN 9780780360297. [Google Scholar]
  80. Repko, A.; Nižňanský, D.; Poltierová-Vejpravová, J. A study of oleic acid-based hydrothermal preparation of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011, 13, 5021–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Repko, A.; Nižňanský, D.; Matulková, I.; Kalbáč, M.; Vejpravová, J. Hydrothermal preparation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanoparticles of iron oxide and a modification with CM-dextran. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Repko, A.; Vejpravová, J.; Vacková, T.; Zákutná, D.; Nižňanský, D. Oleate-based hydrothermal preparation of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, and their magnetic properties with respect to particle size and surface coating. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 390, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chang, H.; Kim, B.H.; Lim, S.G.; Baek, H.; Park, J.; Hyeon, T. Role of the Precursor Composition in the Synthesis of Metal Ferrite Nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 4261–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bronstein, L.; Huang, X. Influence of iron oleate complex structure on iron oxide nanoparticle formation. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 3624–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Creutzburg, M.; Konuk, M.; Tober, S.; Chung, S.; Arndt, B.; Noei, H.; Meißner, R.H.; Stierle, A. Adsorption of oleic acid on magnetite facets. Commun. Chem. 2022, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mameli, V.; Musinu, A.; Ardu, A.; Ennas, G.; Peddis, D.; Niznansky, D.; Sangregorio, C.; Innocenti, C.; Thanh, N.T.K.; Cannas, C. Studying the effect of Zn-substitution on the magnetic and hyperthermic properties of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 10124–10137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. White, W.B.; De Angelis, B.A. Interpretation of the vibrational spectra of spinels. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Spectrosc. 1967, 23, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the synthesis method: (a) XRD patterns and TEM images with size distributions of the Co (b–d) and Co@Mn (e–g) samples; the zones inside red boxes have been magnified as insets.
Figure 1. Scheme of the synthesis method: (a) XRD patterns and TEM images with size distributions of the Co (b–d) and Co@Mn (e–g) samples; the zones inside red boxes have been magnified as insets.
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g001
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g002 550
Figure 2. STEM-EDX chemical mapping (a–c) and HRTEM images with inter-lattice distances and Miller’s indexes of some cubic nanoparticles of the sample Co (d–f).
Figure 2. STEM-EDX chemical mapping (a–c) and HRTEM images with inter-lattice distances and Miller’s indexes of some cubic nanoparticles of the sample Co (d–f).
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g002
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g003 550
Figure 3. STEM-EDX chemical mapping for the sample Co@Mn, depicting core–shell heterostructures (a,b) and manganese ferrite NPs (c,d).
Figure 3. STEM-EDX chemical mapping for the sample Co@Mn, depicting core–shell heterostructures (a,b) and manganese ferrite NPs (c,d).
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g003
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g004 550
Figure 4. HRTEM image (a), FFT (b), and masked inverse FFT images (c–f) of Co@Mn.
Figure 4. HRTEM image (a), FFT (b), and masked inverse FFT images (c–f) of Co@Mn.
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g004
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g005 550
Figure 5. Field-dependent magnetisation curves recorded at 10 K (a) and 300 K (b), and zero-field cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) curves (c) of the samples Co (grey lines) and Co@Mn (blue lines).
Figure 5. Field-dependent magnetisation curves recorded at 10 K (a) and 300 K (b), and zero-field cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) curves (c) of the samples Co (grey lines) and Co@Mn (blue lines).
Nanomaterials 13 01679 g005
Table
Table 1. Lattice parameter (a), crystallite size (DXRD), volumetric particle size (DTEM_V), size distribution (σ), organic content calculated by TGA, metal atomic percentages, and molar ratio Co:Mn:Fe (with Fe moles fixed to 2) calculated via TEM-EDX of the samples. a and DXRD values are computed via Rietveld refinement using two spinel ferrite phases for the Co@Mn sample: the first row of the table refers to CoFe2O4 and the second one to MnFe2O4.
Table 1. Lattice parameter (a), crystallite size (DXRD), volumetric particle size (DTEM_V), size distribution (σ), organic content calculated by TGA, metal atomic percentages, and molar ratio Co:Mn:Fe (with Fe moles fixed to 2) calculated via TEM-EDX of the samples. a and DXRD values are computed via Rietveld refinement using two spinel ferrite phases for the Co@Mn sample: the first row of the table refers to CoFe2O4 and the second one to MnFe2O4.
Samplea (Å)DXRD (nm)DTEM_V (nm)σTEM (%)Org. Phase (%wt.)Mn (%)Co (%)Fe (%)Mn:Co:Fe
Co8.3914(2)10.1(3)14.2 (64% Cube)1110-32.6(7)67.4(7)0:0.96:2
14.9 (36% Sphere)15
Co@Mn8.4030(9)
8.4684(7)		10.7(9)
8.3(4)		15.3121125.0(2)9.6(3)65.4(4)0.76:0.30:2
Table
Table 2. Coercive field (Hc) at 10 K and 300 K, anisotropy field (HK) at 10 K, saturation magnetisation (Ms) at 10 K and 300 K, and remanent magnetisation (Mr) at 10 K of the samples.
Table 2. Coercive field (Hc) at 10 K and 300 K, anisotropy field (HK) at 10 K, saturation magnetisation (Ms) at 10 K and 300 K, and remanent magnetisation (Mr) at 10 K of the samples.
SampleHc10K (T)HK10K (T)Ms10K (Am2kg−1)Mr10K (Am2kg−1)Mr/Ms10KHc300K (T)Ms300K (Am2kg−1)
Co1.91(1)3.7(1)92(3)75(2)0.82(2)0.06(1)77(2)
Co@Mn0.13(1)3.8(1)98(3)51(1)0.52(2)0.01(1)77(2)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanna Angotzi, M.; Mameli, V.; Zákutná, D.; Secci, F.; Xin, H.L.; Cannas, C. Hard–Soft Core–Shell Architecture Formation from Cubic Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101679

AMA Style

Sanna Angotzi M, Mameli V, Zákutná D, Secci F, Xin HL, Cannas C. Hard–Soft Core–Shell Architecture Formation from Cubic Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(10):1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanna Angotzi, Marco, Valentina Mameli, Dominika Zákutná, Fausto Secci, Huolin L. Xin, and Carla Cannas. 2023. "Hard–Soft Core–Shell Architecture Formation from Cubic Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles" Nanomaterials 13, no. 10: 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop