Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Model of Attacks on Distribution Automation Systems Based on CVSS and Attack Trees
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Computational Social Science”
Previous Article in Journal
Interoperability Conflicts in Linked Open Statistical Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Approach for Web Service Recommendation Based on Advanced Trust Relationships

Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter

by 1,2,†, 1,*,† and 3,*,†
Univ Lyon, Inria, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LIP UMR 5668, F-69007 Lyon, France
Mines ParisTech, 75006 Paris, France
CNRS and Computational Social Science Team, Centre Marc Bloch, UMIFRE CNRS-MAEE 14, Friedrichstrasse 191, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Information 2019, 10(8), 250;
Received: 24 May 2019 / Revised: 5 July 2019 / Accepted: 24 July 2019 / Published: 29 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Social Science)
Twitter may be considered to be a decentralized social information processing platform whose users constantly receive their followees’ information feeds, which they may in turn dispatch to their followers. This decentralization is not devoid of hierarchy and heterogeneity, both in terms of activity and attention. In particular, we appraise the distribution of attention at the collective and individual level, which exhibits the existence of attentional constraints and focus effects. We observe that most users usually concentrate their attention on a limited core of peers and topics, and discuss the relationship between interactional and informational attention processes—all of which, we suggest, may be useful to refine influence models by enabling the consideration of differential attention likelihood depending on users, their activity levels, and peers’ positions. View Full-Text
Keywords: attention; influence; ego-centered networks; twitter study; information spreading attention; influence; ego-centered networks; twitter study; information spreading
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Baltzer, A.; Karsai, M.; Roth, C. Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter. Information 2019, 10, 250.

AMA Style

Baltzer A, Karsai M, Roth C. Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter. Information. 2019; 10(8):250.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baltzer, Agathe, Márton Karsai, and Camille Roth. 2019. "Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter" Information 10, no. 8: 250.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop