Next Article in Journal
Variable Gain Prescribed Performance Control for Dynamic Positioning of Ships with Positioning Error Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Water and Salt Transports in the Hengsha Channel of Changjiang Estuary
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dynamic Responses of a Multilayered Transversely Isotropic Poroelastic Seabed Subjected to Ocean Waves and Currents

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10010073
by Xi Chen 1,2, Qi Zhang 1,2, Xiang Yuan Zheng 2,* and Yu Lei 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10010073
Submission received: 1 December 2021 / Revised: 27 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have considered the anisotropy of the multilayered TIP seabed and investigated the dynamic response under wave-current loading. The reviewer would like to request the following clarifications to further improve the paper.

  • Section 4, Pg 12: The effect of current velocity U0 on the maximum pore pressure requires proper clarification. Further, please explain the rationale behind adopting a smaller averaged current velocity for the model input.
  • Please justify why the transient liquefaction can occur in fully saturated seabeds as opposed to the findings by Rahman [52] and Jeng [35].
  • The limitations of the present semi-analytical solution need to be highlighted. Perhaps, in a separate section?

Jeng, D.S. Soil Response in Cross-Anisotropic Seabed due to Standing Waves. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. 1997, 123, 9-19.

Rahman, M.S. Wave-induced instability of seabed: mechanism and conditions. Mar. Geotechnol. 1991, 10, 277-299.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper discusses an interesting investigation of wave-current interaction on the dynamic response of the seafloor. The first chapters describe the theoretical backgroungd of the solution. Sequentially, the paper describes the detailed analytical solution of this specific dynamic problem in several variants. As a result, sensitivity plots are presented for changes in various parameters appearing in the solution. The conclusions evaluate the significant influences of each parameter. The only question I have about the whole paper is whether experimental verification is possible or, if measurements have been made in the past, how consistent they are with the solution presented by the authors. In general, I evaluate the paper as a result of good work and recommend it for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop