Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Abstract: line 25: In conclusion instead of Inconclusion.

Results: page 9 table 6: specificity of NEWS2 plus is less that of traditional NEWS2 system explain this?

If so, ways to improve specificity of the NEWS2 plus model.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I read with great interest the manuscript by Trongtrakul et al. The study is sound and interesting. However, there are some issues that need to be addressed:

- Lines 33-39. Authors should report that COVID-19 disease does not only involve respiratory tract, but it may also impact cardiovascular function (doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06685-2 - doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07147-z), gastrointestinal (doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab042) and cutaneous manifestations (doi: 10.1111/dth.13549), as well as coagulation disorders (doi: 10.1007/s12185-020-03029-y). Please briefly discuss and add these 5 references.

- Lines 94-97. Please use abbreviations only for word that are used more than three times throughout the paper.

- Line 120. Please remove this paragraph.

- In general the methods section is quite long and hard to read. Please remove the unnecessary information in order to increase readability.

- Please remove subparagraphs from the discussion section.

- Please include the fact that the registry is limited to one country as a limitation of the study.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear author

1- Tables and examples are not clear for readers.

2- In terms of grammar, it should be checked again.

3- Does high weight affect the severity of corona infection? Why are scientific documents available?

4- What is the purpose of this study?

5- How can this scoring help in the treatment of Covid-19?

6- Can this rating and index be used for other respiratory diseases?

Comments on the Quality of English Language

* Extensive editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear editor

The answer to the comments is not convincing.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Extensive editing of English language required