Next Article in Journal
What We Know about the Public’s Level of Concern for Farm Animal Welfare in Food Production in Developed Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Dairy Cows Produce Less Milk and Modify Their Behaviour during the Transition between Tie-Stall to Free-Stall
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
An Investigation into the Relationship between Owner Knowledge, Diet, and Dental Disease in Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus)
Open AccessArticle

Relationship Between Scarring and Dog Aggression in Pit Bull-Type Dogs Involved in Organized Dogfighting

1
Anti-Cruelty Behavior Team, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY 10128, USA
2
Forensic Sciences Department, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY 10128, USA
3
Shelter Research and Development Department, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY 10128, USA
4
Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Rachel A. Grant
Animals 2016, 6(11), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6110072
Received: 30 September 2016 / Revised: 3 November 2016 / Accepted: 8 November 2016 / Published: 15 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Ethology and Welfare of Animals)
When pit bull-type dogs are seized in an investigation of organized dogfighting, heavily scarred dogs are often assumed to be highly dog aggressive due to a history of fighting. These dogs may be deemed dangerous and euthanized based on scarring alone. We analyzed our existing data on dogs seized from four dogfighting investigations, examining the relationship between the dogs’ scars with aggression towards other dogs. Scar and wound data were tallied in three body zones where dogfighting injuries tend to be concentrated. Dog aggression was assessed using a model dog and a friendly stimulus dog in a standardized behavior evaluation. Scarring and dog aggression were significantly related, more strongly among male (Fisher’s Exact p < 0.001) than female dogs (Fisher’s Exact p = 0.05). Ten or more scars in the three body zones was a reasonable threshold with which to classify a dog as high risk for dog aggression: 82% of males and 60% of females with such scarring displayed dog aggression. However, because many unscarred dogs were dog aggressive while some highly scarred dogs were not, we recommend collecting behavioral information to supplement scar counts when making disposition decisions about dogs seized in dogfighting investigations. View Full-Text
Keywords: dogfighting; dog; aggression; veterinary; behavior; forensic; scar; wound; animal cruelty dogfighting; dog; aggression; veterinary; behavior; forensic; scar; wound; animal cruelty
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Miller, K.A.; Touroo, R.; Spain, C.V.; Jones, K.; Reid, P.; Lockwood, R. Relationship Between Scarring and Dog Aggression in Pit Bull-Type Dogs Involved in Organized Dogfighting. Animals 2016, 6, 72.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop