Next Article in Journal
Zinc-Doped Magnesium Borate Glass: A Potential Thermoluminescence Dosimeter for Extended Range of Dosimetric Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Change Modulates Halophyte Secondary Metabolites to Reshape Rhizosphere Halobacteria for Biosaline Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
Neural Networks for Early Diagnosis of Postpartum PTSD in Women after Cesarean Section
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Profiling of Limonium vulgare Mill. Using UHPLC-DAD-ESI/MS2 and GC-MS Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Halophytes as Medicinal Plants against Human Infectious Diseases

1
Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV) of the Network of Chemistry and Technology (REQUIMTE), Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(15), 7493; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157493
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Halophytes Plants)

Abstract

:
Halophytes have long been used for medicinal purposes. However, for many decades, their use was entirely empirical, with virtually no knowledge of the bioactive compounds underlying the different applications. In recent decades, the growing problem of antibiotic resistance triggered the research on alternative antimicrobial approaches, and halophytes, along with other medicinal plants, regained attention as an underexplored pharmacological vein. Furthermore, the high nutritional/nutraceutical/pharmacological value of some halophytic species may represent added value to the emerging activity of saline agriculture and targeted modification of the rhizosphere, with plant-growth-promoting bacteria being attempted to be used as a tool to modulate the plant metabolome and enhance the expression of interesting metabolites. The objective of this review is to highlight the potential of halophytes as a valuable, and still unexplored, source of antimicrobial compounds for clinical applications. For that, we provide a critical perspective on the empirical use of halophytes in traditional medicine and a state-or-the-art overview of the most relevant plant species and metabolites related with antiviral, antifungal and antibacterial activities.

1. Introduction

Halophytes are ecologically, physiologically and biochemically specialized plants that are able to grow and reproduce under salinities >200 mM NaCl. Although representing only 1% of terrestrial angiosperms, approximately 3000 species in the world are considered as halophytes, corresponding to 550 genera and 120 families [1]. Halophytes have an extremely broad distribution, occurring over a wide range in mostly costal and wetlands habitats [2] that are directly or indirectly influenced by ocean waters, such as salt marshes/mangroves and sand dunes, and the significant fraction of once arable soils are now threatened by salinization as a consequence of irrigation practices or climate change [3].
A first line of physiological adaptation involves salt-induced signaling pathways of osmotic adjustment that trigger the removal of Na+ and Cl from sap and sequestration in intracellular compartments known as vacuoles [4,5], whereas small organic molecules, such as soluble carbohydrates, polyols, amino acids and betaines, accumulate in the cytoplasm to further ensure osmotic balance [4,6,7]. Insufficient adjustment leads to osmotic and oxidative stress, ion toxicity and nutrient deficiency [4]. High concentrations of NaCl in soil reduce water availability to the roots, reduce the water potential of leaves and, ultimately, limit nutrient uptake [8]. Net photosynthesis is reduced because of stomatal closure, and the balance between the production and the scavenging of reactive oxidative species (ROS) is disrupted [9,10]. Energy is diverted from biosynthetic pathways associated with growth to the expression of enzymes and phytohormones involved in stress responses and homeostasis [11] with an overall reduction of productivity.
The multifactorial adaptive responses of halophytes involve a complex network of biochemical mechanisms and a plethora of bioactive molecules, such as phenolic compounds (e.g., phenolic acids, flavonoids and tannins), polysaccharides, glycosides and related compounds, lipids (e.g., fats and fatty acids, phytosterols and tocopherols, essential oils, acetylenic lipids, carotenoids) and alkaloids [12]. The ethnobotanical literature provides evidence that, because of their phytochemical richness, halophytic medicinal plants have long been used to treat various infectious diseases, particularly in developing countries where traditional medicine remains the first approach to minor ailments [12,13]. In recent decades, little has been investigated about the utilization of halophytes for medicinal purposes as a way to validate their use in traditional medicine or as a source of pharmacological compounds and only recently, with the building up of antibiotic resistance and the perspective of a post-antibiotic era, has the screening of halophytes for antimicrobial compounds regained interest [12,14,15,16,17]. Furthermore, the high nutritional/nutraceutical/pharmacological value of some halophytic species may represent added value to the emerging activity of saline agriculture [12,14,18,19].
The present review intends to provide a critical perspective on the empirical use of halophytes in traditional medicine and on the recently produced scientific evidence of the antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal activities underlying ethnopharmacological applications, highlighting the importance of halophytes as a valuable and still unexplored source of antimicrobial compounds for clinical applications.

2. Halophytes in Traditional Medicine and Ethnopharmacology

Traditional medicine (TM) is the mainstay of health care delivery in many developing countries. In the 2019 WHO Global Report [20], 34 countries included TM in their national essential medicines list and 107 member states have acknowledged the use of traditional and complementary medicine. In some countries, such as India, China, South Africa, Ghana, Mexico and Russia, TM is actually the major source of health care, or is at least a very important health care resource for the poorer, less educated and rural communities [21].
Many halophytes have been used for centuries in TM [12,22,23]. Leaves, roots, seeds, fruits, barks, latex or whole plants are used as juices, decoctions, or infusions, macerated, grounded to powder, crumpled into pastes or poultices, or incinerated to ashes (Figure 1).
Halophytes thrive in diverse saline habitats, whether coastal, such as in salt marshes, or inland, such as in salt deserts and salt flats [12,24]. Therefore, the therapeutic use of halophytes is more common in populations established in these areas (Figure 2).
Mediterranean regions of Africa and Europe, the Arabian Peninsula, southwest Asian countries such as Pakistan, India and Afghanistan, and east Asian countries such as China and Thailand have a millennial history of using halophyte species as traditional medicines to treat or relieve symptoms of infectious and noninfectious diseases (Table 1).
In the Mediterranean basin, rural communities use halophytes both as food and a source of health-promoting compounds, consumed them fresh or cooked [23,46]. Leaves, fruits and seeds of species of Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Chenopodiaceae, Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, Capparaceae, Plantaginaceae, Portulacaceae and Zygophyllaceae are the most important families among more than 50 plant families with medicinal properties known in East Mediterranean regions (Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan and Israel) [11]. These plants are mostly for the treatment of urinary system and internal diseases, as well as skin and respiratory conditions [46].
In Saudi Arabia, halophytes from the families of Asteraceae, Fabaceae and Apocynaceae are the most represented in traditional medicine, with the leaves, fruits or the whole plant being used. The species Ziziphus spina-christi (Mill.) Georgi and Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand have the largest range of therapeutic uses, but Datura stramonium L., Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal, and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. are also extensively applied [47]. Some species widely used in the Arabian Sea are also popular for traditional medicine applications in other regions. That is the case for Zygophyllum album L.f, which belongs to the Zygophyllaceae family [41], and Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Shrader (Cucurbitaceae), which is used in Tropical Africa, India and Pakistan for the treatment of a wide range of infectious diseases [48]. In fact, countries in the Arabian Sea region, especially Pakistan, have a long and rich tradition in terms of medicinal applications of halophytes. On the Arabian Sea coast, Chenopodiaceae, Capparidaceae, Amaranthaceae, Zygophyllaceae, Poaceae and Boraginaceae are the most represented families. The whole plants are used, or only the leaves, fruits or roots [24]. Solanum virginianum L. and Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Shrader have the widest range of applications, but many more halophyte species are used in this region to treat digestive problems (Acacia nilotica L., Citrullus colocynthis and Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R.Br.), skin conditions (Suaeda monoica Forssk.), respiratory, liver and kidney problems, genito-urinary infections, piles, toothache, chronical pain and fever. Ziziphus mauritiana Lam., Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal, Rhazya stricta Decne., Fagonia cretica L., Kochia prostrata L., Peganum harmala L. and Solanum surattense are used for multiple purposes, particularly their leaves and fruits [32]. Some species are also used as alexipharmics and blood purifiers [49].
In China, Apocynum venetum L., Astragalus membranaceus Moench, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ex.DC., Lycium chinense Mill. and Nitraria tangutorum Bobrov are extensively used in traditional medicine [50]. However, these species represent only a small fraction of the more than 100 species of halophytes used as Chinese medicines and some of them have even been domesticated [50]. In Thailand, mostly herbs, especially of the Fabaceae family, are used as traditional medicines against fever, skin diseases and gastrointestinal tract problems [51].
Ethnobotanical studies referring to the use of halophytes in traditional medicine usually identify general effects of plants or plant products. In most cases, what is intended is a relief of symptoms, and medicines are empirically used without attempting to establish the cause. As the infectious nature of the disease is not always confirmed, in most cases antimicrobial effects of halophyte-based medicines can only be indirectly inferred. There may be a significant overlapping of symptoms between infectious and noninfectious diseases and the effects of plant products, namely, in terms of antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects [52,53]; therefore, recent studies addressing the potential of halophytes as sources of antimicrobial compounds have set the focus on the demonstration of effects on defined infectious agents and on the purification and identification of the active molecules.

3. Halophytes as a Source of Antimicrobial Compounds

Plants accumulate bioactive compounds as a consequence of both phylogeny and the functional response to different environmental conditions [12]. Along with the abiotic conditions, plant species, genotype, physiology and the developmental stage also influence the type and concentration of these molecules produced by a plant [54,55]. The concentration and diversity of bioactive compounds in halophytes are higher compared to salt-sensitive species, and some compounds are exclusive to halophytes [14]. Moreover, there seems to exist a positive correlation between salt content in the medium and the production of secondary metabolites [56].
Primary metabolites of halophytes, such as carbohydrates and lipids, are regarded with interest as supplements or nutraceutics. Secondary metabolites, such as terpenes and phenols, have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory antitumoral and antimicrobial activities [35] and underlie many of the applications of halophytes in traditional medicine [57]. Some compounds modulate and stimulate the immune system, lower the risk of heart diseases, control body weight and blood sugar levels, and can even act as antiaging agents [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Antimicrobial activity is most commonly associated with phenolic acids, flavonoids and tannins (Figure 3). Terpenoids are the second most abundant group of bioactive molecules, followed by alkaloids, essential oils, glycosides and steroids.
In spite of the accumulation of evidence on the pharmacological potential of halophytes, only a few species have been subjected to systematic phytochemical characterization and screening for biological activities. Sixty-three species are reported in TM in Rwanda to treat diarrheal-like symptoms [64]. In fact, the same plants are used to treat different diseases with similar symptomatology, such as diarrhea, dysentery, cholera and gastroenteritis in general, but different aetiology (helminths, bacteria and viruses). Some studies have found that only some plants have antimicrobial properties in in vitro and in vivo studies. Additionally, only a few studies have researched the bioactive phytocompounds of some of these plants [64]. This situation is not exclusive to plants with antimicrobial effects. A pharmacological investigation conducted over a pool of plants used in TM to treat cancer patients found only 30% had a significant cytotoxic effect. Additionally, only 6 out of 77 bioactive compounds isolated from those plants exhibited beneficial effects with few side effects in clinical trials [65]. Ethnopharmacological and phytochemistry studies are essential for the pharmacological industry to look for and produce new antimicrobial drugs [66]. Even though some tests may be inconclusive or even show adverse effects, the ethnopharmacological approach is desirable as a selection method for screening potential new drugs. However, the phytochemistry of the plants, in vitro tests to determine the potential effect on the targeted microorganisms and clinical trials to determine toxicity and possible side effects are inherent parts of the process.
The development of new antimicrobial, anticancer or anti-inflammatory drugs has been the subject of rising interest. The emergence of various drug-resistant microbes has directed attention to the need for new drugs and evaluating methods [67]. A wide variety of methods are available to evaluate and detect in vitro antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and purified compounds. Diffusion methods (disk-diffusion, well diffusion or agar plug diffusion) are commonly used bioassay methods that are officially used as routine antimicrobial susceptibility tests. These are simple, standardized and low-cost methods and allow multiple testing. However, some of these techniques are not quantifiable and do not allow for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration. Dilution methods can overcome this difficulty. However, none of these methods allow the evaluation of the clinical relevance of results.
Other methods, such as cytofluorometric and bioluminescent methods, require specified equipment and are not yet used as standard testing methods. These are quantifiable techniques and provide results within a short time window [67,68].

3.1. Antiviral Effects

Viral diseases represent major threats to human health and a global challenge in terms of disease prevention and treatment [69]. They are caused by a large diversity of agents that also display a high rate of mutation and are easily spread by water, air, inert materials and person-to-person contacts, and therefore, are prone to pandemics in a world where people and products rapidly circulate between continents [68].
Viral diseases can be treated with antiviral drugs. However, because of the intimate relationship between the virus and the host cells, the design of antiviral medicines that block the replication of the virus without causing unacceptable damage in the host represents a significant constraint in the progress of antiviral chemotherapy [70]. Moreover, vaccines and antiviral drugs are neither affordable nor readily accessible for general use in many developing countries. These circumstances lead to regaining interest in medicinal halophytes as sources of antiviral compounds.
Although in vitro tests are, in most cases, conducted with extracts containing mixtures of compounds and it is not possible to associate antiviral effects with specific bioactive molecules, there are now several halophytic plants for which antiviral effects have been demonstrated (Table 2). An extensive study of the antiviral potential of water:ethanol extracts of different plant parts of several halophyte species allowed the detection of anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity in Acanthus ilicifolius L., Aegiceras corniculatum (L.) Blanco, Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh., Bruguiera cylindrica L., Ceriops decandra (Griff.) Ding Hou, Rhizophora apiculata Blume, R. lamarckii Montrouz., R. mucronata Rathbun, Salicornia brachiata Sessé & Moc. and Sesuvium portulacastrum L. and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity in Aegiceras corniculatum, Ceriops decandra, Excoecaria agallocha L., Rhizophora apiculata, R. lamarckii and R. mucronata [71]. A leaf extract of Suaeda maritima Torr. containing polyphenols, flavonoids and tannins caused the inhibition of the HBV reverse transcriptase [72]. Extracts of Limonium densiflorum (Guss.) Kuntze shoots, also rich in phenolic compounds, caused direct inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) [73], and ferulic acid and caffeic acids extracted from Plantago major L. exhibited activity against herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) [12,27]. Extracts of P. major also demonstrated activity against adenoviruses (ADV-3, ADV-8, ADV-11), and among the classes of bioactive compounds identified, caffeic acid was associated with the strongest antiviral activity [74]. Activity against influenza A viruses (H1N1 strain) was also detected in L. densiflorum extracts [55]. Extracts of halophytes have also demonstrated activity against the Newcastle disease virus (NDV), vaccinia virus (VV), encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) [71].

3.2. Antibacterial Effects

Many halophytes have been screened for antibacterial effects (Table 3). Extracts obtained with various solvents from different plant parts have been tested against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria commonly associated with urinary, intestinal, respiratory and skin infections in humans.
Persistent infections are commonly associated with bacterial biofilms, which normally exhibit enhanced resistant to antibiotics. Molecules that interfere with quorum-sensing communication (anti-quorum sensing, anti-QS) reduce biofilm development and make bacteria more susceptible to antimicrobials, being therefore used as coadjutants in antimicrobial chemotherapy [77]. Some halophytes (e.g., Rhizophora annamalayana Kathiresan) express metabolites with anti-QS activity against the biological models of Chromobacterium violaceum and Vibrio harveyi [78]. Ethanol extracts of the fruits of the facultative halophyte Salvadora persica L., containing gallic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids, inhibited biofilm development in oral Staphylococcus strains [79].
Ether extracts of Salicornia europaea L. inhibited Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Interestingly, the water and acetone extracts had no significant antibacterial activity [80]. A study of the antibacterial properties of Excoecaria agallocha L. confirmed the influence of the solvent on the efficiency of the extract. Methanol extracts of leaves exhibited the highest activity, whereas hexane and chloroform extracts had no activity at all [81]. This indicates that antibacterial effects are closely related to specific metabolites that are selectively extracted.
Regardless of the solvent, extracts are mixtures of different metabolites that may interact to attain higher inactivation yields than equivalent concentrations of pure compounds. Extracts of Citrullus colocynthis, used to treat tuberculosis in traditional medicine, were successfully tested against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a methanolic extract of ripe deseeded fruits (63 µg/mL) was lower than the MIC of cucurbitacin acid (25 mg/mL), an antibacterial membrane disruptor present in the extracts [82]. Additionally, there is a strong relation between the antibacterial efficiency of the extracts and the plant part from which they are obtained. Extracts from E. agallocha roots had higher activity against the Gram-negative Salmonella typhi, but leaf extracts were much less effective against this bacterium and, in contrast, highly effective against Enterobacter species and Staphylococcus aureus [81].
Table 3. Antibacterial effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
Table 3. Antibacterial effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
BacteriaPlant SpeciesReference
Bacillus cereusSalicornia europaea[80]
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Cressa cretica
Tamarix gallica
[62,83,84,85,86]
Enterobacter sp.Exoecaria agallocha[59]
Enterococcus faecalisSalicornia europaea[80]
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Tamarix gallica
[86]
[87]
[86]
Escherichia coliArthrocnemum macrostachyum[88]
Salicornia europaea[80]
Cressa cretica
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Tamarix gallica
[89]
[83]
[84]
[86]
Listeria monocytogenesMesembryanthemum edulis
Tamarix gallica
[83]
[86]
Micrococcus luteusSalicornia europaea[80]
Cressa cretica
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Retama raetam
Retama sphaerocarpa
Tamarix gallica
[89]
[90]
[91]
[91]
[86]
Mycobacterium tuberculosisCitrullus colocynthis[82]
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Ziziphus spina-christi
[88]
[92]
Proteus sp.Exoecaria agallocha[34]
Pseudomonas sp.Cressa cretica
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Tamarix gallica
[89]
[90]
[84]
[86]
Pseudomonas aeruginosaArthrocnemum macrostachyum[88]
Multi-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosaEryngium barrelieri
Eryngium glomeratum
[93]
Salmonella sp.Cressa cretica
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Tamarix gallica
[89]
[88]
[84]
[86]
Salmonella typhiExoecaria agallocha[81]
Salmonella typhimuriumSalicornia europaea[80]
Serratia marcescensSalicornia europaea[80]
Staphylococcus aureusArthrocnemum macrostachyum[88]
Exoecaria agallocha[81]
Cressa cretica
Mesembryanthemum edulis
Suaeda monoica
Tamarix gallica
[89]
[88]
[84]
[86]
Methicillin-Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Acanthus ilicifolius
Exoecaria agallocha
Rhizophora mucronata
Sonneratia caseolaris
[94]
[95]
[96]
[94]
Aegiceras corniculatum
Avicennia marina
Ceriops decandra
Eryngium thoraefolium
Kochia scoparia
Lumnitzera racemosa
Rhizophora mucronata
Tamarix gallica
[97]
[98]
[97]
[99]
[34]
[97]
[96]
[86]
Staphylococcus epidermidisSalicornia europaea[80]
Vibrio choleraeExoecaria agallocha[81]

3.3. Antifungal Effects

Many plants produce antifungal compounds as a strategy of defense against phytopathogenic agents [100]. Facing the emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs among human pathogenic fungi, there is a regaining interest in plants as an alternative source of fungicidals [101].
Evidence of the activity of halophyte metabolites against pathogenic fungi is less documented in the literature than antibacterial effects, although in many studies, bacterial and fungal strains are included in the panel of microbial targets of bioactive compounds. Often, extracts that are active against bacteria are ineffective against fungi [102]. There are, however, encouraging reports of the antifungal activity of halophytes (Table 4), which are mainly associated with essential oils and phenolic-rich extracts [102,103], although there is a strong variability in the antifungal activity of different extracts, depending on the solvents used. The cell wall, the cytoplasmic membrane and the cytoplasm are considered as the main targets of the phenol attack that underlies antifungal activity of plant extracts [104]. Efficiency of extraction of phenolic compounds increases with the polarity of the solvents; hence, the strongest antifungal activity of water: methanol extracts and the correlation with antioxidant activities [105].
Candida species are normally represented in the human commensal microbiota, but some species are also among the most threatening fungal pathogens. C. albicans accounts for the vast majority of skin, urinary system and blood infections [106]. C. auris is an emergent pathogen that imposes concern because it is extremely invasive, multi-resistant to antifungal drugs, causes high mortality and has triggered research on plant-derived antifungals. Therefore, Candida species are the most frequent fungal models for the testing of antifungal activity of halophyte metabolites [107,108].
There is evidence that C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. holmii, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis can be inactivated in vitro by extracts of many different halophytes, including Avicennia marina, Eryngium sp., Rhizophora sp. and Xanthium sibiricum Widd. [105]. Extracts of the facultative halophyte Salsola kali L. were also effective on C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. holmii, and the fungicidal activity was attributed to phenolic compounds such as syringic acid and kaempferol [109]. Essential oils of Salsola vermiculata L. and S. cyclophylla Gand. strongly inhibited C. albicans [110]. Extracts of Arthrocnemum macrostachyum Torr. and Salicornia europaea inhibited C. albicans [105] and C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. utilis and C. tropicalis [80], respectively.
Table 4. Antifungal effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
Table 4. Antifungal effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
FungiPlant SpeciesReference
Aspergillus fumigatusArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda maritima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
[84]
Cressa cretica[89]
Myrtus communis[104]
Eryngium maritimum[112]
Aspergillus nigerCakile maritima
Crithmum maritimum
Eryngium maritimum
[17]
Candida albicansArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda maritima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
[84]
Salicornia europaea[80]
Cressa cretica[89]
Limoniastrum monopetalum
Limoniastrum guyonianum
[113]
Puccinellia maritima
Spartina maritima
Spartina patens
[114]
Salsola kali[109]
Salsola cyclophylla
Suaeda vermiculata
[110]
Myrtus communis
Tetraena alba
[104]
Candida glabrataArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda maritima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
Tamarix gallica[86]
Salicornia europaea[80]
Cressa cretica[89]
Limoniastrum monopetalum
Limoniastrum guyonianum
[113]
Salsola kali[109]
Candida holmiiArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda marítima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
Salsola kali[109]
Candida kruseiArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda marítima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
Salicornia europaea[80]
Limoniastrum monopetalum
Limoniastrum guyonianum
[113]
Candida parapsilosisArthrocnemum indicum
Salicornia brachiata
Suaeda maritima
Suaeda monoica
[111]
Limoniastrum monopetalum
Limoniastrum guyonianum
[113]
Candida tropicalisSalicornia europaea[80]
Candida utilis
There are also reports of the inhibition of pathogenic molds. Extracts of Cressa cretica L. inhibited several pathogenic fungi. The effect on the molds Aspergillus fumigatus and A. niger was even stronger than on the yeasts Candida albicans and C. tropicalis [89]. Aqueous extracts and the essential oil of Myrtus communis Blanco caused inhibition of the pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus, and the effect was within the same order of magnitude as on Candida albicans [104].

4. Current Limitations and Future Prospects

There is a generalized consensus around the potential of plant metabolites as novel antimicrobials or coadjutants for antimicrobial chemotherapy. Being well represented in costal and arid regions, halophytes have been long used in traditional medicine and are, therefore, immediate candidates for the screening of new bioactive metabolites. There are, in fact, several studies that establish the link between the empiric use of these plants to treat infections with the photochemistry evidence of the compounds that underlie antimicrobial effects. However, efforts in the investigation of new antimicrobial compounds and the demonstration of their effect in vitro have not yet resulted in an antibiotic sufficiently effective to be clinically advantageous and economically profitable.
The concern around drug-resistant microbes has drawn attention to plant-derived, effective antimicrobial compounds. A new life is waiting for plants that have been used for centuries in infectious disease treatment. The detection and quantification of known, and even the discovery of new, small bioactive molecules produced by plants as secondary metabolites will provide new forms of therapy for numerous infectious and noninfectious illnesses. Appropriate and optimized extraction methods, susceptibility tests and clinical trials are still required. The prospects of the outcomes of further investigations seem promising and may lead to significant advances with the potential discovery of new and effective treatments [115,116].
Mass-spectrometry-based plant metabolomics is an extremely powerful approach, likely to provide comprehensive metabolite profiles of medicinal halophytes in the near future. In vitro tests represent the first approach to screen promising metabolites, either purified or as mixtures, for antimicrobial effects. The complexity and diverse chemical properties of plant metabolites demands a combined use of analytical platforms to increase the detection coverage of these compounds in biological samples. To detect volatile and nonvolatile metabolites, it is essential to use GC and HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry, as well as other techniques such as UPLC or NMR to ensure that all or at least the majority of compounds are separated, detected, identified, quantified and characterized. Each method should also cover several extraction solvents to ensure the detection of both polar and nonpolar compounds. The isolation and chemical characterization of each compound, by NMR technologies and testing them in bioassays, is crucial to move towards the assessment of the biological activity of each compound. The methodological approaches for in vitro tests must, however, be carefully adjusted to the chemical nature of the metabolites or extracts. Protocols need to be standardized and validated against representative biological models so that comparisons between products are reliable and meaningful.
Many bioactive metabolites are expressed by plants in response to stress or induced by environmental conditions or microbial symbionts colonizing plant tissues [117]. Examples of the most characteristic biologically active metabolites found in halophytes are the phenolic acids, sterols and terpenoids, among others (Figure 4).
The targeted manipulation on the plant microbiome is, therefore, regarded as a strategy to modulate the metabolome and to induce the expression of high added-value metabolites, such as antimicrobial compounds. Considering that the root is an important gateway for bacteria that are able to establish stable, mutually beneficial relations with the plant hosts (plant-growth-promoting bacteria), the modification of the rhizosphere microbiome with selected inoculants (rhizosphere engineering) represents an all-new line of research towards the general objective of plant-derived, effective antimicrobial compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.G.A.P., Â.C. and H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.F., D.C.G.A.P., Â.C. and H.S; writing—review and editing, D.C.G.A.P., Â.C. and H.S.; supervision, D.C.G.A.P., Â.C. and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FCT/MEC through CESAM (UIDB/50017/2020+UIDP/50017/2020) and LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020) research units, and by project RhiZoMis (PTDC/BIA-MIC/2973672017) through national founds and, where applicable, co-financed by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. The first author of this work was funded by FCT through a doctoral grant (PD/BD/150363/2019).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Inês Simão for producing the illustration of Avicennia marina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shamsutdinov, N.; Shamsutdinova, E.; Orlovsky, N.; Shamsutdinov, Z.S. Halophytes: Ecological features, global resources, and outlook for multipurpose use. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2017, 87, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perrino, E.; Magazzini, P.; Musarella, C. Management of grazing “buffalo” to preserve habitats by Directive 92/43 EEC in a wetland protected area of the Mediterranean coast: Palude Frattarolo, Apulia, Italy. J. Environ. Integr. 2021, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Han, G.; Guo, J.; Meng, Z.; Chen, M. Progress in the study and use of seawater vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5998–6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Plant salt tolerance: Adaptations in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Maimaiti, A.; Iwanaga, F.; Taniguchi, T.; Hara, N.; Matsuo, N.; Mori, N.; Yunus, Q.; Yamanaka, N. Inorganic and organic osmolytes accumulation in five halophytes growing in saline habitats around the Aiding Lake area in Turpan Basin, Northwest China. Arid. Land Res. Manag. 2016, 30, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Zelm, E.; Zhang, Y.; Testerink, C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Raihan, M.R.H.; Masud, A.A.C.; Rahman, K.; Nowroz, F.; Rahman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under salinity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. García-Caparrós, P.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Lao, M.T. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in plants under salinity. React. Oxyg. Nitrogen Sulfur Species Plants Prod. Metab. Signal. Def. Mech. 2019, 12, 291–309. [Google Scholar]
  11. Abobatta, W.F. Plant responses and tolerance to extreme salinity: Learning from halophyte tolerance to extreme salinity. In Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 177–210. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ksouri, R.; Ksouri, W.M.; Jallali, I.; Debez, A.; Magné, C.; Hiroko, I.; Abdelly, C. Medicinal halophytes: Potent source of health promoting biomolecules with medical, nutraceutical and food applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abenavoli, L.; Milanovic, M.; Procopio, A.C.; Spampinato, G.; Maruca, G.; Perrino, E.V.; Mannino, G.C.; Fagoonee, S.; Luzza, F.; Musarella, C.M. Ancient wheats: Beneficial effects on insulin resistance. Minerva Med. 2020, 112, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faustino, M.V.; Faustino, M.A.; Pinto, D.C. Halophytic grasses, a new source of nutraceuticals? A review on their secondary metabolites and biological activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Alanis, A.J. Resistance to antibiotics: Are we in the post-antibiotic era? Arch. Med. Res. 2005, 36, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Buhmann, A.; Papenbrock, J. An economic point of view of secondary compounds in halophytes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 952–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Meot-Duros, L.; Le Floch, G.; Magné, C. Radical scavenging, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of halophytic species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hayat, K.; Bundschuh, J.; Jan, F.; Menhas, S.; Hayat, S.; Haq, F.; Shah, M.A.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Ullah, A.; Zhang, D. Combating soil salinity with combining saline agriculture and phytomanagement with salt-accumulating plants. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 1085–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarker, S.; Ara Hussain, F.; Assaduzzaman, M.; Failler, P. Blue economy and climate change: Bangladesh perspective. J. Ocean. Coast. Econ. 2019, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2019; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oyebode, O.; Kandala, N.-B.; Chilton, P.J.; Lilford, R.J. Use of traditional medicine in middle-income countries: A WHO-SAGE study. Health Policy Plan. 2016, 31, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fan, W.; Fan, L.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Peng, W.; Wu, C. Traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and toxicology of Xanthium strumarium L.: A review. Molecules 2019, 24, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Petropoulos, S.; Karkanis, A.; Martins, N.; Ferreira, I.C. Edible halophytes of the Mediterranean basin: Potential candidates for novel food products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Qasim, M.; Gulzar, S.; Khan, M.A. Halophytes as medicinal plants. Urban. Land Use Land Degrad. Environ. 2011, 21, 330–343. [Google Scholar]
  25. Debez, A.; Belghith, I.; Friesen, J.; Montzka, C.; Elleuche, S. Facing the challenge of sustainable bioenergy production: Could halophytes be part of the solution? J. Biol. Eng. 2017, 11, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.-S.; Kim, J.-W. Dynamics of zonal halophyte communities in salt marshes in the world. J. Mar. Isl. Cult. 2018, 7, 84–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ksouri, R.; Smaoui, A.; Isoda, H.; Abdelly, C. Utilization of halophyte species as new sources of bioactive substances. J. Arid Land Stud. 2012, 22, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  28. Doudach, L.; Meddah, B.; Benbacer, L.; Hammani, K.; El Mzibri, M.; Vérité, P.; Elomri, A.; Cherrah, Y. Ethnopharmacological studies of Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum. Phytopharmacology 2013, 4, 246–258. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gamal, E.E.-G.; Khalifa, S.A.-K.; Gameel, A.S.; Emad, M.A. Traditional medicinal plants indigenous to Al-Rass province, Saudi Arabia. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 2680–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Alqethami, A.; Hawkins, J.A.; Teixidor-Toneu, I. Medicinal plants used by women in Mecca: Urban, Muslim and gendered knowledge. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Larhsini, M.; Bousaid, M.; Lazrek, H.; Jana, M.; Amarouch, H. Evaluation of antifungal and molluscicidal properties of extracts of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia 1997, 68, 371–373. [Google Scholar]
  32. Musharaf, K.; Shahana, M.; Zabta, K.S. Ethnobotanical importance of halophytes of Noshpho salt mine, District Karak, Pakistan. Res. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2011, 3, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pattanayak, S.; Mandal, T.K.; Bandyopadhyay, S. A study on use of plants to cure enteritis and dysentery in three southern districts of West Bengal, India. J. Medic. Plants Stud. 2015, 3, 277–283. [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-Snafi, A.E. A review on pharmacological activities of Kochia scoparia-a review. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 5, 2213–2221. [Google Scholar]
  35. Abdul Qadir, M.; Shahzadi, S.K.; Bashir, A.; Munir, A.; Shahzad, S. Evaluation of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of some common herbs. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Srivastava, A.K. Significance of medicinal plants in human life. In Synthesis of Medicinal Agents from Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  37. Knezevic, P.; Aleksic, V.; Simin, N.; Svircev, E.; Petrovic, A.; Mimica-Dukic, N. Antimicrobial activity of Eucalyptus camaldulensis essential oils and their interactions with conventional antimicrobial agents against multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 178, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, Y.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gao, F.; Chen, Z. Lycium barbarum: A traditional Chinese herb and a promising anti-aging agent. Aging Dis. 2017, 8, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kefu, Z.; Hai, F.; Ungar, I. Survey of halophyte species in China. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mocan, A.; Vlase, L.; Vodnar, D.C.; Bischin, C.; Hanganu, D.; Gheldiu, A.-M.; Oprean, R.; Silaghi-Dumitrescu, R.; Crișan, G. Polyphenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Lycium barbarum L. and Lycium chinense Mill. leaves. Molecules 2014, 19, 10056–10073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mnafgui, K.; Hamden, K.; Ben Salah, H.; Kchaou, M.; Nasri, M.; Slama, S.; Derbali, F.; Allouche, N.; Elfeki, A. Inhibitory activities of Zygophyllum album: A natural weight-lowering plant on key enzymes in high-fat diet-fed rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 620384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gupta, V.K.; Malhotra, S. Pharmacological attribute of Aloe vera: Revalidation through experimental and clinical studies. Ayu 2012, 33, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Souid, A.; Bellani, L.; Gabriele, M.; Pucci, L.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Hamed, K.B.; Longo, V. Phytochemical and biological activities in Limonium species collected in different biotopes of Tunisia. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saxena, S. Glycyrrhiza glabra: Medicine over the millennium. NIScPR. 2005, 4, 358–367. [Google Scholar]
  45. Du, Q.; Xin, H.; Peng, C. Pharmacology and phytochemistry of the Nitraria genus. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Öztürk, M.; Altay, V.; Gucel, S.; Guvensen, A. Halophytes in the East Mediterranean–their medicinal and other economical values. In Sabkha Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 247–272. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tounekti, T.; Mahdhi, M.; Khemira, H. Ethnobotanical study of indigenous medicinal plants of Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 3190670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Pravin, B.; Tushar, D.; Vijay, P.; Kishanchnad, K. Review on Citrullus colocynthis. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Chem. 2013, 3, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lal, B.; Farrukh, H.; Zaman, S. An overview of people plant interaction in the rangeland of District Tank, Pakistan. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 2820–2826. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao, K.; Song, J.; Feng, G.; Zhao, M.; Liu, J. Species, types, distribution, and economic potential of halophytes in China. Plant Soil 2011, 342, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oratai, N.; Patcharin, S.; Kornkanok, Y.; Narumon, S. A survey of medicinal plants in mangrove and beach forests from sating Phra Peninsula, Songkhla Province, Thailand. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 2421–2437. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kynaston, K.; Sinnott, J. Emerging Infectious Diseases: Clinical Case Studies. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2015, 61, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Steele, G.M.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Chastain, D.B. Noninfectious causes of fever in adults. Nurse Pract. 2018, 43, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Isah, T. Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Medini, F.; Fellah, H.; Ksouri, R.; Abdelly, C. Total phenolic, flavonoid and tannin contents and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of organic extracts of shoots of the plant Limonium delicatulum. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2014, 8, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Boestfleisch, C.; Papenbrock, J. Changes in secondary metabolites in the halophytic putative crop species Crithmum maritimum L., Triglochin maritima L. and Halimione portulacoides (L.) Aellen as reaction to mild salinity. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Arya, S.S.; Devi, S.; Ram, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, N.; Mann, A.; Kumar, A.; Chand, G. Halophytes: The plants of therapeutic medicine. Ecophysiol. Abiotic Stress Responses Util. Halophytes 2019, 271–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bernal, J.; Mendiola, J.; Ibáñez, E.; Cifuentes, A. Advanced analysis of nutraceuticals. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 55, 758–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Jithesh, M.; Prashanth, S.; Sivaprakash, K.; Parida, A.K. Antioxidative response mechanisms in halophytes: Their role in stress defence. J. Genet. 2006, 85, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Loconsole, D.; Cristiano, G.; De Lucia, B. Glassworts: From wild salt marsh species to sustainable edible crops. Agriculture 2019, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Qasim, M.; Abideen, Z.; Adnan, M.; Gulzar, S.; Gul, B.; Rasheed, M.; Khan, M. Antioxidant properties, phenolic composition, bioactive compounds and nutritive value of medicinal halophytes commonly used as herbal teas. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 110, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rodrigues, M.J.; Gangadhar, K.N.; Vizetto-Duarte, C.; Wubshet, S.G.; Nyberg, N.T.; Barreira, L.; Varela, J.; Custódio, L. Maritime halophyte species from southern Portugal as sources of bioactive molecules. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2228–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Attia-Ismail, S.A. Plant secondary metabolites of halophytes and salt tolerant plants. Halophytic Salt Toler. Feedstuffs 2015, 1, 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gahamanyi, N.; Munyaneza, E.; Dukuzimana, E.; Tuyiringire, N.; Pan, C.-H.; Komba, E.V. Ethnobotany, Ethnopharmacology, and Phytochemistry of Medicinal Plants Used for Treating Human Diarrheal Cases in Rwanda: A Review. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Merrouni, I.A.; Elachouri, M. Anticancer medicinal plants used by Moroccan people: Ethnobotanical, preclinical, phytochemical and clinical evidence. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Neiva, V.d.A.; Ribeiro, M.N.S.; Nascimento, F.R.; Cartágenes, M.d.S.S.; Coutinho-Moraes, D.F.; do Amaral, F.M. Plant species used in giardiasis treatment: Ethnopharmacology and in vitro evaluation of anti-Giardia activity. Rev. Bras. De Farmacogn. 2014, 24, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Oppong, J.R. Globalization of communicable diseases. Int. Encycl. Hum. Geogr. 2020, 223–228. [Google Scholar]
  69. Luo, G.G.; Gao, S.J. Global health concerns stirred by emerging viral infections. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Denaro, M.; Smeriglio, A.; Barreca, D.; De Francesco, C.; Occhiuto, C.; Milano, G.; Trombetta, D. Antiviral activity of plants and their isolated bioactive compounds: An update. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 742–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Premanathan, M.; Kathiresan, K.; Nakashima, H. Mangrove halophytes: A source of antiviral substances. South Pac. Study 1999, 19, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  72. Banerjee, M.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gnanadesigan, M.; Rajakumar, B.; Anand, M. Antiviral, antioxidant and toxicological evaluation of mangrove associate from South East coast of India. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S1775–S1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Medini, F.; Legault, J.; Pichette, A.; Abdelly, C.; Ksouri, R. Antiviral efficacy of Limonium densiflorum against HSV-1 and influenza viruses. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 92, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Chiang, L.; Chiang, W.; Chang, M.; Ng, L.; Lin, C. Antiviral activity of Plantago major extracts and related compounds in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2002, 55, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bourne, K.Z.; Bourne, N.; Reising, S.F.; Stanberry, L.R. Plant products as topical microbicide candidates: Assessment of in vitro and in vivo activity against herpes simplex virus type 2. Antivir. Res. 1999, 42, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lee, H.-W.; Yoon, S.-R.; Lee, H.-M.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Ha, J.-H. Use of RT-qPCR with combined intercalating dye and sodium lauroyl sarcosinate pretreatment to evaluate the virucidal activity of halophyte extracts against norovirus. Food Control 2019, 98, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vicente-Soler, J.; Madrid, M.; Franco, A.; Soto, T.; Cansado, J.; Gacto, M. Quorum sensing as target for antimicrobial chemotherapy. In New Weapons to Control Bacterial Growth; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 161–184. [Google Scholar]
  78. Musthafa, K.S.; Sahu, S.K.; Ravi, A.V.; Kathiresan, K. Anti-quorum sensing potential of the mangrove Rhizophora annamalayana. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Merghni, A.; Nazzaro, F.; Quindós, G.; Akdamar, G.; Mastouri, M.; Al-Sieni, A.; Ceylan, O. Phytochemical composition, anti-biofilm and anti-quorum sensing potential of fruit, stem and leaves of Salvadora persica L. methanolic extracts. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 109, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Çoban, E.P.; Biyik, H.; Uzun, C. Investigation of antimicrobial activity of some natural plants which are not-cultivated and are sold at bazaars in Aydın vicinity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2009, 3, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  81. Vadlapudi, V.; Bobbarala, V.; Penumajji, S.; Naidu, K.C. Excoecaria agallocha L. antimicrobial properties against important pathogenic microorganisms. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2009, 1, 865–867. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mehta, A.; Srivastva, G.; Kachhwaha, S.; Sharma, M.; Kothari, S. Antimycobacterial activity of Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad. against drug sensitive and drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and MOTT clinical isolates. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 149, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Placines, C.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Pereira, C.; Zengin, G.; Uysal, A.; Jeko, J.; Cziáky, Z.; Reis, C.P.; Gaspar, M.M. If you cannot beat them, join them: Exploring the fruits of the invasive species Carpobrotus edulis (L.) NE Br as a source of bioactive products. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 144, 112005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Muthazhagan, K.; Thirunavukkarasu, P.; Ramanathan, T.; Kannan, D. Studies on phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and anti radical scavenging effect coastal salt mash plant of a Suaeda monoica. Res. J. Phytochem. 2014, 8, 102–111. [Google Scholar]
  85. Priyashree, S.; Jha, S.; Pattanayak, S. A review on Cressa cretica Linn.: A halophytic plant. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Boulaaba, M.; Snoussi, M.; Saada, M.; Mkadmini, K.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Ksouri, R. Antimicrobial activities and phytochemical analysis of Tamarix gallica extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 1114–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Lincy, M.P.; Paulpriya, K.; Mohan, V. Pharmacochemical characterisation and antibacterial activity of Suaeda monoica leaf Forssk ex Gmel (Chenopodiaceae). Pharma Sci. Monit. 2013, 4, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  88. Al-Saleh, G.; Gamal El-Din, A.; Abbas, J.; Saeed, N. Phytochemical and biological studies of medicinal plants in Bahrain: The family Chenopodiaceae—part 2. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1997, 35, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sunita, P.; Jha, S.; Pattanayak, S.; Mishra, S. Antimicrobial activity of a halophytic plant Cressa cretica L. J. Sci. Res. 2012, 4, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Falleh, H.; Trabelsi, N.; Bonenfant-Magné, M.; Le Floch, G.; Abdelly, C.; Magné, C.; Ksouri, R. Polyphenol content and biological activities of Mesembryanthemum edule organs after fractionation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 42, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mariem, S.; Hanen, F.; Inès, J.; Mejdi, S.; Riadh, K. Phenolic profile, biological activities and fraction analysis of the medicinal halophyte Retama raetam. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 94, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Mongalo, N.; Mashele, S.; Makhafola, T. Ziziphus mucronata Willd.(Rhamnaceae): It’s botany, toxicity, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Landoulsi, A.; Roumy, V.; Duhal, N.; Skhiri, F.H.; Rivière, C.; Sahpaz, S.; Neut, C.; Benhamida, J.; Hennebelle, T. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil from Aerial Parts and Roots of Eryngium barrelieri Boiss. and Eryngium glomeratum Lam. from Tunisia. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 1720–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Prihanto, A.A.; Firdaus, M.; Nurdiani, R. Anti-Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of methanol extract of mangrove plants leaf: Preliminary report. Drug Invent. Today 2012, 4, 439–440. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sahoo, G.; Mulla, N.; Ansari, Z.; Mohandass, C. Antibacterial activity of mangrove leaf extracts against human pathogens. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 74, 348. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kusuma, S.; Kumar, P.A.; Boopalan, K. Potent antimicrobial activity of Rhizophora mucronata. J. Ecobiotechnol. 2011, 3, 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  97. Chandrasekaran, M.; Kannathasan, K.; Venkatesalu, V.; Prabhakar, K. Antibacterial activity of some salt marsh halophytes and mangrove plants against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Seepana, R.; Perumal, K.; Kada, N.M.; Chatragadda, R.; Raju, M.; Annamalai, V. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties from the mangrove Rhizophora apiculata and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza of Burmanallah coast, South Andaman, India. J. Coast. Life Med. 2016, 4, 475–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Çelik, A.; Aydınlık, N.; Arslan, I. Phytochemical constituents and inhibitory activity towards methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains of Eryngium species (Apiaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2011, 8, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Dubey, O.; Dubey, S.; Schnee, S.; Glauser, G.; Nawrath, C.; Gindro, K.; Farmer, E.E. Plant surface metabolites as potent antifungal agents. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 150, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Marquez, L.; Quave, C.L. Prevalence and therapeutic challenges of fungal drug resistance: Role for plants in drug discovery. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Saïdana, D.; Mahjoub, S.; Boussaada, O.; Chriaa, J.; Mahjoub, M.A.; Chéraif, I.; Daami, M.; Mighri, Z.; Helal, A.N. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oils of two saltcedar species from Tunisia. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Silva, B.; Souza, M.M.; Badiale-Furlong, E. Antioxidant and antifungal activity of phenolic compounds and their relation to aflatoxin B1 occurrence in soybeans (Glycine max L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Belmimoun, A.; Meddah, B.; Meddah, A.; Gabaldon, J.; Sonnet, P. Antifungal activity of Myrtus communis and Zygophyllum album extracts against human pathogenic fungi. Eur. J. Biol. Res. 2020, 10, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  105. Chekroun-Bechlaghem, N.; Belyagoubi-Benhammou, N.; Belyagoubi, L.; Mansour, S.; Djebli, N.; Bouakline, H.; Gismondi, A.; Nanni, V.; Di Marco, G.; Canuti, L. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of three halophyte plants from Algeria and detection of some biomolecules by HPLC-DAD. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 2107–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chin, V.K.; Lee, T.Y.; Rusliza, B.; Chong, P.P. Dissecting Candida albicans infection from the perspective of C. albicans virulence and omics approaches on host–pathogen interaction: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Shao, J.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; Ma, K.; Yan, G.; Yin, D. Antifungal evaluation of traditional herbal monomers and their potential for inducing cell wall remodeling in Candida albicans and Candida auris. Biofouling 2020, 36, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shaban, S.; Patel, M.; Ahmad, A. Improved efficacy of antifungal drugs in combination with monoterpene phenols against Candida auris. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Boulaaba, M.; Medini, F.; Hajlaoui, H.; Mkadmini, K.; Falleh, H.; Ksouri, R.; Isoda, H.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C. Biological activities and phytochemical analysis of phenolic extracts from Salsola kali L. Role of endogenous factors in the selection of the best plant extracts. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 123, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mohammed, H.A.; Al-Omar, M.S.; Aly, M.S.; Hegazy, M.M. Essential oil constituents and biological activities of the halophytic plants, Suaeda vermiculata Forssk and Salsola cyclophylla Bakera growing in Saudi Arabia. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chandrasekaran, M.; Kannathasan, K.; Venkatesalu, V. Antimicrobial activity of fatty acid methyl esters of some members of Chenopodiaceae. Z. Für Nat. C 2008, 63, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Erdem, S.A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Izadi, M.; Nabavi, S.M. Blessings in disguise: A review of phytochemical composition and antimicrobial activity of plants belonging to the genus Eryngium. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 23, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Trabelsi, N.; Waffo-Téguo, P.; Snoussi, M.; Ksouri, R.; Mérillon, J.M.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C. Variability of phenolic composition and biological activities of two Tunisian halophyte species from contrasted regions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Faustino, M.V.; Faustino, M.A.; Silva, H.; Cunha, Â.; Silva, A.M.; Pinto, D.C. Puccinellia maritima, Spartina maritima, and Spartina patens halophytic grasses: Characterization of polyphenolic and chlorophyll profiles and evaluation of their biological activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Savoia, D. Plant-derived antimicrobial compounds: Alternatives to antibiotics. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A review study on challenges and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Perrino, E.V.; Valerio, F.; Jallali, S.; Trani, A.; Mezzapesa, G.N. Ecological and Biological Properties of Satureja cuneifolia Ten. and Thymus spinulosus Ten.: Two Wild Officinal Species of Conservation Concern in Apulia (Italy). A Preliminary Survey. Plants 2021, 10, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Most widely used parts of the plants (A) and most common preparations (B) in traditional medicine. Avicennia marina was illustrated by Inês Simão.
Figure 1. Most widely used parts of the plants (A) and most common preparations (B) in traditional medicine. Avicennia marina was illustrated by Inês Simão.
Applsci 12 07493 g001
Figure 2. World distribution of halophyte habitats according to soil type (based on [25,26]).
Figure 2. World distribution of halophyte habitats according to soil type (based on [25,26]).
Applsci 12 07493 g002
Figure 3. Diversity of bioactive compounds (secondary metabolites) with antimicrobial activity produced by halophyte plants.
Figure 3. Diversity of bioactive compounds (secondary metabolites) with antimicrobial activity produced by halophyte plants.
Applsci 12 07493 g003
Figure 4. Most common bioactive compounds produced by halophyte plants.
Figure 4. Most common bioactive compounds produced by halophyte plants.
Applsci 12 07493 g004
Table 1. Most common taxa of halophyte families used in traditional medicine and most frequent applications.
Table 1. Most common taxa of halophyte families used in traditional medicine and most frequent applications.
FamiliySpeciesPlant PartApplicationRegionReference
AizoaceaeMesembryanthemum spp.aerial partsfungal and bacterial infections, diarrhea, tuberculosis, antiseptic to treat infections of the mouth and throatEurope, Africa, Australia and California[27,28]
AmaranthaceaeAerva javanicaroots, leaves, flowers and seedsinfected wounds, malariaSaudi Arabia[29]
ApiaceaeFoeniculum vulgareroot and seedsgastrointestinal, urological, gynecological infectionsSaudi Arabia[30]
ApocynaceaeCalotropis proceraleaves and latexskin infection (antifungal)Morocco[31]
Calotropis proceralatexskin infectionsSaudi Arabia[29]
AsteraceaeBlumea lacerarootsantiseptic,
dysentery
Pakistan [32,33]
Xanthium
sibiricum
fruitsrhinitis, nasal sinusitis, headache, gastric ulcer, urticaria, rheumatism, bacterial and fungal infections, arthritis and eye diseasesChina[22]
ChenopodiaceaeKochia scopariafruitsdysuria, skin, urinary tract and eye diseases, pruritus and thermal skin lesionsChina, Japan and Korea[34]
Beta vulgarisleaves and stemsdigestive disorders, throat inflammation, digestive, diuretic and laxative propertiesMediterranean basin[23]
CucurbitaceaeCitrullus colocynthisfruits and rootsbronchitis, tuberculosis, glands of the neck, throat infectionIndia and Pakistan, Arabia, West Asia, Tropical Africa and the Mediterranean region[35]
EphedraceaeEphedrasinica
Ephedramajor
treatment of cold, bronchial asthma, cough, fever, flu, headache, edema, allergies, bacterial infectionsChina, India[36]
MyrtaceaeEucalyptus camaldulensisleavesinfected woundsNigeria [37]
SolanaceaeLycium barbarum
L.chinense
Fruits, leaves,
root bark
lung function and eye diseases,
cough
China[38]
[39]
[40]
TamaricaceaeTamarix aphyllaleaves and rootsinfected woundsSaudi Arabia[29]
ZygophyllaceaeTetraena albaleaves, stems, fruitsantiviral and
antifungal
semiarid areas of Saudi Arabia, Africa[41]
LiliaceaeAloe veraleaves and rootsfever, constipation, sunstroke, malaria, eczema, psoriasis, hair loss, gastric ulcer, liver pain, diabetes, menstrual troubles, gonorrhea, spleen disorders, nerve pain, rheumatism [42]
PlumbaginaceaeLimonium spp.leaves and rootsmicrobial and viral infectionsTunisia[43]
FabaceaeGlycyrrhiza spp.underground unpeeled or peeled stems and rootsupper respiratory tract ailments including coughs, hoarseness, sore throat and bronchitisChina, Japan[44]
ZygophyllaceaeNitraria spp.fruitshypertension, menstrual disorders and gastroenteritisChina[45]
Table 2. Antiviral effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
Table 2. Antiviral effects associated with extracts of halophyte plants.
VirusPlants SpeciesReference
Newcastle disease virus
(NDV)
Acanthus ilicifolius
Aegiceras corniculatum
Bruguiera cylindrica
Excoecaria agallocha
Lumnitzera racemosa
Rhizophora mucronata
[71]
Vaccinia virus
(VV)
Bruguiera cylindrica
Lumnitzera racemosa
Rhizophora mucronata
Ceriops decandra
Encephalomyocarditis virus
(EMCV)
Avicennia marina
Bruguiera cylindrica
Excoecaria agallocha
Lumnitzera racemosa
Rhizophora apiculata
Rhizophora lamarckii
Rhizophora mucronata
Salicornia brachiata
Semliki Forest virus (SFV)Bruguiera cylindrica
Ceriops decandra
Aegiceras corniculatum
Rhizophora lamarckii
Rhizophora mucronata
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)Acanthus ilicifolius
Aegiceras corniculatum
Avicennia marina
Bruguiera cylindrica
Ceriops decandra
Rhizophora apiculata
Rhizophora lamarckii
Rhizophora mucronata
Salicornia brachiata
Sesuvium portulacastrum
Suaeda maritima[72]
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Aegiceras corniculatum
Ceriops decandra
Excoecaria agallocha
Rhizophora apiculata
Rhizophora lamarckii
Rhizophora mucronata
[71]
Herpesviruses
(HSV-1, HSV-2)
Plantago major[75]
Limonium densiflorum[73]
Adenoviruses
(ADV-3, ADV-8, ADV-11)
Plantago major[74]
Influenza A viruses (H1N1 strain)Limonium densiflorum[73]
Human norovirus (HuNoV GII.4)Glehnia littoralis
Mesembryanthemum crystallinum
Salicornia europaea
Spergularia marina
Suaeda japonica
[76]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferreira, M.J.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Cunha, Â.; Silva, H. Halophytes as Medicinal Plants against Human Infectious Diseases. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7493. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157493

AMA Style

Ferreira MJ, Pinto DCGA, Cunha Â, Silva H. Halophytes as Medicinal Plants against Human Infectious Diseases. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15):7493. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferreira, Maria João, Diana C. G. A. Pinto, Ângela Cunha, and Helena Silva. 2022. "Halophytes as Medicinal Plants against Human Infectious Diseases" Applied Sciences 12, no. 15: 7493. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop