You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Download PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

15 April 2021

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Hepatitis C Virus Therapy with Direct-Acting Antivirals. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
2
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally and share the co-first authorship.
J. Clin. Med.2021, 10(8), 1694;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081694
This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cirrhosis. The risk of HCC recurrence after a complete response among patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has not been fully elucidated yet. Aim: To assess the risk of HCC recurrence after DAA therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methods: A systematic review across PubMed, Scopus and Scholar up to November 2020, including full-text studies that assessed the pattern of HCC recurrence after DAA therapy for HCV. Random-effect meta-analysis and univariable metaregression were applied to obtain pooled estimates for proportions and relative risk (RR) and variables influential for the outcome, respectively. Results: Thirty-one studies with 2957 patients were included. Overall, 30% (CI, 26–34%) of the patients with a history of HCC experienced HCC recurrence after DAA therapy, at mean time intervals ranging from 4 to 21 months. This result increased when going from European studies (23%, CI, 17–28%) to US studies (34%, CI, 30–38%), to Egyptian studies (37%, CI, 27–47%), and to Asian studies (33%, CI, 27–40%). Sixty-eight percent (CI, 45–91%) of recurrent HCCs developed within 6 months of follow-up since DAA treatment, among the eight studies providing stratified data. Among the studies providing head-to-head comparisons, the HCC recurrence risk was significantly lower after DAA therapy than IFN (RR, 0.64; CI, 0.51–0.81), and after DAA therapy than no intervention (RR, 0.68; CI, 0.49–0.94). Conclusions: The recurrence of HCC after DAA is not negligible, being higher soon after the end of treatment and among non-European countries. DAA therapy seems to reduce the risk of HCC recurrence compared to an IFN regimen and no intervention.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most frequent causes of cancer-related death all over the world; hepatitis C virus (HCV) is recognized as the most common main etiological factor in Western countries [1]. The curative treatments for HCC encompass liver transplantation, resection, and ablation with radiofrequency [2]. These approaches yield satisfactory long-term survival; however, they are hampered by tumor recurrence rates as high as 50% at 5 years [3].
Antiviral therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has replaced interferon as the standard treatment regimen for HCV, yielding eradication rates higher than 90% [4]. It was reported that interferon-based treatment was associated with a decrease in HCC incidence and recurrence [5], even though the mechanistic linkage was speculative. Indeed, whether this effect was due to sustained viral responses (SVRs) or to interferon-associated antineoplastic effects remained unknown [6]. Therefore, researchers are trying to assess whether DAA therapy replicates the interferon-mediated effects on HCC incidence and recurrence. Studies have consistently demonstrated that DAA therapy improves liver fibrosis, portal hypertension and the occurrence of de novo HCC [7]. However, some evidence coming from observational studies has suggested that patients with a history of a curative treatment for HCC and chronic hepatitis C who underwent DAA therapy experienced an increased HCC recurrence rate [8]. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported that DAA therapy does not seem to significantly influence the HCC recurrence rate [9]; however, they were based on a limited number of studies. Subsequently, after the publication of such analyses, new studies have provided further evidence for this important topic.
Thus, the primary aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the risk and pattern of HCC recurrence in patients treated with DAAs. The key secondary aim was to compare the HCC recurrence risk after DAA therapy to that after IFN and no intervention.

2. Methods

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations (Table 1) [10] and rated the methodological quality of the included studies through the Newcastle–Ottawa scale [11]. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale categorizes the risk of bias for the included studies into a four-tier system (i.e., unknown, low, medium, and high).
Table 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist for the included studies.

2.1. Literature Search and Study Selection

A comprehensive literature search was independently performed by four investigators (L.F.; U.S.; F.M.; S.S.) up to November 2020 by querying PubMed, Scopus, and Scholar using a combination of controlled vocabulary, medical subject headings (MeSH) terms, and keywords including “hepatocellular ca*” or “liver cancer”, “hepatitis C virus” or “chronic hepatitis c”, and “direct-acting antivirals” or “interferon-free”. The PubMed search string was ((chronic hepatitis c(MeSH Terms) OR (hepatitis c virus(MeSH Terms))) AND ((hepatocellular cancer(MeSH Terms)) OR (hepatocellular carcinoma(MeSH Terms)) OR (liver cancer(MeSH Terms))) AND ((direct-acting antivirals) OR (interferon-free) OR (DAA)).
To be included in the systematic review, studies had to report HCC recurrence among patients treated with DAA. Prospective and retrospective studies, published in the English language, with no minimum sample size, were considered for inclusion. Studies published in abstract form were excluded. We included studies reporting complete response from surgical or local ablative therapies; we excluded studies that administered interferon-based regimens in conjunction with DAAs.
Titles and abstracts were first screened. Then, the authors evaluated the full texts of the potentially relevant screened articles, including those meeting the inclusion criteria. Disputes were resolved by collegial discussion. The reasons for excluding studies from the selection process were recorded.

2.2. Data Extraction

The same four authors who performed the search (L.F.; U.S.; F.M.; S.S.) extracted data from each included study on a pre-specified datasheet. The following data were extracted from each study: the study design and country, the numbers of centers involved, the study size, the rate of recurrent HCC, the mean follow-up, the mean duration between prior HCC curative treatment and DAA therapy, and patients’ baseline characteristics (i.e., the mean MELD score, mean number of previous HCCs, proportion of patients with >1 previous HCC, and mean size of previous HCC).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The proportions of patients experiencing HCC recurrence, as well as the relative risk (RR) for HCC recurrence, were pooled by a random effects model, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We quantified the statistical heterogeneity according to the inconsistency I2 statistic, considering it high when I2 > 50%. A continuity correction factor equal to 0.1 was applied when no HCC recurrence was detected. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated through subgroup meta-analytic models according to study design (i.e., retrospective vs. prospective, or monocentric vs. multicentric) and country (i.e., Europe vs. Asia vs. United States), as well as through univariable metaregression analyses including the study size, mean time elapsed from HCC curative treatment to DAA therapy, mean follow-up duration, mean size of previous HCC, proportion of patients with >1 previous HCC, and mean baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. Continuous data reported as medians with interquartile ranges or ranges were converted into means through approximation formulae, in order to perform meta-analyses. Publication bias was evaluated throughout the visual inspection of funnel plots and by the regression test as proposed by Harbord, Egger and Sterne [12]. All the analyses were performed with R by using the metafor package [13].

3. Results

3.1. Study Characteristics

Overall, the search strategy identified 337 studies, of which 61 were considered for inclusion. After excluding 15 studies presenting data on HCC occurrence and not recurrence, 10 reporting incomplete data, and 5 focusing on post-transplantation HCC recurrence, 31 studies were finally included in the present systematic review [8,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] (Figure 1), encompassing 2957 patients and 32 cohorts, as the ANRS study included two patient groups [14].
Figure 1. Flow-chart describing the process of study selection.
Seven studies were prospective, whereas 15 studies were multicentric. Eleven studies were performed in Europe, whereas 14 were conducted in Asian countries, two in North America, three in Egypt, and one in Australia. All the studies were published between 2016 and 2020. The study sizes ranged from 8 to 304 patients. The mean follow-up durations to identify HCC recurrence ranged from 3 to 50 months. The study characteristics are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies reporting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy.

3.2. HCC Recurrence

The pooled HCC recurrence at the end of follow-up was 30% (CI, 26−34%), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.7%) (Figure 2). The proportion of patients experiencing HCC recurrence varied widely between studies, ranging from 7 to 54%, as did the mean time to recurrence, ranging from 4 to 21 months. According to subgroup analyses, the pooled HCC recurrence was similar between prospective and retrospective studies (28%, CI, 21−36%, vs. 30%, CI, 26−35%), whereas monocentric studies yielded significantly higher estimates than multicentric studies (36%, CI, 31−41%, vs. 25%, CI, 20−30%; p = 0.003). The recurrence of HCC was higher for Australian studies (50%, CI, 19−81%) than Egyptian studies (37%, CI, 27−47%), Asian studies (33%, CI, 27−40%), US studies (34%, CI, 30−38%), and European studies (23%, CI, 17−28%), with p = 0.013. No significant impact on HCC recurrence was found for the study size (p = 0.49), mean time elapsed from HCC curative treatment to DAA therapy (p = 0.32), mean follow-up duration (p = 0.58), mean size of previous HCC (p = 0.46), proportion of patients with >1 previous HCC (p = 0.92), or mean baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (p = 0.50).
Figure 2. Proportion of patients developing hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following direct-acting antiviral therapy.
Among the eight studies providing data on HCC recurrence stratified by the time elapsed from DAA therapy, 88 out of 137 (64%) recurrent HCCs developed within the first 6 months (Figure 3A), whereas 26 (19%) HCCs developed between 6 and 12 months, as reported by four studies (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Recurrence rate for hepatocellular carcinoma stratified by time elapsed from direct-acting antiviral therapy. (A) Within 6 months; (B) Between 6 and 12 months.

3.3. HCC Recurrence after DAA vs. IFN vs. No Intervention

Six studies provided data on head-to-head comparisons between HCC recurrence rates after DAA vs. IFN therapy. The risk of HCC recurrence was significantly lower after DAA therapy than an IFN-based regimen (RR, 0.64; CI, 0.51−0.81), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 3%) (Figure 4A).
Figure 4. Relative risk of developing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma according to strategy. (A) Direct-acting antivirals vs. interferon; (B) Direct-acting antivirals vs. no intervention.
Eleven studies provided data on head-to-head comparisons between HCC recurrence rates after DAA therapy vs. no intervention. The risk of HCC recurrence was significantly lower after DAA therapy than no intervention (RR, 0.68; CI, 0.49−0.94) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 87.8%) (Figure 4B).

3.4. Study Quality and Publication Bias

Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was judged as low, mostly due to uncontrolled designs, retrospective natures, and short follow-up lengths. A detailed representation of the study quality evaluation is reported in Table 3.
Table 3. Methodological quality of included studies according to Newcastle–Ottawa scale. *, low risk of bias.
Figure 5. Funnel plot describing publication bias for the primary outcome.

4. Discussion

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that about one-third of patients with a history of curative treatment for HCC undergoing DAA therapy for HCV infection experience HCC recurrence. Notably, this risk seems to be the highest early during follow-up, i.e., within 6 months from the end of DAA treatment, and among Asian countries. Furthermore, DAA therapy significantly reduces the risk of HCC recurrence compared to an IFN regimen and no intervention.
Some studies initially suggested that DAA treatment might increase the recurrence rate for HCC [8], raising concern about this therapy for patients with a history of HCC. Nevertheless, subsequent evidence did not confirm such an association, both for HCC recurrence and for HCC risk overall [16,44], leading international guidelines to eventually also recommend DAA therapy in such patients [45]. In this meta-analysis, we comprehensively showed that HCC recurrence is significantly lower after DAA therapy than an IFN-based regimen and no intervention. This result validates current guidelines and confirms and expands previous findings by Saraiya et al. [9], who showed that DAA-treated patients had a lower risk of HCC recurrence than untreated patients, while they did not compute any pooled analysis for DAA vs. IFN due to a paucity of data. On the other hand, Waziry et al. [7] found a higher HCC recurrence rate for DAA vs. IFN-treated patients, which became no longer significant after adjusting for study follow-up and patient age. Although they were not confirmatory, as they were provided by pooled study-level analysis, these findings are informative for clinicians. A possible explanation for such results lies in the decrease in active viremia induced by antiviral therapy. In fact, DAA therapy attains much higher sustained virological response (SVR) rates than IFN [45]; this might be, in turn, responsible for a decreased inflammatory stimulus and, therefore, reduce the neoplastic drive in the liver. An effect mediated through fibrosis regression and portal hypertension improvement seems to be less likely, as most of the included studies had a limited duration of follow-up, which probably prevented such modifications from happening.
Whether or not it is clear that we have to treat all patients infected by HCV with DAA, we should note that the rate of HCC recurrence was not low, being around one-third of patients, mostly within the first six months after antiviral therapy. However, these data should be taken with caution, as the mean time interval between HCC curative treatment and DAA therapy was low in some of the included studies. Therefore, it is possible that some patients already had recurrent HCC when DAA therapy was started. This would clearly lead to an overestimation of the burden of HCC recurrence.
We observed a tendency towards a significant difference in HCC recurrence rates according to the geographical region, ranging from 23% in European studies to 33% in Asian studies and 50% in the only study conducted in Australia. There are some possible explanations underlying this result. On one hand, these data might reflect differences in HCV genotype distribution, as genotype 3 has been found to increase liver fibrosis [46] and genotype 1 has been associated with an increased risk of HCC development [47]. Even though a large modelling study from the Polaris Observatory HCV Collaborators [48] found genotype 1 to be much more frequent in Asia than western Europe, paving the way to this pathophysiological theory, no stratified data on HCV genotypes were provided by the studies, preventing us from verifying this hypothesis. On the other hand, the higher HCC recurrence rates observed in Asian studies might be explained by different ethnicities’ genetic backgrounds. In fact, a cohort study conducted on more than 400 patients with cirrhosis due to HCV infection in the US found that HCC risk was increased 4-fold in Asians and doubled in African American men, compared to Caucasians [48].
Our findings expand the previously published systematic review and meta-analysis by Saraiya et al. [9] and by Waziry et al. [7], including 24 studies with 1820 patients and 10 studies with 867 patients focusing on HCC recurrence, respectively. We believe that at least three reasons for novelty can be found. First, more than twenty full-text studies were published since Saraiya and Waziry’s reviews, permitting us to achieve more consistent pooled estimates. Second, we decided to include only full-text studies, differently from Saraiya et al. [9], who also included conference abstracts. Although this choice might have partly decreased the total size of our meta-analysis, we feel that this approach was more rigorous. Third, we found in a sub-analysis that more than two-thirds of recurrent HCCs developed within six months after DAA treatment, providing insightful information to clinicians.
Our meta-analysis has strengths and limitations. On one hand, the quality of most of the included studies was low, owing to the uncontrolled designs, the retrospective natures, and the short follow-up durations after DAA therapy. Furthermore, most studies did not provide enough data on patients’ characterization, e.g., regarding the baseline HCC features, and the degree and duration of liver cirrhosis before DAA treatment. This clearly affects the degree of confidence in our estimates. On the other hand, we followed the PRISMA recommendations [10] for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Furthermore, the decision to include full-text studies only was undertaken in order to reduce the study-related bias. Although high heterogeneity affected our primary outcome, we tried to explain it through several subgroup analyses and metaregression analyses, providing useful hints for future research. Last, the significant reduction in the HCC recurrence rate for DAA-treated patients vs. IFN-treated and untreated subjects is explorative and not confirmative. Indeed, most of the included studies did not provide enough information on patients’ clinical factors potentially affecting HCC recurrence, e.g., history of previous HCC recurrence, the type of HCC treatment, the degree of liver dysfunction, and the tumor burden. Furthermore, we decided not to adjust for any study-related variables such as the mean follow-up, as the number of included studies for this comparative outcome was small.
In conclusion, we found that HCC recurrence in patients with prior HCC history after DAA therapy is not infrequent, as it concerns about one-third of patients, especially early after the end of DAA therapy. Of note, DAA therapy seems to reduce the risk of HCC recurrence compared to an IFN regimen and no intervention according to unadjusted analysis. Prospective, multicenter studies with complete information on patients’ characteristics that might affect HCC recurrence are needed.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: L.F. (Leonardo Frazzoni) and F.A.; analysis and interpretation of the data: L.F. (Leonardo Frazzoni), U.S., and F.A.; drafting of the article: all authors; collection and assembly of data: L.F. (Leonardo Frazzoni), U.S., F.M., and S.S.; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: all authors; final approval of the article: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest, either personal or financial, to declare by any of the authors.

Abbreviations

CIconfidence interval
DAAdirect-acting antivirals
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HCVhepatitis C virus
PEG-IFNpegylated interferon
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
SVRsustained virological response

References

  1. El-Serag, H.B. Epidemiology of Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1264–1273.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 182–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Reddy, S.K.; Steel, J.L.; Chen, H.-W.; DeMateo, D.J.; Cardinal, J.; Behari, J.; Humar, A.; Marsh, J.W.; Geller, D.A.; Tsung, A. Outcomes of Curative Treatment for Hepatocellular Cancer in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis versus Hepatitis C and Alcoholic Liver Disease. Hepatology 2012, 55, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Holmes, J.A.; Rutledge, S.M.; Chung, R.T. Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C. Lancet 2019, 393, 1392–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singal, A.G.; Volk, M.L.; Jensen, D.; Di Bisceglie, A.M.; Schoenfeld, P.S. A Sustained Viral Response Is Associated with Reduced Liver-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 8, 280–288.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hsu, C.-S.; Chao, Y.-C.; Lin, H.H.; Chen, D.-S.; Kao, J.-H. Systematic Review: Impact of Interferon-Based Therapy on HCV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Waziry, R.; Hajarizadeh, B.; Grebely, J.; Amin, J.; Law, M.; Danta, M.; George, J.; Dore, G.J. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Following Direct-Acting Antiviral HCV Therapy: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Regression. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Conti, F.; Buonfiglioli, F.; Scuteri, A.; Crespi, C.; Bolondi, L.; Caraceni, P.; Foschi, F.G.; Lenzi, M.; Mazzella, G.; Verucchi, G.; et al. Early Occurrence and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV-Related Cirrhosis Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saraiya, N.; Yopp, A.C.; Rich, N.E.; Odewole, M.; Parikh, N.D.; Singal, A.G. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 48, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. 2013. Available online: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  12. Harbord, R.M.; Egger, M.; Sterne, J.A.C. A Modified Test for Small-Study Effects in Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials with Binary Endpoints. Stat. Med. 2006, 25, 3443–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the Metafor Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 36, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. ANRS Collaborative Study Group on Hepatocellular. Lack of Evidence of an Effect of Direct-Acting Antivirals on the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Data from Three ANRS Cohorts. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bielen, R.; Moreno, C.; Van Vlierberghe, H.; Bourgeois, S.; Mulkay, J.-P.; Vanwolleghem, T.; Verlinden, W.; Brixco, C.; Decaestecker, J.; de Galocsy, C.; et al. The Risk of Early Occurrence and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C-Infected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals with and without Pegylated Interferon: A Belgian Experience. J. Viral Hepat. 2017, 24, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cabibbo, G.; Petta, S.; Calvaruso, V.; Cacciola, I.; Cannavò, M.R.; Madonia, S.; Distefano, M.; Larocca, L.; Prestileo, T.; Tinè, F.; et al. Is Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhotic Patients Affected by Treatment with Direct-Acting Antivirals? A Prospective Multicentre Study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 46, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chan, P.P.Y.; Levy, M.T.; Shackel, N.; Davison, S.A.; Prakoso, E. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence Post Direct-Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C-Related Advanced Fibrosis/Cirrhosis Patients in Australia. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2020, 19, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chi, C.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Su, C.-W.; Chen, P.-Y.; Chu, C.-J.; Lan, K.-H.; Lee, I.-C.; Hou, M.-C.; Huang, Y.-H. Direct-Acting Antivirals for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Degasperi, E.; D’Ambrosio, R.; Iavarone, M.; Sangiovanni, A.; Aghemo, A.; Soffredini, R.; Borghi, M.; Lunghi, G.; Colombo, M.; Lampertico, P. Factors Associated with Increased Risk of De Novo or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis Treated With Direct-Acting Antivirals for HCV Infection. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 1183–1191.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. El Kassas, M.; Funk, A.L.; Salaheldin, M.; Shimakawa, Y.; Eltabbakh, M.; Jean, K.; El Tahan, A.; Sweedy, A.T.; Afify, S.; Youssef, N.F.; et al. Increased Recurrence Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after DAA Therapy in a Hepatitis C-Infected Egyptian Cohort: A Comparative Analysis. J. Viral Hepat. 2018, 25, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ikeda, K.; Kawamura, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Kominami, Y.; Fujiyama, S.; Sezaki, H.; Hosaka, T.; Akuta, N.; Saitoh, S.; Suzuki, F.; et al. Direct-Acting Antivirals Decreased Tumor Recurrence After Initial Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 2932–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kogiso, T.; Sagawa, T.; Kodama, K.; Taniai, M.; Katagiri, S.; Egawa, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Tokushige, K. Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Direct-Acting Antiviral Drug Treatment in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus. JGH Open 2019, 3, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kuo, Y.-H.; Wang, J.-H.; Chang, K.-C.; Hung, C.-H.; Lu, S.-N.; Hu, T.-H.; Yen, Y.-H.; Kee, K.-M.; Chen, C.-H. The Influence of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C Virus Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Curative Treatment. Investig. New Drugs 2020, 38, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lashen, S.A.; Shamseya, M.M.; Madkour, M.A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Occurrence/Recurrence after Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in Egyptian Cohort: Single-Center Experience. Dig. Dis. 2019, 37, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, W.-C.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chang, C.-W.; Chang, C.-W.; Wang, T.-E.; Wang, H.-Y.; Chen, M.-J. Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lithy, R.M.; Elbaz, T.; H Abdelmaksoud, A.; M Nabil, M.; Rashed, N.; Omran, D.; Kaseb, A.O.; O Abdelaziz, A.; I Shousha, H. Survival and Recurrence Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Using Direct Acting Antivirals. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lleo, A.; Aglitti, A.; Aghemo, A.; Maisonneuve, P.; Bruno, S.; Persico, M.; Rendina, M.; Ciancio, A.; Lampertico, P.; Brunetto, M.R.; et al. Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhotic Patients Treated with Direct Acting Antivirals. Dig. Liver Dis. 2019, 51, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miuma, S.; Miyamoto, J.; Taura, N.; Fukushima, M.; Sasaki, R.; Haraguchi, M.; Shibata, H.; Sato, S.; Miyaaki, H.; Nakao, K. Influence of Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy on Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence: A Landmark Time Analysis and Time-Dependent Extended Cox Proportional Hazards Model Analysis. Intern. Med. 2020, 59, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nagaoki, Y.; Imamura, M.; Nishida, Y.; Daijo, K.; Teraoka, Y.; Honda, F.; Nakamura, Y.; Morio, K.; Fujino, H.; Nakahara, T.; et al. The Impact of Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antivirals on Clinical Outcome after Curative Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison with Interferon-Based Therapy. J. Med. Virol. 2019, 91, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nagata, H.; Nakagawa, M.; Asahina, Y.; Sato, A.; Asano, Y.; Tsunoda, T.; Miyoshi, M.; Kaneko, S.; Otani, S.; Kawai-Kitahata, F.; et al. Effect of Interferon-Based and -Free Therapy on Early Occurrence and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis C. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nishibatake Kinoshita, M.; Minami, T.; Tateishi, R.; Wake, T.; Nakagomi, R.; Fujiwara, N.; Sato, M.; Uchino, K.; Enooku, K.; Nakagawa, H.; et al. Impact of Direct-Acting Antivirals on Early Recurrence of HCV-Related HCC: Comparison with Interferon-Based Therapy. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ochi, H.; Hiraoka, A.; Hirooka, M.; Koizumi, Y.; Amano, M.; Azemoto, N.; Watanabe, T.; Yoshida, O.; Tokumoto, Y.; Mashiba, T.; et al. Direct-Acting Antivirals Improve Survival and Recurrence Rates after Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria. J. Gastroenterol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogawa, E.F.N.; Kyushu University Liver Disease Study (KULDS) Group. Short-term risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis C virus eradication following direct-acting anti-viral treatment. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 47, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ooka, Y.; Miho, K.; Shuntaro, O.; Nakamura, M.; Ogasawara, S.; Suzuki, E.; Yasui, S.; Chiba, T.; Arai, M.; Kanda, T.; et al. Prediction of the Very Early Occurrence of HCC Right after DAA Therapy for HCV Infection. Hepatol. Int. 2018, 12, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Preda, C.M.; Baicus, C.; Sandra, I.; Oproiu, A.; Manuc, T.; Constantinescu, I.; Gavrila, D.; Diculescu, M.; Dumitru, R.; Vasilescu, C.; et al. Recurrence Rate of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatitis C Virus-Associated Cirrhosis after Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+dasabuvir+ribavirin Therapy. UE Gastroenterol. J. 2019, 7, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reig, M.; Mariño, Z.; Perelló, C.; Iñarrairaegui, M.; Ribeiro, A.; Lens, S.; Díaz, A.; Vilana, R.; Darnell, A.; Varela, M.; et al. Unexpected High Rate of Early Tumor Recurrence in Patients with HCV-Related HCC Undergoing Interferon-Free Therapy. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rinaldi, L.; Rinaldi, L.; Di Francia, R.; Coppola, N.; Guerrera, B.; Imparato, M.; Monari, C.; Nevola, R.; Rosato, V.; Fontanella, L.; et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV Cirrhosis after viral clearance with direct acting antiviral therapy: Preliminary evidence and possible meanings. WCRJ 2016, 3, e748. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sangiovanni, A.; Alimenti, E.; Gattai, R.; Filomia, R.; Parente, E.; Valenti, L.; Marzi, L.; Pellegatta, G.; Borgia, G.; Gambato, M.; et al. Undefined/Non-Malignant Hepatic Nodules Are Associated with Early Occurrence of HCC in DAA-Treated Patients with HCV-Related Cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singal, A.G.; Rich, N.E.; Mehta, N.; Branch, A.; Pillai, A.; Hoteit, M.; Volk, M.; Odewole, M.; Scaglione, S.; Guy, J.; et al. Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Not Associated with Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Multicenter North American Cohort Study. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1683–1692.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tahata, Y.; Sakamori, R.; Urabe, A.; Yamada, R.; Ohkawa, K.; Hiramatsu, N.; Hagiwara, H.; Oshita, M.; Imai, Y.; Kodama, T.; et al. Clinical Outcomes of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatments for Patients with Hepatitis C after Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Equivalent to Interferon Treatment. Hepatol. Res. 2020, 50, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Virlogeux, V.; Pradat, P.; Hartig-Lavie, K.; Bailly, F.; Maynard, M.; Ouziel, G.; Poinsot, D.; Lebossé, F.; Ecochard, M.; Radenne, S.; et al. Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Decreases Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Rate in Cirrhotic Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2017, 37, 1122–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yoshimasu, Y.; Furuichi, Y.; Kasai, Y.; Takeuchi, H.; Sugimoto, K.; Nakamura, I.; Itoi, T. Predictive Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Occurrence or Recurrence after Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis 2019, 28, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zou, W.Y.; Choi, K.; Kramer, J.R.; Yu, X.; Cao, Y.; El-Serag, H.B.; Kanwal, F. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer Recurrence in Hepatitis C Virus+ Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2019, 64, 3328–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pawlotsky, J.M.; Negro, F.; Aghemo, A.; Berenguer, M.; Dalgard, O.; Dusheiko, G.; Marra, F.; Puoti, M.; Wedemeyer, H.; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C: Final Update of the Series. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1170–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Probst, A.; Dang, T.; Bochud, M.; Egger, M.; Negro, F.; Bochud, P.-Y. Role of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 3 in Liver Fibrosis Progression--a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Viral Hepat. 2011, 18, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, M.-H.; Yang, H.-I.; Lu, S.-N.; Jen, C.-L.; You, S.-L.; Wang, L.-Y.; L’Italien, G.; Chen, C.-J.; Yuan, Y.; REVEAL-HCV Study Group. Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b Increases Cumulative Lifetime Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blach, S.; Zeuzem, S.; Manns, M.; Altraif, I.; Duberg, A.-S.; Muljono, D.H.; Waked, I.; Alavian, S.M.; Lee, M.-H.; Negro, F.; et al. Global Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in 2015: A Modelling Study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nguyen, M.H.; Whittemore, A.S.; Garcia, R.T.; Tawfeek, S.A.; Ning, J.; Lam, S.; Wright, T.L.; Keeffe, E.B. Role of Ethnicity in Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C and Cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004, 2, 820–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Variable Creatinine Levels in Critical Care Patients: A Concerning Knowledge Gap
Previous
Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Positively Associated with Increased Glycated Haemoglobin Levels in Subjects without Diabetes
Next