This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessStudy Protocol
Analysis and Verification Results of Manual Inspection of Pavement Condition Index
by
Szu-Han Lu
Szu-Han Lu *
,
Jyh-Dong Lin
Jyh-Dong Lin and
Yi-Shian Chiou
Yi-Shian Chiou
Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320317, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 5600; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105600 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 February 2025
/
Revised: 17 April 2025
/
Accepted: 14 May 2025
/
Published: 16 May 2025
Abstract
The aim of this study is to establish an analysis of certification indicators for the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to address previously unaccredited issues. In the management of road infrastructure, the PCI serves as a crucial indicator for assessing road pavement conditions. However, the lack of standardized detection and accreditation mechanisms in the past may have led to variations in the reliability of detection results among different personnel. This study observes the accuracy and precision of the data obtained by different inspectors. The analysis is based on repeated manual inspections conducted by four inspectors across 12 road units on Zhongda Road, using the ASTM D6433-23 (2023) standard. To ensure the reliability of the inspection results, the Coefficient of Variation (CV) is used to measure repeatability, while the Mean Relative Error (MRE) is used to evaluate accuracy. Training was introduced between inspection phases to assess performance improvement. The results showed that the average CV decreased from 27.2% to 7.5% and the average MRE reduced from 45.3% to 5.9% after training. These findings demonstrate that targeted training significantly enhances the repeatability and accuracy of manual PCI assessments. This study concludes with recommendations to set a CV threshold of ≤0.1 and an MRE threshold of ≤10% as practical benchmarks for manual PCI Quality Control. These standards can serve as validation criteria for future automated inspection systems.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lu, S.-H.; Lin, J.-D.; Chiou, Y.-S.
Analysis and Verification Results of Manual Inspection of Pavement Condition Index. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5600.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105600
AMA Style
Lu S-H, Lin J-D, Chiou Y-S.
Analysis and Verification Results of Manual Inspection of Pavement Condition Index. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(10):5600.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105600
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lu, Szu-Han, Jyh-Dong Lin, and Yi-Shian Chiou.
2025. "Analysis and Verification Results of Manual Inspection of Pavement Condition Index" Applied Sciences 15, no. 10: 5600.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105600
APA Style
Lu, S.-H., Lin, J.-D., & Chiou, Y.-S.
(2025). Analysis and Verification Results of Manual Inspection of Pavement Condition Index. Applied Sciences, 15(10), 5600.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105600
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.