SARS-CoV-2 T-Cell Responses in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients following Two Doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Authors reported the simple statistic analysis data regarding to more than 100 Aollo-HSCT patients whose T cell responses after two shots of BNT mRNA vaccine. Overall, it is a good report, although it is not a novelty, it is really one of the pioneer studies. The weak antibody immuno-response tis known in Allo-HSCT recipients, and the role of T cell role of the immune system is brought into sharper focus. T cells might be overlooked in the fight against COVID-19. This report may provide an interested and useful information. As if authors can provide more discussions among the 4 similar reports, including authors’ report, that should improve the importance of this manuscript. For a brief report point of view, I only have two more minor comments:
- Authors should carefully check whether there are more typing errors in the text including figure legends, such as: 1). Page 5 line 155 and line 157, the “(a)” and “(b)” should be corrected as “(A)” and “(B)”, respectively, to appropriately correlate figure label with its relative legend. 2). Page 7 line 188, …. (data not shown). “(D)” Bar graphs showing…. That should be a typing error and to be corrected as “(C)”.
- For figure 1 & 2, the small font size and its low resolution that make not clearly enough labelling for the graphs.
Author Response
Reviewer 1:
Authors reported the simple statistic analysis data regarding to more than 100 Aollo-HSCT patients whose T cell responses after two shots of BNT mRNA vaccine. Overall, it is a good report, although it is not a novelty, it is really one of the pioneer studies. The weak antibody immuno-response tis known in Allo-HSCT recipients, and the role of T cell role of the immune system is brought into sharper focus. T cells might be overlooked in the fight against COVID-19. This report may provide an interested and useful information. As if authors can provide more discussions among the 4 similar reports, including authors’ report that should improve the importance of this manuscript.
We have now discussed the specific T-cell responses in terms of CD4/CD8 + T cells responses comparing our results with those published. We have also provided a paragraph regarding predictive factors of the humoral and cellular responses.
For a brief report point of view, I only have two more minor comments:
- Authors should carefully check whether there are more typing errors in the text including figure legends, such as: 1). Page 5 line 155 and line 157, the “(a)” and “(b)” should be corrected as “(A)” and “(B)”, respectively, to appropriately correlate figure label with its relative legend. 2). Page 7 line 188, …. (data not shown). “(D)” Bar graphs showing…. That should be a typing error and to be corrected as “(C)”.
Changes have been made accordingly.
- For figure 1 & 2, the small font size and its low resolution that make not clearly enough labelling for the graphs.
Figures are now provided in the .jpg format showing adequate resolution.
Author Response File: Author Response.doc
Reviewer 2 Report
This is a well performed and well written study on the occurrence and function of SARS-Cov-2 spike protein-specific CD4 T cells after vaccination in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study is of high interest in general and for patients with HSCT.
Concerns
-Graphic quality of figures is poor and has to be improved.
Author Response
Reviewer 2: This is a well performed and well written study on the occurrence and function of SARS-Cov-2 spike protein-specific CD4 T cells after vaccination in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study is of high interest in general and for patients with HSCT.
Concerns
-Graphic quality of figures is poor and has to be improved.
Figures are now provided in the .jpg format showing adequate resolution.
Author Response File: Author Response.doc