A Conceptual and Systematics for Intelligent Power Management System-Based Cloud Computing: Prospects, and Challenges

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall, the paper is quite comprehensive and well-organised given the amount of information that the authors aimed to incorporate. Taking a closer look at how they went about reviewing the various articles in their study to determine the potential impacts of intelligent power management system-based cloud computing, I see nothing that is apparent that should bar publication of the paper notwithstanding minor revisions. The paper requires routine English language editing as well as copy-editing for some inconsistencies in the use of abbreviations. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We appreciate you for your precious time in reviewing our paper and providing valuable comments. It was your valuable and insightful comments that led to possible improvements in the current version. The authors have carefully considered the comments and have tried our best to address every one of them. We hope the manuscript, after careful revisions, meets your high standards. The authors welcome further constructive comments if any.

Below we provide the point-by-point responses..

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper should by re-structured to meet the form of a good scientific survey paper. It's length is too long and poor-organized. In its current form, it is hard to understand the key points of this survey and the state-of-arts in the fields to be presented. Hence, we recommend to reject this paper.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We appreciate you for your precious time in reviewing our paper and providing valuable comments. It was your valuable and insightful comments that led to possible improvements in the current version. The authors have carefully considered the comments and have tried our best to address every one of them. We hope the manuscript, after careful revisions, meets your high standards. The authors welcome further constructive comments if any.

Below we provide the point-by-point responses. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript systematically categorizes and discusses the related literature on power management. Although the materials are quite rich and the cross-field scope is also quite large, there are many errors in the typesetting, and the author is recommended to carefully correct them. The error part is listed below:
1. In the manuscript, there is a space before the brackets of the cited references, and some do not.
2. There are many places in the manuscript, and a period is added before the parentheses of the cited references.
3. There are many places in the manuscript, and the expression styles of the cited references are inconsistent.
4. In the manuscript, some of the initials before the abbreviation are capitalized, and some are not.
5. There is an obvious error in the layout of Section 2.1.
6. The content of Table 2 is too long and complicated. It is recommended to reduce it appropriately, otherwise, it will be difficult to read.

Author Response

Dear reviewers,

We appreciate you for your precious time in reviewing our paper and providing valuable comments. It was your valuable and insightful comments that led to possible improvements in the current version. The authors have carefully considered the comments and have tried our best to address every one of them. We hope the manuscript, after careful revisions, meets your high standards. The authors welcome further constructive comments if any.

Below we provide the point-by-point responses. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Because the revised manuscript is organized better and enhanced in many parts, we recommend to accept this paper in present form.

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have revised their manuscript according to reviewer’s comments.