Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Metallic Glass Layers on Al Alloys with Improved Corrosion Resistance and Micro-Hardness by Pulsed Electrical Discharge Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on Important Issues for Estimating the Effectiveness of the Proposed Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters under Volume Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Passively Q-Switched Operation of a Tm,Ho:LuVO4 Laser with a Graphene Saturable Absorber
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Piezoelectric Harvesters with Integrated Trimming Devices
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(6), 955; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060955

Comparison Among Different Rainfall Energy Harvesting Structures

Dipartimento di Energia, Ingegneria Dell’informazione e Modelli Matematici, DEIM, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Received: 23 May 2018 / Revised: 4 June 2018 / Accepted: 7 June 2018 / Published: 9 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting: Materials, Devices and Application)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3880 KB, uploaded 9 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

In this paper, an experimental comparison between different rainfall harvesting devices through the study of the electrical rectifying circuit is proposed. In more detail, three harvesting structures are considered: the cantilever, the bridge and the floating circle. Different waveforms were acquired and discussed. The processed data were compared in order to suggest the best choice for the rectifying circuit, from the simplest one to that most frequently endorsed in the technical literature. View Full-Text
Keywords: piezoelectric effect; energy harvester; rectifying circuit piezoelectric effect; energy harvester; rectifying circuit
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Viola, F. Comparison Among Different Rainfall Energy Harvesting Structures. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 955.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top