You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Sadaf Salehkalaibar1 and
  • Michèle Wigger2,*,†

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See attached letter.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper studies the problem of hypothesis testing over broadcast channels. It presents two achievable error exponent regions. I recommend that the paper be accepted after a minor revision.

  Main comments: 1. It is mentioned in the remark of Theorem 2 that if \theta_{cross,1} and \theta_{cross,2} are not active, then there is no tradeoff between \theta_1 and \theta_2. But it's unclear whether this is a fundamental property or is just the characteristic of the achievable region presented in Theorem 2. In particular, it is important to know whether the achievable exponent presented in Theorem 1 is optimal or not. Also, are there non-degenerate examples for which \theta_{cross,1} and \theta_{cross,2} are not active?   2. The expressions are highly complicated. It is unclear whether such expressions can be evaluated for any reasonable example.   3. The following paper should be cited: C. Tian and J. Chen, "Successive Refinement for Hypothesis Testing and Lossless One-Helper Problem," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, pp. 4666-4681, Oct. 2008.   4. There are a few typos and grammatical errors. For example:   p. 1, That means, each terminal observes a memoryless sequence and depending on the underlying hypothesis...   p.1, Focusing on two decision centers, two scenarios can encountered   p.5, then the it produces    

Author Response

See attached letter

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf