Biomaterials play a vital role in regenerative medicine, aiming to regenerate and replace lost/dysfunctional tissues. For instance, biomaterials are widely used for joint replacement, dental implants, orthopedic fixations, stents, and so on. Once biomaterials are implanted into the human body, there are inevitable interactions between biomaterial surfaces and the biological environment, such as proteins, cells, and bacteria. Therefore, implant failures still happen due to the implant-related complications resulting from poor implant integration, infections, mechanical instability, inflammation, etc. [1]. Thus, more efforts need to be put into addressing these challenges.
Many nanostructures can be found in nature. For example, the surface of lotus leaves is composed of fine-branched nanostructures that show super-hydrophobicity [2]. Aligned nanocolumns with diameters of about 70 nm and a column-to-column distance of about 90 nm exist in cicada wings, which endows cicadas with a self-cleaning property [3]. Additionally, nanostructures can be found in the human body. For example, human bones are composed of nanosized organic and mineral phases [4]. This indicates that nanostructures show promise in the field of biomaterials. Nanotechnology is a powerful tool in modern materials science and is able to incorporate biomimicry on the nanoscale into biomaterials and endow them with bioactivity [5].
Bacterial infection is one of the major post-surgery complications in clinics. Antibiotics have been considered as effective weapons against bacterial infections. However, antibiotic resistance is presently an emerging public health threat, caused by the overuse and abuse of antibiotics. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new methods to combat bacteria. In the past decade, mechanical and physical sterilization has attracted considerable attention, which does not cause bacterial resistance, as the morphology of nanometers can directly cause bacterial death through physical and mechanical interactions [6].
Based on this, various types of nanostructured biomaterials have been developed and many surface modification techniques have been adopted to produce nano-functionalized biomaterials surface. Due to the advantages of nanoscale features, nanostructured biomaterials show enhanced biocompatibilities, such as cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, and present excellent antibacterial activity. These nanostructured biomaterials exhibit promising applications in biomedical fields.
This Special Issue, “Nanostructured Biomaterials for Tissue Repair and Anti-infection”, focuses on the latest research progress of nanostructured biomaterials for tissue repair and anti-infection. Both original research articles and review articles covering the current progress on nanostructured biomaterials for tissue repair and anti-infection are welcomed. This Special Issue includes, but is not limited to, the following research topics, surface nano-functionalization of biomedical metals, ceramics, polymers for tissue repair, and anti-infection.
Author Contributions
J.Q. prepared the original draft, which was reviewed and edited by X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This article received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Nanomaterials and their continues support.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Prasad, K.; Bazaka, O.; Chua, M.; Rochford, M.; Fedrick, L.; Spoor, J.; Symes, R.; Tieppo, M.; Collins, C.; Cao, A.; et al. Metallic Biomaterials: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Materials 2017, 10, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, X.J.; Jiang, L. Design and Creation of Superwetting/Antiwetting Surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 3063–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Jin, M.K.; Yoo, W.C.; Lee, J.K. Nanostructuring of a Polymeric Substrate with Well-Defined Nanometer-Scale Topography and Tailored Surface Wettability. Langmuir 2004, 20, 7665–7669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fratzl, P.; Gupta, H.S.; Paschalis, E.P.; Roschger, P. Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite in bone. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 2115–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.Y.; Chu, P.K.; Ding, C.X. Surface nano-functionalization of biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2010, 70, 275–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.J.; Bing, W.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Chen, Z.W.; Gu, Z. Topographical nanostructures for physical sterilization. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2021, 11, 1376–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).